Advertisement

Modeling Earth Systems and Environment

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 1529–1542 | Cite as

Modeling potential zones for solar energy in Fayoum, Egypt, using satellite and spatial data

  • Hala A. Effat
  • Ahmed El-Zeiny
Original Article
  • 147 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this research is to delimitate optimal sites for solar grid-connected photovoltaic and concentrated solar power plants in El Fayoum region, Egypt. The method applies a GIS-based methodology to estimate the technical potential of such sites. Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) digital elevation model was used to model the global solar radiation map for 2016. Data from satellite images and topographic maps were combined in a GIS multi-criteria decision model. Criteria including solar radiation, topography, infrastructure, and land-cover/land-use were standardized and aggregated using weighted linear combination method. The global solar radiation and sunshine hours were used to model the geographic and technical potentials for the Photovoltaic (PV). For estimation of thermal concentrated solar power (CSP) geographic potential, only direct solar radiation was used. Landsat 8 OLI satellite image was used to derive the land-use/land-cover map. Using area constraint, twenty-three potential sites were selected from the suitability index based on the maximum suitability values and site-area. The geographic potentials for PV and CSP were calculated for each of the candidate sites using the area constraint, sunshine hours and conversion efficiency. The technical potential were estimated using conversion efficiency, performance ratio and geographic potentials. A geographic database encompassing the candidate sites was created. The calculated CSP technical potential for the candidate sites range between 112 and 160 kW. The PV technical potential range between 268 and 374 kW. The study results provide a database for potential solar farm sites and indicates a good capacity for solar energy in El-Fayoum region.

Keyword

Solar energy Potential sites GIS Satellite image El Fayoum-Egypt 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is part of a research project funded by the National Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, NARSS, Egypt.

References

  1. ARCADIS (1999) Euroconsult, Arnhem, the Netherlands and Darwish Consulting Engineers, “Rehabilitation Master Plan, Main Report” Fayoum Water Management Project II, Cairo, EgyptGoogle Scholar
  2. Barakat A, Ennaji W, El Jazouli A, Amediaz R, Touhami F (2017) Multivariate analysis and GIS-based soil suitability diagnosis for sustainable intensive agriculture in Beni-Moussa irrigated subperimeter (Tadla plain, Morocco). Model Earth Syst Environ 2017(3):3. doi: 10.1007/s40808-017-0272-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barredo CJI (2005) Sistemas de Informacion Geografica y Evaluacion Multicriterio en la ordenacion del territorio. RA-MA Editorial 2005, MadridGoogle Scholar
  4. Boerema N, Morrison G, Taylor R, Rosengarten G (2013) High temperature solar thermal central-receiver billboard design. Sol Energy 97:356–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carl C (2014) Calculating Solar Photovoltaic Potential on Residential Rooftops in Kailua Kona, Hawaii. Msc. Thesis presented to the Faculty of the UDC Graduate School University of Southern California, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. Chu Y, Meisen P (2011) Review and Comparison of different solar energy technologies. Global Energy Network Institute (GENI). http://geni15.wrsc.org/sites/default/files/Review-and-Comparison-of-Different-Solar-Technologies.pdf. Accessed Mar 2017
  7. Eastman JR, Jin WG, Kyem P, Toledano J (1995) Raster procedures for multicriteria multiobjective decisions. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 61(5):539–547Google Scholar
  8. Effat HA (2013) Selection of potential sites for solar energy farms in Ismailia Governorate, Egypt using SRTM and multi-criteria analysis. Int J Adv Remote Sens GIS 2(1):205–220Google Scholar
  9. Effat HA (2016) Mapping solar energy potential zones using SRTM and spatial analysis, application in Lake Nasser Region, Egypt. Int J Sustain Land Use Urban Plan 3(1):1–14Google Scholar
  10. Gad A, El-Zeiny A (2016) Spatial analysis for sustainable development of El Fayoum and Wadi El Natrun desert depressions, Egypt with the aid of remote sensing and GIS. J Geogr Environ Earth Sci Int 8(3):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gastli A, Charabi Y (2010) Solar electricity prospects in Oman using GIS-based solar radiation maps. Renew Sustain Energy 14(2):790–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamidy N, Alipur H, Nasab SNH et al (2016) Spatial evaluation of appropriate areas to collect runoff using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and geographical information system (GIS) (case study: the catchment “Kasef” in Bardaskan. Model Earth Syst Environ 2:172. doi: 10.1007/s40808-016-0230-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofman Y, de Jager D, Molenbroek E, Schilig F, Voogt M (2002) The potential of solar electricity to reduce CO2 emissions. Ecofys, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoogwijk M (2004) On the global and regional potential of renewable energy sources. Utrecht University; 2004. http://www.library.uu.nl/digiarchief/dip/ diss/2004-0309-123617/full.pdf. Accessed April 2016
  15. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2010) Technology roadmap—concentrating solar power, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Jankowski P, Ligmann-Zielinska A, Swobodzinski M (2008) Choice modeler: a web-based spatial multiple criteria evaluation tool. Transactions in GIS 12(4):541–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karsteadt R, Dahle D, Heimiller D, Nealon T (2005) Assessing the potential for renewable energy on national forest system lands. US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TNGoogle Scholar
  18. Law EW, Prasad AA, Kay M, Taylor RA (2014) Direct normal irradiance forecasting and its application to concentrated solar thermal output forecasting—a review. Sol Energy 108:287–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Law EW, Kay M, Taylor RA (2016) Calculating the financial value of a concentrated solar thermal plant operated using direct normal irradiance forecasts. Sol Energy 125:267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahtta R, Joshi PK, Jindal AK (2014) Solar power potential mapping in India using remote sensing inputs and environmental parameters. Renew Energy 71:255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malczewski J (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Mansouri Daneshvar MR, Khatami F, Shirvani S (2017) GIS-based land suitability evaluation for building height construction using an analytical process in the Mashhad city, NE Iran. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:16. doi: 10.1007/s40808-017-0286-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nguyen H, Pearce J (2010) Estimating potential photovoltaic yield with r.sun and the open source geographic resources analysis support system. Sol Energy 84:831–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Painuly JP (2001) Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis. Renew Energy 24(1):73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Proulx F, Rodriguez MJ, Sérodes J, Bouchard C (2007) A methodology for identifying vulnerable locations to taste and odour problems in a drinking water system. Water Sci Technol 55(5):177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramachandra TV, Jain R, Krishnadas G (2011) Hotspots of solar potential in India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(6):3178–3186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramirez L (2006) Curso de caracterizacion de la radiacion solar comorecurso energetico CIEMAT (Centro de Investigacion Energetica, Medioambientey Tecnologicas). Edit. CIEMAT, MadridGoogle Scholar
  28. Rich PM, Dubayah R, Hetrick WA, Saving SC (1994) Using viewshed models to calculate intercepted solar radiation: applications in ecology. American society for photogrammetry and remote sensing technical papers, pp 524–529Google Scholar
  29. Rumbayan M, Abudureyimu A, Nagasaka K (2012) Mapping of solar energy potential in Indonesia using artificial neural network and geographical information system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(3):1437–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saaty T (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Sar N, Chatterjee S, Das Adhikari M (2015) Integrated remote sensing and GIS based spatial modelling through analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for water logging hazard, vulnerability and risk assessment in Keleghai river basin, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 1:31. doi: 10.1007/s40808-015-0039-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sorensen N (2004) Renewable energy: its physics, engineering, use, environmental impacts, economy and planning aspects, 3rd ed. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  33. Sozen A, Arcaklioglu E, Ozalp M (2004) Estimation of solar potential in Turkey by artificial neural networks using meteorological and geographical data. Energy Convers Manage 45(18–19):3033–3052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. State Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency, EEAA (2008) Environmental action plan Fayoum governorate. http://www.eeaa.gov.eg/portals/0/eeaaReports/GovPlans/FayoumGEAPen.pdf. Accessed Dec 2016
  35. Stillwell WG, Seaver DA, Edwards W (1981) A comparison of weight approximation techniques in multi-attribute utility decision making. Organ Behavior Hum Perform 28(1):62–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suncyclopedia, the solar encyclopedia (2017) http://www.suncyclopedia.com/en/area-required-for-solar-pv-power-plants/. Accessed Apr 2017
  37. Trieb F, Schllings C, O’Sullivan M, Pregger T, Hoyer-Klick C (2009) Global potential of concentrating solar power. Solar Paces Conference, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. Turkenberg WC (2004) Renewable energy technologies. In: Goldemberg J (ed) World energy assessment. UNDP, Washington DC, pp 220–72Google Scholar
  39. Ummadisingu A, Soni MS (2008) Concentrating solar power-technology, potential and policy in India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(9):5169–5175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Voogd H (1983) Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang S, Koch B (2010) Determining profits for solar energy with remote sensing data. Energy 35(7):2934–2938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zucca A, Sharifi AM, Fabbri AG (2008) Application of spatial multi-criteria analysis to site selection for a local park: a case study in the Bergamo Province, Italy. J Environ Manage 88(4):752–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Environmental Studies and Land UseNational Authority for Remote Sensing and Space SciencesCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations