Recognising intraspecies threat is essential for survival. However, this needs to be balanced against the undue avoidance of unknown others who may be useful to us. Research has shown that judgments of ‘aggression’ and ‘threat’ posed by an unknown person can accurately reflect that person’s general aggressive tendencies. To date, there has not been a within-sample comparison of the informativeness of static and walking stimuli for threat judgments. In this study, 193 participants rated the threat posed by 23 target people presented as both simplified gait presentations (point-light walkers) and still images. We analysed how threat judgments made by participants were predicted by the target’s self-reported aggression (accuracy), the sex of the targets and the medium of target presentation (point-light vs. still image). Our results showed that participants’ threat judgments accurately predicted targets’ aggression. Male targets received higher threat ratings than female targets and point-light displays were rated as more threatening than still images. There were no effects of target sex and presentation medium on accuracy of threat perception and no sex by medium interactions on judgments themselves. Overall, this study provides further evidence of the accuracy of threat judgments at detecting trait aggression. However, further research is needed to explain what features of the target people are enabling the accurate judgments of aggression.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
The data can be found on the Open Science Framework here: https://osf.io/c6aby/. Stimulus material are not open access due to not requesting ethical permission to do so from target people at time of data collection
The analysis code can be found on the Open Science Framework here: https://osf.io/c6aby/
Archer, J. (1991). The influence of testosterone on human aggression. British Journal of Psychology, 82(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1991.tb02379.x.
Banaji, M. R., Hardin, C., & Rothman, A. J. (1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2062.
Barr, D. J. (2013). Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00328.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
Barrett, L. F., Adolphs, R., Marsella, S., Martinez, A. M., & Pollak, S. D. (2019). Emotional expressions reconsidered: challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 20(1), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619832930.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Book, A. S., Starzyk, K. B., & Quinsey, V. L. (2001). The relationship between testosterone and aggression: a meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6(6), 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00032-X.
Bryant, F. B., & Smith, B. D. (2001). Refining the architecture of aggression: a measurement model for the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(2), 138–167. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2302.
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452–459.
Carré, J. M., & McCormick, C. M. (2008). In your face: facial metrics predict aggressive behaviour in the laboratory and in varsity and professional hockey players. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1651), 2651–2656. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0873.
Carré, J. M., Geniole, S. N., Ortiz, T. L., Bird, B. M., Videto, A., & Bonin, P. L. (2017). Exogenous testosterone rapidly increases aggressive behavior in dominant and impulsive men. Biological Psychiatry, 82(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.009.
Cheetham, M. (2017). Editorial: the uncanny valley hypothesis and beyond. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01738.
Cowey, A., & Vaina, L. M. (2000). Blindness to form from motion despite intact static form perception and motion detection. Neuropsychologia, 38(5), 566–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00117-7.
Coy, A. E., Green, J. D., & Price, M. E. (2014). Why is low waist-to-chest ratio attractive in males? The mediating roles of perceived dominance, fitness, and protection ability. Body Image, 11(3), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.04.003.
Deaner, R. O., Goetz, S. M. M., Shattuck, K., & Schnotala, T. (2012). Body weight, not facial width-to-height ratio, predicts aggression in pro hockey players. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(2), 235–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.01.005.
Efferson, C., & Vogt, S. (2013). Viewing men’s faces does not lead to accurate predictions of trustworthiness. Scientific Reports, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01047.
Elson, M., Mohseni, M. R., Breuer, J., Scharkow, M., & Quandt, T. (2014). Press CRTT to measure aggressive behavior: the unstandardized use of the competitive reaction time task in aggression research. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035569.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2016) Crime in the United States 2015. Retrieved June 15th, 2020 from. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2015/crime-inthe-u.s.-2015/tables/table-42
Funder, D. (1999). Personality judgment: a realistic approach to person perception (1st ed.). Academic Press.
Funder, D. C. (2012). Accurate personality judgment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412445309.
Geniole, S. N., Keyes, A. E., Mondloch, C. J., Carré, J. M., & McCormick, C. M. (2012). Facing aggression: cues differ for female versus male faces. Plos One, 7(1), e30366. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030366.
Geniole, S. N., Denson, T. F., Dixson, B. J., Carré, J. M., & McCormick, C. M. (2015). Evidence from meta-analyses of the facial width-to-height ratio as an evolved cue of threat. Plos One, 10(7), e0132726. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132726.
Gill, D., Garrod, O. G. B., Jack, R. E., & Schyns, P. G. (2014). Facial movements strategically camouflage involuntary social signals of face morphology. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1079–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614522274.
Gómez-Valdés, J., Hünemeier, T., Quinto-Sánchez, M., Paschetta, C., de Azevedo, S., González, M. F., Martínez-Abadías, N., Esparza, M., Pucciarelli, H. M., Salzano, F. M., Bau, C. H. D., Bortolini, M. C., & González-José, R. (2013). Lack of support for the association between facial shape and aggression: a reappraisal based on a worldwide population genetics perspective. Plos One, 8(1), e52317. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052317.
Good, J. M. M. (2007). The affordances for social psychology of the ecological approach to social knowing. Theory & Psychology, 17(2), 265–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307075046.
Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R. (2002). Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron, 35(6), 1167–1175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00897-8.
Grossman, E. D., Battelli, L., & Leone, A. P. (2004). TMS over STSp disrupts perception of biological motion. Journal of Vision, 4(8), 239–239. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.239.
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.11.
Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2009). Error management theory and the evolution of misbeliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(06), 522–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09991440.
Hehman, E., Leitner, J. B., & Gaertner, S. L. (2013). Enhancing static facial features increases intimidation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 747–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.015.
Kosinski, M. (2017). Facial width-to-height ratio does not predict self-reported behavioral tendencies. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1675–1682. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617716929.
Kramer, R. S. S., Jones, A. L., & Ward, R. (2012). A lack of sexual dimorphism in width-to-height ratio in White European faces using 2D photographs, 3D scans, and anthropometry. Plos One, 7(8), e42705. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042705.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
Lefevre, C. E., Lewis, G. J., Bates, T. C., Dzhelyova, M., Coetzee, V., Deary, I. J., & Perrett, D. I. (2012). No evidence for sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio in four large adult samples. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(6), 623–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.03.002.
Lefevre, C. E., Lewis, G. J., Perrett, D. I., & Penke, L. (2013). Telling facial metrics: facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(4), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.03.005.
Letzring, T. D. (2008). The good judge of personality: characteristics, behaviors, and observer accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 914–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.12.003.
McCarthy, R. J., & Elson, M. (2018). A conceptual review of lab-based aggression paradigms. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.104.
Neisser, U. (1980). On ‘social knowing’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6(4), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728064012.
Özener, B. (2012). Facial width-to-height ratio in a Turkish population is not sexually dimorphic and is unrelated to aggressive behavior. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(3), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.08.001.
R Core Team (2013). A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
Ritter, D., & Eslea, M. (2005). Hot Sauce, toy guns, and graffiti: a critical account of current laboratory aggression paradigms. Aggressive Behavior, 31(5), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20066.
Satchell, L. (2019). From photograph to face-to-face: brief interactions change person and personality judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.02.010.
Satchell, L., Akehurst, L., & Morris, P. (2017a). Learning to be streetwise: the acquisition of accurate judgments of aggression. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 24(3), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1247420.
Satchell, L., Morris, P., Mills, C., O’Reilly, L., Marshman, P., & Akehurst, L. (2017b). Evidence of big five and aggressive personalities in gait biomechanics. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 41(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-016-0240-1.
Satchell, L., Morris, P., Akehurst, L., & Morrison, E. (2018). Can judgments of threat reflect an approaching person’s trait aggression? Current Psychology, 37(3), 661–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9557-5.
Stirrat, M., & Perrett, D. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21(3), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362647.
Tedeschi, J. T., & Quigley, B. M. (1996). Limitations of laboratory paradigms for studying aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-1789(95)00014-3.
Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., Penke, L., & Perrett, D. I. (2014). Judging a man by the width of his face: the role of facial ratios and dominance in mate choice at speed-dating events. Psychological Science, 25(3), 806–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613511823.
Welker, K. M., Bird, B. M., & Arnocky, S. (2016). Commentary: facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) is not associated with adolescent testosterone levels. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01745.
Whitehouse, A. J. O., Gilani, S. Z., Shafait, F., Mian, A., Tan, D. W., Maybery, M. T., Keelan, J. A., Hart, R., Handelsman, D. J., Goonawardene, M., & Eastwood, P. (2015). Prenatal testosterone exposure is related to sexually dimorphic facial morphology in adulthood. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1816), 20151351. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1351.
Windhager, S., Schaefer, K., & Fink, B. (2011). Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity. American Journal of Human Biology, 23(6), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.21219.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Satchell, L.P., Mayes, H.S., Lee, A.J. et al. Is threat in the way they move? Influences of static and gait information on threat judgments of unknown people. Evolutionary Psychological Science (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-020-00249-7
- Gait perception
- Threat perception
- Static images
- Walking stimuli