Advertisement

Family Cohesion and the General Factor of Personality: Examining Differences in Monozygotic Twin Pairs

  • Curtis S. Dunkel
  • Dimitri van der Linden
  • Emma I. Fullerton
  • Michael P. Hengartner
Research Article

Abstract

It was recently found that differences between monozygotic twins in the general factor of personality were positively correlated with differences in adulthood recollections of maternal and paternal affection. The current study used data from the Swedish Adoption/Twin Study on Aging to possibly replicate and extend these findings. The results were consistent with replication for monozygotic twin pairs who were reared together (base total of 166 pairs), but not for those who were reared apart (base total of 99 pairs). This finding suggests that the effect is due to the relative and not absolute aspects of the familial environment during childhood. Additionally, the general factor of personality was not shown to mediate childhood and adulthood family cohesion. These results suggest that the general factor of personality may have independent effects on recollections of childhood family cohesion and current family cohesion. Thus, both how family dynamics are related to the development of the general factor of personality and how the general factor of personality impacts adulthood family relations (e.g., parenting) are important areas of future inquiry.

Keywords

General factor of personality Monozygotic twins Family cohesion 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Asendorpf, J. B., Conner, M., De Fruyt, F., De Houwer, J., Denissen, J. J. A., Fiedler, K., . . . Wicherts, J. M. (2013). Recommendations of increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27, 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbaro, N., Boutwell, B. B., Barnes, J. C., & Shackelford, T. K. (2017). Rethinking the transmission gap: What behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology mean for attachment theory: a comment on Verhage et al. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 107–113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaver, K. M. (2013). Biosocial criminology: a primer (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
  4. Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: an evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647–670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Benoit, D., & Parker, K. C. H. (1994). Stability and transmission of attachment across three generations. Child Development, 65, 1444–1456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergeman, C. S., Chipuer, H. M., Plomin, R., Pederson, N. L., McClearn, G. E., Nesselroade, J. R., Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1993). Genetic and environmental effects on openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness: an adoption/twin study. Journal of Personality, 61, 159–179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Briffa, M., Sneddon, L. U., & Wilson, A. J. (2015). Animal personality as a cause and consequence of contest behavior. Biological Letters, 11, 20141007.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2014.1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassibba, R., Coppola, G., Sette, G., Curci, A., & Costantini, A. (2017). The transmission of attachment across three generations: a study in adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 53, 396–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Copping, L. T., Campbell, A., & Muncer, S. (2014). Psychometrics and life history theory: The structure and validity of the High K Strategy Scale. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 200–222.  https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunkel, C. S., Harbke, C. R., & Papini, D. R. (2009). Direct and indirect effects of birth order on personality and identity: support for the null hypothesis. Journal of GeneticPsychology, 170, 159–175.Google Scholar
  11. Dunkel, C. S., Cabeza de Baca, T., Woodley of Menie, M. A., & Fernandes, H. B. F. (2014). The general factor of personality and general intelligence: testing hypotheses from Differential-K, life history theory, and strategic differentiation-integration effort. Personality and Individual Differences, 62, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunkel, C. S., Mathes, E. W., Kesselring, S. N., Decker, M. L., & Kelts, D. J. (2015). Parenting influence on the development of life history strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 374–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunkel, C. S., Van der Linden, D., Brown, N., & Mathes, E. (2016). Self-report based general factor of personality as socially desirable responding, positive self-evaluation, and social-effectiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunkel, C. S., Nedelec, J. L., & Van der Linden, D. (2018). Using monozygotic twin differences to examine the relationship between parental affection and personality: a life history account. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellis, B. J., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., Pettit, G. S., & Woodward, L. (2003). Does father absence place daughters at special risk for early sexual activity and teen pregnancy? Child Development, 74, 801–821.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Fearon, P., Shmueli-Goetz, Y., Viding, E., Fonagy, P., & Plomin, R. (2014). Genetic and environmental influences on adolescent attachment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 1033–1041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., & Schneider, S. M. R. (2004). The heritability of life history strategy: the K-factor, covitality, and personality. Social Biology, 51, 121–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Garvus-Ion, A., Sjøvold, T., Hernández, A., González-José, R., Torné, M.E.E., Martínez-Abadías, N., Esparza, M. (2017). Measuring fitness heritability: life history traits versus morphological traits in humans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23271, (Advance on-line publication).
  19. Jenkins, J. M., Rasbash, J., & O'Connor, T. G. (2003). The role of the shared family context in differential parenting. Developmental Psychology, 39, 99–113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jokela, M., Pekkarinen, T., Sarvimäki, M., Terviö, M., & Uusitalo, R. (2017). Secular rise in economically valuable personality traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 6527–6532.Google Scholar
  21. Loehlin, J. C., & Horn, J. M. (2012). How general is the “general factor of personality”? Evidence from the Texas Adoption Project. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 655–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1981). Family environment scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pedersen, N. L Swedish Adoption/Twin Study on Aging (SATSA). (1984, 1987, 1990, 1993, 2004, 2007, & 2010). ICPSR03843-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2015-05-13.  https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03843.v2.
  24. Pedersen, N. L., Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., & Friberg, L. (1988). Neuroticism, extraversion, and related traits in adult twins reared apart and reared together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 950–957.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pedersen, N. L., McClearn, G. E., Plomin, R., Nesselroade, J. R., Berg, S., & DeFaire, U. (1991). The Swedish Adoption Twin Study of Aging: an update. Acta Genaticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 40, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Penke, L., Denissen, J. J. A., & Miller, G. (2007). The evolutionary genetics of personality. European Journal of Personality, 21, 549–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nesselroade, J. R., & Bergeman, C. S. (1988). Genetic influence on childhood family environment perceived retrospectively from the last half of the life span. Developmental Psychology, 24, 738–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2010-2018). Calculation for the Sobel test: an interaction calculation tool for mediation tests. http://www.quantpsy.org/sobel/sobel.htmGoogle Scholar
  29. Robinson, O. C., Fredrick, G., & Ramos, K. (2014). Parental antipathy and neglect: relations with Big Five personality traits, cross-context trait variability and authenticity. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 180–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rovine, M. J. (1994). Estimating nonshared environment using sibling discrepancy scores. In E. M. Hetherington, D. Reiss, & R. Plomin (Eds.), Separate social worlds of siblings: the impact of nonshared environment on development (pp. 33–61). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  31. Rushton, J. P., & Irwing, P. (2011). The general factor of personality: normal and abnormal. In T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, & A. Furnham (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Individual Differences (pp. 132–161). London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Rushton, J. P., Bons, T. A., & Hur, Y. (2008). The genetics and evolution of a general factor of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1173–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rushton, J. P., Bons, T. A., Ando, J., Hur, Y. -M., Irwing, P., Vernon, P. A., Petrides, K. V., & Barbaranelli, C. (2009). A general factor of personality from multitrait-multimethod data and cross-national twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 356–365.Google Scholar
  34. Sulloway, F. J. (2001). Birth order, sibling competition, and human behavior. In H. R. Holcomb III (Ed.), Conceptual challenges in evolutionay psychology: innovative research strategies (pp. 39–83). Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van der Akker, A. L., Deković, M., Asscher, J., & Prinzie, P. (2014). Mean-level personality development across childhood and adolescence: a temporary defiance of the maturity principle and bidirectional associations with parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 736–750.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Van der Linden, D., Te Nijenhuis, J., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: a meta-analysis and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 315–327.Google Scholar
  37. Van der Linden, D., Dunkel, C.S., & Petrides, K.V. (2016). The General Factor of Personality (GFP) as social effectiveness: review of the literature. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 98–105.Google Scholar
  38. Van der Linden, D., Pekaar, K., Bakker, A., Aitken Schermer, J., Vernon, P. A., Dunkel, C. S., & Petrides, K. V. (2017). Overlap between the general factor of personality and emotional intelligence: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 36–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Van der Linden, D., Schermer, J. A., Dunkel, C. S., Pekaar, K. A., Bakker, A. B., Vernon, P. A., & Petrides, K. V. (2018). Overlap between the general factor of personality and trait emotional intelligence: a genetic correlation study. Behavioral Genetics, 48, 147–154.Google Scholar
  40. Verhage, M. L., Schuengel, C., Madigan, S., Fearon, R. M. P., Oosterman, M., Cassibba, R., et al. (2016). Narrowing the transmission gap: a synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 337–366.Google Scholar
  41. Verweij, K. J., Yang, J., Lahti, J., Veiiola, J., Hintsanen, M., Pulkki-Raback, L., et al. (2012). Maintenance of genetic variation in human personality: testing evolutionary models by estimating heritability due to common causal variants and investigating the effect of distant inbreeding. Evolution, 66, 3238–3251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Curtis S. Dunkel
    • 1
  • Dimitri van der Linden
    • 2
  • Emma I. Fullerton
    • 1
  • Michael P. Hengartner
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWestern Illinois UniversityMacombUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Education, and Child StudiesErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.School of Applied PsychologyZurich University of Applied SciencesZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations