Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 139–164 | Cite as

The Socio-Economic Impact of Pre-trial Detention in Kenya, Mozambique and Zambia

Article

Abstract

The presumed link between the rule of law and development suggests that an operational justice system is key to development. The research sought to understand and quantify how the decision to detain an accused person affects his or her socio-economic situation. Data was collected in Kenya, Mozambique and Zambia. The findings suggest that the use of the coercive power of the state exercised through the deprivation of an individual’s liberty has serious socio-economic consequences. While detention pending trial is justifiable sometimes, we argue that it is over-used, frequently resulting in excessively long detention. The deprivation of liberty interferes with the ability of individuals to be agents of their own development, infringing on socio-economic rights of individuals and their dependents. States can justify such infringements only if their coercive power is used within the ambit of democratic and rights-respecting laws complying with human rights standards.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research on which this article is based was made possible with support from Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa (OSISA), in partnership with Open Society Initiative for Eastern Africa (OSIEA), the Open Society Justice Initiative (OSJI) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

References

Journal Article

  1. Ginsburg T (2000) Does law matter for economic development? Evidence from East Asia. Law Soc Rev 34(3):829–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Liebenberg S (2008) The value of freedom in interpreting socio-economic rights. Acta Juridica Spec Edn, pp 149–176Google Scholar

Book

  1. Nowak M (1993) UN Covenant on civil and political rights. CCPR commentary. N.P. Engel, Kehl-Strasbourg Google Scholar
  2. Sen A (2000) Development as freedom. Anchor Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Book Chapter

  1. De Zayas A (2001) The examination of individual complaints by the united nations human rights committee under the optional protocol to the international covenant on civil and political rights. In: Alfredsson G et al (eds) International human rights monitoring mechanisms. Martinus Nijhof Publishers, The Hague, pp 67–121Google Scholar
  2. De Zayas A (2003) Desarrollo jurisprudencial del Comité de Derechos Humanos. In Piernas CJ (ed) Iniciación a la Práctica en Derecho Internacional. Marcial Pons, Madrid, pp 215–277Google Scholar

Online Document

  1. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (2006) Frequently asked questions on a human rights-based approach to development cooperation http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/FAQen.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2011
  2. United Nations Development Programme (2013) Country studies: the socioeconomic impact of pretrial detention. http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/democratic-governance/access_to_justiceandruleoflaw/the-socioeconomic-impact-of-pretrial-detention/. Accessed 21 Jan 2011
  3. World Bank (2007) Law and development movement: world bank note. http://go.worldbank.org/F535AXQWE0. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  4. World Bank (2011) World bank development report 2011. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDRS/Resources/WDR2011_Full_Text.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2011
  5. World Bank (2016) Rule of law and development. http://go.worldbank.org/9OTC3P5070. Accessed 26 Jan 2016
  6. World Bank (2016) Poverty. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview. Accessed 26 Jan 2016

International and regional instruments and case law

  1. African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Adopted 27 June 1981, OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58 (1982), entered into force 21 October 1986Google Scholar
  2. African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Principles and Guidelines on Rights to a Fair Trial and Legal Assistance in AfricaGoogle Scholar
  3. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 3, The nature of States parties’ obligations (Fifth session, 1990), U.N. Doc. E/1991/23, annex III at 86 (1991), reprinted in Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.6 at 14 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. International Covenant on Socio-Economic and Cultural Rights Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966Google Scholar
  5. International Covenant on Socio-Economic and Cultural Rights ‘General Comment 3’ Adopted 1 January 1991, para 7Google Scholar
  6. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976Google Scholar
  7. Peter Joseph Chacha v the United Republic of Tanzania, Application No. 003/2012, African Court of Human and Peoples’ RightsGoogle Scholar
  8. Prosecutor v. Furundzija ICTY (Trial Chamber) judgment of 10 December 1998Google Scholar
  9. Rights International v Nigeria, African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights, Communication no. 215/98Google Scholar
  10. UN Committee on ESCR General Comment No 14, UN Doc E/C/12/2000/4, The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of HealthGoogle Scholar
  11. UN General Assembly A/RES/41/128 (UN Declaration on the Right to Development)Google Scholar
  12. UN General Assembly, Report by the UN Special Rapporteur on Extreme poverty and human rights, A/67/278Google Scholar
  13. UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment 29, States of Emergency CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment 32: Right to Equality before Courts and Tribunals and to a Fair Trial, CCPR/C/GC/32 (23 August 2007)Google Scholar
  15. UN General Assembly, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the question of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, A/56/156, 3 July 2001Google Scholar

Domestic case law

  1. A (FC) and others (FC) (Appellants) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2004] UKHL 56Google Scholar
  2. A and others (FC) and others vs Secretary of State for the Home Department[2005] UKHL 71Google Scholar
  3. Ferreira v Levin NO and Others; Vryenhoek and Others v Powell NO and Others (CCT5/95) [1995] ZACC 13; 1996 (1) SA 984 (CC); 1996 (1) BCLR 1 (6 December 1995) para 49Google Scholar
  4. R v. Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 3) [2000] 1 AC 147Google Scholar
  5. S v M (CCT 53/06) [2007] ZACC 18; 2008 (3) SA 232 (CC); 2007 (12) BCLR 1312 (CC) (26 September 2007)Google Scholar
  6. van Alphen v. the Netherlands (Communication No. 305/1988), CCPR/C/39/D/305/1988, UN Human Rights Committee (HRC), 23 July 1990Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Africa Criminal Justice Reform, Dullah Omar Institute on Constitutional Law, Governance and Human RightsUniversity of the Western CapeBellvilleSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations