Advertisement

Experimental Techniques

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 209–221 | Cite as

Accurate Data Reduction for the Uniaxial Compression Test

  • J. A. Gruber
Article
  • 87 Downloads

Abstract

Raw load-displacement data from the uniaxial compression test are shown to be contaminated by both machine deflection and seating effects at the specimen surface. Machine displacement is found to be a nonlinear and reversible function of applied load, insensitive to the displacement or loading rate, but sensitive to environmental conditions such as temperature. An empirical function is proposed which provides an accurate fit to machine displacement data. Specimen seating effects alter the measured load-displacement data by introducing additional nonlinearity, reducing the elastic loading slope, and shifting the load data to higher displacement. These effects are shown to originate from non-ideality of the specimen geometry and are independent of friction. A simple analytical model to predict specimen seating effects was proposed. The model was then used to determine a robust method for determining the proper correction to compensate for specimen non-ideality. A new method for compression test data reduction is proposed that accounts for both machine compliance and specimen seating effects.

Keywords

Compression Mechanical testing Test machines Data reduction Plasticity 

References

  1. 1.
    House JW, Gillis PP (2000) Testing machines and strain sensors. In: Mechanical testing and evaluation, ASM handbook, volume 8. ASM international, Materials ParkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kalidindi SR, Abusafieh A, El-Danaf E (1997) Accurate characterization of machine compliance for simple compression testing. Exp Mech 37:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hockett JE, Gillis PP (1971) Mechanical testing machine stiffness: part I – theory and calculations. Int J Mech Sci 13:251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hockett JE, Gillis PP (1971) Mechanical testing machine stiffness: part II – application to data reduction. Int J Mech Sci 13:265–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ASTM E9–09 (2009) Standard test methods of compression testing metallic materials at room temperature. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ASTM E209–00 (2010) Standard practice for compression tests of metallic materials at elevated temperatures with conventional or rapid heating rates and strain rates. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ASTM E4–16 (2016) Standard practices for force verification of testing machines. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Song JF, Vorburger TV (1992) Surface texture. In: Friction, lubrication, and wear technology, ASM handbook, volume 18. ASM International, Materials ParkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas TR (1999) Rough surfaces. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Core Structural Materials Technology, Bettis Atomic Power LaboratoryWest MifflinUSA

Personalised recommendations