Advertisement

Experimental Techniques

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 199–207 | Cite as

Optimal Preparation Process for Fatigue Specimens Treated by Ultrasonic Peening

  • H. Zhang
  • D. Wang
  • C. Deng
Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of preparing small-scale fatigue specimens for properly evaluating the effect of ultrasonic peening on fatigue life of welded structures and metallic components by laboratory experiment. Axial fatigue test and four-point bend fatigue test were conducted on fatigue specimens including untreated specimens and specimens being peened before and after cutting process. Fracture surfaces of fatigue failure specimens were observed to determine the crack initiation sites. Residual stresses were measured on different widths of cutting pieces to investigate the residual stress relaxation caused by cutting. The experimental results demonstrate that for specimens being cut after peening treatment, residual stresses are relaxed at the cutting edge, which results in significant reduction of fatigue life improvement and potential fatigue failure from the cutting edge. It is concluded that small-scale fatigue specimens should be machined to the final shape first and then applied peening, which not only applies for ultrasonic peening treatment, but for other residual stress-based improvement techniques.

Keywords

Ultrasonic peening Fatigue specimen Cutting Residual stress Fatigue life 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51275343) for financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Benedetti M, Bortolamedi T, Fontanari V, Frendo F (2004) Bending fatigue behaviour of differently shot peened al 6082 T5 alloy. Int J Fatigue 26:889–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rodopoulos CA, Romero JS, Curtis SA, de los Rios ER, Peyre P (2003) Effect of controlled shot peening and laser shock peening on the fatigue performance of 2024-T351 aluminum alloy. J. Mater. Eng. Perform 12:414–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Luong H, Hill MR (2010) The effects of laser peening and shot peening on high cycle fatigue in 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 527:699–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Uematsu Y, Kakiuchi T, Tokaji K, Nishigaki K, Ogasawara M (2013) Effects of shot peening on fatigue behavior in high speed steel and cast iron with spheroidal vanadium carbides dispersed within martensitic-matrix microstructure. Mater Sci Eng A 561:386–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ganesh P, Sundar R, Kumar H, Kaul R, Ranganathan K, Hedaoo P et al (2014) Studies on fatigue life enhancement of pre-fatigued spring steel specimens using laser shock peening. Mater Des 54:734–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mordyuk BN, Prokopenko GI (2007) Ultrasonic impact peening for surface properties' management. J Sound Vib 308:855–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gao Y, Li X, Yang Q, Yao M (2007) Influence of surface integrity on fatigue strength of 40CrNi2Si2MoVA steel. Mater Lett 61:466–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mordyuk BN, Prokopenko GI, Volosevych PY, Matokhnyuk LE, Byalonovich AV, Popova TV (2016) Improved fatigue behavior of low-carbon steel 20GL by applying ultrasonic impact treatment combined with the electric discharge surface alloying. Mater Sci Eng A 659:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mordyuk BN, Prokopenko GI, Milman Yu V, Iefimov MO, Sameljuk AV (2013) Enhanced fatigue durability of Al-6Mg alloy by applying ultrasonic impact peening: effects of surface hardening and reinforcement with AlCuFe quasicrystalline particles. Mater Sci Eng A 563:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kudryavtsev Y., Kleiman J., Prokopenko G., Mordyuk B., Krasovskiy T., Mikheev P., et al. (2002) Computerized complex for Ultrasonic Peening of parts and welded elements. 32-nd Annual Ultrasonic Industry Association Symposium. New York, NY, USA, October 21–23Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takamori H, Fisher JW (2000) Tests of large girders treated to enhance fatigue strength. Fifth International Bridge Engineering Conference, TampaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roy S, Fisher JW, Yen BT (2003) Fatigue resistance of welded details enhanced by ultrasonic impact treatment (UIT). Int J Fatigue 25:1239–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kudryavtsev Y, Kleiman J (2013) Fatigue improvement of welded elements and structures by ultrasonic peening. Proceedings of the ASME 2013 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huo L, Wang D, Zhang Y (2005) Investigation of the fatigue behaviour of the welded joints treated by TIG dressing and ultrasonic peening under variable-amplitude load. Int J Fatigue 27:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ghahremani K, Walbridge S (2011) Fatigue testing and analysis of peened highway bridge welds under in-service variable amplitude loading conditions. Int J Fatigue 33:300–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Okawa T, Shimanuki H, Funatsu Y, Nose T, Sumi Y (2013) Effect of preload and stress ratio on fatigue strength of welded joints improved by ultrasonic impact treatment. Weld World 57:235–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu Y, Wang D, Deng C, Xia L, Huo L, Wang L (2014) Influence of re-ultrasonic impact treatment on fatigue behaviors of S690QL welded joints. Int J Fatigue 66:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wright W (1996) Post-weld treatment of a welded bridge girder by ultrasonic impact treatment. In: Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. McleanGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yekta RT, Ghahremani K, Walbridge S (2013) Effect of quality control parameter variations on the fatigue performance of ultrasonic impact treated welds. Int J Fatigue 55:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leitner M, Stoschka M, Eichlseder W (2014) Fatigue enhancement of thin-walled, high-strength steel joints by high-frequency mechanical impact treatment. Weld World 58:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feng Y, Hu S, Wang D, Cui L (2016) Formation of short crack and its effect on fatigue properties of ultrasonic peening treatment S355 steel. Mater Des 89:507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hacini L, Van Le N, Bocher P (2009) Evaluation of residual stresses induced by robotized hammer peening by the contour method. Exp Mech 49:775–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pagliaro P, Prime MB, Swenson H, Zuccarello B (2010) Measuring multiple residual-stress components using the contour method and multiple cuts. Exp Mech 50:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Toparli MB, Fitzpatrick ME (2016) Development and application of the contour method to determine the residual stresses in thin laser-peened Aluminium alloy plates. Exp Mech 56:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shimanuki H, Okawa T (2013) Effect of stress ratio on the enhancement of fatigue strength in high performance steel welded joints by ultrasonic impact treatment. Int J Steel Struct 13:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Tianjin key Laboratory of Advanced Joining TechnologyTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations