Current Stem Cell Reports

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 13–21 | Cite as

Extracellular Matrix Regulation of Stem Cell Fate

Stem Cell Switches and Regulators (KK Hirschi, Section Editor)
  • 85 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Stem Cell Switches and Regulators

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The extracellular matrix (ECM) presents a complex myriad of biochemical and physical cues in the stem cell niche and is able to modulate stem cell fate and function. This review summarizes engineering approaches that have exploited natural and synthetic biomaterials to understand ECM regulation of stem cell fate. Specifically, we demonstrate how these studies have advanced our understanding of vascular maturation and mesenchymal lineage specification.

Recent Findings

ECM mechanics have emerged as a critical cue in stem cell lineage specification. With the introduction of mechanically dynamic materials, which mirror the non-linear elastic behavior of natural matrices, our understanding of differentiation behavior has evolved.

Summary

While studies using conventional culture employing rigid, two-dimensional surfaces have greatly advanced our understanding of stem cell differentiation, they overlook the complexity of ECM in the stem cell environment. Implementing defined analogs, through material science and tissue engineering approaches, will allow us to mirror the dynamic nature of ECM and fully elucidate how stem cells differentiate.

Keywords

Stem cell differentiation Hydrogels Cell fate Mesenchymal stem cells Tissue engineering Material science 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to give thanks and recognition to the institutions who provided funding for the mentioned studies from our lab including the National Institute of Health, National Science Foundation, Maryland Stem Cell Fund and American Heart Association.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Quinton Smith and Sharon Gerecht declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:• Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Ingber D. Extracellular matrix and cell shape: potential control points for inhibition of angiogenesis. J Cell Biochem. 1991;47(3):236–41.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240470309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raab M, Swift J, Dingal PCD, Shah P, Shin J-W, Discher DE. Crawling from soft to stiff matrix polarizes the cytoskeleton and phosphoregulates myosin-II heavy chain. J Cell Biol. 2012;199(4):669–83.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201205056.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lo C-M, Wang H-B, Dembo M, Wang Y-L. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J. 2000;79(1):144–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76279-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang N, Ingber DE. Control of cytoskeletal mechanics by extracellular matrix, cell shape, and mechanical tension. Biophys J. 1994;66(6):2181–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(94)81014-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prasain N, Lee MR, Vemula S, Meador JL, Yoshimoto M, Ferkowicz MJ, et al. Differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells to cells similar to cord-blood endothelial colony-forming cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(11):1151–7.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3048.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dickinson LE, Kusuma S, Gerecht S. Reconstructing the differentiation niche of embryonic stem cells using biomaterials. Macromol Biosci. 2011;11(1):36–49.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201000245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levental I, Georges PC, Janmey PA. Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. Soft Matter. 2007;3(3):299–306.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B610522J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wells RG. The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology. 2008;47(4):1394–400.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22193.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim IL, Mauck RL, Burdick JA. Hydrogel design for cartilage tissue engineering: a case study with hyaluronic acid. Biomaterials. 2011;32(34):8771–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.073.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schaffler MB, Burr DB. Stiffness of compact bone: effects of porosity and density. J Biomech. 1988;21(1):13–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(88)90186-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baldwin AD, Kiick KL. Polysaccharide-modified synthetic polymeric biomaterials. Pept Sci. 2010;94(1):128–40.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.21334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis GE, Camarillo CW. An α2β1 integrin-dependent pinocytic mechanism involving intracellular vacuole formation and coalescence regulates capillary lumen and tube formation in three-dimensional collagen matrix. Exp Cell Res. 1996;224(1):39–51.  https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1996.0109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bayless KJ, Davis GE. The Cdc42 and Rac1 GTPases are required for capillary lumen formation in three-dimensional extracellular matrices. J Cell Sci. 2002;115(6):1123–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis GE, Bayless KJ, Mavila A. Molecular basis of endothelial cell morphogenesis in three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Anat Rec. 2002;268(3):252–75.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.10159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis GE, Black SM, Bayless KJ. Capillary morphogenesis during human endothelial cell invasion of three-dimensional collagen matrices. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology—Animal. 2000;36(8):513–9.  https://doi.org/10.1290/1071-2690(2000)036<0513:CMDHEC>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    George EL, Georges-Labouesse EN, Patel-King RS, Rayburn H, Hynes RO. Defects in mesoderm, neural tube and vascular development in mouse embryos lacking fibronectin. Development. 1993;119(4):1079–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Francis SE, Goh KL, Hodivala-Dilke K, Bader BL, Stark M, Davidson D, et al. Central roles of α5β1 integrin and fibronectin in vascular development in mouse embryos and embryoid bodies. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22(6):927–33.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000016045.93313.F2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Toole BP. Hyaluronan in morphogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2001;12(2):79–87.  https://doi.org/10.1006/scdb.2000.0244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Davis GE, Senger DR. Extracellular matrix mediates a molecular balance between vascular morphogenesis and regression. Curr Opin Hematol. 2008;15(3):197–203.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0b013e3282fcc321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    • Smith Q, Chan XY, Carmo AM, Trempel M, Saunders M, Gerecht S. Compliant substratum guides endothelial commitment from human pluripotent stem cells. Sci Adv. 2017;3(5):e1602883. Demonstration of the utility of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates for controlling substrate stiffness and investigating mesodermal commitment of human induced pluripotent stem cells in chemcially defined media conditions.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602883.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kusuma S, Smith Q, Facklam A, Gerecht S. Micropattern size-dependent endothelial differentiation from a human induced pluripotent stem cell line. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. 2015.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dickinson LE, Moura ME, Gerecht S. Guiding endothelial progenitor cell tube formation using patterned fibronectin surfaces. Soft Matter. 2010;6(20):5109–19.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0sm00233j.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith Q, Stukalin E, Kusuma S, Gerecht S, Sun SX. Stochasticity and spatial interaction govern stem cell differentiation dynamics. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):12617.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12617.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wanjare M, Kusuma S, Gerecht S. Defining differences among perivascular cells derived from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2014;2(5):561–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.03.004.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kusuma S, Facklam A, Gerecht S. Characterizing human pluripotent-stem-cell-derived vascular cells for tissue engineering applications. Stem Cells Dev. 2015;24(4):451–8.  https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2014.0377.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barreto-Ortiz SF, Zhang S, Davenport M, Fradkin J, Ginn B, Mao H-Q, et al. A novel in vitro model for microvasculature reveals regulation of circumferential ECM organization by curvature. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e81061.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081061.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wanjare M, Kuo F, Gerecht S. Derivation and maturation of synthetic and contractile vascular smooth muscle cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Cardiovasc Res. 2013;97(2):321–30.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvs315.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barreto-Ortiz SF, Fradkin J, Eoh J, Trivero J, Davenport M, Ginn B, et al. Fabrication of 3-dimensional multicellular microvascular structures. FASEB J. 2015;29(8):3302–14.  https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.14-263343.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kusuma S, Zhao S, Gerecht S. The extracellular matrix is a novel attribute of endothelial progenitors and of hypoxic mature endothelial cells. The FASEB J. 2012.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wanjare M, Agarwal N, Gerecht S. Biomechanical strain induces elastin and collagen production in human pluripotent stem cell-derived vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2015;309(4):C271–81.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00366.2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Eoh JH, Shen N, Burke JA, Hinderer S, Xia Z, Schenke-Layland K, et al. Enhanced elastin synthesis and maturation in human vascular smooth muscle tissue derived from induced-pluripotent stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2017;52:49–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.083.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hanjaya-Putra D, Yee J, Ceci D, Truitt R, Yee D, Gerecht S. Vascular endothelial growth factor and substrate mechanics regulate in vitro tubulogenesis of endothelial progenitor cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14(10):2436–47.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00981.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hanjaya-Putra D, Bose V, Shen Y-I, Yee J, Khetan S, Fox-Talbot K, et al. Controlled activation of morphogenesis to generate a functional human microvasculature in a synthetic matrix. Blood. 2011;118(3):804–15.  https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-12-327338.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hanjaya-Putra D, Wong KT, Hirotsu K, Khetan S, Burdick JA, Gerecht S. Spatial control of cell-mediated degradation to regulate vasculogenesis and angiogenesis in hyaluronan hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2012;33(26):6123–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.027.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kusuma S, Shen Y-I, Hanjaya-Putra D, Mali P, Cheng L, Gerecht S. Self-organized vascular networks from human pluripotent stem cells in a synthetic matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(31):12601–6.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306562110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Park KM, Gerecht S. Hypoxia-inducible hydrogels. Nature Communications. 2014;5.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Blatchley M, Park KM, Gerecht S. Designer hydrogels for precision control of oxygen tension and mechanical properties. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3(40):7939–49.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TB01038A.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chan XY, Black R, Dickerman K, Federico J, Lévesque M, Mumm J, et al. Three-dimensional vascular network assembly from diabetic patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(12):2677–85.  https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306362.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell. 2004;6(4):483–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell. 2006;126(4):677–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, Enzo E, Giulitti S, Cordenonsi M, et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature. 2011;474(7350):179–83.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Azzolin L, Panciera T, Soligo S, Enzo E, Bicciato S, Dupont S, et al. YAP/TAZ incorporation in the β-catenin destruction complex orchestrates the Wnt response. Cell. 2014;158(1):157–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schwartz MA. Integrins and extracellular matrix in mechanotransduction. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2(12):a005066.  https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005066.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cosgrove BD, Mui KL, Driscoll TP, Caliari SR, Mehta KD, Assoian RK, et al. N-cadherin adhesive interactions modulate matrix mechanosensing and fate commitment of mesenchymal stem cells. Nature Materials. 2016.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    •• Yang C, Tibbitt MW, Basta L, Anseth KS. Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate. Nat Mater. 2014;13(6):645–52. Demonstration of photo-tunable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for investigating temporal regulation of substrate stiffness, YAP/TAZ signaling, and downstream differentation of mesenchymal stem cells.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3889.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yang C, DelRio FW, Ma H, Killaars AR, Basta LP, Kyburz KA, et al. Spatially patterned matrix elasticity directs stem cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(31):E4439–45.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1609731113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Trappmann B, Gautrot JE, Connelly JT, Strange DGT, Li Y, Oyen ML, et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat Mater. 2012;11(7):642–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3339.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wen JH, Vincent LG, Fuhrmann A, Choi YS, Hribar KC, Taylor-Weiner H, et al. Interplay of matrix stiffness and protein tethering in stem cell differentiation 2014;13(10):979–87.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    •• Baker BM, Trappmann B, Wang WY, Sakar MS, Kim IL, Shenoy VB, et al. Cell-mediated fibre recruitment drives extracellular matrix mechanosensing in engineered fibrillar microenvironments. Nat Mater. 2015;14(12):1262–8. Tunable electrospun hydrogel fibers unveil new mechanistic insight into the mechanoresponse of mesenchymal stem cells in fibrillar microenvironments. Specifically, cells on soft fibrillar structures recruit neighboring fibers which lead to increased proliferation, spreading, and ligand density of adhesion domains.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4444.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhang M, Nigwekar P, Castaneda B, Hoyt K, Joseph JV, di Sant'Agnese A, et al. Quantitative characterization of viscoelastic properties of human prostate correlated with histology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(7):1033–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.11.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hayes WC, Mockros LF. Viscoelastic properties of human articular cartilage. J Appl Physiol. 1971;31(4):562–8.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1971.31.4.562.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Miller K, Chinzei K. Mechanical properties of brain tissue in tension. J Biomech. 2002;35(4):483–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00234-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cameron AR, Frith JE, Cooper-White JJ. The influence of substrate creep on mesenchymal stem cell behaviour and phenotype. Biomaterials. 2011;32(26):5979–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    •• Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Klumpers D, Darnell M, Bencherif SA, Weaver JC, et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat Mater. 2016;15(3):326–34. Using alginate hydrogels, osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells was found to be dependent on the rate of stress relaxation of the material. In particular, with faster stress-relaxation substratum, osteogenic differentiaton was enhanced via YAP-mediated signaling resulting from enhanced RGD clustering and actomyosin activity.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4489.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Flaim CJ, Chien S, Bhatia SN. An extracellular matrix microarray for probing cellular differentiation. Nat Meth. 2005;2(2):119–25.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Brafman DA, Phung C, Kumar N, Willert K. Regulation of endodermal differentiation of human embryonic stem cells through integrin-ECM interactions. Cell Death Differ. 2013;20(3):369–81.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2012.138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hou L, Kim JJ, Wanjare M, Patlolla B, Coller J, Natu V, et al. Combinatorial extracellular matrix microenvironments for probing endothelial differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6551.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06986-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tsai Y, Cutts J, Kimura A, Varun D, Brafman DA. A chemically defined substrate for the expansion and neuronal differentiation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived neural progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res. 2015;15(1):75–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2015.05.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    •• Nguyen EH, Daly WT, Le NNT, Farnoodian M, Belair DG, Schwartz MP, et al. Versatile synthetic alternatives to Matrigel for vascular toxicity screening and stem cell expansion. 2017;1:0096. An array of synthetic hydrogel formulations, ranging in stiffness, degradability, and RGD composition, were used in tandem with varied media conditions to probe optimal chemically defined conditions that support human pluripotent stem cell culture and expansion.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rosales AM, Anseth KS. The design of reversible hydrogels to capture extracellular matrix dynamics. 2016;1:15012.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Das RK, Gocheva V, Hammink R, Zouani OF, Rowan AE. Stress-stiffening-mediated stem-cell commitment switch in soft responsive hydrogels. Nat Mater. 2016;15(3):318–25.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Physical Sciences-Oncology Center and the Institute for NanoBioTechnologyJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations