Current Stem Cell Reports

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 156–163 | Cite as

The Axolotl Limb Regeneration Model as a Discovery Tool for Engineering the Stem Cell Niche

  • Negar Seyedhassantehrani
  • Takayoshi Otsuka
  • Shambhavi Singh
  • David M. GardinerEmail author
In Vitro and In Vivo Models in Stem Cell Biology (E Scott, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on In Vitro and In Vivo Models in Stem Cell Biology


Purpose of Review

Recent advances in genomics and gene editing have expanded the range of model organisms to include those with interesting biological capabilities such as regeneration. Among these are the classic models of regeneration biology, the salamander. Although stimulating endogenous regeneration in humans likely is many years away, with advances in stem cell biology and biomedical engineering (e.g., bio-inspired materials), it is evident that there is great potential to enhance regenerative outcomes by approaching the problem from an engineering perspective. The question at this point is what do we need to engineer?

Recent Findings

The value of regeneration models is that they show us how regeneration works, which then can guide efforts to mimic these developmental processes therapeutically. Among these models, the accessory limb model (ALM) was developed in the axolotl as a gain-of-function assay for the sequential steps that are required for successful regeneration. To date, this model has identified a number of proregenerative signals, including growth factor signaling associated with nerves and signals associated with the extracellular matrix (ECM) that induce pattern formation.


Identification of these signals through the use of models in highly regenerative vertebrates (e.g., the axolotl) offers a wide range of possible modifications for engineering bioinspired, biomimetic materials to create a dynamic stem cell niche for regeneration and scar-free repair.


Axolotl Regeneration Regenerative engineering Hyaluronic acid Heparan sulfate ECM 



We thank Dr. Susan V. Bryant and Dr. Ken Muneoka for insights into the importance of designing gain-of-function experiments for regeneration, and Dr. Cato Laurencin for his insights into the convergence of regeneration biology and engineering leading to the emergence of regenerative engineering for inducing human regeneration.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Negar Seyedhassantehrani, Takayoshi Otsuka, Shambhavi Singh, and David M. Gardiner declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Laurencin CT, Khan Y. Regenerative engineering. CRC Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Trounson A, DeWitt ND. Pluripotent stem cells progressing to the clinic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17:194–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vishwakarma A, Karp JM. Biology and engineering of stem cell niches. Elsevier Science; 2017.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bryant SV, Endo T, Gardiner DM. Vertebrate limb regeneration and the origin of limb stem cells. Int J Dev Biol. 2002;46:887–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    • McCusker C, Gardiner DM, Bryant SV. The Axolotl limb blastema: cellular and molecular mechanisms driving blastema formation and limb regeneration in tetrapods. Regeneration (Oxf). 2015. This review provides the most current overview of the process of limb regeneration based largely on the axolotl regeneration model.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    French V, Bryant PJ, Bryant SV. Pattern regulation in epimorphic fields. Science. 1976;193:969–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bryant SV, French V, Bryant PJ. Distal regeneration and symmetry. Science. 1981;212:993–1002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Putta S, Smith JJ, Walker JA, Rondet M, Weisrock DW, Monaghan J, et al. From biomedicine to natural history research: EST resources for ambystomatid salamanders. BMC Genomics. 2004;5:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith JJ, Putta S, Walker JA, Kump DK, Samuels AK, Monaghan JR, et al. Sal-Site: integrating new and existing ambystomatid salamander research and informational resources. BMC Genomics. 2005;6:181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Voss SR, Epperlein HH, Tanaka EM. Ambystoma mexicanum, the axolotl: a versatile amphibian model for regeneration, development, and evolution studies. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2009; 2009:pdb.emo128–8.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Endo T, Bryant SV, Gardiner DM. A stepwise model system for limb regeneration. Dev Biol. 2004;270:135–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bryant SV, Gardiner DM. The relationship between growth and pattern formation. Regeneration. 2016;3:103–22. doi: 10.1002/reg2.55).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Voss SR, Palumbo A, Nagarajan R, Gardiner DM, Muneoka K, Stromberg AJ, et al. Gene expression during the first 28 days of axolotl limb regeneration I: experimental design and global analysis of gene expression. Regeneration (Oxf). 2015;2:120–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu W, Pao GM, Satoh A, Cummings G, Monaghan JR, Harkins TT, et al. Activation of germline-specific genes is required for limb regeneration in the Mexican axolotl. Dev Biol. 2012;370:42–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Monaghan JR, Walker JA, Page RB, Putta S, Beachy CK, Voss SR. Early gene expression during natural spinal cord regeneration in the salamander Ambystoma mexicanum. J Neurochem. 2007;101:27–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Monaghan JR, Athippozhy A, Seifert AW, Putta S, Stromberg AJ, Maden M, et al. Gene expression patterns specific to the regenerating limb of the Mexican axolotl. Biol Open. The Company of Biologists Ltd. 2012;1:937–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Monaghan JR, Epp LG, Putta S, Page RB, Walker JA, Beachy CK, et al. Microarray and cDNA sequence analysis of transcription during nerve-dependent limb regeneration. BMC Biol. 2009;7:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Satoh A, Gardiner DM, Bryant SV, Endo T. Nerve-induced ectopic limb blastemas in the Axolotl are equivalent to amputation-induced blastemas. Dev Biol. 2007;312:231–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maden M, Holder N. Axial characteristics of nerve induced supernumerary limbs in the axolotl. Roux's Arch Dev Biol. 1984;193:394–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bodemer CW. The development of nerve-induced supernumerary limbs in the adult newt, Triturus viridescens. J Morphol. 1958;102:555–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Muller TL, Ngo-Muller V, Reginelli A, Taylor G, Anderson R, Muneoka K. Regeneration in higher vertebrates: limb buds and digit tips. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1999;10:405–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wallace H. Vertebrate Limb Regeneration. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1981.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tassava RA, Olsen CL. Higher vertebrates do not regenerate digits and legs because the wound epidermis is not functional. A hypothesis. Differentiation. 1982;22:151–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    • Makanae A, Mitogawa K, Satoh A. Co-operative Bmp- and Fgf-signaling inputs convert skin wound healing to limb formation in urodele amphibians. Dev Biol. 2014;396:57–66. This paper demonstrates that a cocktail of human growth factors can substitute functionally for signaling from a nerve to induce blastema formation and maintain subsequent steps involved in limb regeneration.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Makanae A, Mitogawa K, Satoh A. Cooperative inputs of Bmp and Fgf signaling induce tail regeneration in urodele amphibians. Dev Biol. 2016;410:45–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Makanae A, Hirata A, Honjo Y, Mitogawa K, Satoh A. Nerve independent limb induction in axolotls. Dev Biol. 2013;381:213–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    •• Phan AQ, Lee J, Oei M, Flath C, Hwe C, Mariano R, et al. Heparan sulfates mediate positional information by position-specific growth factor regulation during axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum) limb regeneration. Regeneration (Oxf). 2015;2:182–201. This paper demonstrates that bioactive ECM from both axolotl and mouse limb skin can stimulate formation of ectopic limb structures in the axolotl Accessory Limb Model. Characterization of this activity leads to the conclusion that the signaling properties of the ECM are encoded by spatial- and temporal-specific modifications in the patterns of sulfation of glycosaminoglycans.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gilbert SF. Developmental biology. 10th ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc; 2013.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yayon A, Klagsbrun M, Esko JD, Leder P, Ornitz DM. Cell surface, heparin-like molecules are required for binding of basic fibroblast growth factor to its high affinity receptor. Cell. 1991;64:841–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sarrazin S, Lamanna WC, Esko JD. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. Cold Spring Harbor Lab. 2011;3:a004952.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Radice M, Brun P, Cortivo R, Scapinelli R, Battaliard C, Abatangelo G. Hyaluronan-based biopolymers as delivery vehicles for bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitors. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;50:101–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Baier Leach J, Bivens KA, Patrick CW, Schmidt CE. Photocrosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels: natural, biodegradable tissue engineering scaffolds. Biotechnol Bioeng. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company. 2003;82:578–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kim J, Kim IS, Cho TH, Lee KB, Hwang SJ, Tae G, et al. Bone regeneration using hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel with bone morphogenic protein-2 and human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1830–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Seidlits SK, Khaing ZZ, Petersen RR, Nickels JD, Vanscoy JE, Shear JB, et al. The effects of hyaluronic acid hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties on neural progenitor cell differentiation. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3930–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ballios BG, Cooke MJ, van der Kooy D, Shoichet MS. A hydrogel-based stem cell delivery system to treat retinal degenerative diseases. Biomaterials. 2010;31:2555–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ha C-W, Park Y-B, Chung J-Y, Park Y-G. Cartilage repair using composites of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells and hyaluronic acid hydrogel in a minipig model. Stem Cells Transl Med. AlphaMed Press. 2015;4:1044–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Toole BP, Gross J. The extracellular matrix of the regenerating newt limb: synthesis and removal of hyaluronate prior to differentiation. Dev Biol. 1971;25:57–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Smith GN, Toole BP, Gross J. Hyaluronidase activity and glycosaminoglycan synthesis in the amputated newt limb: comparison of denervated, nonregenerating limbs with regenerates. Dev Biol. 1975;43:221–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mescher AL, Munaim SI. Changes in the extracellular matrix and glycosaminoglycan synthesis during the initiation of regeneration in adult newt forelimbs. Anat Rec. Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company. 1986;214:424–31–394–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Calve S, Odelberg SJ, Simon H-G. A transitional extracellular matrix instructs cell behavior during muscle regeneration. Dev Biol. 2010;344:259–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Langer R, Vacanti JP. Tissue engineering. Science. 1993;260:920–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Seyedhassantehrani N, Li Y, Yao L. Dynamic behaviors of astrocytes in chemically modified fibrin and collagen hydrogels. Integr Biol (Camb). The Royal Society of Chemistry. 2016;8:624–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gardiner DM, Muneoka K, Bryant SV. The migration of dermal cells during blastema formation in axolotls. Dev Biol. 1986;118:488–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Satoh A, Graham GM, Bryant SV, Gardiner DM. Neurotrophic regulation of epidermal dedifferentiation during wound healing and limb regeneration in the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum). Dev Biol. 2008;319:321–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Satoh A, Mitogawa K, Makanae A. Regeneration inducers in limb regeneration. Develop Growth Differ. 2015;57:421–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Negar Seyedhassantehrani
    • 1
  • Takayoshi Otsuka
    • 1
  • Shambhavi Singh
    • 1
  • David M. Gardiner
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Developmental and Cell BiologyUniversity of California IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations