Threats to Courtship and the Physiological Response: Testosterone Mediates the Association Between Relational uncertainty and Disclosure for Dating Partner Recipients of Relational Transgressions
- 36 Downloads
Scholars have increasingly recognized that an important avenue for future research is to examine why the relational characteristic of uncertainty incites reactivity for romantic partners during times of transition. Grounded within relational turbulence theory, this study examined whether testosterone, a social hormone that inspires approach behaviors that protect against status and dominance threats, can help account for the negative relationship between relational uncertainty and disclosure for dating partner recipients of severe relational transgressions.
Baseline testosterone levels were measured through a dried blood spot method for dating partners who had experienced severe relational transgressions within 5-months of their study participation.
The results revealed that each type of relational uncertainty was negatively associated with testosterone, that testosterone was positively associated with reports of disclosure, and that testosterone mediated the relationship between each type of relational uncertainty and disclosure.
The findings demonstrate that experiences with relational uncertainty following a severe relational transgression may negatively impact levels of disclosure for transgression recipients and that testosterone levels may be an explanatory mechanism for this association.
KeywordsRelational uncertainty Disclosure Testosterone Physiology Relational transgressions
Partial support for this research came from a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development research infrastructure grant, P2C HD042828, to the Center for Studies in Demography & Ecology at the University of Washington.
- Afifi, W. A., Falato, W. L., & Weiner, J. L. (2001). Identity concerns following a severe relational transgression: The role of discovery method for the relational outcomes of infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501182007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- Arnocky, S., Graham, A., Carré, J. M., & Ortiz, T. L. (2018). Intrasexual competition mediates the relationship between men’s testosterone and mate retention behavior. Physiology & Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.01.007.
- Avtgis, T. A., West, D. V., & Anderson, T. L. (1998). Relationship stages: An inductive analysis identifying cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions of Knapp's relational stages model. Communication Research Reports, 15, 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824099809362124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bhasin, S., Cunningham, G. R., Hayes, F. J., Matsumoto, A. M., Snyder, P. J., Swerdloff, R. S., & Montori, V. M. (2010). Testosterone therapy in men with androgen deficiency syndromes: An endocrine society clinical practice guideline. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 95, 2536–2559. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-2847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brambilla, D. J., Matsumoto, A. M., Araujo, A. B., & McKinlay, J. B. (2009). The effect of diurnal variation on clinical measurement of serum testosterone and other sex hormone levels in men. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 94, 907–913. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brashers, D. E. (2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communication, 51, 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brindle, E., O’Connor, K. A., & Garrett, D. (2014). Applications of dried blood spots in general human health studies. In W. Li & M. S. Lee (Eds.), Dried Blood Spots: Applications and Techniques (pp. 114–129). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Crowley, J. P., Denes, A., Makos, S., & Whitt, J. (2018). Expressive writing to cope with relational transgressions: tests of a dual-process model of expressive writing and its effects on forgiveness communication and testosterone. Health Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1431017.
- Derlega, V. J., & Grzelak, J. (1979). Appropriateness of self-disclosure. In G. J. Chelune (Ed.), Self-disclosure: Origins, patterns, and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships (pp. 151–176). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Derlega, V. L., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Dreher, J. C., Dunne, S., Pazderska, A., Frodl, T., Nolan, J. J., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2016). Testosterone causes both prosocial and antisocial status-enhancing behaviors in human males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 11633–11638. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608085113\.Google Scholar
- Goetz, S. M. M., Tang, L., Thomason, M. E., Diamond, M. P., Hariri, A. R., & Carre, J. M. (2014). Testosterone rapidly increases neural reactivity to threat in healthy men: A novel two-step pharmacological challenge paradigm. Biological Psychiatry, 76, 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.01.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kenny, D. A. (2014). Learn how you can do a mediation analysis and output a text description of your results: Go to mediational analysis using DataToText using SPSS or R. Retrieved October, 20, 2016.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2008). Becoming a behavioral science researcher: A guide to producing research that matters. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Knapp, M. L. (1978). Social intercourse: From greeting to goodbye. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Knobloch, L. K., & McAninch, K. G. (2014). Uncertainty management. In P. Cobley & P. Schultz (Series Eds.), Handbook of communication sciences: Interpersonal communication (pp. 297–319). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Lombardo, M. V., Ashwin, E., Auyeung, B., Chakrabarti, B., Taylor, K., Hackett, G., Bullmore, E. T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). Fetal testosterone influences sexually dimorphic gray matter in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 674–680. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4389-11.2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Metts, S. (1994). Relational transgressions. In W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 217–240). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Muir, C. E., Spironello-Vella, N., Pisani, N., & deCatanzaro, D. (2001). Enzyme immunoassay of 17 beta-estradiol, estrone conjugates, and testosterone in urinary and fecal samples from male and female mice. Hormone and Metabolic Research, 33, 653–658. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-18692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Purifoy, F. E., Koopmans, L. H., & Mayes, D. M. (1981). Age differences in serum androgen levels in normal adult males. Human Biology, 499–511. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41463334
- Solomon, D. H. (2016). Relational turbulence model. In C. R. Berger, M. E. Roloff, S. R. Wilson, J. P. Dillard, J. Caughlin, & D. H. Solomon (Eds.), International encyclopedia of interpersonal communication. Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken.Google Scholar
- Solomon, D. H., & Knobloch, L. K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504047838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Solomon, D. H., & Theiss, J. A. (2011). Relational turbulence: What doesn’t kill us makes us stronger. In W. Cupach & B. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships (pp. 197–216). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Soper, D. S. (2018). Post-hoc statistical power calculator for multiple regression [software]. Available from http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc.
- van Anders, S. M., Goldey, K. L., & Kuo, P. X. (2011). The steroid/peptide theory of social bonds: integrating testosterone and peptide responses for classifying social behavioral contexts. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36, 1265–1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar