Advertisement

Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 188–206 | Cite as

Filipino Women’s Preferences for Male Voice Pitch: Intra-Individual, Life History, and Hormonal Predictors

  • Talia N. Shirazi
  • David A. Puts
  • Michelle J. Escasa-Dorne
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Prior work suggests that women’s preferences for sexually dimorphic traits, such as preferences for masculine facial and vocal characteristics, may be modulated by a multitude of factors related to reproductive potential including breastfeeding status. In the present study, we investigated women’s preferences for a highly sexually dimorphic vocal characteristic, voice pitch, across a sample of nulliparous (n = 65) and breastfeeding (n = 63) women in Manila, Philippines. We examined whether preferences for pitch were related to breastfeeding status, age, relationship status, self-rated attractiveness, or salivary steroid hormone concentrations. Both nulliparous and breastfeeding women displayed preferences for feminized, rather than masculinized, pitch. The strength of this preference was negatively associated with age and negatively associated with self-rated attractiveness, but was unrelated to breastfeeding and relationship status. Estradiol and progesterone positively interacted in predicting pitch preferences, such that estradiol tended to negatively predict preferences for masculinized pitch when progesterone was low, and to positively predict preferences when progesterone was high. Our findings reinforce the notion that reproductive potential predicts preferences for sexually dimorphic traits, and emphasize importance of assessing measures of reproductive potential when evaluating mate preferences.

Keywords

Attractiveness Breastfeeding Estradiol Testosterone Progesterone Voice pitch Voice 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research fellowship awarded to T. N. Shirazi, and by a Wenner-Gren Dissertation Fieldwork Grant (#8297) awarded to M. J. Escasa-Dorne.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

40750_2018_87_MOESM1_ESM.docx (164 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 164 kb)
40750_2018_87_MOESM2_ESM.wav (383 kb)
ESM 2 (WAV 382 kb)
40750_2018_87_MOESM3_ESM.wav (383 kb)
ESM 3 (WAV 382 kb)

References

  1. Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2009). Variation in testosterone levels and male reproductive effort: Insight from a polygynous human population. Hormones and Behavior, 56(5), 491–497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.07.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. van Anders, S. M., Hamilton, L. D., & Watson, N. (2007). Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in north American men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51(3), 454–459.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apicella, C. L., & Feinberg, D. R. (2009). Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter – gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276(1659), 1077–1082.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(3), 319–345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avery, M. D., Duckett, L., & Roth Frantzich, C. (2000). The experience of sexuality during breastfeeding among primiparous women. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 45(3), 227–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1526-9523(00)00020-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benjamin, B. J. (1981). Frequency variability in the aged voice. Journal of Gerontology, 36(6), 722–726.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/36.6.722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blake, K. R., Dixson, B. J. W., O’Dean, S. M., & Denson, T. F. (2016). Standardized protocols for characterizing women’s fertility: A data-driven approach. Hormones and Behavior, 81, 74–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bobst, C., Sauter, S., Foppa, A., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2014). Early follicular testosterone level predicts preference for masculinity in male faces - but not for women taking hormonal contraception. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 41, 142–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.12.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borras-Guevara, M. L., Batres, C., & Perrett, D. I. (2017). Aggressor or protector? Experiences and perceptions of violence predict preferences for masculinity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(4), 481–489.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks, R., Scott, I. M., Maklakov, A. A., Kasumovic, M. M., Clark, A. P., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2011). National income inequality predicts women’s preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278(1707), 810–812.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butte, N. F., & King, J. C. (2005). Energy requirements during pregnancy and lactation. Public Health Nutrition, 8(7A), 1010–1027.Google Scholar
  12. Cobey, K. D., Little, A. C., & Roberts, S. C. (2015). Hormonal effects on women’s facial masculinity preferences: The influence of pregnancy, post-partum, and hormonal contraceptive use. Biological Psychology, 104, 35–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge Academic.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, S. A. (2000). Men’s voices and women’s choices. Animal Behaviour, 60(6), 773–780.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dabbs, J. M., & Mallinger, A. (1999). High testosterone levels predict low voice pitch among men. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 801–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L. M., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277(1692), 2405–2410.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.2184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edelstein, R. S., Chopik, W. J., & Kean, E. L. (2011). Sociosexuality moderates the association between testosterone and relationship status in men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 60(3), 248–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellison, P. T. (2003). On fertile ground: A natural history of human reproduction. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Escasa-Dorne, M. J., Manlove, H., & Gray, P. B. (2016). Women express a preference for feminized male faces after giving birth. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-016-0048-6.
  20. Evans, M. R., Goldsmith, A. R., & Norris, S. R. A. (2000). The effects of testosterone on antibody production and plumage coloration in male hose sparrows (Passer domesticus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 47(3), 156–163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evans, S., Neave, N., & Wakelin, D. (2006). Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: An evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice. Biological Psychology, 72(2), 160–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fairbanks, G. (1960). Voice and articulation Drillbook (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  23. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2005). Manipulations of fundamental and formant frequencies influence the attractiveness of human male voices. Animal Behaviour, 69(3), 561–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.06.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Law Smith, M. J., Moore, F. R., DeBruine, L. M., Cornwell, R. E., … Perrett, D. I. (2006). Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior, 49(2), 215–222.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.07.004.
  25. Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., Debruine, L. M., O’Connor, J. J. M., Tigue, C. C., & Borak, D. J. (2011). Integrating fundamental and formant frequencies in women’s preferences for men’s voices. Behavioral Ecology, 22(6), 1320–1325.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Feinberg, D. R., Debruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., O’Connor, J. J. M., & Tigue, C. C. (2012). Women’s self-perceived health and attractiveness predict their male vocal masculinity preferences in different directions across short- and long-term relationship contexts. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66(3), 413–418.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1287-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fitch, W. T., & Giedd, J. (1999). Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: A study using magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(3), 1511–1522.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.427148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bring males, and the immunocompetence handicap. The American Naturalist, 139(3), 603–622.  https://doi.org/10.1086/285346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Adaptations to ovulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6), 312–316.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00388.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., Welling, L. L. M., Gildersleeve, K., Pillsworth, E. G., Burriss, R. P., … Puts, D. A. (2016). How valid are assessments of conception probability in ovulatory cycle research? Evaluations, recommendations, and theoretical implications. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(2), 85–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.09.001.
  31. Gettler, L. T., McDade, T. W., Agustin, S. S., Feranil, A. B., & Kuzawa, C. W. (2015). Longitudinal perspectives on fathers’ residence status, time allocation, and testosterone in the Philippines. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 1(2), 124–149.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-014-0018-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gildersleeve, K. A., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1205–1259.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gonzales, J. E., & Ferrer, E. (2016). Efficacy of methods for ovulation estimation and their effect on the statistical detection of ovulation-linked behavioral fluctuations. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 1125–1144.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0638-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Han, C., Wang, H., Fasolt, V., Hahn, A. C., Holzleitner, I. J., DeBruine, L. M., … Jones, B. C. (2017). No evidence for correlations between handgrip strength and sexually dimorphic acoustic properties of voices. bioRxiv.  https://doi.org/10.1101/227165.
  35. Harris, C. R. (2011). Menstrual cycle and facial preferences reconsidered. Sex Roles, 64(9), 669–681.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9772-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harris, C. R. (2013). Shifts in masculinity preferences across the menstrual cycle: Still not there. Sex Roles, 69(9), 507–515.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0229-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hendrick, V., Altshuler, L. L., & Suri, R. (1998). Hormonal changes in the postpartum and implications for postpartum depression. Psychosomatics, 39(2), 93–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(98)71355-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hines, D. A. (2007). Predictors of sexual coercion against women and men: A multilevel, multinational study of university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(3), 403–422.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9141-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Puts, D. A. (2010). Different vocal parameters predict perceptions of dominance and attractiveness. Human Nature, 21(4), 406–427.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-010-9101-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hodges-Simeon, C. R., Gurven, M., Puts, D. A., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2014). Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies are honest signals of threat potential in peripubertal males. Behavioral Ecology, 25(4), 984–988.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hodges-Simeon, C., Gurven, M., & Gaulin, S. (2015). The low male voice is a costly signal of phenotypic quality among Bolivian adolescents. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(4), 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jasienska, G. (2012). The fragile wisdom: An evolutionary view on Women’s biology and health. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674067196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Boothroyd, L. G., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., Smith, M. J. L., … Perrett, D. I. (2006). Commitment to relationships and preferences for femininity and apparent health in faces are strongest on days of the menstrual cycle when progesterone level is high. Hormones and Behavior, 48(3).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.03.010.
  44. Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R., Debruine, L. M., & Little, A. C. (2008). Integrating cues of social interest and voice pitch in men’s preferences for women’s voices. Biology Letters, 4(2), 192–194.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., Han, C., … DeBruine, L. M. (2017). No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status. bioRxiv.  https://doi.org/10.1101/136549.
  46. Jones, B. C., Hahn, A., Fisher, C., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., & DeBruine, L. M. (2018). General sexual desire, but not desire for uncommitted sexual relationships, tracks changes in women’s hormonal status. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 88, 153–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.12.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Li, Y., Bailey, D. H., Winegard, B., Puts, D. A., Welling, L. L. M., & Geary, D. C. (2014). Women’s preference for masculine traits is disrupted by images of male-on-female aggression. PLoS One, 9(10), e110497.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Little, A. C., & Mannion, H. (2006). Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women. Animal Behaviour, 72(5), 981–987.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 268(1462), 39–44.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marcinkowska, U. M., Ellison, P. T., Galbarczyk, A., Milkowska, K., Pawlowski, B., Thune, I., & Jasienska, G. (2016). Lack of support for relation between woman’s masculinity preference, estradiol level and mating context. Hormones and Behavior, 78, 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marcinkowska, U. M., Galbarczyk, A., & Jasienska, G. (2017a). La donna è mobile? Lack of cyclical shifts in facial symmetry, and facial and body masculinity preferences—A hormone based study. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 88, 47–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Marcinkowska, U. M., Jasienska, G., & Prokop, P. (2017b). A comparison of masculinity facial preference among naturally cycling, pregnant, lactating, and post-menopausal women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1093-3.
  54. Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(1998), 353–397.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X98001228.Google Scholar
  55. McNeilly, A. S. (2001). Neuroendocrine changes and fertility in breast-feeding women. Progress in Brain Research, 133, 207–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(01)33015-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Muller, M. N., Marlowe, F. W., Bugumba, R., & Ellison, P. T. (2009). Testosterone and paternal care in East African foragers and pastoralists. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1655), 347–354.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Philippines National Statistics Office (2009). National Demographic and Health Survey – Preliminary Results for 2008. Retrieved from https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR224/FR224.pdf.
  58. Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(4), 229–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.04.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., Tiddeman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo Sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117(3), 264–271.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Petrakis, N. L., Wrensch, M. R., Ernster, V. L., Midce, R., Murai, J., Simberg, N., & Sirreri, P. K. (1987). Influence of pregnancy and lactation on serum breast and fluid estrogen levels: Implications for breast cancer risk. International Journal of Cancer, 40(5), 587–591.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910400502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pisanski, K., & Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Cross-cultural variation in mate preferences for averageness, symmetry, body size, and masculinity. Cross-Cultural Research, 47(2), 162–197.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397112471806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pisanski, K., & Rendall, D. (2011). The prioritization of voice fundamental frequency or formants in listeners’ assessments of speaker size, masculinity, and attractiveness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(4), 2201–2212.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3552866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pisanski, K., Fraccaro, P. J., Tigue, C. C., O’Connor, J. J. M., Röder, S., Andrews, P. W., … Feinberg, D. R. (2014a). Vocal indicators of body size in men and women: A meta-analysis. Animal Behaviour, 95, 89–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.06.011.
  64. Pisanski, K., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., DeBruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., & Jones, B. C. (2014b). Changes in salivary estradiol predict changes in women’s preferences for vocal masculinity. Hormones and Behavior, 66(3), 493–497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.07.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(4), 717–731.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Puts, D. A. (2005). Mating context and menstrual phase affect women’s preferences for male voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 388–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Puts, D. A. (2006). Cyclic variation in women’s preferences for masculine traits: Potential hormonal causes. Human Nature, 17(1), 114–127.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-006-1023-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Puts, D. A., Gaulin, S. J. C., & Verdolini, K. (2006). Dominance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in human voice pitch. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 283–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Puts, D. A., Hodges, C. R., Cárdenas, R. A., & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Men’s voices as dominance signals: Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(5), 340–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Puts, D. A., Apicella, C. L., & Cardenas, R. A. (2012a). Masculine voices signal men’s threat potential in forager and industrial societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1728), 601–609.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Puts, D. A., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2012b). Sexual selection on human faces and voices. Journal of Sex Research, 49(2–3), 227–243.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.658924.
  73. Puts, D. A., Pope, L. E., Hill, A. K., Cárdenas, R. A., Welling, L. L. M., Wheatley, J. R., & Marc Breedlove, S. (2015). Fulfilling desire: Evidence for negative feedback between men’s testosterone, sociosexual psychology, and sexual partner number. Hormones and Behavior, 70, 14–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Puts, D. A., Hill, A. K., Bailey, D. H., Walker, R. S., Rendall, D., Wheatley, J. R., et al. (2016). Sexual selection on male vocal fundamental frequency in humans and other anthropoids. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283, 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rantala, M. J., Moore, F. R., Skrinda, I., Krama, T., Kivleniece, I., Kecko, S., & Krams, I. (2012). Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in humans. Nature Communications, 3(1), 694.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2008). Women’s estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men’s testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 53(1), 14–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2013). Hormonal predictors of sexual motivation in natural menstrual cycles. Hormones and Behavior, 63(4), 636–645.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.02.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2016). Within-cycle fluctuations in progesterone negatively predict changes in both in-pair and extra-pair desire among partnered women. Hormones and Behavior, 81, 45–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2017). Ovarian hormone fluctuations predict within-cycle shifts in women’s food intake. Hormones and Behavior, 90, 8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.01.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roney, J. R., Simmons, Z. L., & Gray, P. B. (2011). Changes in estradiol predict within-women shifts in attraction to facial cues of men’s testosterone. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36(5), 742–749.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.10.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rosen, R. C., Brown, C., Heiman, J. R., Leiblum, S. R., Meston, C. M., Shabsign, R., et al. (2000). The female sexual function index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26(2), 191–208.  https://doi.org/10.1080/009262300278597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sanday, P. R. (1981). The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Social Issues, 37(4), 5–27.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1981.tb01068.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Saxton, T. K., Mackey, L. L., McCarty, K., & Neave, N. (2016). A lover or a fighter? Opposing sexual selection pressures on men’s vocal pitch and facial hair. Behavioral Ecology, 27(2), 512–519.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Scott, I. M., Clark, A. P., Josephson, S. C., Boyette, A. H., Cuthill, I. C., Fried, R. L., Gibson, M. A., Hewlett, B. S., Jamieson, M., Jankowiak, W., Honey, P. L., Huang, Z., Liebert, M. A., Purzycki, B. G., Shaver, J. H., Snodgrass, J. J., Sosis, R., Sugiyama, L. S., Swami, V., Yu, D. W., Zhao, Y., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2014). Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(40), 14388–14393.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409643111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Smith, M. S., True, C., & Grove, K. L. (2010). The neuroendocrine basis of lactation-induced suppression of GnRH: Role of kisspeptin and leptin. Brain Research, 1364, 139–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3(12), 452–460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 131–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Titze, I. R. (1989). Physiologic and acoustic differences between male and female voices. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(4), 1699–1707.  https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tolor, A., & DiGrazia, P. V. (1976). Sexual attitudes and behavior patterns following pregnancy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 5(6), 539–551.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. UNICEF (2013). At a Glance: Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/philippines_statistics.html.
  91. Vitzthum, V. J. (2008). Evolutionary models of women’s reproductive functioning. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37(1), 53–73.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vukovic, J., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Welling, L. L. M., Little, A. C., & Smith, F. G. (2008). Self-rated attractiveness predicts individual differences in women’s preferences for masculine men’s voices. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 451–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Welling, L. L. M., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Conway, C. A., Law Smith, M. J., Little, A. C., … Al-Dujaili, E. A. S. (2007). Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces. Hormones and Behavior, 52(2), 156–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.010.
  94. Wheatley, J. R., Apicella, C. L., Burriss, R. P., Cárdenas, R. A., Bailey, D. H., Welling, L. L. M., & Puts, D. A. (2014). Women’s faces and voices are cues to reproductive potential in industrial and forager societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(4), 264–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wilcox, R. R. (2001). Fundamentals of modern statistical methods: Substantially improving power and accuracy. New York: Springer-Verlag.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3522-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Natural Regulation of Fertility. (1998). The World Health Organization multinational study of breast-feeding and lactational amenorrhea. II. Factors associated with the length of amenorrhea. Fertility and Sterility, 70(3), 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Talia N. Shirazi
    • 1
  • David A. Puts
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Michelle J. Escasa-Dorne
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyPennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA
  2. 2.Center for Brain, Behavior, and CognitionPennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA
  3. 3.Center for Human Evolution and DiversityPennsylvania State UniversityState CollegeUSA
  4. 4.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of ColoradoColorado SpringsUSA

Personalised recommendations