Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early Mobilization in PICU: Are We on Time?

  • Pediatrics in South America (L Landry and WB de Carvalho, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Elements based on specific literature to assist in the elaboration of an early mobilization (EM) protocol for severely ill children in a pediatric intensive care unit or in an inpatient care unit.

Recent findings

Recent findings have shown that immobility during critical periods of the disease may cause physical, neuromusculoskeletal, metabolic, cognitive, and psychological sequelae that may extend throughout life. Prolonged bed rest is associated with thromboembolic events, decreased protein synthesis and muscle mass, and increased risk of death. Children surviving from serious illnesses have an increased risk of delay in overall recovery, resulting in poor quality of life and increased costs of post-discharge health services in the short, medium, and long term.

Summary

Further research is needed to delineate protocols for specific populations in PICU as well as to find associations between interventions in PICU with EM, and with outcome times spent in PICU and hospital, need for care after hospital discharge, death and quality of life, among others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Choong K, Foster G, Fraser DD, et al. Acute rehabilitation practices in critically ill children: a multicenter study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15(6):270–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goddard SL, Cuthbertson BH. Rehabilitation and critical illness. Anesth and Intens Care Med. 2012;13:214–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams S, Horrocks I, Ouvrier R, et al. Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in pediatric intensive care: a review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007;8:18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Knoester H, Bronner MB, Bos AP. Surviving pediatric intensive care: physical outcome after 3 months. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1076–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. • Ong C, Lee JH, Leow MK, et al. Functional outcomes and physical impairments in pediatric critical care survivors: a scoping review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17(5):247–59 This important work approaches of functional outcome assessment tools, prevalence, and risk factors for physical disabilities in pediatric intensive care survivors.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Newacheck PW, Kim SE. A national profile of health care utilization and expenditures for children with special health care needs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(1):10–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moura EC, Moreira MCN, Menezes LA, et al. Complex chronic conditions in children and adolescents: hospitalizations in Brazil, 2013. Cien Saude Colet. 2017;22(8):2727–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adler J, Malone D. EM in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2012;23(1):5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Needham DM, Korupolu R. Rehabilitation quality improvement in an intensive care unit setting: implementation of a quality improvement model. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(4):271–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cameron S, Ball I, Cediminas C, et al. EM in the critical care unit: a review of adult and pediatric literature. J Crit Care. 2015;30:664–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. •• Joyce CL, Taipe C, Sobin B, et al. Provider beliefs regarding EM in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018;38:15–9 This study demonstrates similar concerns between adult and pediatric programs, with the addition of significant concern surrounding EM in very young children.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wieczorek B, Burke C, Al-Harbi A, et al. EM in the pediatric intensive care unit: a systematic review. 2015;129–170.

  13. Choong K, Koo KKY, Clark H, et al. EM in critically ill children: a survey of Canadian practice. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1745–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. •• Wieczorek B, Ascenzi J, Kim Y, et al. PICU Up! Impact of a quality improvement intervention to promote EM in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17(12):e559–66 This important work helps to create a bundled intervention to create a healing environment in the PICU with structured activity that may have benefits for short- and long-term outcomes of critically ill children.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. •• Colwell BRL, Williams CN, Kelly SP, et al. Mobilization therapy in the pediatric intensive care unit: a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative. Am J Crit Care. 2018;27:194–203 This study shows multiprofessional, goal-directed mobilization protocol achieved goal mobilization in more than 50% of patients in this pediatric intensive care unit.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. •• Zheng K, Sarti A, Boles S, et al. Impressions of early mobilization of critically ill children-clinician, patient, and family perspectives. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19(7):e350–7 This article evaluates the clinicians, patients, and families who were highly supportive of mobilization in critically ill children; however, concerns were identified with respect to how and when to execute this practice.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. •• Choong K, Canci F, Clark H, et al. Practice recommendations for EM in critically ill children. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2018;07:014–26 This practice recommendation helps to understand treatment priorities and rehabilitation strategies to improve functional recovery in critically ill children.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hollander SA, Hollander AJ, Rizzuto S, et al. An inpatient rehabilitation program utilizing standardized care pathways after paracorporeal ventricular assist device placement in children. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33(6):587–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Turner DA, Cheifetz IM, Rehder KJ, et al. Active rehabilitation and physical therapy during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation while awaiting lung transplantation: a practical approach. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:2593–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. • Parchem K, Peck A, Tales K. A multidisciplinary approach to equipment use in pediatric patient mobilization. Crit Care Nurs. 2018;41:330–9 This manuscript describes the specific equipment utilized during the different phases of mobility in pediatrics.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Walker TC, Kudchadkar SR. EM in the pediatric intensive care unit. Transl Pediatr. 2018;7(4):308–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Speyer E, Vuillemin A, Herbinet A, et al. Effect of adapted physical activity on health-related quality of life among hospitalized children and adolescents (the ACTIV’HOP randomized controlled trial): Design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010;31:165–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abdulsatar F, Walker RG, Timmons BW, et al. Wii-Hab in critically ill children: a pilot trial. J Ped Rehabil Med: Interdiscip Approach. 2013;6:193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Blumenstein MS. Early ambulation after acute deep vein thrombosis: is it safe? J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2007;24:309–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Choong K, Awladthani S, Khawaji A, et al. Early exercise in critically ill youth and children, a preliminary evaluation: the wEECYCLE Pilot Trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(11):e546–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cuello-Garcia CA, Mai SHC, Simpson R, et al. EM in critically ill children: a systematic review. J Pediatr. 2018;203:25–33.e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. •• Van Damme D, Flori H, Owens T. Development of medical criteria for mobilizing a pediatric patient in the PICU. Crit Care Nur Q. 2018;41(3):323–9 This study aims to define clinical criteria for the safe indication of early mobilization in pediatrics.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. •• Reid JC, Unger J, McCaskell D, et al. Physical rehabilitation interventions in the intensive care unit: a scoping review of 117studies. J Intensive Care. 2018;6:80 This important review identified important reporting deficiencies in ICU PR interventions, limiting clinical implementation and future trial development.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Simone S, Edwards S, Lardieri A, et al. Implementation of an ICU bundle: an interprofessional quality improvement project to enhance delirium management and monitor delirium prevalence in a single PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(6):531–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith HA, Gangopadhyay M, Goben CM, et al. The preschool confusion assessment method for the ICU: valid and reliable delirium monitoring for critically ill infants and children. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(3):592–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Silver G, Kearney J, Traube C, et al. Delirium screening anchored in child development: the Cornell Assessment for Pediatric Delirium. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13(4):1005–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Doiron KA, Hoffmann TC, Beller EM. Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) for critically ill adults in the intensive care unit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;3:CD010754.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. •• Ekim A. The post-intensive care syndrome in children. Compr Child Adolesc Nurs. 2018;25:1–7 This article approaches postintensive care syndrome (PICS) is defined as a new and deteriorating disorder in the cognitive, mental, and physical health status experienced by the survivor after intensive care unit discharge that might continue for months or even years.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Traube C, Silver G, Reeder RW, et al. Delirium in critically ill children: an international point prevalence study. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(4):584–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cíntia Johnston PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Pediatrics in South America

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnston, C., Krebs, V.L.J., de Carvalho, W.B. et al. Early Mobilization in PICU: Are We on Time?. Curr Treat Options Peds 5, 397–405 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-019-00172-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-019-00172-5

Keywords

Navigation