Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Reciprocity Induction on Partial-Altruistic and Unequal-Asymmetric Labor Exchange Interactions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment evaluated the effects of reciprocal behavior of a confederate on the behavior of a participant under concurrent individual and shared contingencies. The experimental situation consisted of solving a puzzle on two synchronized computer screens. Sixteen female and male university students were assigned to the same number of dyads, in which the other member was a confederate. They were divided into four groups of four dyads each. Groups 1 and 3 were exposed to an ascending percentage of reciprocal behavior by the confederate (0, 50, and 100%) whereas groups 2 and 4 were exposed to a descending percentage (100, 50, and 0%). All groups were exposed to two shared contingency situations: partial altruism, in which no points or tokens were provided, and unequal, and asymmetric labor exchange, in which different amounts of valuables were exchanged for earned points. Groups 1 and 2 were first exposed to the partial altruism situation whereas groups 3 and 4 were first exposed to the labor exchange situation. Results show that participants in all groups matched the reciprocal behavior of confederates, resulting in partial altruism during percentages larger than 0 in both conditions, with and without points and earnings. These results confirm previous findings suggesting that reciprocity is a function of the behavior of at least one of the members of the dyad. Results are also discussed in relation to the functional relevance for the occurrence of cultural and economic interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ávila, A. (2017). La reciprocidad humana en interacciones diádicas: Análisis conceptual y experimental (Doctoral thesis). Xalapa, México: Universidad Veracruzana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, J. L. (Ed.). (1972). Attachment and dependency. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirtz, J. L., & Kurtines, W. M. (Eds.). (1991). Intersections with attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experiment analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackenberg, T. D. (2009). Token reinforcement: A review and analysis. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91(2), 257–286. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2009.91-257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace & Work.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogunlade, J. O. (1977). Some effects of asymmetry of rewards on productivity in simulated industrial groups. Social Behavior and Personality, 5(1), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1977.5.1.73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulido, L., Rangel, N., & Ortiz, G. (2014). Efecto del tipo de contingencia en el establecimiento y cualidad de intercambios verbales: Su papel en la elección de alternativas compartidas. Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues, 6(2), 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulido, L., Ribes, E., López, I., & López, B. (2015a). Interacciones altruistas totales como función de la inducción de reciprocidad. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 41(1), 32–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulido, L., Ribes, E., López, I., & Reza, A. (2015b). Interacciones competitivas como función de la inducción de reciprocidad. Acta Comportamentalia, 23(4), 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangel, N., Pulido, L., Ávila, A., Ordoñez, S., & Ribes, E. (2015). Partial altruistic interactions as a function of reciprocity induction and written declarations. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 16(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2015.1065639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribes, E., Rangel, N., Casillas, J., Álvarez, A., Gudiño, M., Zaragoza, A., & Hernández, H. (2003). Inequidad y asimetría de las consecuencias en la elección entre contingencias individuales y sociales. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 29(2), 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribes, E., Rangel, N., Magaña, C., López, A., & Zaragoza, A. (2005). Efecto del intercambio diferencial equitativo e inequitativo en la elección de contingencias sociales de altruismo parcial. Acta Comportamentalia, 13(2), 159–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribes, E., Rangel, N., Zaragoza, A., Magaña, C., Hernández, H., Ramírez, E., & Valdez, U. (2006). Effects of differential and shared consequences on choice between individual and social contingencies. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 7, 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribes, E., Rangel, N., Ramírez, E., Valdez, U., Romero, C., & Jiménez, C. (2008). Verbal and non-verbal induction of reciprocity in a partial-altruism social interaction. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 9(1), 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribes, E., Rangel, N., Pulido, L., Valdez, U., Ramírez, E., Jiménez, C., & Hernández, M. (2010). Reciprocity of responding as a determinant of partial-altruistic behavior in humans. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribes, E., Pulido, L., Rangel, N., & Sánchez-Gatell, E. (2016). Sociopsicología. Instituciones y relaciones interindividuales. Madrid, Spain: La Catarata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1992). Before writing. (2 vols). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, J. B., & Sinha, S. R. (1975). In response to the pressure to reduce disparity. Indian Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegler, M. D. (2016). Contemporary behavior therapy (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundel, M., & Sundel, S. S. (2005). Behavior change in the human services (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R. C. (1980). Behavioral economics, token economies and applied behavior analysis. In J. E. R. Staddon (Ed.), Limits to action (pp. 269–297). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, E., & Bicchieri, C. (2010). When equality trumps reciprocity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lizbeth Pulido Avalos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Lizbeth Pulido, Emilio Ribes, Iván López, Gloria Marinero, and Iván Hernández declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Avalos, L.P., Iñesta, E.R., Ortiz, I.L. et al. Effects of Reciprocity Induction on Partial-Altruistic and Unequal-Asymmetric Labor Exchange Interactions. Psychol Rec 69, 25–37 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0319-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0319-7

Keywords

Navigation