Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conditioned Reinforcement: the Effectiveness of Stimulus—Stimulus Pairing and Operant Discrimination Procedures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present experiment was to evaluate which method, stimulus–stimulus pairing or operant discrimination training, establishes neutral stimuli as more effective conditioned reinforcers, and to explore ways to maintain effects of the stimuli established as conditioned reinforcers. Four rats were exposed to an operant discrimination training procedure to establish a left-situated light as a conditioned reinforcer and to a stimulus–stimulus pairing procedure to establish a right-situated light as a conditioned reinforcer. Acquisition of new responses was then arranged to determine how formerly neutral stimuli could maintain responding when the unconditioned reinforcer (water) was presented intermittently in an experimental design similar to a concurrent-chain procedure. During this acquisition, two levers were concurrently available and presses on the left lever produced an operant discrimination trial (left light–response–water), whereas presses on the right lever produced a stimulus–stimulus pairing trial (right light–water). The results suggest that the operant discrimination training procedure was more effective in establishing a neutral stimulus as a conditioned reinforcer and also maintained a higher rate of responding over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bersh, P. J. (1951). The influence of two variables upon the establishment of a secondary reinforcer for operant responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41(1), 62–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2014). Applied Behavior Analysis (2nd ed.). Edinburgh gate. UK: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmoor, J. A. (1983). Observing and conditioned reinforcement. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 6, 693–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinsmoor, J. A. (1995). Tutorial: Stimulus control: Part I. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 51–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, C. L., Iwata, B. A., Thomason-Sassi, J., Worsdell, A. S., & Wilson, D. M. (2012). A comparison of two pairing procedures to establish praise as a reinforcer. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(4), 721–735.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dube, W. V., MacDonald, R. P. F., Mansfield, R. C., Holcomb, W. L., & Ahearn, W. H. (2004). Toward a behavioral analysis of joint attention. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 197–207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Esch, B. E., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2005). Evaluating stimulus–stimulus pairing and direct reinforcement in the establishment of an echoic repertoire of children diagnosed with autism. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 43–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fantino, E. (1969). Choice and rate of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12(5), 723–730.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fantino, E. (1977). Conditioned reinforcement: Choice and information. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 313–339). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollub, L. R. (1970). Conditioned reinforcement: Choice and information. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 288–312). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, R. D., & Du, L. (2014). Identification and establishment of reinforcers that make the development of complex social language possible. International Journal of Behavior Analysis & Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(1), 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, R. D., Pistoljevic, N., Cahill, C., & Du, L. (2011). Effects of conditioning voices as reinforcers for listener responses on rate of learning, awareness, and preferences for listening to stories in preschoolers with autism. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 103–124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, R. D., & Singer-Dudek, J. (2008). The emergence of conditioned reinforcement from observation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 15–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hackenberg, T. D. (2018). Token reinforcement: Translational research and application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51(2), 393–435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., & Loveland, D. H. (1975). Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 107–116.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holth, P. (2005). An operant analysis of joint attention skills. Journal of Early & Intensive Behavior Intervention, 2(3), 160–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holth, P. (2011). Joint attention in behavior analysis. In E. A. Mayville & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Behavioral Foundations of Effective Autism Treatment (pp. 73–89). NY: Sloan: Cornwall-on-Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holth, P., Vandbakk, M., Finstad, J., Grønnerud, E. M., & Sørensen, J. M. A. (2009). An operant analysis of joint attention and the establishment of conditioned social reinforcers. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 10(2), 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185–241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, J., & Holth, P. (2009). An operant approach to teaching joint attention skills to children with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 24(4), 215–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, I. H., & Lattal, K. A. (Eds.). (1991). Experimental analysis of behavior (Vol. 6). New York, NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, W. O. (1950). A temporal gradient of derived reinforcement. American Journal of Psychology, 63(2), 237–243.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. A., & Carr, E. G. (2004). Joint attention in children with autism: Theory and intervention. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 19(1), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T. (1966). Conditioned reinforcement in second-order schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9(5), 475–485.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kelleher, R. T., & Gollub, L. R. (1962). A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5(S4), 543–597.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950). Principles of psychology: A systematic text in the science of behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kimble, G. A. (1961). Hilgard and Marquis' conditioning and learning. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, T. L., Petursdottir, A. I., & Esch, B. E. (2013). Effects of operant discrimination training on the vocalizations of nonverbal children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(3), 656–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Longano, J. M., & Greer, R. D. (2014). Is the source of naming multiple conditioned reinforcers for observing responses. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31(1), 96–117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I. (2003). Teaching individuals with developmental delays: Basic intervention techniques. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, O. I., Freitag, G., Kinder, M. I., Rubenstein, B. D., Schaeffer, B., & Simmons, J. Q. (1966). Establishment of social reinforcers in two schizophrenic children on the basis of food. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 4(2), 109–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo, A. M., Mathews, T. L., King, M. L., Lamphere, J. C., & Damme, A. M. (2017). Operant discrimination training to establish praise as a reinforcer. Behavioral Interventions, 32(4), 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel, C. F., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2002). The effects of a stimulus–stimulus pairing procedure on the vocal behavior of children diagnosed with autism. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 3–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miliotis, A., Sidener, T. M., Reeve, K. F., Carbone, V., Sidener, D. W., Rader, L., & Delmolino, L. (2012). An evaluation of the number of presentations of target sounds during stimulus–stimulus pairing trials. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(4), 809–813.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Normand, M. P., & Knoll, M. L. (2006). The effects of a stimulus–stimulus pairing procedure on the unprompted vocalizations of a young child diagnosed with autism. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22(1), 81–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. C. (1996). Achieving parity: The role of automatic reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 289–290.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Petursdottir, A. I., Carp, C. L., Matthies, D. W., & Esch, B. E. (2011). Analyzing stimulus–stimulus pairing effects on preferences for speech sounds. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 45–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Petursdottir, A. I., & Lepper, T. L. (2015). Inducing novel vocalizations by conditioning speech sounds as reinforcers. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8(2), 223–232.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rader, L., Sidener, T. M., Reeve, K. F., Sidener, D. W., Delmolino, L., Miliotis, A., & Carbone, V. (2014). Stimulus–stimulus pairing of vocalizations: A systematic replication. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30(1), 69–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reichow, B., Doehring, P., Cicchetti, D. V., & Volkmar, F. R. (2011). Evidence-based practices and treatments for children with autism. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, P. P., & Gutierrez, A. (2017). A comparison of two procedures to condition social stimuli to function as reinforcers for children with autism. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 22(1), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, E. M., Iwata, B. A., & Kahng, S. (1999). Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: Implications for preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 479–493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, W. N., Antonitis, J. J., & Bersh, P. J. (1950). A preliminary study of training conditions necessary for secondary reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40(1), 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahan, T. A. (2010). Conditioned reinforcement and response strength. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 269–289.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1991). The behavior of organisms. Acton, MA: Copley. (Original work published 1938).

  • Sosa, R., dos Santos, C. V., & Flores, C. (2011). Training a new response using conditioned reinforcement. Behavioral Processes, 87(2), 231–236.

  • Stein, J. J. (1958). Reports: Secondary reinforcement established with subcortial stimulation. Science, 127, 466–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, R. A., Schulze, K. A., & Mirenda, P. (2008). A comparison of stimulus–stimulus pairing, standard echoic training, and control procedures on the vocal behavior of children with autism. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 24(1), 123–133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., Michael, J., Partington, J. W., & Sundberg, C. A. (1996). The role of automatic reinforcement in early language acquisition. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13(1), 21–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism and other developmental disabilities. Pleasant Hill, CA: Behavior Analysts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Santa, C., Sidener, T. M., Carr, J. E., & Reeve, K. F. (2014). A discrimination training procedure to establish conditioned reinforcers for children with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 29(2), 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • vom Saal, W., & Jenkins, H. M. (1970). Blocking the development of stimulus control. Learning and Motivation, 1, 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. A. (1994). Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues. The Behavior Analyst, 17(2), 261–285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. A., & Dunn, R. (1991). Preference for conditioned reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55(1), 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wyckoff, L. B. (1952). The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. Part 1. Psychological Review, 66, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, S. Y., & Bennett, G. M. (2000). Effects of a stimulus–stimulus pairing procedure on conditioning vocal sounds as reinforcers. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17(1), 75–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D. W. (1957). Durable secondary reinforcement: Method and theory. Psychological Review, 64(6), 373–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zrinzo, M., & Greer, R. D. (2013). Establishment and maintenance of socially learned conditioned reinforcement in young children: Elimination of the role of the adult. The Psychological Record, 63, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Science, Institute for Behavioral Science, OsloMet—Oslo Metropolitan University, St. Olavs Plass, PO Box 4, 0130, Oslo, Norway

    Monica Vandbakk, Heidi Skorge Olaff & Per Holth

Authors
  1. Monica Vandbakk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heidi Skorge Olaff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Per Holth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Vandbakk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The study was preapproved by the National Animal Research Authority (NARA) and was carried out according to the Norwegian laws and regulations controlling experiments/procedures using live animals with the identification number: id8278.

Some of the data were previously presented in a poster at the annual ABAI conference in Minneapolis in May 2013. This work has not been previously published nor is this work under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vandbakk, M., Olaff, H.S. & Holth, P. Conditioned Reinforcement: the Effectiveness of Stimulus—Stimulus Pairing and Operant Discrimination Procedures. Psychol Rec 69, 67–81 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0318-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0318-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation