Graded Delay, Enhanced Equivalence Class Formation, and Meaning
- 54 Downloads
Assigned to 12 groups, 120 college students were taught the baseline relations for three equivalence classes (A → B → C→ D→ E) using the simultaneous protocol with trials conducted in matching-to-sample format. In 11 of the 12 groups, all stimuli were abstract shapes; in one group (PIC), the A, B, D, and E stimuli were abstract and the C stimuli were pictures. One group with abstract shapes only (ABS) did not receive preliminary training, while 10 other groups received preliminary training before class formation training. In five groups, participants learned identity relations with the C stimuli using 0-, 1-, 3-, 6-, or 9-s delays. In five others, participants learned arbitrary relations between C and X stimuli using the same five delays. Classes were formed by 70 and 0% of participants in the PIC and the ABS groups, respectively. Class formation increased systematically after preliminary training with the 0-s through 6-s delays and decreased after preliminary training with the 9-s delay. Thus, enhanced class formation was a graded, non-monotonic function of delay duration. For each delay, class formation was greater after establishing arbitrary relations than identity relations. The effects of delay in preliminary training on class formation were similar to their effects on the maintenance of the baseline relations in the derived relation tests. Two opposing processes were posited to account for the delay effects on class formation. Finally, we discussed how class enhancement by meaningful stimuli can also be attributed to their relational functions and delays.
KeywordsStimulus equivalence Enhanced class formation Identity and arbitrary relations Delayed matching Opponent processes Simultaneous protocol College students
This research was funded by Oslo Metropolitan University.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Fields, L., Reeve, K. F., Rosen, D., Varelas, A., Adams, B. J., Belanich, J., & Hobbie, S. A. (1997). Using the simultaneous protocol to study equivalence class formation: The facilitating effects of nodal number and size of previously established equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1997.67-367.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fields, L., Varelas, A., Reeve, K. F., Belanich, J., Wadhwa, P., DeRosse, P., & Rosen, D. (2000). Effects of prior conditional discrimination training, symmetry, transitivity, and equivalence testing on the emergence of new equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 50(3), 443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fields, L., Arntzen, E., Nartey, R. K., & Eilifsen, C. (2012). Effects of a meaningful, a discriminative, and a meaningless stimulus on equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.97-163.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fienup, D. M., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Efficiently establishing concepts of inferential statistics and hypothesis decision making through contextually controlled equivalence classes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(3), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-437.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fienup, D. M., Mylan, S. E., Brodsky, J., & Pytte, C. (2015). From the laboratory to the classroom: The effects of equivalence-based instruction on neuroanatomy competencies (pp. 1–23). Online: Journal of Behavioral Education.Google Scholar
- Grehan, P. M. (1998). Depressed subjects’ formation of mood congruent and incongruent equivalence relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York.Google Scholar
- Leslie, J. C., Tierney, K. J., Robinson, C. P., Keenan, M., & Watt, A. (1993). Differences between clinically anxious and non-anxious subjects in a stimulus equivalence training task involving threat works. The Psychological Record, 43, 153–161.Google Scholar
- Lovett, S., Rehfeldt, R. A., Garcia, Y., & Dunning, J. (2011). Comparison of a stimulus equivalence protocol and traditional lecture for teaching single-subject designs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 819–833. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-819.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Vaidya, M., & Smith, K. N. (2006). Brief report: Delayed matching-to-sample training facilitates derived relational responding. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 24, 9–16.Google Scholar
- Walker, B. D., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2012). An evaluation of the stimulus equivalence paradigm to teach single-subject design to distance education students via blackboard. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45(2), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2012.45-329.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar