Advertisement

Current Pollution Reports

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 175–187 | Cite as

Contamination, Fate and Management of Metals in Shooting Range Soils—a Review

  • Peter Sanderson
  • Fangjie Qi
  • Balaji Seshadri
  • Ayanka Wijayawardena
  • Ravi Naidu
Land Pollution (GM Hettiarachchi, Section Editor)
  • 148 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Land Pollution

Abstract

Pollution of shooting range soils by lead from bullets represents a widespread and potentially significant concern for impact on the environment. High concentrations of lead in particular are reported in bullet impact berms and shot fall zones. The other components of bullets used in shooting including antimony, copper and zinc may also be present at elevated concentrations. Antimony is a concern due to its mobility in the environment. It has been recognised that the status of contamination is important for the risk presented by shooting ranges. Lead bullets are subject to weathering in the soil, forming secondary minerals, which may be solubilised and may release lead and co-contaminants into the soil. The mobility and availability of contaminants in the soil affect their potential for spreading in the environment and for uptake and toxicity in organisms. Soil physicochemical properties affect bullet weathering and availability of contaminants in the soil. A number of strategies have been researched for management of shooting range pollution such as chemical stabilisation, phytoremediation and soil washing. This review considers the current state of knowledge and research of contamination and management of shooting ranges from recent literature (2014–2017) reflecting on new knowledge and novel management strategies for shooting range soil management. Ultimately, management of pollution in shooting range soils should seek to remove bullets from soil, reduce the weathering of bullets and reduce the mobility and bioavailability of contaminants. Adopted management practices should be based an understanding of site-specific condition, to achieve the most optimal outcome.

Keywords

Lead Antimony Shooting ranges Chemical stabilisation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Adler A, Devarajan N, Wildi W, Poté J. Metal distribution and characterization of cultivable lead-resistant bacteria in shooting range soils. Soil Sed Contam. 2016; 18;25(4):378–94.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adriano DC, Wenzel WW, Vangronsveld J, Bolan NS. Role of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup. Geoderma. 2004;122(2–4):121–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmad M, Lee SS, Lee SE, Al-Wabel MI, Tsang DCW, Ok YS. Biochar-induced changes in soil properties affected immobilization/mobilization of metals/metalloids in contaminated soils. J Soils Sed. 2017;17(3):717–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1339-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahmad M, Lee SS, Lim JE, Lee S-E, Cho JS, Moon DH, et al. Speciation and phytoavailability of lead and antimony in a small arms range soil amended with mussel shell, cow bone and biochar: EXAFS spectroscopy and chemical extractions. Chemosphere. 2014;95:433–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.09.077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmad M, Lee SS, Moon DH, Yang JE, Ok YS. A review of environmental contamination and remediation strategies for heavy metals at shooting range soils. In: Malik A, Grohmann E, editors. Environmental protection strategies for sustainable development. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2012. p. 437–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ahmad M, Ok YS, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Kim B-Y, Ahn J-H, et al. Lead and copper immobilization in a shooting range soil using soybean stover- and pine needle-derived biochars: chemical, microbial and spectroscopic assessments. J Hazard Mater. 2016;301:179–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.08.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Almaroai YA, Usman AR, Ahmad M, Moon DH, Cho JS, Joo YK, Jeon C, Lee SS and Ok YS. Effects of biochar, cow bone, and eggshell on Pb availability to maize in contaminated soil irrigated with saline water. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2014;71(3), pp. 1289–1296Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arenas-Lago D, Rodríguez-Seijo A, Lago-Vila M, Couce LA, Vega FA. Using Ca 3 (PO4)2 nanoparticles to reduce metal mobility in shooting range soils. Sci Total Environ 2016;571:1136–1146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.108, Using Ca 3 (PO 4 ) 2 nanoparticles to reduce metal mobility in shooting range soils
  9. 9.
    Ayanka Wijayawardena MA, Naidu R, Megharaj M, Lamb D, Thavamani P, Kuchel T. Using soil properties to predict in vivo bioavailability of lead in soils. Chemosphere. 2015;138:422–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bandara T, Vithanage M. Phytoremediation of shooting range soils. In: Ansari AA, Gill SS, Gill R, Lanza GR, Newman L, editors. Phytoremediation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 469–488.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bannon DI, Drexler JW, Fent GM, Casteel SW, Hunter PJ, Brattin WJ, et al. Evaluation of small arms range soils for metal contamination and lead bioavailability. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(24):9071–6.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es901834h.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bolan NS, Adriano DC, Naidu R. Role of phosphorus in (im)mobilization and bioavailability of heavy metals in the soil-plant system. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2003. p. 1–44.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cao X, Ma L, Liang Y, Gao B, Harris W. Simultaneous immobilization of lead and atrazine in contaminated soils using dairy-manure biochar. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(11):4884–9.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es103752u.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cao X, Ma LQ, Chen M, Hardison DW, Harris WG. Weathering of lead bullets and their environmental effects at outdoor shooting ranges. J Environ Qual. 2003;32(2):526.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2003.5260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Conesa HM, Wieser M, Studer B, González-Alcaraz MN, Schulin R. A critical assessment of soil amendments (slaked lime/acidic fertilizer) for the phytomanagement of moderately contaminated shooting range soils. J Soils Sed. 2012;12(4):565–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-012-0478-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Etim EU. Distribution of soil-bound lead arising from rainfall-runoff events at impact berm of a military shooting range. J Environ Prot. 2016;7(05):623–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Etim EU. Lead removal from contaminated shooting range soil using acetic acid potassium chloride washing solutions and electrochemical reduction. J Health Pollut. 2017;7(13):22–31.  https://doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-7-13.22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fayiga AO, Saha U. The effect of bullet removal and vegetation on mobility of Pb in shooting range soils. Chemosphere. 2016a;160:252–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.06.098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fayiga AO, Saha UK. Soil pollution at outdoor shooting ranges: health effects, bioavailability and best management practices. Environ Pollut. 2016b;216:135–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fayiga AO, Saha UK. Effect of phosphate treatment on Pb leachability in contaminated shooting range soils. Soil Sed Contam. 2017;26(1):115–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2017.1245712.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Golden NH, Warner SE, Coffey MJ. A review and assessment of spent lead ammunition and its exposure and effects to scavenging birds in the United States. In: de Voogt WP, editor Rev Environ Contam 2016. Volume 237. Cham: Springer International Publishing; p. 123–191.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guo J, Hua B, Li N, Yang J. Stabilizing lead bullets in shooting range soil by phosphate-based surface coating. AIMS Environ Sci. 2016;3(3):474–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guemiza K, Mercier G, Blais JF. Pilot-scale counter-current acid leaching process for Cu, Pb, Sb, and Zn from small-arms shooting range soil. J Soils Sed. 2014;14(8):1359–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0880-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hockmann K, Tandy S, Lenz M, Reiser R, Conesa HM, Keller M, et al. Antimony retention and release from drained and waterlogged shooting range soil under field conditions. Chemosphere. 2015;134:536–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Igalavithana AD, Lee S-E, Lee YH, Tsang DCW, Rinklebe J, Kwon EE, et al. Heavy metal immobilization and microbial community abundance by vegetable waste and pine cone biochar of agricultural soils. Chemosphere. 2017;174:593–603.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Islam MN, Nguyen XP, Jung HY, Park JH. Chemical speciation and quantitative evaluation of heavy metal pollution hazards in two army shooting range backstop soils. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2016;96(2):179–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Islam MN, Park J-H. Immobilization and reduction of bioavailability of lead in shooting range soil through hydrothermal treatment. J Environ Manag. 2017;191:172–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Johnson CA, Moench H, Wersin P, Kugler P, Wenger C. Solubility of antimony and other elements in samples taken from shooting ranges. J Environ Qual. 2005 Jan 1;34(1):248–54.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Katoh M, Hashimoto K, Sato T. Lead and antimony removal from contaminated soil by phytoremediation combined with an immobilization material. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water. 2016 Dec 1;44(12):1717–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kelebemang R, Dinake P, Sehube N, Daniel B, Totolo O, Laetsang M. Speciation and mobility of lead in shooting range soils. Chem Speciat Bioavailab. 2017;29(1):143–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kilgour DW, Moseley RB, Barnett MO, Savage KS, Jardine PM. Potential negative consequences of adding phosphorus-based fertilizers to immobilize lead in soil. J Environ Qual. 2008;37(5):1733.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kumpiene J, Lagerkvist A, Maurice C. Stabilization of As, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn in soil using amendments—a review. Waste Manag. 2008;28(1):215–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.12.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lafond S, Blais J-F, Mercier G, Martel R. A counter-current acid leaching process for the remediation of contaminated soils from a small-arms shooting range. Soil Sed Contam. 2014;23(2):194–210.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2014.808171.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lewis J, Sjöström J, Skyllberg U, Hägglund L. Distribution, chemical speciation, and mobility of lead and antimony originating from small arms ammunition in a coarse-grained unsaturated surface sand. J Environ Qual. 2010;39(3):863.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lehmann J, Joseph S, editors. Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Routledge; 2015 Feb 20.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lewińska K, Karczewska A, Siepak M, Gałka B, Stysz M, Kaźmierowski C. Recovery and leachability of antimony from mine-and shooting range soils. Journal of Elementology. 2017 Mar 1;22(1):79–90.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li Y, Zhu Y, Zhao S, Liu X. The weathering and transformation process of lead in China’s shooting ranges. Environ Sci: Process Impacts. 2015;17(9):1620–33.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EM00022J.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liu Y, Fang Z, Xie C, Li J. Analysis of Existing Speciation and Evaluation of Heavy Metals Pollution of Soil in a Shooting Range. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology. 2014 Sep 1;13(3):449.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liu R, Gress J, Gao J, Ma LQ. Impacts of two best management practices on Pb weathering and leachability in shooting range soils. Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185(8):6477–84.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-3039-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu Y, Yan Y, Seshadri B, Qi F, Xu Y, Bolan N, et al. Immobilization of lead and copper in aqueous solution and soil using hydroxyapatite derived from flue gas desulphurization gypsum. J Geochem Explor. 2016;184:239–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Luo W, Verweij RA, van Gestel CAM. Determining the bioavailability and toxicity of lead contamination to earthworms requires using a combination of physicochemical and biological methods. Environ Pollut 2014;185:1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.10.017.
  42. 42.
    Ma LQ, Hardison DW, Harris WG, Cao X, Zhou Q. Effects of soil property and soil amendment on weathering of abraded metallic Pb in shooting ranges. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007;178(1–4):297–307.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9198-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mariussen E, Johnsen IV, Strømseng AE. Selective adsorption of lead, copper and antimony in runoff water from a small arms shooting range with a combination of charcoal and iron hydroxide. Journal of Environmental Management. 2015;150:281–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mariussen E, Johnsen IV, Strømseng AE. Distribution and mobility of lead (Pb), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and antimony (Sb) from ammunition residues on shooting ranges for small arms located on mires. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017a;24(11):10182–96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8647-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mariussen E, Heier LS, Teien HC, Pettersen MN, Holth TF, Salbu B et al. Accumulation of lead (Pb) in brown trout (Salmo trutta) from a lake downstream a former shooting range. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2017c;135:327–36.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mariussen E, Johnsen IV, Strømseng AE. Application of sorbents in different soil types from small arms shooting ranges for immobilization of lead (Pb), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and antimony (Sb). J Soil Sed. 2017b:1–1.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Martin WA, Nestler CC, Wynter M, Larson SL. Bullet on bullet fragmentation profile in soils. J Environ Manag. 2014;15(146):369–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    McGowen SL, Basta NT, Brown GO. Use of diammonium phosphate to reduce heavy metal solubility and transport in smelter-contaminated soil. J Environ Qual. 2001;30(2):493.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.302493x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    McLaren RG, Rooney CP, Condron LM. Control of lead solubility in soil contaminated with lead shot: effect of soil moisture and temperature. Aust J Soil Res. 2009;47(3):296.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR08195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    McTee MR, Mummey DL, Ramsey PW, Hinman NW. Extreme soil acidity from biodegradable trap and skeet targets increases severity of pollution at shooting ranges. Sci Total Environ. 2016;539:546–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Moseley RA, Barnett MO, Stewart MA, Mehlhorn TL, Jardine PM, Ginder-Vogel M, et al. Decreasing lead bioaccessibility in industrial and firing range soils with phosphate-based amendments. J Environ Qual. 2008;37(6):2116.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Naidu, R. “Bioavailability: Definition, assessment and implications for risk assessment.” Chapter 3, Developments in soil science, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 39–51, 2008.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ogawa S, Katoh M, Sato T. Simultaneous lead and antimony immobilization in shooting range soil by a combined application of hydroxyapatite and ferrihydrite. Environ Technol. 2015;36(20):2647–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1042071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Okkenhaug G, Grasshorn Gebhardt K-A, Amstaetter K, Lassen Bue H, Herzel H, Mariussen E, et al. Antimony (Sb) and lead (Pb) in contaminated shooting range soils: Sb and Pb mobility and immobilization by iron based sorbents, a field study. J Hazard Mater. 2016;307:336–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Okkenhaug G, Smebye AB, Pabst T, Amundsen CE, Sævarsson H, Breedveld GD. Shooting range contamination: mobility and transport of lead (Pb), copper (Cu) and antimony (Sb) in contaminated peatland. J Soils Sed. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1739-8.
  56. 56.
    Pain DJ, Cromie R, Green RE. Poisoning of birds and other wildlife from ammunition-derived lead in the UK. In Oxford Lead Symposium 2014 Dec 10 (p. 58).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Park JH, Bolan NS, Chung JW, Naidu R, Megharaj M. Environmental monitoring of the role of phosphate compounds in enhancing immobilization and reducing bioavailability of lead in contaminated soils. J Environ Monit. 2011a;13(8):2234–42.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1em10275c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Park JH, Choppala GK, Bolan NS, Chung JW, Chuasavathi T. Biochar reduces the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of heavy metals. Plant Soil. 2011b;348(1–2):439–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0948-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Peddicord RK, LaKind JS. Ecological and human health risks at an outdoor firing range. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2000;19(10):2602–13.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620191029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Perroy RL, Belby CS, Mertens CJ. Mapping and modeling three dimensional lead contamination in the wetland sediments of a former trap-shooting range. Sci Total Environ. 2014;487:72–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Qi F, Dong Z, Lamb D, Naidu R, Bolan NS, Ok YS, et al. Effects of acidic and neutral biochars on properties and cadmium retention of soils. Chemosphere. 2017;180:564–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rajapaksha AU, Ahmad M, Vithanage M, Kim K-R, Chang JY, Lee SS, et al. The role of biochar, natural iron oxides, and nanomaterials as soil amendments for immobilizing metals in shooting range soil. Environ Geochem Health. 2015;37(6):931–42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-015-9694-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rinklebe J, Shaheen SM, Frohne T. Amendment of biochar reduces the release of toxic elements under dynamic redox conditions in a contaminated floodplain soil. Chemosphere. 2016;142:41–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rodríguez-Seijo A, Alfaya MC, Andrade ML, Vega FA. Copper, chromium, nickel, lead and zinc levels and pollution degree in firing range soils. Land Degrad Dev. 2016a;27(7):1721–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rodríguez-Seijo A, Lago-Vila M, Andrade ML, Vega FA. Pb pollution in soils from a trap shooting range and the phytoremediation ability of Agrostis capillaris L. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016b;23(2):1312–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5340-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rodríguez-Seijo A, Cachada A, Gavina A, Duarte AC, Vega FA, Andrade ML, et al. Lead and PAHs contamination of an old shooting range: a case study with a holistic approach. Sci Total Environ. 2017;575:367–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rubio M, Germanier A, Mera MF, Faudone SN, Sbarato RD, Campos JM, et al. Study of lead levels in soils by weathering of metallic Pb bullets used in dove hunting in CÃ3rdoba, Argentina. X-Ray Spectrometry. 2014;43(3):186–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sanderson P, Naidu R, Bolan N, Bowman M. Critical review on chemical stabilization of metal contaminants in shooting range soils. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste. 2012a;16(3):258–72.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sanderson P, Naidu R, Bolan N, Bowman M, McLure S. Effect of soil type on distribution and bioaccessibility of metal contaminants in shooting range soils. Sci Total Environ. 2012b;438:452–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sanderson P, Naidu R, Bolan N. Ecotoxicity of chemically stabilised metal(loid)s in shooting range soils. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014;100:201–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.11.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sanderson P, Naidu R, Bolan N. Effectiveness of chemical amendments for stabilisation of lead and antimony in risk-based land management of soils of shooting ranges. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015a;22(12):8942–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sanderson P, Naidu R, Bolan N, Lim JE, Ok YS. Chemical stabilisation of lead in shooting range soils with phosphate and magnesium oxide: synchrotron investigation. J Hazard Mater. 2015b;299:395–403.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sanderson P, Naidu R, Bolan N. The effect of environmental conditions and soil physicochemistry on phosphate stabilisation of Pb in shooting range soils. J Environ Manag. 2016;170:123–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sanderson P, Naidu R, Bolan N. Application of a biodegradable chelate to enhance subsequent chemical stabilisation of Pb in shooting range soils. J Soils Sed. 2017;17(6):1696–705.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1608-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Scheetz CD, Donald Rimstidt J. Dissolution, transport, and fate of lead on a shooting range in the Jefferson National Forest near Blacksburg, VA, USA. Environ Geol. 2009;58(3):655–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1540-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sehube N, Kelebemang R, Totolo O, Laetsang M, Kamwi O, Dinake P. Lead pollution of shooting range soils. S Afr J Chem. 2017;70  https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2017/v70a4.
  77. 77.
    Seshadri B, Bolan NS, Choppala G, Kunhikrishnan A, Sanderson P, Wang H, et al. Potential value of phosphate compounds in enhancing immobilization and reducing bioavailability of mixed heavy metal contaminants in shooting range soil. Chemosphere. 2017;184:197–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Smith E, Weber J, Naidu R, McLaren RG, Juhasz AL. Assessment of lead bioaccessibility in peri-urban contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater. 2011;186(1):300–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Sorvari J, Antikainen R, Pyy O. Environmental contamination at Finnish shooting ranges—the scope of the problem and management options. Sci Total Environ. 2006;366(1):21–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.12.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Spuller C, Weigand H, Marb C. Trace metal stabilisation in a shooting range soil: mobility and phytotoxicity. J Hazard Mater. 2007;141(2):378–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Stauffer M, Pignolet A, Alvarado JC. Persistent mercury contamination in shooting range soils: the legacy from former primers. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2017; 1;98(1):14–21.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Tandy S, Meier N, Schulin R. Use of soil amendments to immobilize antimony and lead in moderately contaminated shooting range soils. J Hazard Mater. 2017;324:617–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Tariq SR, Ashraf A. Comparative evaluation of phytoremediation of metal contaminated soil of firing range by four different plant species. Arab J Chem. 2016. 1;9(6):806–14.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Uchimiya M, Bannon DI, Wartelle LH. Retention of heavy metals by carboxyl functional groups of Biochars in small arms range soil. J Agric Food Chem. 2012a;60(7):1798–809.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf2047898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Uchimiya M, Bannon DI, Wartelle LH, Lima IM, Klasson KT. Lead retention by broiler litter biochars in small arms range soil: impact of pyrolysis temperature. J Agric Food Chem. 2012b;60(20):5035–44.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf300825n.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Urrutia-Goyes R, Mahlknecht J, Argyraki A, Ornelas-Soto N. Trace element soil contamination at a former shooting range in Athens, Greece. Geoderma Regional. 2017;10:191–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    USEPA (2005): Best Management Practices for Lead at Outdoor Shooting Ranges. Division of Enforcement and Compliance Assistance, New York, NY, EPA 902/B-01-001Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Valipour M, Shahbazi K, Khanmirzaei A. Chemical immobilization of lead, cadmium, copper, and nickel in contaminated soils by phosphate amendments: soil. CLEAN—Soil, Air, Water. 2016;44(5):572–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201300827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Vantelon D, Lanzirotti A, Scheinost AC, Kretzschmar R. Spatial distribution and speciation of lead around corroding bullets in a shooting range soil studied by micro-X-ray fluorescence and absorption spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(13):4808–15.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es0482740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Vithanage M, Herath I, Almaroai YA, Rajapaksha AU, Huang L, Sung J-K, et al. Effects of carbon nanotube and biochar on bioavailability of Pb, Cu and Sb in multi-metal contaminated soil. Environmental Geochemistry and Health. 2017;39(6):1409–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Wang Z, Liu G, Zheng H, Li F, Ngo HH, Guo W, et al. Investigating the mechanisms of biochar’s removal of lead from solution. Bioresour Technol. 2015;177:308–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Xie ZM, Chen J, Naidu R. Not all phosphate fertilizers immobilize lead in soils. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013;224(12)  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1712-0.
  93. 93.
    Yan K, Dong Z, Wijayawardena MAA, Liu Y, Naidu R, Semple K. Measurement of soil lead bioavailability and influence of soil types and properties: a review. Chemosphere. 2017;184:27–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Yan Y, Qi F, Seshadri B, Xu Y, Hou J, Ok YS, et al. Utilization of phosphorus loaded alkaline residue to immobilize lead in a shooting range soil. Chemosphere. 2016;162:315–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Yin X, Saha UK, Ma LQ. Effectiveness of best management practices in reducing Pb-bullet weathering in a shooting range in Florida. J Hazard Mater. 2010;179(1–3):895–900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Yoo J-C, Shin Y-J, Kim E-J, Yang J-S, Baek K. Extraction mechanism of lead from shooting range soil by ferric salts. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2016;103:174–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Global Centre for Environmental RemediationUniversity of Newcastle and CRC for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRCCARE)NewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations