Advertisement

Current Pollution Reports

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 112–127 | Cite as

Nutrients in Urban Stormwater Runoff: Current State of the Science and Potential Mitigation Options

  • Yun-Ya Yang
  • Mary G. Lusk
Water Pollution (G Toor, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Water Pollution

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Stormwater runoff of nutrients from developed landscapes is recognized as a major threat to water quality degradation through cultural eutrophication, which can lead to ecosystem imbalances and harmful algal growth. This review summarizes the current state-of-knowledge on the occurrence, sources, and transport processes of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in urban stormwater runoff and describes strategies for nutrient management of urban stormwater runoff. Future research needs identified from this review are provided as well.

Recent Findings

Stormwater runoff of nutrients from urban environments to fresh water is controlled by multiple factors, including type of inputs, land use, development patterns, and management strategies. Recent research on stormwater management strategies has focused on internal nutrient cycling processes, such as microbial transformations of N in conventional wet ponds or bioretention cells, leading to a better understanding of the mechanisms that control the efficacy of stormwater management practices.

Summary

Mitigating nutrient exports from urban environments will require controlling both quantities and sources of nutrient inputs into water systems, as well as new mechanistic understanding of the biogeochemical processes controlling nutrient treatment in stormwater ponds and low impact design (LID) structures. We need more research on source tracking of P from stormwater runoff as information is still relatively scarce. There is also a need to obtain better understanding of the dynamic interactions among multiple factors (e.g., sources, land use, characteristic of catchment and climate, management strategies) that control fate and transport of nutrients in urban stormwater runoff.

Keywords

Nitrogen Phosphorus Stormwater runoff Urban water quality Stormwater management 

Notes

Author Contributions

Y-Y. Y and M.G.L contributed equally to this work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Guan MF, Sillanpaa N, Koivusalo H. Storm runoff response to rainfall pattern, magnitude and urbanization in a developing urban catchment. Hydrol Process. 2016;30:543–57.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O'Driscoll M, Clinton S, Jefferson A, Manda A, McMillan S. Urbanization effects on watershed hydrology and in-stream processes in the Southern United States. Water. 2010;2:605–48.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown LR, Cuffney TF, Coles JF, Fitzpatrick F, McMahon G, Steuer J, et al. Urban streams across the USA: lessons learned from studies in 9 metropolitan areas. J N Am Benthol Soc. 2009;28:1051–69.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McGrane SJ. Impacts of urbanisation on hydrological and water quality dynamics, and urban water management: a review. Hydrol Sci J-J Sci Hydrol. 2016;61:2295–311.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP. The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J N Am Benthol Soc. 2005;24:706–23.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schueler TR, Fraley-McNeal L, Cappiella K. Is impervious cover still important? Review of recent research. J Hydrol Eng. 2009;14:309–15.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conley DJ, Paerl HW, Howarth RW, Boesch DF, Seitzinger SP, Havens KE, et al. Controlling eutrophication: nitrogen and phosphorus. Science. 2009;323:1014–5.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howarth R, Paerl HW. Coastal marine eutrophication: control of both nitrogen and phosphorus is necessary. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:E103-E103.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saraswat C, Kumar P, Mishra BK. Assessment of stormwater runoff management practices and governance under climate change and urbanization: an analysis of Bangkok, Hanoi and Tokyo. Environ Sci Pol. 2016;64:101–17.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sage J, Berthier E, Gromaire MC. Stormwater management criteria for on-site pollution control: a comparative assessment of international practices. Environ Manag. 2015;56:66–80.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tondera K, Blecken G-T, Tournebize J, Mander Ü, Tanner CC. Nutrient removal from variable stormwater flows. In Ecotechnologies for the treatment of variable stormwater and wastewater flows, Springer; 2018. pp. 31–55.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Results of the nationwide urban runoff program. volume III-data appendix. Washington, DC: Water Planning Division; 1983; WH-554, PB84e185578. p. 207.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The national stormwater quality database, version 1.1. A complication and analysis of NPDES stormwater monitoring information. Washington, DC. 2005.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smullen J, Cave KA. National stormwater runoff pollution database. In: Field R, Sullivan D, editors. Wet-weather flow in the urban watershed. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers; 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ma J, Ying GX, Sansalone JJ. Transport and distribution of particulate matter phosphorus fractions in rainfall-runoff from roadway source areas. J Environ Eng ASCE. 2010;136:1197–205.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bratt AR, Finlay JC, Hobbie SE, Janke BD, Worm AC, Kemmitt KL. Contribution of leaf litter to nutrient export during winter months in an urban residential watershed. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:3138–47.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    •• Lusk MG, Toor GS. Biodegradability and molecular composition of dissolved organic nitrogen in urban stormwater runoff and outflow water from a stormwater retention pond. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:3391–8. This article provides a novel approach to investigating the biodegradability and molecular composition of organic nitrogen in urban stormwater runoff and retention ponds. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lusk MG, Toor GS. Dissolved organic nitrogen in urban streams: biodegradability and molecular composition studies. Water Res. 2016;96:225–35.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang Y-Y, Toor GS. δ15N and δ18O reveal the sources of nitrate-nitrogen in urban residential stormwater runoff. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:2881–9.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang Y-Y, Toor GS. Sources and mechanisms of nitrate and orthophosphate transport in urban stormwater runoff from residential catchments. Water Res. 2017;112:176–84.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hall SJ, Weintraub SR, Eiriksson D, Brooks PD, Baker MA, Bowen GJ, et al. Stream nitrogen inputs reflect groundwater across a snowmelt-dominated montane to urban watershed. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:1137–46.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaushal SS, Groffman PM, Band LE, Elliott EM, Shields CA, Kendall C. Tracking nonpoint source nitrogen pollution in human-impacted watersheds. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:8225–32.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Divers MT, Elliott EM, Bain DJ. Quantification of nitrate sources to an urban stream using dual nitrate isotopes. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:10580–7.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pennino MJ, Kaushal SS, Murthy SN, Blomquist JD, Cornwell JC, Harris LA. Sources and transformations of anthropogenic nitrogen along an urban river-estuarine continuum. Biogeosciences. 2016;13:6211–28.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mueller C, Zink M, Samaniego L, Krieg R, Merz R, Rode M, et al. Discharge driven nitrogen dynamics in a mesoscale river basin as constrained by stable isotope patterns. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50:9187–96.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yi Q, Chen Q, Hu L, Shi W. Tracking nitrogen sources, transformation, and transport at a basin scale with complex plain river networks. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:5396–403.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu T, Wang F, Michalski G, Xia X, Liu S. Using 15N, 17O, and 18O to determine nitrate sources in the Yellow River, China. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47:13412–21.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Groffman PM, Law NL, Belt KT, Band LE, Fisher GT. Nitrogen fluxes and retention in urban watershed ecosystems. Ecosystems. 2004;7:393–403.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Janke BD, Finlay JC, Hobbie SE. Trees and streets as drivers of urban stormwater nutrient pollution. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:9569–79.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    •• Hobbie SE, Finlay JC, Janke BD, Nidzgorski DA, Millet DB, Baker LA. Contrasting nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in urban watersheds and implications for managing urban water pollution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:4177–82. This article shows a comparsion of urban watershed N and P budgets and describes the ways to reduce nutrient pollution from urban landscapes. Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kojima K, Murakami M, Yoshimizu C, Tayasu I, Nagata T, Furumai H. Evaluation of surface runoff and road dust as sources of nitrogen using nitrate isotopic composition. Chemosphere. 2011;84:1716–22.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Anisfeld SC, Barnes RT, Altabet MA, Wu T. Isotopic apportionment of atmospheric and sewage nitrogen sources in two Connecticut rivers. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:6363–9.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Riha KM, Michalski G, Gallo EL, Lohse KA, Brooks PD, Meixner T. High atmospheric nitrate inputs and nitrogen turnover in semi-arid urban catchments. Ecosystems. 2014;17:1309–25.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hale RL, Turnbull L, Earl S, Grimm N, Riha K, Michalski G, et al. Sources and transport of nitrogen in arid urban watersheds. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:6211–9.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Waschbusch RJ, Selbig WR, Bannerman RT. Sources of phosphorus in stormwater and street dirt from two urban residential basins in Madison, Wisconsin, 1994–95: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report. 1999;99–4021. p. 47.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Toor GS, Occhipinti ML, Yang Y-Y, Majcherek T, Haver D, Oki L. Managing urban runoff in residential neighborhoods: nitrogen and phosphorus in lawn irrigation driven runoff. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179151.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Carey RO, Hochmuth GJ, Martinez CJ, Boyer TH, Dukes MD, Toor GS, et al. Evaluating nutrient impacts in urban watersheds: challenges and research opportunities. Environ Pollut. 2013;173:138–49.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Badruzzaman M, Pinzon J, Oppenheimer J, Jacangelo J. Sources of nutrients impacting surface waters in Florida: a review. J Environ Manag. 2012;109:80–92.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Fissore C, Baker LA, Hobbie SE, King JY, McFadden JP, Nelson KC, et al. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus fluxes in household ecosystems in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul, Minnesota, urban region. Ecol Appl. 2011;21:619–39.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baker LA, Hope D, Xu Y, Edmonds J, Lauver L. Nitrogen balance for the Central Arizona-Phoenix (CAP) ecosystem. Ecosystems. 2001;4:582–602.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pennino MJ, Kaushal SS, Mayer PM, Utz RM, Cooper CA. Stream restoration and sewers impact sources and fluxes of water, carbon, and nutrients in urban watersheds. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2016;20:3419–39.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Selbig W. Evaluation of leaf removal as a means to reduce nutrient concentrations and loads in urban stormwater. Sci Total Environ. 2016;571:124–33.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xing J, Song J, Yuan H, Li X, Li N, Duan L, et al. Fluxes, seasonal patterns and sources of various nutrient species (nitrogen, phosphorus and silicon) in atmospheric wet deposition and their ecological effects on Jiaozhou Bay, North China. Sci Total Environ. 2017;576:617–27.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Burns M, Fletcher T, Walsh C, Ladson A, Hatt B. Hydrologic shortcomings of conventional urban stormwater management and opportunities for reform. Landsc Urban Plan. 2012;105:230–40.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fletcher TD, Shuster W, Hunt WF, Ashley R, Butler D, Arthur S, et al. SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more—the evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J. 2015;12:525–42.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Taylor A, Fletcher T. Nonstructural urban stormwater quality measures: building a knowledge base to improve their use. Environ Manag. 2007;39:663–77.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Cousins JJ. Infrastructure and institutions: stakeholder perspectives of stormwater governance in Chicago. Cities. 2017;66:44–52.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kaplowitz MD, Lupi F. Stakeholder preferences for best management practices for non-point source pollution and stormwater control. Landsc Urban Plan. 2012;104:364–72.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Monaghan P, Hu S, Hansen G, Ott E, Nealis C, Morera M. Balancing the ecological function of residential stormwater ponds with homeowner landscaping practices. Environ Manag. 2016;58:843–56.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Baker L, Kalinosky P, Hobbie S, Bintner R, Buyarksi C. Quantifying nutrient removal by enhanced street sweeping. Stormwater. 2014;15:16–23.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hobbie S, Baker L, Buyarski C, Nidzgorski D, Finlay J. Decomposition of tree leaf litter on pavement: implications for urban water quality. Urban Ecosyst. 2014;17:369–85.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Duan S, Delaney-Newcomb K, Kaushal S, Findlay S, Belt K. Potential effects of leaf litter on water quality in urban watersheds. Biogeochem. 2014;121:61–80.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fore LS. Effectiveness of public education and outreach programs for reducing impacts of stormwater on rivers and streams. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/769e/1020503d435102ecfc6c3df6131295764341.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  54. 54.
    Bos DG, Brown H. Overcoming barriers to community participation in a catchment-scale experiment: building trust and changing behavior. Freshwater Sci. 2015;34:1169–75.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Brown HL, Bos DG, Walsh CJ, Fletcher TD, RossRakesh S. More than money: how multiple factors influence householder participation in at-source stormwater management. J Environ Plan Manag. 2016;59:79–97.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hartman R, Alcock F, Pettit C. The spread of fertilizer ordinances in Florida. Sea Grant Law & Policy Journal. 2008;1:98–115.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Persaud A, Alsharif K, Monaghan P, Akiwumi F, Morera MC, Ott E. Landscaping practices, community perceptions, and social indicators for stormwater nonpoint source pollution management. Sustain Cities Soc. 2016;27:377–85.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Collins K, Lawrence T, Stander E, Jontos R, Kaushal S, Newcomer T, et al. Opportunities and challenges for managing nitrogen in urban stormwater: a review and synthesis. Ecol Eng. 2010;36:1507–19.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Williams CJ, Frost PC, Xenopoulos MA. Beyond best management practices: pelagic biogeochemical dynamics in urban stormwater ponds. Ecol Appl. 2013;23:1384–95.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rosenzweig BR, Smith JA, Baeck ML, Jaffe PR. Monitoring nitrogen loading and retention in an urban strormwater detention pond. J Environ Qual. 2011;40:598–609.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Koch BJ, Febria CM, Gevrey M, Wainger LA. Nitrogen removal by stormwater management structures: a data synthesis. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2014;50:1594–607.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Comings K, Booth D, Horner R. Storm water pollutant removal by two wet ponds in Bellevue, Washington. J Environ Eng Asce. 2000;126:321–30.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bettez ND, Groffman PM. Denitrification potential in stormwater control structures and natural riparian zones in an urban landscape. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:10909–17.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Morse NR, McPhillips LE, Shapleigh JP, Walter MT. The role of denitrification in stormwater detention basin treatment of nitrogen. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:7928–35.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rosenquist S, Hession W, Eick M, Vaughan D. Variability in adsorptive phosphorus removal by structural stormwater best management practices. Ecol Eng. 2010;36:664–71.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    WERF International stormwater BMP database: 2016 summary statistics; 2017.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Li L, Davis AP. Urban stormwater runoff nitrogen composition and fate in bioretention systems. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:3403–10.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    •• Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and research needs of bioretention used for the treatment of urban stormwater. Water. 2014;6:1069–99. This review offers a thorough discussion of bioretention used for the urban stormwater treatment of numerous pollutants, as well as valuable insights into the future direction of bioretention design. Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Brown RA, Birgand F, Hunt WF. Analysis of consecutive events for nutrient and sediment treatment in field-monitored bioretention cells. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013;224:1581.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lucas William C, Greenway M. Phosphorus retention by bioretention mesocosms using media formulated for phosphorus sorption: response to accelerated loads. JIrrig Drain Eng. 2011;137:144–53.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Palmer ET, Poor CJ, Hinman C, Stark JD. Nitrate and phosphate removal through enhanced bioretention media: mesocosm study. Water Environ Res. 2013;85:823–32.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Lopez EV, Lynn TJ, Peterson M, Ergas SJ, Trotz MA, In Mihelcic JR. Enhanced nutrient management of stormwater through a field demonstration of nitrogen removal in a modified bioretention system. World Environ Water Resour Congr. 2016:60–9.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Lucke T, Mohamed M, Tindale N. Pollutant removal and hydraulic reduction performance of field grassed swales during runoff simulation experiments. Water. 2014;6:1887–904.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Leroy M, Portet-Koltalo F, Legras M, Lederf F, Moncond’huy V, Polaert I, et al. Performance of vegetated swales for improving road runoff quality in a moderate traffic urban area. Sci Total Environ. 2016;566:113–21.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kachchu Mohamed MA, Lucke T, Boogaard F. Preliminary investigation into the pollution reduction performance of swales used in a stormwater treatment train. Water Sci Technol. 2014;69:1014–20.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Stagge JH, Davis AP, Jamil E, Kim H. Performance of grass swales for improving water quality from highway runoff. Water Res. 2012;46:6731–42.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Winston RJ, Hunt WF, Kennedy SG, Merriman LS, Chandler J, Brown D. Evaluation of floating treatment wetlands as retrofits to existing stormwater retention ponds. Ecol Eng. 2013;54:254–65.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    White SA, Cousins MM. Floating treatment wetland aided remediation of nitrogen and phosphorus from simulated stormwater runoff. Ecol Eng. 2013;61:207–15.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Lynch J, Fox LJ, Owen Jr JS, Sample DJ. Evaluation of commercial floating treatment wetland technologies for nutrient remediation of stormwater. Ecol Eng. 2015;75:61–9.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Brown RA, Borst M. Nutrient infiltrate concentrations from three permeable pavement types. J Environ Manag. 2015;164:74–85.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Bean EZ, Hunt WF, Bidelspach DA. Field survey of permeable pavement surface infiltration rates. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2007;133:249–55.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Mullaney J, Lucke T. Practical review of pervious pavement designs. Clean Soil Air Water. 2014;42:111–24.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Sansalone J, Kuang X, Ying G, Ranieri V. Filtration and clogging of permeable pavement loaded by urban drainage. Water Res. 2012;46:6763–74.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Winston R, Al-Rubaei A, Blecken G-T, Hunt W. Maintenance measures for preservation and recovery of permeable pavement hydraulics: effects of vacuum cleaning, high pressure washing, street sweeping, and milling. J Environ Manag. 2016;169:132–44.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    James W, von Langsdorff H. Towards restoring infiltration in permeable pavers—initial demonstration of rapid clean-out concepts. J Water Manag Model. 2016;  https://doi.org/10.14796/JWMM.C405.
  86. 86.
    Li H, Li Z, Zhang X, Li Z, Liu D, Li T, et al. The effect of different surface materials on runoff quality in permeable pavement systems. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24:21103–10.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ahiablame LM, Engel BA, Chaubey I. Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012;223:4253–73.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Bliss DJ, Neufeld RD, Ries RJ. Storm water runoff mitigation using a green roof. Environ Eng Sci. 2009;26:407–18.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Gregoire BG, Clausen JC. Effect of a modular extensive green roof on stormwater runoff and water quality. Ecol Eng. 2011;37:963–9.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Berndtsson JC. Green roof performance towards management of runoff water quantity and quality: a review. Ecol Eng. 2010;36:351–60.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Sims AW, Robinson CE, Smart CC, Voogt JA, Hay GJ, Lundholm JT, et al. Retention performance of green roofs in three different climate regions. J Hydrol. 2016;542:115–24.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Whittinghill LJ, Rowe DB, Andresen JA, Cregg BM. Comparison of stormwater runoff from sedum, native prairie, and vegetable producing green roofs. Urban Ecosyst. 2015;18:13–29.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Vanuytrecht E, Van Mechelen C, Van Meerbeek K, Willems P, Hermy M, Raes D. Runoff and vegetation stress of green roofs under different climate change scenarios. Landsc Urban Plan. 2014;122:68–77.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Volder A, Dvorak B. Event size, substrate water content and vegetation affect storm water retention efficiency of an un-irrigated extensive green roof system in Central Texas. Sustain Cities Soc. 2014;10:59–64.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Silva SR, Ging PB, Lee RW, Ebbert JC, Tesoriero AJ, Inkpen EL. Forensic applications of nitrogen and oxygen isotopes in tracing nitrate sources in urban environments. Environ Forensic. 2002;3:125–30.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Cettner A, Ashley R, Viklander M, Nilsson K. Stormwater management and urban planning: lessons from 40 years of innovation. J Environ Plan Manag. 2013;56:786–801.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Jia H, Lu Y, Yu SL, Chen Y. Planning of LID–BMPs for urban runoff control: the case of Beijing Olympic Village. Sep Purif Technol. 2012;84:112–9.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Krueger R, Buckingham S. Towards a ‘consensual’ urban politics? Creative planning, urban sustainability and regional development. Int J Urban Reg Res. 2012;36:486–503.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Jarvie HP, Withers PJA, Bowes MJ, Palmer-Felgate EJ, Harper DM, Wasiak K, et al. Streamwater phosphorus and nitrogen across a gradient in rural - agricultural land use intensity. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2010;135:238–52.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Taylor GD, Fletcher TD, Wong THF, Breen PF, Duncan HP. Nitrogen composition in urban runoff - implications for stormwater management. Water Res. 2005;39:1982–9.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Vaze J, Chiew FHS. Nutrient loads associated with different sediment sizes in urban stormwater and surface pollutants. J Environ Eng ASCE. 2004;130:391–6.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Wu JL, Ren YF, Wang XM, Wang XK, Chen LD, Liu GC. Nitrogen and phosphorus associating with different size suspended solids in roof and road runoff in Beijing, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:15788–95.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Arias ME, Brown MT, Sansalone JJ. Characterization of storm water-suspended sediments and phosphorus in an urban catchment in Florida. J Environ Eng ASCE. 2013;139:277–88.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Li DY, Wan JQ, Ma YW, Wang Y, Huang MZ, Chen YM. Stormwater runoff pollutant loading distributions and their correlation with rainfall and catchment characteristics in a rapidly industrialized city. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0118776.Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Gallo EL, Brooks PD, Lohse KA, McLain JE. Land cover controls on summer discharge and runoff solution chemistry of semi-arid urban catchments. J Hydrol. 2013;485:37–53.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Kaushal SS, Mayer PM, Vidon PG, Smith RM, Pennino MJ, Newcomer TA, et al. Land use and climate variability amplify carbon, nutrient, and comtaminant pulses: a review with management implications. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2014;50:585–614.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Lewis DB, Grimm NB. Hierarchical regulation of nitrogen export from urban catchments: interactions of storms and landscapes. Ecol Appl. 2007;17:2347–64.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Beck SM, McHale MR, Hess GR. Beyond impervious: urban land-cover pattern variation and implications for watershed management. Environ Manag. 2016;58:15–30.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Goonetilleke A, Thomas E, Ginn S, Gilbert D. Understanding the role of land use in urban stormwater quality management. J Environ Manag. 2005;74:31–42.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Kaushal SS, Groffman PM, Band LE, Shields CA, Morgan RP, Palmer MA, et al. Interaction between urbanization and climate variability amplifies watershed nitrate export in Maryland. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:5872–8.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    • Hale RL, Turnbull L, Earl SR, Childers DL, Grimm NB. Stormwater infrastructure controls runoff and dissolved material export from arid urban watersheds. Ecosystems. 2015;18:62–75. This article describes how stormwater infrastructure design, land use, and storm characteristics affect nutrient loads from urban watershed ecosystems over time and space. Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Lee J, Bang K, Ketchum L, Choe J, Yu M. First flush analysis of urban storm runoff. Sci Total Environ. 2002;293:163–75.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Taebi A, Droste RL. First flush pollution load of urban stormwater runoff. J Environ Eng Sci. 2004;3:301–9.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Hathaway J, Tucker R, Spooner J, Hunt W. A traditional analysis of the first flush effect for nutrients in stormwater runoff from two small urban catchments. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012;223:5903–15.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Wijesiri B, Egodawatta P, McGree J, Goonetilleke A. Understanding the uncertainty associated with particle-bound pollutant build-up and wash-off: a critical review. Water Res. 2016;101:582–96.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Miguntanna NP, Liu A, Egodawatta P, Goonetilleke A. Characterising nutrients wash-off for effective urban stormwater treatment design. J Environ Manag. 2013;120:61–7.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Chow MF, Yusop Z, Abustan I. Relationship between sediment build-up characteristics and antecedent dry days on different urban road surfaces in Malaysia. Urban Water J. 2015;12:240–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soil and Water Quality Laboratory, Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural SciencesUniversity of FloridaWimaumaUSA

Personalised recommendations