Advertisement

Treatment of Typical Organic Pollutants in Textile Wastewater by Direct Contact Membrane Distillation

  • Muyao Ji
  • Qin Xia
  • Hongteng Chen
  • Qianxun Cheng
  • Yanbiao Liu
  • Fang Li
Original Article
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

Direct contact membrane distillation technology was considered as a promising and efficient technology for the treatment of textile wastewater. In this study, hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene and polyvinylidene fluoride membranes for the treatment of selected model compounds of textile wastewater (e.g., phenol, aniline, and sulfanilic acid) were explored comparatively in a bench-scale direct contact membrane distillation technology test unit. The effect of various operational parameters including temperature, flow rate, and concentration on the rejection performance was investigated systematically. The results indicated that an increased feed temperature and a faster cross flow velocity contributed positively to the direct contact membrane distillation performance. Limited rejection for phenol and aniline was witnessed, which can be due to their relatively lower boiling point. A > 99% of sulfanilic acid rejection was obtained under the same conditions. Furthermore, the polytetrafluoroethylene membrane always presented enhanced performance compared with the polyvinylidene fluoride samples. In brief, the direct contact membrane distillation process could be potentially used as a promising technique for the treatment of textile wastewater.

Keywords

DCMD Hydrophobic membrane Pollutants Rejection performance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0400501) and the Start-up Grant of Donghua University (Grant No. 113-07-005710), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51478099). A previous shorter version of the paper has been presented in the 10th World Congress of EWRA “Panta Rei” Athens, Greece, 5-9 July 2017.

Supplementary material

40710_2018_292_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 18 kb)

References

  1. Abd Jalil SN, Wang DK, Yacou C, Motuzas J, Smart S, da Costa JCD (2017) Vacuum-assisted tailoring of pore structures of phenolic resin derived carbon membranes. J Membr Sci 525:240–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. An AK, Guo J, Jeong S, Lee EJ, Tabatabai SA, Leiknes T (2016) High flux and antifouling properties of negatively charged membrane for dyeing wastewater treatment by membrane distillation. Water Res 103:362–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armand SB, Fouladitajar A, Ashtiani FZ, Karimi M (2017) The effect of polymer concentration on electrospun PVDF membranes for desalination by direct contact membrane distillation. European Water 58:21–26Google Scholar
  4. Cai J, Guo F (2017) Study of mass transfer coefficient in membrane desalination. Desalination 407:46–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen J, Wang Q, Hua Z, Du G (2007) Research and application of biotechnology in textile industries in China. Enzyme Microb Tech 40:1651–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chhabra M, Mishra S, Sreekrishnan TR (2015) Combination of chemical and enzymatic treatment for efficient decolorization/degradation of textile effluent: high operational stability of the continuous process. Biochem Eng J 93:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dasgupta J, Sikder J, Chakraborty S, Curcio S, Drioli E (2015) Remediation of textile effluents by membrane based treatment techniques: a state of the art review. J Environ Manag 147:55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drioli E, Ali A, Macedonio F (2015) Membrane distillation: recent developments and perspectives. Desalination 356:56–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eykens L, Sitter KD, Dotremont C, Pinoy L, Bruggen BVD (2017) Membrane synthesis for membrane distillation: a review. Sep Purif Technol 182:36–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.03.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Figoli A, Ursino C, Galiano F, Nicolò ED, Carnevale MC, Criscuoli A (2016) Innovative hydrophobic coating of perfluoropolyether (PFPE) on commercial hydrophilic membranes for DCMD application. J Membr Sci 522:192–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khalifa A, Ahmad H, Antar M, Laoui T, Khayet M (2017) Experimental and theoretical investigations on water desalination using direct contact membrane distillation. Desalination 404:22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim S, Dong WL, Cho J (2016) Application of direct contact membrane distillation process to treat anaerobic digestate. J Membr Sci 511:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liang B, Zhan W, Qi GG, Lin SS, Nan Q, Liu YX, Cao B, Pan K (2015) High performance graphene oxide/polyacrylonitrile composite pervaporation membranes for desalination applications. J Mater Chem A 3:5140–5147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lou M, Ding L, Zhao F, Li F, Ma C, Tian Q, Liu Y (2017) Performance of direct contact membrane distillation for simulated dyeing wastewater treatment. European Water 58:223–228Google Scholar
  15. Lu KJ, Zuo J, Chung TS (2016) Tri-bore PVDF hollow fibers with a super-hydrophobic coating for membrane distillation. J Membr Sci 514:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marcucci M, Ciardelli G, Matteucci A, Ranieri L, Russo M (2002) Experimental campaigns on textile wastewater for reuse by means of different membrane processes. Desalination 149:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mohamed ES, Boutikos P, Mathioulakis E, Belessiotis V (2017) Experimental evaluation of the performance and energy efficiency of a vacuum multi-effect membrane distillation system. Desalination 408:70–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mokhtar NM, Lau WJ, Ismail AF, Kartohardjono S, Lai SO, Teoh HC (2016) The potential of direct contact membrane distillation for industrial textile wastewater treatment using PVDF-Cloisite 15A nanocomposite membrane. Chem Eng Res Des 111:284–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ozturk E, Koseoglu H, Karaboyaci M, Yigit NO, Yetis U, Kitis M (2016) Sustainable textile production: cleaner production assessment/eco-efficiency analysis study in a textile mill. J Clean Prod 138:248–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Saha S, Das C (2017) Purification of humic acids contained simulated wastewater using membrane ultrafiltration. European Water 58:33–40Google Scholar
  21. Segato L, Mattioli W, Capello N, Migliorini M (2017) Environmental crimes in the water sector. European Water 60:373–379Google Scholar
  22. Sundar LS, Sharma KV, Singh MK, Sousa ACM (2017) Hybrid nanofluids preparation, thermal properties, heat transfer and friction factor a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 68:185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsiourtis NX (2017) Desalination and alternative water resources. European Water 58:103–109Google Scholar
  24. Wang P, Chung TS (2015) Recent advances in membrane distillation processes: Membrane development, configuration design and application exploring. J Membr Sci 474:39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringDonghua UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Textile Pollution Controlling Engineering Center of Ministry of Environmental ProtectionShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations