Compassionate end-of-life care matters deeply for patients and their caregivers, but studies continue to demonstrate ways in which physicians fall short. Despite specific training during medical school, many patients report lack of empathy in their providers with respect to end-of-life conversations. This is likely because empathy is simply hard to teach. Numerous activities have been tried to combat the decline in empathy during medical training with little to moderate success. However, virtual reality, which allows users to viscerally experience anything from another person’s point of view, could be a game changer for building empathy within medicine. This type of perspective-taking has previously shown to improve understanding, reduce biases, facilitate empathy, and promote prosocial behaviors. In this pilot study, virtual reality was used to allow students to “become a patient” virtually embodying their daily activities, symptoms, and interactions with caregivers. Using the Embodied Labs modules, first-year medical students were able to experience first-hand having a terminal illness, being told no further treatments are available and witnessing loved ones’ reactions. Data generated through surveys and reflections indicated a high level of place illusion, plausibility, and embodiment of users. This high level of immersion generated an increase in comfortability with talking about end-of-life issues, produced a better understanding of what patients and their families experience, and promoted a change in the way students would approach clinical skills. Analysis of reflections indicated a high level of empathy for the patient and his family members. Overall, the activity was highly received by students as a valuable learning activity. As such, we propose that virtual reality could be a useful pedagogical tool to facilitate empathy and clinical skills within medical education.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Berger DM. Clinical empathy. Aronson; 1987.
Hojat M, Mangione S, Nasca TJ, Cohen MJM, Gonnella JS, Erdmann JB, et al. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: development and preliminary psychometric data. Educ Psychol Meas. 2001;61:349–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971158.
Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M. Physician empathy: Definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:1563–9. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1563.
Kerasidou A, Horn R. Making space for empathy: supporting doctors in the emotional labour of clinical care Ethics in Clinical Practice. BMC Med Ethics. 2016;17:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0091-7.
Hojat M. Empathy in health professions education and patient care. Springer International Publishing; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27625-0.
Neumann MA, Bensing JB, Mercer SC, Ernstmann NA, Ommen OA, Pfaff HA. H. Analyzing the “nature” and “specific effectiveness” of clinical empathy: a theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda. Patient education and counseling analyzing the ‘nature’ and ‘specific effectiveness’ of clinical empathy: A theoretical overview and contribution towards a theory-based research agenda. Elsevier 2009;74:339–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.013.
Batt-Rawden SA, Chisolm MS, Anton B, Flickinger TE. Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88:1171–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299f3e3.
Kelm Z, Womer J, Walter JK, Feudtner C. Interventions to cultivate physician empathy: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:219. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-219.
Sugarman L. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, David A. Kolb, Prentice-Hall International, Hemel Hempstead, Herts., 1984. No. of pages: xiii + 256. J Organ Behav 1987;8:359–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030080408.
Bunn W, Terpstra J. Cultivating empathy for the mentally ill using simulated auditory hallucinations. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33:457–60. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.33.6.457.
Varkey P, Chutka DS, Lesnick TG. The aging game: improving medical students’ attitudes toward caring for the elderly. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006;7:224–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2005.07.009.
Herrera F, Bailenson J, Weisz E, Ogle E, Zaki J. Building long-term empathy: a large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0204494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204494.
Slater M. Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2009;364:3549–57. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0138.
Louie AK, Coverdale JH, Balon R, Beresin EV, Brenner AM, Guerrero APS, et al. Enhancing empathy: a role for virtual reality? Acad Psychiatry. 2018;42:747–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0995-2.
Chris Milk: How virtual reality can create the ultimate empathy machine | TED Talk n.d. https://www.ted.com/talks/chris_milk_how_virtual_reality_can_create_the_ultimate_empathy_machine/discussion?la (accessed 31 Jan 2020).
Schutte NS, Stilinović EJ. Facilitating empathy through virtual reality. Motiv Emot. 2017;41:708–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9641-7.
Kandaurova M, Lee SH (Mark). The effects of virtual reality (VR) on charitable giving: the role of empathy, guilt, responsibility, and social exclusion. J Bus Res 2019;100:571–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.
Russell V, Barry R, Murphy D. HAVE experience: an investigation into vr empathy for panic disorder. 2018 IEEE Games, Entertain. Media Conf. GEM 2018, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; 2018, p. 167–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/GEM.2018.8516461.
Dyer E, Swartzlander BJ, Gugliucci MR. Using virtual reality in medical education to teach empathy. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106:498–500. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.518.
Gugliucci MR. Virtual reality medical education project enhances empathy. Innov Aging. 2019;3:S298. https://doi.org/10.1093/GERONI/IGZ038.1096.
Washington E, Shaw C. The effects of a VR intervention on career interest, empathy, communication skills, and learning with second-year medical students, Springer, Cham; 2019, p. 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27986-8_7.
Rabow MW, McPhee SJ. Beyond breaking bad news: how to help patients who suffer. West J Med. 1999;171:260–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.000365.
Weisse CS, Melekis K, Hutchins B. Providing end-of-life care: increased empathy and self-efficacy among student caregivers in residential homes for the dying. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019;36:538–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049909118820844.
Embodied Labs n.d. https://embodiedlabs.com/ (accessed 24 Mar 2020).
Shin D. Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: To what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? Comput Human Behav. 2018;78:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.012.
Nicovich SG, Boller GW, Cornwell TB. Experienced presence within computer-mediated communications: initial explorations on the effects of gender with respect to empathy and immersion. J Comput Commun. 2006;10:00–00. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00243.x.
Halpern J. From detached concern to empathy : humanizing medical practice. Oxford University Press; 2001.
Reniers RLEP, Corcoran R, Drake R, Shryane NM, Völlm BA. The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. J Pers Assess. 2011;93:84–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484.
Bellet PS, Maloney MJ. The importance of empathy as an interviewing skill in medicine. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1991;266:1831–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03470130111039.
Telle NT, Pfister HR. Positive empathy and prosocial behavior: a neglected link. Emot Rev. 2014;8:154–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915586817.
Barzansky B, Vesloski JJ, Miller R, Jonas HS. Education in end-of-life care during medical school and residency training. Acad Med. 1999;74:s102–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199910000-00054.
Mermann AC, Gunn DB, Dickinson GE. Learning to care for the dying: a survey of medical schools and a model course. Acad Med. 1991;66:35–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199101000-00010.
Linn LS, DiMatteo MR, Cope DW, Robbins A. Measuring physicians’ humanistic attitudes, values, and behaviors. Med Care. 1987;25:504–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198706000-00005.
Ferreira-Valente A, Monteiro JS, Barbosa RM, Salgueira A, Costa P, Costa MJ.  Ferreira-Valente A, Monteiro JS, Barbosa RM, Salgueira A, Costa P, Costa MJ. Clarifying changes in student empathy throughout medical school: a scoping review. Adv Heal Sci Educ 2017;22:1293–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9704-7.
Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, Brainard G, Herrine SK, Isenberg GA, et al. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84:1182–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55.
Preusche I, Lamm C. Reflections on empathy in medical education: what can we learn from social neurosciences? Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2016;21:235–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9581-5.
Gleichgerrcht E, Decety J. Empathy in clinical practice: how individual dispositions, gender, and experience moderate empathic concern, burnout, and emotional distress in physicians. PLoS One. 2013;8:e61526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061526.
Patel S, Pelletier-Bui A, Smith S, Roberts MB, Kilgannon H, Trzeciak S, et al. Curricula for empathy and compassion training in medical education: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0221412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221412.
van Loon A, Bailenson J, Zaki J, Bostick J, Willer R. Virtual reality perspective-taking increases cognitive empathy for specific others. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0202442. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202442.
Blascovich J, Loomis J, Beall AC, Swinth KR, Hoyt CL, Bailenson JN. Immersive virtual environment technology: just another methodological tool for social psychology? Psychol Inq. 2002;13:146–9. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1302_03.
Bailenson JN, Yee N. A longitudinal study of task performance, head movements, subjective report, simulator sickness, and transformed social interaction in collaborative virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 2006;15:699–716. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.15.6.699.
Shriram K, Oh SY, Bailenson J. Virtual Reality and Prosocial Behavior. In: Burgoon JK, Magnenat-Thalmann N, Pantic M, Vinciarelli A, editors. Soc. Signal Process., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017, p. 304–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676202.022.
Psychiatry EW-HJ of C, 1980 undefined. The dutiful physician: the central role of empathy in psychoanalysis, psychotherapy, and medical practice. PsycnetApaOrg n.d.
Feighny KM, Monaco M, Arnold L. Empathy training to improve physician-patient communication skills. Acad Med. 1995;70:435–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199505000-00031.
Real F, DeBlasio D, Ollberding N, Davis D, Cruse B, Mclinden D, et al. Resident perspectives on communication training that utilizes immersive virtual reality. Educ Heal. 2017;30:228. https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.EfH_9_17.
Fisher JA. Empathic actualities: toward a taxonomy of empathy in virtual reality. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 10690 LNCS, Springer Verlag; 2017, p. 233–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71027-3_19.
Shamasundar C. Understanding empathy and related phenomena. Am J Psychother. 1999;53:232–45. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.19126.96.36.199.
Hojat M, DeSantis J, Shannon SC, Speicher MR, Bragan L, Calabrese LH. Empathy as related to gender, age, race and ethnicity, academic background and career interest: a nationwide study of osteopathic medical students in the United States. Med Educ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14138.
Grosseman S, Novack DH, Duke P, Mennin S, Rosenzweig S, Davis TJ, et al. Residents’ and standardized patients’ perspectives on empathy: Issues of agreement. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96:22–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.007.
This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics committee of Eastern Virginia Medical School (IRB # 19-10-WC-0246).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Elzie, C.A., Shaia, J. A Pilot Study of the Impact of Virtually Embodying a Patient with a Terminal Illness. Med.Sci.Educ. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01243-9
- Virtual reality
- Embodied learning