This paper argues that we can see our lives as a snapshot happening now or as a moving picture extending across time. These dual ways of seeing our lives inform how we conceive of the problem of age group justice. A snapshot view sees age group justice as an interpersonal problem between distinct age groups. A moving picture view sees age group justice as a first-person problem of prudential choice. This paper explores these different ways of thinking about age group justice and illustrates them using a principle of respect for human dignity, understood in terms of reasonable support for floor level central human capabilities at each stage of life. I argue that different frames are suitable for different kinds of decisions, and each provides a true, but partial, picture of aging and age group justice.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics. (2016). Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161484. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1484.
Arneson, R. J., & Ian Shapiro, I. (1996). Democratic autonomy and religious freedom: A critique of Wisconsin v. Yoder. In I. Shapiro & R. Hardin (Eds.), Nomos XXXVIII: political order (pp. 365–441). London: New York University Press.
Baars, J. (2013). A deepening involvement in life with others. Research on Ageing and Social Policy, 1(1), 6–26.
Blasimme, A. (2017). Physical frailty, sarcopenia, and the enablement of autonomy. Aging, Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 59–63.
Blasimme, A. (2021). Ageing and functional plasticity: Explanatory frameworks of ageing and care. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.
Boniolo, G. (2021). Demented patients and the quandaries of identity: Setting the problem, advancing a proposal. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00365-y.
Buchanan, A., Brock, D. W., Daniels, N., & Wikler, D. (2000). From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daniels, N. (1988). Am I my parents’ keeper?: An essay on justice between the young and old. New York: Oxford University Press.
Davis, J. (2004). Precedent autonomy and subsequent consent. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 7(267–291), 2004.
Diekema, D. (1990). Is taller really better?: Growth hormone therapy in short children. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 34(1), 109–123.
Dworkin, R. (1994). Life’s dominion. New York: Vintage Books.
Feinberg, J. (1980). The child’s right to an open future. In W. Aiken & H. LaFollette (Eds.), Whose child? (pp. 124–153). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garson, J. (2021). Ageing and the goal of evolution. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.
Giaimo, S. (2021). A perspective on the concept of aging in evolutionary biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.
Gilbert, S. F. (2000). Developmental biology (6th ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Green, S., & Hillersdal. (2021). Aging biomarkers and the measurement of health and risk. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00367-w.
Gullette, M. M. (2021). Ageism in state power and literary culture. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.
Havighurst, R. J. (1961). Successful aging. Gerontologist, 1(1), 8–13.
Hawkins, J. (2014). Well being, time and dementia. Ethics, 124(3), 507–542.
Jecker, N. S. (2013). Justice between age groups. American Journal of Bioethics, 13(8), 3–15.
Jecker, N. S. (2020a). Ending midlife bias: New values for old age. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jecker, N. S. (2020b). African conceptions of age-based moral standing. Hastings Center Report, 50(2), 35–43.
Jecker, N. S. (2020c). Ageism. In Encyclopedia of life sciences. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0028976.
Jecker, N. S. (2020d). Nothing to be ashamed of: Sex robots for older adults with disabilities. Journal of Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106645.
Jecker, N. S. (2020e). You’ve got a friend in me: Sociable robots for older adults in an age of global pandemics. Ethics and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09546-y.
Jecker, N. S., & Miwa, E. (2019). What do we owe the newly dead? Bioethics, 33(6), 691–698.
Katz, A. L., Webb, S. A., & American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. (2016). Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161485. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1485.
Katz, W. J. (2016). Age and notions related to it in Greek non-legal sources—The contribution to the research of Roman law. Roczniki Administracji i Prawa nr, XVI(1), 85–96.
Laceulle, H. (2017). Aging and the ethics of authenticity. Gerontologist, 58(5), 970–978.
Lavretsky, H. (2014). What is resilience in the context of aging? In H. Lavretsky (Ed.), Resilience and aging (pp. 1–13). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
McKerlie, D. (2013). Justice between the young and the old. New York: Oxford University Press.
McMahan, J. (2002). The ethics of killing. Oxford University Press.
Nathan, M. J. (2021). Does anybody really know what time it is? History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00381-y (In press).
Nunes, R. (2001). Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 22(4), 337–349.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Overall, C. (2013). Concepts of life span and life-stages: Implications for ethics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 32(supp 1), 298–318.
Oxford University Press. (2020a)."integrity, n.". OED Online. June 2020. Oxford University Press. Retrieved June 12, 2020, from https://www-oed-com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/view/Entry/97366?redirectedFrom=integrity&.
Oxford University Press. (2020b). "fair, adj. and n.1". OED Online. June 2020. Oxford University Press. https://www-oed-com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/view/Entry/67704?result=2&rskey=yE7Nms&.
Oxford University Press. (2020c). "prudence, n.". OED Online. June 2020. Oxford University Press. https://www-oed-com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/view/Entry/153584?.
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rhoden, N. K. (1989). How should we view the incompetent? Law Med Healthcare, 17(3), 264–268.
Schicktanz, S., & Schweda, M. (2021). Aging 4.0?: Rethinking the ethical framing of technology-assisted eldercare. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.
Sholl, J. (2021). Can aging research generate a theory of health? History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences.
Wareham, C. (2021). Between hoping to die and longing to live long. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00385-8 (In press).
World Health Organization (WHO). (2015). World report on healthy aging. Geneva: WHO Press.
Versions of this paper were presented at a workshop on Rethinking Ageing: Philosophy of Science and Ethics, Civitas Vitae Research Centre, Padova, Italy (2018) and the American Philosophical Association Pacific Division meeting, San Francisco, California, USA (2020). I am grateful to participants in these events for valuable feedback. The ideas developed in the paper draw from my book, Ending Midlife Bias: New Values for Old Age (Oxford University Press 2020a).
Conflict of interest
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Jecker, N.S. The time of one's life: views of aging and age group justice. HPLS 43, 24 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00377-8
- Age group justice
- Narrative identity
- Midlife bias