Skip to main content
Log in

Abnormal 1-hour post-load glycemia during pregnancy impairs post-partum metabolic status: a single-center experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Recent evidence indicates that people with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) but 1-h post-load plasma glucose (1-h OGTT) ≥ 155 mg/dl have an increased risk for developing Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), determining a new risk category with deeper metabolic impairment. The aim of this study was to identify, among women with gestational diabetes (GDM), which alterations at OGTT during pregnancy are more frequently associated with 1-h OGTT ≥ 155 mg/dl at post-partum examination.

Methods

Among 297 women affected by GDM, we retrospectively evaluated 244 resulted NGT after delivery. Based on post-partum glucose levels at 1-h OGTT, these people were divided into 188 cases (77.0%) with 1-h OGTT < 155 mg/dl (L-NGT) and 56 (23.0%) with 1-h OGTT ≥ 155 mg/dl (H-NGT).

Results

Abnormal glucose levels at 1-h OGTT during pregnancy (≥ 180 mg/dl) were more frequent in H-NGT than in L-NGT (39.3 vs. 24.6%, odds ratio 3.7 [95% CI 1.4–9.6]; p = 0.016). Moreover, H-NGT showed more frequently the simultaneous alteration of all three OGTT plasma glucose values during pregnancy (10.7 vs. 2.1%, odds ratio 4.5 [95% CI 1.5–20.3]; p = 0.038) and less frequently the alteration of fasting plasma glucose alone (14.3 vs. 30.8%, odds ratio 0.4 [95% CI 0.1–0.7]; p = 0.028).

Conclusions

Abnormal 1-h OGTT during pregnancy predicts an increased risk for post-partum 1-h OGTT ≥ 155 mg/dl in women with previous GDM. Even if NGT after delivery, these women may require a closer long-term post-partum follow-up, being at higher risk to develop future glucose intolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Diabetes Association (2016) Standards of medical care in diabetes—2016. Diabetes Care 39(suppl 1):S1–S112

    Google Scholar 

  2. Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD)—Società Italiana di Diabetologia (SID) (2016) Standard italiani per la cura del diabete mellito 2016. Available at http://www.standarditaliani.it. Accessed 18 Apr 2017

  3. Ferrara A (2007) Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus: a public health perspective. Diabetes Care 30:S141–S146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. American Diabetes Association (2004) Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 27:S88–S90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nesbitt TS, Gilbert WM, Herrchen B (1998) Shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors with macrosomic infants born in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:476–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH (2002) Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 25:1862–1868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiefari E, Arcidiacono B, Foti D, Brunetti A (2017) Gestational diabetes mellitus: an updated overview. J Endocrinol Invest. doi:10.1007/s40618-016-0607-5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, Coustan DR et al (2008) Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 358:1991–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Committee on Obstetric Practice (2009) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 435: postpartum screening for abnormal glucose tolerance in women who had gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 113:1419–1421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunt KJ, Conway DL (2008) Who returns for postpartum glucose screening following gestational diabetes mellitus? Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(404):e1–e6

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lawrence JM, Black MH, Hsu JW, Chen W, Sacks DA (2010) Prevalence and timing of postpartum glucose testing and sustained glucose dysregulation after gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 33:569–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Russell MA, Phipps MG, Olson CL, Welch HG, Carpenter MW (2006) Rates of postpartum glucose testing after gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 108:1456–1462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Almario CV, Ecker T, Moroz LA, Bucovetsky L, Berghella V, Baxter JK (2008) Obstetricians seldom provide postpartum diabetes screening for women with gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(528):e1–e5

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abdul-Ghani MA, Abdul-Ghani T, Ali N, Defronzo RA (2008) One-hour plasma glucose concentration and the metabolic syndrome identify subjects at high risk for future type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 31:1650–1655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdul-Ghani MA, Lyssenko V, Tuomi T, Defronzo RA, Groop L (2009) Fasting versus postload plasma glucose concentration and the risk for future type 2 diabetes: results from the Botnia Study. Diabetes Care 32:281–286

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Priya M, Anjana RM, Chiwanga FS, Gokulakrishnan K, Deepa M, Mohan V (2013) 1-hour venous plasma glucose and incident prediabetes and diabetes in Asian Indians. Diabetes Technol Ther 15:497–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Succurro E, Marini MA, Arturi F, Grembiale A, Lugarà M, Andreozzi F et al (2009) Elevated 1-hour post-load plasma glucose levels identifies subjects with normal glucose tolerance but early carotid atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 207:245–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sciacqua A, Miceli S, Carullo G, Greco L, Succurro E, Arturi F et al (2011) One-hour postload plasma glucose levels and left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients. Diabetes Care 34:1406–1411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Marini MA, Succurro E, Frontoni S, Mastroianni S, Arturi F, Sciacqua A et al (2012) Insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, and incretin effect in individuals with elevated 1-hour post-load plasma glucose levels. Diabetes Care 35:868–872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sesti G, Fiorentino TV, Succurro E, Perticone M, Arturi F, Sciacqua A et al (2014) Elevated 1-h post-load plasma glucose levels in subjects with normal glucose tolerance are associated with unfavorable inflammatory profile. Acta Diabetol 51:927–932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fiorentino TV, Marini MA, Andreozzi F, Arturi F, Succurro E, Perticone M et al (2015) One-Hour Postload Hyperglycemia is a stronger predictor of type 2 diabetes than impaired fasting glucose. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:3744–3751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bianchi C, Miccoli R, Trombetta M, Giorgino F, Frontoni S, Faloia E, GENFIEV Investigators et al (2013) Elevated 1-hour postload plasma glucose levels identify subjects with normal glucose tolerance but impaired β-cell function, insulin resistance, and worse cardiovascular risk profile: the GENFIEV study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98(5):2100–2105. doi:10.1210/jc.2012-3971

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carpenter MW, Coustan DR (1982) Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Ostet Gynecol 144(7):768–773

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel (2010) International Association Of Diabetes And Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 33(3):676–682

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Cozzolino M, Serena C, Maggio L, Rambaldi MP, Simeone S, Mello G, Pasquini L, Di Tommaso M, Mecacci F (2017) Analysis of the main risk factors for gestational diabetes diagnosed with International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria in multiple pregnancies. J Endocrinol Invest. doi:10.1007/s40618-017-0646-6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Unwin N, Shaw J, Zimmet P, Alberti KG (2002) Impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glycemia: the current status on definition and intervention. Diabet Med 19:708–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuang L, Huang Z, Hong Z, Chen A, Li Y (2015) Predictability of 1-h postload plasma glucose concentration: a 10-year retrospective cohort study. J Diabetes Investig 6:647–654. doi:10.1111/jdi.12353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D (2009) Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 373:1773–1779

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nathan DM, Davidson MB, DeFronzo RA, Heine RJ, Henry RR, Pratley R (2007) Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: implications for care. Diabetes Care 30:753–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abdul-Ghani MA, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA (2006) Contributions of beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance to the pathogenesis of impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting Glucose. Diabetes Care 29:1130–1139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Laakso M, Zilinskaite J, Hansen T, Boesgaard TW, Väntinnen M, Stancáková A (2008) Insulin sensitivity, insulin release and glucagon-like peptide-1 levels in persons with impaired fasting glucose and/o impaired glucose tolerance in the EUGENE2 study. Diabetologia 51:502–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Giuliana Arcidiacono, Ph.D. in English and Anglo-American Studies, University of Catania, for the language revision of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Sciacca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

RV. participated in the Novo Nordisk Advisory Board in 2015 and 2016. L.S. participated in the Lilly Advisory Board in 2017. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Ethical approval

The ethical committee approval is not required in our institution for retrospective studies. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 59 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tumminia, A., Milluzzo, A., Cinti, F. et al. Abnormal 1-hour post-load glycemia during pregnancy impairs post-partum metabolic status: a single-center experience. J Endocrinol Invest 41, 567–573 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-017-0774-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-017-0774-z

Keywords

Navigation