Abstract
The language of behavior analysis is precise in the sense that it focuses attention on functional relations between behavior and the environment that are extended in time. However, to non-behavior analysts, behavior-analytic terms and explanations are difficult to understand and awkward sounding. Evidence suggests that this has had deleterious effects on the acceptance of the field of behavior analysis and its explanations of behavior. The goal of this article is to assert that verbal behavior that describes behavior is functionally related to subsequent explanatory verbal behavior. In addition, it is argued that technical language is not a requirement of precision and logical formulation. Suggestions are made regarding how behavior analysts can generate evidence to better understand explanatory preferences of individuals with various amounts of exposure to behavior analysis. In addition, methods are suggested for introducing behavior analysis to others with vernacular descriptions of behavior and its causes that do not obscure critical distinctions by introducing mental/mediational explanations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austin, J. L. (1961). Philosophical papers. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Bailey, J. S. (1991). Marketing behavior analysis requires different talk. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 445–448. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-445
Barling, J., & Wainstein, T. (1979). Attitudes, labeling bias, and behavior modification in work organizations. Behavior Therapy, 10, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(79)80016-7
Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 137–153.
Baum, W. M. (2012). Rethinking reinforcement: Allocation, induction, and contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.97-101
Becirevic, A., Critchfield, T. S., & Reed, D. D. (2016). On the social acceptability of behavior-analytic terms: Crowdsourced comparisons of lay and technical language. The Behavior Analyst, 39, 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0067-4
Borkovec, T. D., & Nau, S. D. (1972). Credibility of analogue therapy rationales. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychology, 3, 257–260.
Buehner, M. J. (2003). Rethinking temporal contiguity and the judgement of causality: Effects of prior knowledge, experience, and reinforcement procedure. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 865–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000675
Buehner, M. J. (2005). Contiguity and covariation in human causal inference. Learning & Behavior, 33, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196065
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill-Prentice Hall.
Critchfield, T. S., Doepke, K. J., Epting, L. K., Becirevic, A., Reed, D. D., Fienup, D. M., et al. (in press). Normative emotional responses to behavior analysis jargon, or, how not to use words to win friends and influence people. Behavior Analysis in Practice., 10, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0161-9
Fernandez-Duque, D., Evans, J., Christian, C., & Hodges, S. D. (2015). Superfluous neuroscience information makes explanations of psychological phenomena more appealing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 926–944. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00750
Field, D. P., & Hineline, P. N. (2008). Dispositioning and the obscured roles of time in psychological explanations. Behavior and Philosophy, 36, 5–69.
Foxx, R. M. (1996). Translating the covenant: The behavior analyst as ambassador and translator. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393162
Friman, P. C. (2006). Eschew obfuscation: A colloquial description of contingent reinforcement. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 7, 107–110.
Hayes, S. C., Pistorello, J., & Walser, R. D. (1995). Communicating behavioral views and techniques to practicing clinicians. Journal of Behavioral Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 26, 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(95)00012-O
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Hineline, P. N. (1966). Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 9, 421–430.
Hineline, P. N. (1980). The language of behavior analysis: Its community, its function, and its limitations. Behaviorism, 8, 67–86.
Hineline, P. N. (1983). When we speak of knowing. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392398
Hineline, P. N. (1990). The origins of environment-based psychological theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1990.53-305
Hineline, P. N. (2001). Beyond the molar molecular distinction: We need multiscaled analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 75, 342–347. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2001.75-342
Hume, D. (1975). Enquiries concerning human understanding and concerning the principles of morals. Oxford, UK: Clarendon. (Originally published in 1777.)
Jarmolowicz, D. P., Kahng, S., Ingvarsson, E. T., Goysovich, R., Heggemeyer, R., & Gregory, M. K. (2008). Effects of conversational versus technical language on treatment preferences and integrity. Intellectual and Development Disabilities, 46, 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1352/2008.46:190-199
Kaplan, P. S., & Hearst, E. (1982). Bridging temporal gaps between CSs and USs in autoshaping: Insertion of other stimuli before, during and after Cs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 187–203.
Kazdin, A. E., & Cole, P. M. (1981). Attitudes and labeling biases toward behavior modification: The effects of labels, content, and jargon. Behavior Therapy, 12, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(81)80106-2
Kazdin, A. E., & Krouse, R. (1983). The impact of variations in treatment rationales on expectations for therapeutic change. Behavior Therapy, 14, 657–671.
Leigland, S. (1989). A functional analysis of mentalistic terms in human observers. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392831
Leigland, S. (1996). The functional analysis of psychological terms: In defense of a research program. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 13, 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392909
Lindsley, O. R. (1991). From technical jargon to plain English for application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-449
Matute, H., & Miller, R. R. (1998). Detecting causal relations. In O’Donohue (Ed.), Learning and behavior therapy (pp. 483–497). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Mendelson, R., & Shultz, T. R. (1976). Covariation and temporal contiguity as principles of causal inference in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22, 408–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(76)90104-1
Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York, NY: Basic Books. (Originally published in 1946.)
Miles, T. R. (1994). Ordinary language: The contributions of Gilbert Ryle and John Austin to the experimental analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392650
Moore, J. (1983). On molarism and matching. The Psychological Record, 33, 313–336.
Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Read, P. (1992). Effects of signaled delay between an action and outcome on human judgement of causality. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44B, 81–100.
Rhoades, M. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1992). Teacher reactions to behavioral consultation: An analysis of language and involvement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088247
Rhodes, R. E., Rodriguez, F., & Shah, P. (2014). Explaining the alluring influence of neuroscience reasoning on scientific reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1432–1440.
Rolider, A., Axelrod, S., & Van Houton, R. (1998). Don’t speak behavior modification to me: How to clearly and effectively communicate behavioral interventions to the general public. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 20, 39–56.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York, NY: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London, UK: Hutchinson.
Sambursky, S. (1974). Physical thought: From the presocratics to the quantum physicists. London, UK: Hutchinson.
Shultz, T. R., & Ravinsky, F. B. (1977). Similarity as a principle of causal inference. Child Development, 48, 1552–1558. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128518
Siegler, R. S., & Liebert, R. M. (1974). Effects of contiguity, regularity, and age on children’s causal inferences. Developmental Psychology, 10, 574–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036594
Skinner, B. F. (1935). The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. Journal of General Psychology, 13, 40–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1935.9920087
Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062535
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). The role of the environment, notes 1.1–1.2. In B. F. Skinner, Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis (pp. 3–28). New York, NY: Appleton-century-crofts.
Stein, R. I., & Nemeroff, C. J. (1995). Moral overtones of food: Judgments of others based on what they eat. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 480–490.
Tomasello, M., & Farmer, M. J. (1986). Joint attention and early language. Child Development, 57, 1454–1463.
Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 470–477. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20040
Weisberg, D. S., Taylor, J. C. V., & Hopkins, E. J. (2015). Deconstructing the seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Judgement and Decision Making, 10, 429–441.
Wincour, S. (1976). Primer of verbal behavior: An operant view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Witt, J. C., Moe, G., Gutkin, T. B., & Andrews, L. (1984). The effect of saying the same thing in different ways: The problem of language and jargon in school-based consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(84)90023-2
Wolpe, J. (1978). Cognition and causation in human behavior and its therapy. The American Psychologist, 33, 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.33.5.437
Woodward-Kron, R. (2008). More than just jargon: The nature and role of specialized language in learning disciplinary knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7, 234–249.
Woolfolk, R. L., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1979). Modifying the effect of the behavior modification label. Behavior Therapy, 10, 575–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(79)80060-X
Funding
This researched received no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author reports no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
I would like to thank Bill Ahearn, Anne Castley Burdzy, Phil Hineline, and Pauline Guerin for their careful reviews of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neuman, P. Vernacular Selection: What to Say and When to Say It. Analysis Verbal Behav 34, 62–78 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0097-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0097-y