Skip to main content
Log in

Instructional Demonstrations are More Efficient Than Consequences Alone for Children with Naming

  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research found that without the naming cusp, children did not learn from instructional demonstrations presented before learn units (IDLUs) (i.e., modeling an expected response twice for a learner prior to delivering an instructional antecedent), however, following the establishment of naming, they could. The present study was designed to compare the rate of learning reading and mathematics objectives in children who showed naming using IDLUs compared to standard learn units (SLUs) alone (comparable to three-term contingency trials). In Phase 1, a pre-screening phase, we demonstrated that four typically developing males, 3 to 4 years of age, had naming within their repertoire, meaning they were able to master the names of novel 2-D stimuli as both a listener and a speaker without explicit instruction. Using the same participants in Phase 2, we compared rates of learning under two instructional methods using a series of repeated AB designs where conditions (IDLUs versus SLUs) were counterbalanced across dyads and replicated across participants. The participants learned more than twice as fast under IDLU conditions and showed between 30% and 50% accuracy on the first presentation of a stimulus following a model. The IDLU condition was more efficient (fewer trials to criterion) than the SLU condition. These findings, together with prior findings, suggest that the onset of naming allows children to learn faster when instructional demonstrations are incorporated into lessons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s verbal behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23(1), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (1961). Child development, Vol 1: A systematic and empirical theory.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, C. S., & Greer, R. D. (2014). Actions vs. words: How we can learn both. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 4(3), 1717–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnerero, J. J., & Pérez-González, L. A. (2014). Induction of naming after observing visual stimuli and their names in children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(10), 2514–2526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childers, J. B., & Tomasello, M. (2002). Two-year-olds learn novel nouns, verbs, and conventional actions from massed or distributed exposures. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 967–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coon, J. T., & Miguel, C. F. (2012). The role of increased exposure to transfer-of-stimulus control procedures on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 657–666.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Corwin, A., & Greer, R. D. (in press). Effect of the establishment of naming on learning from teacher demonstrations by children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.

  • Gewirtz, J. L., & Baer, D. M. (1958). Deprivation and satiation of social reinforcers as drive conditions. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57(2), 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilic, L., & Greer, R. D. (2011). Establishing naming in typically developing two-year-old children as a function of multiple exemplar speaker and listener experiences. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, R. D. (2002). Designing teaching strategies: An applied behavior analysis systems approach. Academic Press.

  • Greer, R. D., Corwin, A., & Buttigieg, S. (2011a). The effects of the verbal developmental capability of naming on how children can be taught. Acta de Investigacion Psicologia, 1(1), 23–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, D., & Du, L. (2015). Identification and establishment of reinforcers that make the development of complex social language possible. International Journal of Behavior Analysis & Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(1), 13-34.

  • Greer, R. D., & Han, H. S. A. (2015). Establishment of conditioned reinforcement for visual observing and the emergence of generalized visual-identity matching. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 20(2), 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, R. D., & Keohane, D. D. (2005). The evolution of verbal behavior in children. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 12(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, R. D., & Longano, J. (2010). A rose by naming: How we may learn how to do it. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26(1), 73–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, R. D., Pistoljevic, N., Cahill, C., & Du, L. (2011b). Effects of conditioning voices as reinforcers for listener responses on rate of learning, awareness, and preferences for listening to stories in preschoolers with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: Inducing and expanding new verbal capabilities in children with language delays. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, R. D., & Speckman, J. (2009). The integration of speaker and listener responses: A theory of verbal development. The Psychological Record, 59(3), 449–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. In Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Prentice Hall.

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of the constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobari-Wright, V. V., & Miguel, C. F. (2014). The effects of listener training on the emergence of categorization and speaker behavior in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(2), 431–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longano, J. M., & Greer, R. D. (2015). Is the source of reinforcement for naming multiple conditioned reinforcers for observing responses? The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31(1), 96–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. S. (1950). A system of logic. In E. Wagel (Ed.), John Stuart Mill's philosophy of scientific method (pp. 20–105). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, G., & Pelaez, M. (2004). Child and adolescent development: A behavioral systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira-Delgado, J. A., Greer, R. D., & Speckman, J. (2008). Effects of conditioning reinforcement for print stimuli on match-to-sample responding in preschoolers. The Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis, 3(2-3), 60–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosales-Ruiz, J., & Baer, D. M. (1997). Behavioral cusps: A developmental and pragmatic concept for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(3), 533–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. (1968). The technology of teaching (the century psychology series). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vladescu, J. C., & Kodak, T. M. (2013). Increasing instructional efficiency by presenting additional stimuli in learning trials for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 805–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, T. D., Schuster, J. W., & Collins, B. C. (2000). Effects on future learning of presenting non-target stimuli in antecedent and consequent conditions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kieva Hranchuk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. (Please attached in the supplemental material section, an IRB approval document).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hranchuk, K., Douglas Greer, R. & Longano, J. Instructional Demonstrations are More Efficient Than Consequences Alone for Children with Naming. Analysis Verbal Behav 35, 1–20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0095-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0095-0

Keywords

Navigation