Abstract
Prior research found that without the naming cusp, children did not learn from instructional demonstrations presented before learn units (IDLUs) (i.e., modeling an expected response twice for a learner prior to delivering an instructional antecedent), however, following the establishment of naming, they could. The present study was designed to compare the rate of learning reading and mathematics objectives in children who showed naming using IDLUs compared to standard learn units (SLUs) alone (comparable to three-term contingency trials). In Phase 1, a pre-screening phase, we demonstrated that four typically developing males, 3 to 4 years of age, had naming within their repertoire, meaning they were able to master the names of novel 2-D stimuli as both a listener and a speaker without explicit instruction. Using the same participants in Phase 2, we compared rates of learning under two instructional methods using a series of repeated AB designs where conditions (IDLUs versus SLUs) were counterbalanced across dyads and replicated across participants. The participants learned more than twice as fast under IDLU conditions and showed between 30% and 50% accuracy on the first presentation of a stimulus following a model. The IDLU condition was more efficient (fewer trials to criterion) than the SLU condition. These findings, together with prior findings, suggest that the onset of naming allows children to learn faster when instructional demonstrations are incorporated into lessons.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s verbal behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23(1), 69–84.
Bijou, S. W., & Baer, D. M. (1961). Child development, Vol 1: A systematic and empirical theory.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York: Macmillan.
Cahill, C. S., & Greer, R. D. (2014). Actions vs. words: How we can learn both. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 4(3), 1717–1746.
Carnerero, J. J., & Pérez-González, L. A. (2014). Induction of naming after observing visual stimuli and their names in children with autism. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(10), 2514–2526.
Childers, J. B., & Tomasello, M. (2002). Two-year-olds learn novel nouns, verbs, and conventional actions from massed or distributed exposures. Developmental Psychology, 38(6), 967–978.
Coon, J. T., & Miguel, C. F. (2012). The role of increased exposure to transfer-of-stimulus control procedures on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 657–666.
Corwin, A., & Greer, R. D. (in press). Effect of the establishment of naming on learning from teacher demonstrations by children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis.
Gewirtz, J. L., & Baer, D. M. (1958). Deprivation and satiation of social reinforcers as drive conditions. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57(2), 165–172.
Gilic, L., & Greer, R. D. (2011). Establishing naming in typically developing two-year-old children as a function of multiple exemplar speaker and listener experiences. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 157–177.
Greer, R. D. (2002). Designing teaching strategies: An applied behavior analysis systems approach. Academic Press.
Greer, R. D., Corwin, A., & Buttigieg, S. (2011a). The effects of the verbal developmental capability of naming on how children can be taught. Acta de Investigacion Psicologia, 1(1), 23–54.
Greer, D., & Du, L. (2015). Identification and establishment of reinforcers that make the development of complex social language possible. International Journal of Behavior Analysis & Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(1), 13-34.
Greer, R. D., & Han, H. S. A. (2015). Establishment of conditioned reinforcement for visual observing and the emergence of generalized visual-identity matching. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 20(2), 227–252.
Greer, R. D., & Keohane, D. D. (2005). The evolution of verbal behavior in children. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 12(1), 31–47.
Greer, R. D., & Longano, J. (2010). A rose by naming: How we may learn how to do it. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26(1), 73–106.
Greer, R. D., Pistoljevic, N., Cahill, C., & Du, L. (2011b). Effects of conditioning voices as reinforcers for listener responses on rate of learning, awareness, and preferences for listening to stories in preschoolers with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 103–124.
Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: Inducing and expanding new verbal capabilities in children with language delays. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc..
Greer, R. D., & Speckman, J. (2009). The integration of speaker and listener responses: A theory of verbal development. The Psychological Record, 59(3), 449–488.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. In Springer Science & Business Media.
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185–241.
Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Prentice Hall.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of the constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Kobari-Wright, V. V., & Miguel, C. F. (2014). The effects of listener training on the emergence of categorization and speaker behavior in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(2), 431–436.
Longano, J. M., & Greer, R. D. (2015). Is the source of reinforcement for naming multiple conditioned reinforcers for observing responses? The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31(1), 96–117.
Mills, J. S. (1950). A system of logic. In E. Wagel (Ed.), John Stuart Mill's philosophy of scientific method (pp. 20–105). New York: Harper.
Novak, G., & Pelaez, M. (2004). Child and adolescent development: A behavioral systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pereira-Delgado, J. A., Greer, R. D., & Speckman, J. (2008). Effects of conditioning reinforcement for print stimuli on match-to-sample responding in preschoolers. The Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis, 3(2-3), 60–77.
Rosales-Ruiz, J., & Baer, D. M. (1997). Behavioral cusps: A developmental and pragmatic concept for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(3), 533–544.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Skinner, B. (1968). The technology of teaching (the century psychology series). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Vladescu, J. C., & Kodak, T. M. (2013). Increasing instructional efficiency by presenting additional stimuli in learning trials for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 805–816.
Wolery, T. D., Schuster, J. W., & Collins, B. C. (2000). Effects on future learning of presenting non-target stimuli in antecedent and consequent conditions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 77–94.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. (Please attached in the supplemental material section, an IRB approval document).
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hranchuk, K., Douglas Greer, R. & Longano, J. Instructional Demonstrations are More Efficient Than Consequences Alone for Children with Naming. Analysis Verbal Behav 35, 1–20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0095-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0095-0