Advertisement

A Digital Language Divide? The Relationship between Internet Medication Refills and Medication Adherence among Limited English Proficient (LEP) Patients

  • Alejandra Casillas
  • Gerardo Moreno
  • Jonathan Grotts
  • Chi-Hong Tseng
  • Leo S. Morales
Article

Abstract

Background

Use of an Internet portal to refill medicines positively affects medication adherence among English-speakers. No prior studies, however, have specifically examined the relationship between Internet refills and medication adherence among patients who are limited English proficient (LEP).

Objectives

(1) Examine the relationship between Internet medication refill system use and medication adherence among linguistically diverse patients with chronic conditions and (2) compare this relationship between LEP and English-proficient (EP) patients.

Design, Participants, Measures

We analyzed 2013–2014 cross-sectional data from 509 surveyed adults in the Group Health Cooperative. Surveys were merged with plan enrollment, claims data, and electronic medical records. Medication adherence was calculated by the “Continuous Measure of Medication Gaps” (CMG) method. For Internet refill system use, patients were asked, “Have you used the health systems Internet site to refill any medications in the last 12 months?” LEP status was captured in the electronic medical record by a non-English primary language and a claims record of interpreter use in at least one clinical encounter between 2005 and 2012. We used multivariate linear regression models to examine Internet refill system use and medication adherence and compared the association between LEP and EP patients.

Results

Three hundred eighty-four patients (75%) had a calculable CMG: 134 EP and 250 LEP in the adherence analyses. In unadjusted analyses, LEP patients had lower use of the Internet refill system (p < .001) and lower adherence versus the EP group (p < .001). In multivariate analyses, LEP status (β = − 0.022, p = .047) was negatively associated with adherence, while use of the Internet refill system (β = 0.030, p = .002) was positively associated. In stratified models, use of Internet refills was positively associated with adherence, even when examining LEP (β = 0.029, p = .003) and EP patients (β = 0.027, p = .049) separately.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that LEP patients may be under-utilizing a beneficial Internet tool. Should our healthcare systems fail to ensure that LEP patients have full and meaningful access to Internet patient portals, we risk worsening healthcare disparities.

Keywords

Limited English proficiency Digital divide Health disparities Patient portal Medication adherence 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Contributors: Authors listed, no others.

Prior Presentations: Casillas A, Moreno G, Tseng CH, Grotts J, and L Morales. A digital language divide? The relationship between Internet medication fills and medication adherence among Limited English Proficient patients. Oral Research Presentation. Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting. April 2017 in Washington DC.

Funding

This research was supported by R01MD006185 (PI: Morales). Alejandra Casillas MD, MSHS, also received support from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) and Charles Drew University (CDU), resource Centers for Minority Aging Research Center for Health Improvement of Minority Elderly (RCMAR/CHIME) under the NIH/NIA Grant P30-AG021684, and from the UCLA Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) under the NIH/NCATS Grant Number UL1R001881. The contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the NIH.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Halamka JD, Mandl KD, Tang PC. Early experiences with personal health records. Journal of the American medical informatics association. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:1–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sarkar U, Lyles CR, Parker MM, Allen J, Nguyen R, Moffet HH, et al. Use of the refill function through an online patient portal is associated with improved adherence to statins in an integrated health system. Med Care. 2014;52:194–201.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhou YY, Kanter MH, Garrido T. Improved quality at Kaiser Permanente through e-mail between physicians and patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29:1370–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gordon NP, Hornbrook MC. Differences in access to and preferences for using patient portals and other eHealth technologies based on race, ethnicity, and age: a database and survey study of seniors in a large health plan. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e50.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Roblin DW, Houston TK, Allison JJ, Joski PJ, Becker ER. Disparities in use of a personal health record in a managed care organization. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:683–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moreno G, Lin EH, Chang E, Johnson RL, Berthoud H, Solomon CC, et al. Disparities in the use of internet and telephone medication refills among linguistically diverse patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:282–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garrido T, Kanter MH, Meng D, Turley M, Wang J, Valerie S, Scott L. Race/ethnicity, personal health record access, and quality of care. Am J Manag Care 2015; e103–e113.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    The Joint Center Report, April 2012. Minorities, mobile broadband and the management of chronic diseases. Available at: http://jointcenter.org/sites/default/files/Minorities%20Mobile%20Broadband%20and%20the%20Management%20of%20Chronic%20Diseases_0.pdf. Accessed August 9, 2016.
  9. 9.
    Lyles CR, Allen JY, Poole D, Tieu L, Kanter MH, Garrido T. “I want to keep the personal relationship with my doctor”: understanding barriers to portal use among African Americans and Latinos. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e263.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tieu L, Sarkar U, Schillinger D, Ralston JD, Ratanawongsa N, Pasick R, et al. Barriers and facilitators to online portal use among patients and caregivers in a safety net health care system: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e275.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schickedanz A, Huang D, Lopez A, Cheung E, Lyles CR, Bodenheimer T, et al. Access, interest, and attitudes toward electronic communication for health care among patients in the medical safety net. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:914–20.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shin HB, Bruno R. Language use and English speaking ability: census 2000 brief. Washington DC: US Census Bureau; 2003. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-29.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2017Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson E, Chen AH, Grumbach K, Wang F, Fernandez A. Effects of limited English proficiency and physician language on health care comprehension. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:800–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karliner LS, Auerbach A, Napoles A, Schillinger D, Nickleach D, Perez-Stable EJ. Language barriers and understanding of hospital discharge instructions. Med Care. 2012;50:283–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lyles CR, Sarkar U, Schillinger D, Ralston JD, Allen JY, Nguyen R, et al. Refilling medications through an online patient portal: consistent improvements in adherence across racial/ethnic groups. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23:e28–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steiner JF, Prochazka AV. The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:105–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Steiner JF, Koepsell TD, Fihn SD, Inui TS. A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records: description and validation. Med Care. 1988;26:814–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, Ahmed AT, Schmittdiel JA, Selby JV. New prescription medication gaps: a comprehensive measure of adherence to new prescriptions. Health Serv Res. 2009;44:1640–61.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choo PW, Rand CS, Inui TS, Lee MLT, Cain E, Cordeiro-Breault M, et al. Validation of patient reports, automated pharmacy records, and pill counts with electronic monitoring of adherence to antihypertensive therapy. Med Care. 1999;37:846–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nau DP, Steinke DT, Williams LK, Austin R, Lafata JE, Divine G, et al. Adherence analysis using visual analog scale versus claims-based estimation. Ann Pharmacother. 2007;41:1792–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ratanawongsa N, Karter AJ, Quan J, Parker MM, Handley M, Sarkar U, et al. Reach and validity of an objective medication adherence measure among safety net health plan members with diabetes: a cross-sectional study. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:688–98.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© W. Montague Cobb-NMA Health Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alejandra Casillas
    • 1
  • Gerardo Moreno
    • 2
  • Jonathan Grotts
    • 1
  • Chi-Hong Tseng
    • 1
  • Leo S. Morales
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of MedicineUCLA David Geffen School of MedicineLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Family MedicineUCLA David Geffen School of MedicineLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Center for Health Equity, Diversity and InclusionUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations