Abstract
Across various subfields within psychology, mechanistic causation is invoked regularly. When the temporal contiguity of the typical cause–effect relation is violated, mechanistic causation often assigns causal roles to mediating hypothetical constructs to account for observed effects. Two primary consequences of mechanistic causation are that 1) the proposed hypothetical constructs add what many behavior analysts consider an unnecessary step in the causal chain, and 2) these constructs then become the focus of study thereafter diverting attention from more accessible “causes.” Constructs do not contribute directly to determining the control of behavior; thus, their reification as “causes” often distracts from variables that do fulfill a causal role. In this review, these consequences are discussed in relation to theories of interval timing proposing an internal clock. Not only has this clock been said to be a cause of behavior in experiments on temporally regulated behavior, but also the clock itself has been a frequent subject of study within the timing literature. Despite descriptive accounts of this sort initially serving a heuristic function for model development, the promotion from descriptive aid to causal factor has the potential to limit much of the heuristic value that mechanistic models of causation can provide to the analysis of behavior. Problems related to construct reification are less likely to be at issue when functional relations and the processes of establishing such behavior are emphasized as alternatives to mechanistic causation alone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allman, M. J., Teki, S., Griffiths, T. D., & Meck, W. H. (2014). Properties of the internal clock: First- and second-order principles of subjective time. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 743–771. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115117
Bachrach, A. J. (1962). Two fundamental methods of research: The formal theoretical and the informal theoretical. In A. J. Bachrach (Ed.), Psychological research: An introduction (pp. 53–68). New York: Random House.
Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20(1), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137
Catania, A. C. (1970). Reinforcement schedules and psychophysical judgements: A study of some temporal properties of behavior. In W. N. Schoenfled (Ed.), The theory of reinforcement schedules. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Chiesa, M. (1994). Radical behaviorism: The philosophy and the science. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
Church, R. M. (1984). Properties of the internal clock. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, 566–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23459.x
Church, R. M., & Deluty, M. Z. (1977). Bisection of temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3(3), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.3.3.216
Dragoi, V., Staddon, J. E. R., Palmer, R. G., & Buhusi, C. V. (2003). Interval timing as an emergent learning property. Psychological Review, 110(1), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.126
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84(3), 279–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.279
Gibbon, J., & Church, R. M. (1984). Sources of variance in an information processing theory of timing. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 465–488). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Grünbaum, A. (1952). Causality and the science of human behavior. American Scientist, 40, 665–676.
Hanson, N. R. (1955). Causal chains. Mind, 64(255), 289–311.
Hineline, P. N. (2004). When we speak of intentions. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 203–221). New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum.
Jozefowiez, F., Staddon, J. E. R., & Cerutti, D. T. (2009). The behavioral economics of choice and interval timing. Psychological Review, 116, 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016171
Killeen, P. R., & Fetterman, J. G. (1988). A behavioral theory of timing. Psychological Review, 95(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.274
MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.
Mach, E. (1893). The science of mechanics: A critical and historical exposition of its principles. (T. J. McCormack, trans.). Chicago: Open Court.
Machado, A. (1997). Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior. Psychological Review, 104, 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.241
Marr, M. J. (1993). Contextualistic mechanism or mechanistic contextualism? The straw machine as tar baby. The Behavior Analyst, 16(1), 59–65.
Matell, M. S., & Meck, W. H. (2004). Cortico-striatal circuits and interval timing: Coincidence detection of oscillatory processes. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.06.012
Meck, W. H. (1996). Neuropharmacology of timing and time perception. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(3–4), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(96)00009-2
Meck, W. H., Penney, T. B., & Pouthas, V. (2008). Cortico-striatal representation of time in animals and humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.002
Morris, E. K. (1988). Contextualism: The world view of behavior analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46(3), 289–323.
Nevin, J. A. (1984). Quantitative analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 421–434.
Palya, W. L. (1993). Bipolar control in fixed interfood intervals. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 345–359.
Richelle, M., & Lejeune, H. (Eds.). (1980). Time in animal behavior. London, UK: Pergamon Press.
Roberts, S., & Church, R. M. (1978). Control of an internal clock. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 4(4), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.4.4.318
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London, UK: Hutchinson.
Schneider, B. A. (1969). A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12(5), 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-677
Segal, E. F. (1962). Exteroceptive control of fixed-interval responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5(1), 49–57.
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology. New York: Basic Books.
Skinner, B. F. (1999a). Are theories of learning necessary? In V. G. Laties & A. C. Catania (Eds.), Cumulative record: A selection of papers (4th ed.). East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts (Original work published 1950).
Skinner, B. F. (1999b). The concept of the reflex in the description of behavior. In V. G. Laties & A. C. Catania (Eds.), Cumulative record: A selection of papers (4th ed.). East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts (Original work published 1931).
Skinner, B. F. (1999c). Can psychology be a science of mind? In V. G. Laties & A. C. Catania (Eds.), Cumulative record: A selection of papers (4th ed.). East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts (Original work published 1990).
Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the “internal clock”. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 77(13), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093864
von Glasersfeld, E. (1990). Teleology and the concepts of causation. Philosophica, 46, 17–43.
Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia University Press.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the three anonymous reviewers for providing stimulating feedback on previous drafts of this manuscript. Inspiration for this manuscript came largely from discussions of behavior theory in Behavior Theory and Philosophy, a graduate course in the Department of Psychology at West Virginia University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eckard, M.L., Lattal, K.A. The Internal Clock: A Manifestation of a Misguided Mechanistic View of Causation?. Perspect Behav Sci 43, 5–19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-00189-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-00189-5