Academic Psychiatry continues to further the role of technology in clinical care and education in several ways. The articles on evidence-based approaches to tele- and e-behavioral health in this issue remind us of several core medical, psychiatric, pedagogic, and technical tenets. Academic health centers promote the current and next-generation’s education through innovative approaches to research, clinical care, and faculty development. Innovations in medicine and technology (e.g., telepsychiatry) invite clinicians to practice and advocate for underserved populations without access to quality care due to geographical, cultural, and other barriers) [1]. Telepsychiatry also empowers patients, personalizes care, and increases administrative efficiency and communication. A new range of technologies challenges clinicians, trainees, and educators to ensure high-quality clinical care, professional standards, and sensitivity to differences in participants [2].
The articles in this issue are geared to help trainees, clinicians, faculty educators, and others improve care via clinical and technological competence. In order to do that, the profession has to consider new applications of technology as instrumental, rather than supplemental, to practice and teaching (e.g., “instructional technology”). The articles provide a broad perspective on what clinicians, trainees, patients, and the public are doing with technology and how they are using it in clinical care, education, and everyday life. A range of technologies is discussed, including social media [3] and smartphone apps [4]; these have been used across mobile health and other platforms [5].
Articles in this issue delve into telecompetencies, which are becoming an essential part of the clinical toolkit skills and practices. Indeed, telecompetencies help align targeted clinical outcomes with teaching/supervisory methods, evaluation, and feedback. One paper provides an overview of why we need not just telepsychiatric competencies but also telebehavioral health competencies across mental health specialties [6]. Another paper spells out the domains: clinical evaluation and care; administration; cultural competence and diversity; legal and regulatory issues; evidence-based and ethical practice; and mobile health, smartphone, and apps [7]. Telepsychiatric competencies are updated [6], and specific competencies for social media are offered [3].
Several articles offer fresh ideas on how to use technology for teaching faculty, course and clerkship directors, program directors, and other leaders to advance medical and psychiatric residency education [8,9,10]. There are options for those interested in incorporating technology into the psychiatric residency curriculum [9] or developing a digitally informed curriculum in psychiatric education and practice [10]. Crawford et al. [11] offer three educational reports across the learning continuum to describe how to build ehealth and telepsychiatry capabilities, including those geared toward underserved, primary care, and integrated care populations. Ratzliff et al. [12] also look at tele-behavioral health in collaborative and integrated care. Finally, an article thinks through the professionalism implications for practice and education [13].
Competencies are a focus of undergraduate and graduate medical education but have yet to be fully described in the continuing medical education (CME) realm. The educational outcomes of the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) are evidence-based, including the domains of medical knowledge, patient care skills and attitudes, interpersonal and communication skills and attitudes, ethical judgment, professionalism, lifelong learning and experience-based improvement, and community and systems-based practice [14]. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) specifies patient caremedical knowledge practice-based learning and improvement, systems-based practice, professionalism, and interpersonal skills, and communication domains [15]. The AAMC framework on pre-entrustable and entrustable professional activities for entering residency [16] attempts to bridge gaps between knowledge and skills/behaviors. CME still lacks an integrated plan of competencies, despite consensus- and evidence-based guidelines and accreditation, legal, and regulatory agency policies.
The collection of articles in this issue is founded on other critical considerations. First, clinical care is only as good as the outcomes that are prioritized and evaluated. The Institute of Medicine and its Health Professions Education Summit [17, 18] linked health care professional training with quality of care, safety, and interdisciplinary skill objectives for patient-centered care, interdisciplinary teams, evidence-based practice, and information technology (IT). Another consideration is that lifelong learning is an ongoing necessary process for all psychiatrists—as supported by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN) and the American Psychiatric Association, based on a lifelong learning platform [19].
Technology, now ubiquitous in everyday life, has had no “home” in mental or behavioral health or psychiatric journals. The collection of articles in this issue builds on a previous issue of Academic Psychiatry in 2006 on the use of technology for education and on the innovations and technology in education column. The Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, and Journal of Medical Informatics Research—Mental Health have some focus on these topics, but unlike Academic Psychiatry, education is not the focus. The new Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science focuses on telecompetencies across professions.
Trends in Clinical Care, Use of Technologies, and Competencies
This collection of articles takes a look at technologies applied to clinical and educational activities, as well as everyday life. It moves beyond telepsychiatry, a common service delivery option for over 20 years with a strong evidence base, to a mental or behavioral health-related continuum of technology-based options for patients, families, caregivers, and professionals. The field is exploring the interface between these technologies (e.g., a system) and the participants (e.g., individual/group, patients, virtual characters) [2]. This continuum includes Internet-based information; self-help/support groups; well-prepared materials for patient and clinician education; use of social media; self- and clinician-assisted assessment; asynchronous text, e-mail, and video; mobile health with apps; and synchronous video (Table 1) [2].
Being aware of how patients and populations at large are using technology is important [1, 20, 21]. Patients may at times prefer low intensity options for services (e.g., patient education modules, text/e-mail interventions) that, if researched and effective, may nicely complement traditional in-person and telepsychiatric care options. Indeed, technology is a “practice extender” by performing some of the tasks that clinicians and staff have done to integrate care [22]. Perhaps more broadly, it can be considered an integral “team member” of a stepped care approach. It is hoped that these technologies will be better included in the electronic health record and/or part of a broader, mobile health platform.
The telepsychiatric competencies in 2015 [23]—the first telecompetencies published—were based on the ACGME [15] and CanMEDS [24] frameworks, in six domains: patient care, communications, system-based practice, professionalism, practice-based improvement, and knowledge. These competencies adapted the Dreyfus model for learners (5 levels: Novice, Advanced, Competent, Proficient, and Expert) [25] but combined them into Novice/Advanced Beginner, Competent/Proficient, and Expert levels. The Coalition for Technology in Behavioral Science developed an interprofessional, evidence-based framework for measurable telebehavioral health competencies [6, 7, 26, 27] in seven topic domains: (1) clinical evaluation and care, (2) virtual environment and telepresence, (3) technology, (4) legal and regulatory issues, (5) evidence-based and ethical practice, (6) mobile health and apps, and (7) telepractice development.
Social media and networking competencies in the graduate medical education domain framework were recently posited [7, 28] and are advanced in this issue [3]. Along with mobile health, smartphone/device, and app competencies, these technologies pose substantial challenges (e.g., asynchronous, not structured like traditional care visits, affect the therapeutic frame, create additional boundary issues). Advantages of these technologies include portability, accessibility across time and place, affordability, and the potential for additional features.
Clinical Issues and Challenges
Ethics, professionalism, and the law are domains with substantial overlap. Psychiatrists are typically held to a higher ethical standard than other physicians because of the nature of their work. Publicized breaches of professionalism online spurred the development of a field now called “digital ethics” or “e-professionalism” due to reports by deans and state medical boards [29, 30] and the media. Current use and misuse of technology by residents and medical students is difficult to assess.
Delivering mental health care through technology has many potential clinical, legal, professional, and communication ramifications [13]. Clinicians should screen patients about their use of technology, evaluate its impact, and be mindful of informed consent documentation and licensing and other legal requirements when using technology with patients [27]. The American Psychological Association Guideline for the Practice of Telepsychology [31] includes many components: clinical (e.g., informed consent, documentation, confidentiality, adjusting assessments), ethical, educational, legal and regulatory, and security and management of data.
Other key themes across traditional video, Internet, mobile device, and other technologies include quality of information; how to communicate via texting, e-mail, and apps; therapeutic and boundary issues; and practitioner and patient privacy. While not wholly new, these issues raise unexpected and unintended consequences and challenges like verification of identity/authenticity, data “permanence” of information posted, public sharing of personal versus professional information, and searches conducted by the public, patients, and clinicians. Clinicians are expected to safeguard patients’ privacy and inform them of potential risks and benefits in the use of technology in the clinical setting.
Administrative, Business, and Reimbursement/Financing Issues
For administrators, attending to technology-related issues is another challenge. Telepsychiatry provides versatility to health care systems by enabling more patient points-of-entry, matching patient needs with provider skills, and helping providers work at the top of their licenses. Telepsychiatry and other technologies make collaborative, stepped, and integrated care less costly and more accessible. Effective health care delivery matches the intensity of the services to the needs of a patient population or clinic, standardizes interventions, and evaluates both process and clinical outcomes.
Theoretically and practically, evaluation of clinical skills/behaviors should dovetail with evaluation of clinical care. Perhaps a finite, but manageable, subset of faculty and trainees’ behaviors could be efficiently evaluated with regard to core concepts related to quality care and decision-making. If clinical supervisors and program directors work with administrators, the learning and clinical objectives can be aligned with the instructional method [32, 33] and policies and procedures for technology (e.g., electronic documentation). More than ever, teamwork is needed across professions and disciplines, teaching and clinical faculty, evaluators and students/clinicians, managers, and staff. Research findings must be translated into models of teaching, practice, and assessment.
Another challenge is in consolidating information in an effort to enhance decision-making, whether at the level of a clinician and/or a psychiatric leader. The amount of information is skyrocketing, and it is not integrated across public, private, and health system datasets and systems. Electronic health records are standard, but systems do not smoothly interface between systems and clinicians. This lack of ability to interface across systems restricts automated capture, processing, and utilization, which decrease the return on investment for technology. And perhaps worse, each new innovation is costly and often fails to provide a platform on which new data can be smoothly flow and be integrated.
In the growing flood of data, medicine is caught largely reacting instead of getting ahead of the problem. In business, shared domain knowledge and common understanding between the IT and the line managers has improved performance [34]—if it is done with a specific goal in mind and as part of a strategic approach. Competition in business made this a “life and death” proposition for survival rather than elective, but the result was a competitive advantage by abandoning manual processes in systems, even if there was disruption [34,35,36,37]. A strategic approach using this shared IT-business—or shared IT-psychiatric or IT-medical understanding—could (1) reduce supplemental, technological add-ons to the organization; (2) reduce expenditures; (3) increase reliance on integrative rather than manual (or siloed computer) systems for communication, evaluation, and queries; and (4) enhance long-term planning.
Technology could be central to health care transformation and improvement. Currently, Americans pick technology and obtain health care like a commodity—searching for the best service, price, and time—even though health care is viewed as a right and is best distributed by a central, equitable process [38, 39]. One might imagine a more systematic approach in which technology was harnessed to key goals of patient-centered care and value-based care as part of an overarching system coordinated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service. Such an approach might better tie reimbursements to clinical care, quality, patient experience, safety, efficiency, and mortality [40, 41] and potentially slow the growth of health care expenses [42], as has been demonstrated well in the Canadian and Japanese health care systems [43,44,45].
Academic psychiatrists and other mental health clinicians influence the future of the profession at the level of both the individual (e.g., trainees) and local and national systems. Technology is permeating future education and training, clinical practice, and research. This collection offers expert thinking about current practices and future needs across a wide variety of domains and settings with the goal of improving access to and quality of care across populations nationwide. There are many implications of telepractice for departments, schools, academic health centers, psychiatric workforce, and international organizations. There is much to learn about implementation and evaluation of competencies, change management, and prioritization of technology by leaders.
References
Hilty DM, Yellowlees PM, Parish MB, et al. Telepsychiatry: effective, evidence-based and at a tipping point in healthcare delivery. Psych Clin N Amer. 2015;38(3):559–92.
Hilty DM, Chan S, Torous J, et al. New frontiers in healthcare and technology: Internet- and web-based mental options emerge to complement in-person and telepsychiatric care options. J Health Med Informatics. 2015;6(4):1–14.
Zalpuri I, Liu H, Stubbe D, et al. Social media and networking competencies for psychiatric education: skills, teaching methods, and implications. Acad Psychiatry (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0983-6.
Torous J, Bauer A, Chan S, Boland R, Ramo D Smart steps for psychiatric education: approaching smartphone apps for learning and care. Acad Psychiatry (2018). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0901-y.
Hilty DM, Chan S, Hwang T, Wong A, Bauer AM. Advances in mobile mental health: opportunities and implications for the spectrum of e-mental health services. Mhealth. 2017;3:34.
Hilty DM, Maheu MM, Drude KP, Hertlein KM. The need to implement and evaluate telehealth competency frameworks to ensure quality care across behavioral health professions. Acad Psychiatry (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0992-5.
Maheu MM, Hilty DM, Drude KP, Hertlein KM. A framework of interprofessional telebehavioral health competencies: implementation and challenges moving forward. Acad Psychiatry (2018). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0988-1.
Moran J, Briscoe G, Peglow S. Current technology in advancing medical education: perspectives for learning and providing care. Acad Psychiatry (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0946-y.
Mahoney N, Walaszek A, Caudill R. Incorporating technology into the psychiatric residency curriculum. Acad Psychiatry (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0978-3.
Kim JW, Torous JB, Chan S, Gipson SYMT Developing a digitally informed curriculum in psychiatry education and clinical practice. Acad Psychiatry (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0895-5.
Crawford A, Gratzer D, Jovanovic M, Rodie D, Sockalingam S, Sunderji N, Teshima J, Thomas Z Building ehealth and telepsychiatry capabilities: three educational reports across the learning continuum. Acad Psychiatry (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0989-0.
Ratzliff A, Sunderji N, McCarron R. Tele-behavioral health in collaborative and integrated care: competencies for psychiatric trainees, faculty and community providers. Acad Psychiatry (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0984-5.
DeJong S. Professionalism and technology: competencies across the tele-behavioral health and e-behavioral health spectrum. Acad Psychiatry (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0947-x.
American Association of Medical Colleges. (2014). Core entrustable professional activities for entering residency. https://www.aamc.org/download/427456/data/spring2015updatepptpdf.pdf. Accessed: 1 September 2018.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. (2013). Common program requirements. https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRs2013.pdf. Accessed: 1 September 2018.
American Association of Medical Colleges, Core Medical Student Competencies. (2015). https://www.aamc.org. Accessed: 1 September 2018.
Institute of Medicine, 2003. Health Professions Education Summit. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221516/
Institute of Medicine. The core competencies needed for health care professionals. health professions education: a bridge to quality. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2003. p. 45.
American Psychiatric Association Council on Medical Education and Lifelong Learning. Training psychiatrists for integrated behavioral health care (official actions). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2014. http://www.psychiatry.org/File%20Library/Advocacy%20and%20Newsroom/Press%20Releases/2015%20Releases/CMELL_ICReport_Public_03022015.pdf. Accessed: 1 September 2018.
Hilty DM, Ferrer D, Parish MB, et al. The effectiveness of telemental health: a 2013 review. Tel J E-Health. 2013;19(6):444–54.
Fortney J, Pyne JT, Turner E, et al. Telemedicine integration of mental health into rural primary care settings. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27(6):525–39.
Raney L, Bergman D, Torous J, et al. Digitally driven integrated primary care and behavioral health: How technology can expand access to effective treatment. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(11):86.
Hilty DM, Crawford A, Teshima J, Chan S, Sunderji N, Yellowlees PM, et al. A framework for telepsychiatric training and e-health: competency-based education, evaluation and implications. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2015;27:569–92.
Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons, CanMEDS Framework, 2005. http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/canmeds/framework. Accessed 1 September 2018.
Dreyfus SE, Dreyfus HL. A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition: Berkeley, CA, University of California, Operations Research Center; 1980. https//:www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/ GetTRDoc?AD=ADA084551. Accessed 1 September 2018.
Hilty DM, Maheu M, Drude K, et al. Telebehavioral health, telemental health, e-therapy and e-health competencies: the need for an interdisciplinary framework. J Technology in Behav Sci. 2017;2:171–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-017-0036-0.
Maheu M, Drude K, Hertlein K, et al. An interdisciplinary framework for telebehavioral health competencies. J Tech Behav Sci. 2018 doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-017-0038-y
Hilty DM, Zalpuri I, Stubbe D, Snowdy CE, Shoemaker EZ, Myint MT, Joshi SV, Liu HY Social media/networking as part of e-behavioral health and psychiatric education: competencies, teaching methods, and implications. J Tech Behav Sci 2018 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-018-0061-7.
Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1309–15.
Greysen SR, Chretien KC, Kind T, et al. Physician violations of online professionalism and disciplinary actions: a national survey of state medical boards. Research Letter JAMA. 2012;307(11):1141–2.
American Psychological Association Guideline for the Practice of Telepsychology, 2013. http://www.apapracticecentral.org/ce/guidelines/telepsychology-guidelines.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2018.
Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990;65:s63–7.
Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1984.
Ray G, Muhanna WA, Barney JB. Competing with IT: the role of shared IT-business understanding. Asso Comput Machinery Communications ACM. 2007;50(12):87–91.
Hee J, Chen Y, Huang W. Straight through processing technology in global financial market: readiness assessment and implementation. J Glob Inform Manag. 2003;11(2):56–66.
Bower JL, Christensen CM. Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harv Busin Rev. 1995;73(1):43–53.
Christensen CM, Grossman JH, Hwang J. The innovators prescription—a disruptive solution for health care. New York: McGraw Hill; 2009.
Stone LC, Steimel L, Vasquez-Guzman E, et al. The potential conflict between policy and ethics in caring for undocumented immigrants at academic health centers. Acad Med. 2014;89(4):536–9.
Acosta DA, Aguilar-Gaxiola S. Academic health centers and care of undocumented immigrants in the United States: servant leaders or uncourageous followers? Acad Med. 2014;89(4):540–3.
Keehan SP, Poisal JA, Cuckler GA, Sisko AM, Smith SD, Madison AJ, et al. National health expenditure projections, 2015–25: economy, prices, and aging expected to shape spending and enrollment. Health Aff. 2016;35(8):1522–31.
Phillips L. What will health care look like in 5–15 years? Healthcare Financial Management Association. http://www.hfma.org/Leadership/E-Bulletins/2015/April/What_Will_Health_Care_Look_Like_in_5-15_Years_/, 2015. Accessed 1 September 2018.
Aaron HJ. Five years old, going on ten: the future of the affordable care act. 2015. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/health360/2015/03/27/five-years-old-going-on-ten-the-future-of-the-affordable-care-act/. Accessed 1 September 2018.
Phelps CE. Health economics. Fifth ed. London: Routledge, Taylor and France; 2013.
Shi L, Singh DA. Delivering health care in America: a systems approach, vol. 40. Sixth ed. Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning; 2015. p. 195–245.
Islam N. The dilemma of physician shortage and international recruitment in Canada. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;3(1):29–32.
Acknowledgements
I. The Coalition for Technology in Behavioral Science
American Psychiatric Association and the Board of Trustees Committee on Telepsychiatry.
American Telemedicine Association and the Telemental Health Interest Group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of both authors, the corresponding author states that there is conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hilty, D.M., DeJong, S. Putting Technologies Used for Clinical Care and Education in Context. Acad Psychiatry 42, 753–758 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0996-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0996-1