Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Administering a Boundary Course to Third-Year Medical Students During Their Psychiatry Clerkship

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Due to lack of experience, third-year medical students (MS3) may be vulnerable to boundary violations. Investigators aimed to increase awareness regarding boundary issues among MS3s and assess the effect of using videotaped scenarios and case-based discussion on medical students’ comfort in managing boundary issues.

Methods

A nine-question pre-course survey was administered to MS3s enrolled at Cooper Medical School of Rowan University that asked students to rate their comfort in managing various boundary challenges. MS3s then viewed seven pre-recorded boundary-related cases followed by a 10–15-min discussion after each case. A post-course survey reassessed comfort in managing boundary challenges using the same nine questions, with three additional questions assessing satisfaction with the course. Change in pre- and post-course scores were analyzed using paired t tests and effect sizes. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha.

Results

There was a significant difference between pre- and post-course total scores as well as seven of the nine individual scores. Effect sizes were large (d > .08). These findings indicate that students became more comfortable managing boundary issues following the course. In addition, satisfaction ratings were high indicating the course was perceived favorably.

Conclusion

Medical students perceived the course to be beneficial and reported that it increased their awareness of boundary issues. A boundary course at the beginning of the psychiatry clerkship can improve MS3s’ comfort in managing boundary challenges. With increased comfort in managing boundary, students can better focus on other aspects of their psychiatry education and on building therapeutic alliances with their patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garfinkel PE, Dorian B, Sadavoy J, Bagby RM. Boundary violations and departments of psychiatry. Can J Psychiatr. 1997;42(7):764–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674379704200710.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas CR, Pastusek A. Boundary crossings and violations: time for child psychiatry to catch up. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatr. 2012;51(9):858–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.06.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gutheil TG, Gabbard GO. The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: theoretical and risk- management dimensions. Am J Psychiatr. 1993;150(2):188–96. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.150.2.188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brooks KD, Eley DS, Pratt R, Zink T. Management of professional boundaries in rural practice. Acad Med. 2012;87(8):1091–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31825ccbc8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gormley GJ, Fenwick T. Learning to manage complexity through simulation: students’ challenges and possible strategies. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5(3):138–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0275-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaufberg E, Baumer N, Hinrichs M, Krupat E. Professional boundaries: the perspective of the third year medical student in negotiating three boundary challenges. Teach Learn Med. 2008;20(4):334–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401330802384862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cruz-Oliver DM, Malmstrom TK, Roegner M, Yeo G. Evaluation of a video-based seminar to raise health care professionals’ awareness of culturally sensitive end-of-life care. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2017;54(4):546–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ozer MA, Govsa F, Bati AH. Web-based teaching video packages on anatomical education. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017;39(11):1253–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1889-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jang HW and Kim KJ. Use of online clinical videos for clinical skills training for medical students: benefits and challenges. BMC Med Educ vol. 14, no. 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-56.

  10. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shevell AH, Thomas A, Fuks A. Teaching professionalism to first year medical students using video clips. Med Teach. 2014;37(10):935–42. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2014.970620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boon K. Ethical and professional conduct of medical students: review of current assessment measures and controversies. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(2):221–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2002.002618.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. White GE. Medical students’ learning needs about setting and maintaining social and sexual boundaries: a report. Med Educ. 2003;37(11):1017–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01676.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fronek P, Kendall MB. The impact of professional boundaries for health professionals (PBHP) training on knowledge, comfort, experience, and ethical decision-making: a longitudinal randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;39(24):2522–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1236152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sklansky M, Nadkarni N, Ramirez-Avila L. Banning the handshake from the health care setting. J Am Med Assoc. 2014;311(24):2477–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.4675.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Galletly CA. Crossing professional boundaries in medicine: the slippery slope to patient sexual exploitation. Med J Aust. 2004;181(7):380–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Amanda Bunden, the director of the simulation lab at the medical school for her direction. In addition, we thank Aileen Zoneni the Standardized Patient Program Coordinator for her help with the case write-ups, recordings, and editing of the simulated cases.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karim Sedky.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Considerations

All research ethics were evaluated and approved by the Rowan University IRB with standards as set forth in the Belmont Report. Rowan University IRB has reviewed and approved the consent and/or assent process, waiver and/or alteration described in this protocol as required by 45 CFR 46 and 21 CFR 50, 56 (if FDA regulated research) (Rowan University IRB number 16-024EX).

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author confirms that there are no disclosures or conflict of interest. This research received no grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kunaparaju, S., Hidalgo, M.S., Bennett, D.S. et al. The Effect of Administering a Boundary Course to Third-Year Medical Students During Their Psychiatry Clerkship. Acad Psychiatry 42, 371–375 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0904-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0904-8

Keywords

Navigation