Advertisement

Academic Psychiatry

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 189–196 | Cite as

Residents Perceive Limited Education on Family Planning and Contraception for Patients with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness

  • Matthew Macaluso
  • Rosey Zackula
  • Christina Bowman
  • Christina Bourne
  • Donna Sweet
In Brief Report

Abstract

Objective

The primary goal of this study was to assess perceived adequacy of training by residents from multiple specialties on contraceptive prescribing and family planning for patients with severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI). Secondary goals included the following: (1) explore resident knowledge, attitudes, and behavior towards patients with SPMI and (2) identify barriers to meeting the reproductive health needs of patients with SPMI.

Methods

The target population was 44,237 residents from four medical specialties. Participants were from a stratified, self-selected sample. Program coordinators were asked to forward a survey link to residents. Consenting residents were provided access to a questionnaire via a secure, web-based application (REDCap). The survey assessed resident education on the reproductive health needs of patients with SPMI and included demographics (age, gender, year of residency, and specialty), perceived adequacy of training, knowledge, and attitudes, and barriers regarding contraception and family planning. Responses were summarized with frequency and compared by medical specialty.

Results

A total of 768 residents consented: 49% female, 20% male, and 31% did not indicate their gender; 19% were first year residents, 21% second year residents, 21% third year residents, 8% fourth year residents, and 30% did not indicate their year of training. By specialty, 30.6% of residents were from family medicine programs (n = 235), 10.8% were from internal medicine programs (n = 83), 18.1% were from OBGYN programs (n = 139), and 10.4% were from psychiatry programs (n = 80); 231 (30.1%) did not indicate specialty. Regarding training, 60% of residents disagreed or strongly disagreed that they had proper training on prescribing contraceptives for patients with SPMI (363 of 599). Sixty two percent of residents disagreed or strongly disagreed that they had proper training about family planning for patients with SPMI (368/599). Over 83% of residents surveyed (405/486) would prescribe contraception for patients with SPMI if they had adequate training.

Conclusions

Results indicate the need for curricular change on the reproductive health needs of patients with SPMI.

Keywords

Family planning Mental illness Education 

Notes

Funding Sources

The electronic database used to collect and manage the survey data was funded by CTSA Award # UL1TR000001.There was no direct source of funding for this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study and its conduct were approved by the University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita Human Subjects Committee (IRB # 00004144).

Disclosures

The authors have no financial or personal relationships with commercial entities that may have a direct or indirect interest in the subject matter of this presentation. Matthew Macaluso, D.O. has conducted clinical trials research as principal investigator for the following pharmaceutical companies over the last twelve months: Alkermes, Allergan, AssureRx, Eisai, Forum, Lundbeck, Janssen, and Naurex/Aptinyx. All clinical trial and study contracts were with payments made to the Kansas University Medical Center Research Institute, a research institute affiliated with Kansas University School of Medicine-Wichita (KUSM-W).

References

  1. 1.
    Parabiaghi A, Bonetto C, Ruggeri M, Lasalvia A, Leese M. Severe and persistent mental illness: a useful definition for prioritizing community-based mental health service interventions. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41:457–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruggeri M, Leese M, Thornicroft G, Bisoffi G, Tansella M. Definition and prevalence of severe and persistent mental illness. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;177:149–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices. Behind the term: serious mental illness. ref. no. 283–12–3702. 2016.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matevosyan N. Reproductive health in women with serious mental illnesses: a review. Sex Disabil. 2009;27(2):109–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-009-9114-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seeman M, Ross R. Prescribing contraceptives for women with schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Pract. 2011;17(4):258–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Magalhães P, Kapczinsk F, Kauer-Sant’Anna M. Use of contraceptive methods among women treated for bipolar disorder. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2009;12(3):183–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miller L, Finnert M. Sexuality, pregnancy, and childrearing among women with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. J Psychiatr Serv. 1996;47(5):502–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meade C, Graff F, Griffin M, Weiss R. HIV risk behavior among patients with co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorder: associations with mania and drug use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;92(1–3):296–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beyer J, Taylor L, Gersing K, Krishnan K. Prevalence of HIV infection in a general psychiatric outpatient population. Psychosomatics. 2007;48(1):31–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Hert M. Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. II. Barriers to care, monitoring and treatment guidelines, plus recommendations at the system and individual level. World Psychiatry. 2011;10(2):138–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oliver R. Contraceptive and sexual health care issues in women with schizophrenia. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2013;39(4):289–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peckham C, Grisham S. Medscape lifestyle report 2016: bias and burnout. New York; 2016.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Graber M, Bergus G, Dawson J, Wood B, Levy B, Levin I. Effect of a patient’s psychiatric history on physicians’ estimation of probability of disease. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(3):204–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akers A, Gold M, Borrero S, Santucci A, Schwarz E. Providers’ perspectives on challenges to contraceptive counseling in primary care settings. J Women’s Health. 2010;19(6):1163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010 adapted from the World Health Organization medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 4th ed. Atlanta: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR); 2010.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burns KEA. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. J Can Med Assoc. 2008;179(3):245–252.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080372.
  17. 17.
    Harris A, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    American Academy of Family Physicians. (2011). Mental health care services by family physicians (position paper).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2015). Behavioral health trends in the United States: results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. SMA 15-4927, NSDUH Series H-50).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academic Psychiatry 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kansas University School of Medicine-WichitaWichitaUSA
  2. 2.University of California-DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations