Advertisement

Current Environmental Health Reports

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 59–69 | Cite as

Multi-pollutant Modeling Through Examination of Susceptible Subpopulations Using Profile Regression

  • Eric Coker
  • Silvia Liverani
  • Jason G. Su
  • John Molitor
Susceptibility Factors in Environmental Health (B Ritz and Z Liew, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Susceptibility Factors in Environmental Health

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The inter-correlated nature of exposure-based risk factors in environmental health studies makes it a challenge to determine their combined effect on health outcomes. As such, there has been much research of late regarding the development and utilization of methods in the field of multi-pollutant modeling. However, much of this work has focused on issues related to variable selection in a regression context, with the goal of identifying which exposures are the “bad actors” most responsible for affecting the health outcome of interest. However, the question addressed by these approaches does not necessarily represent the only or most important questions of interest in a multi-pollutant modeling context, where researchers may be interested in health effects from co-exposure patterns and in identifying subpopulations associated with patterns defined by different levels of constituent exposures.

Recent Findings

One approach to analyzing multi-pollutant data is to use a method known as Bayesian profile regression, which aids in identifying susceptible subpopulations associated with exposure mixtures defined by different levels of each exposure. Identification of exposure-level patterns that correspond to a location may provide a starting point for policy-based exposure reduction. Also, in a spatial context, identification of locations with the most health-relevant exposure-mixture profiles might provide further policy relevant information.

Summary

In this brief report, we review and describe an approach that can be used to identify exposures in subpopulations or locations known as Bayesian profile regression. An example is provided in which we examine associations between air pollutants, an indicator of healthy food retailer availability, and indicators of poverty in Los Angeles County. A general tread suggesting that vulnerable individuals are more highly exposed and have limited access to healthy food retailers is observed, though the associations are complex and non-linear.

Keywords

Bayesian profile regression Multi-pollutant modeling Health effects Susceptible subpopulations Health policy 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Eric Coker reports grants from Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and grants from Fogarty International Center, Global Health Equity Scholar. John Molitor, Silvia Liverani, and Jason G. Su declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Uzoigwe JC, Prum T, Bresnahan E, Garelnabi M. The emerging role of outdoor and indoor air pollution in cardiovascular disease. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5:445–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Molitor J, Papathomas M, Jerrett M, Richardson S. Bayesian profile regression with an application to the National Survey of Children’s Health. Biostatistics. 2010;11(3):484–98.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxq013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davalos AD, Luben TJ, Herring AH, Sacks JD. Current approaches used in epidemiologic studies to examine short-term multipollutant air pollution exposures. Ann Epidemiol. 2017;27(2):145–153.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.11.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coker E, Ghosh J, Jerrett M, Gomez-Rubio V, Beckerman B, Cockburn M, et al. Modeling spatial effects of PM2.5 on term low birth weight in Los Angeles County. Environ Res. 2015;142:354–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.044.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liverani S, Hastie DI, Azizi L, Papathomas M, Richardson S. PReMiuM: an R package for profile regression mixture models using Dirichlet processes. J Stat Softw. 2015;64(7):1–30.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v064.i07.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dunson DB, Herring AH, Siega-Riz AM. Bayesian inference on changes in response densities over predictor clusters. J Am Stat Assoc. 2008;103(484):1508–17.  https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000001039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bigelow JL, Dunson DB. Bayesian semiparametric joint models for functional predictors. J Am Stat Assoc. 2009;104(485):26–36.  https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Molitor J, Su JG, Molitor N-T, Rubio VG, Richardson S, Hastie D, et al. Identifying vulnerable populations through an examination of the association between multipollutant profiles and poverty. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45(18):7754–60.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es104017x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Papathomas M, Molitor J, Richardson S, Riboli E, Vineis P. Examining the joint effect of multiple risk factors using exposure risk profiles: lung cancer in nonsmokers. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(1):84–91.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christenfeld NJS, Sloan RP, Carroll D, Greenland S. Risk factors, confounding, and the illusion of statistical control. Psychosom Med. 2004;66(6):868–75.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000140008.70959.41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zanobetti A, Austin E, Coull BA, Schwartz J, Koutrakis P. Health effects of multi-pollutant profiles. Environ Int. 2014;71:13–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.05.023.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Austin E, Coull B, Thomas D, Koutrakis P. A framework for identifying distinct multipollutant profiles in air pollution data. Environ Int. 2012;45:112–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.04.003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crépet A, Héraud F, Béchaux C, Gouze ME, Pierlot S, Fastier A, et al. The PERICLES research program: an integrated approach to characterize the combined effects of mixtures of pesticide residues to which the French population is exposed. Toxicology. 2013;313(2-3):83–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2013.04.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tadesse MG, Sha N, Vannucci M. Bayesian variable selection in clustering high-dimensional data. J Am Stat Assoc. 2005;100(470):602–17.  https://doi.org/10.1198/016214504000001565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barcella W, Iorio MD, Baio G, Malone-Lee J. Variable selection in covariate dependent random partition models: an application to urinary tract infection: variable selection in covariate dependent random partition models: an application to urinary tract infection. Stat Med. 2016;35(8):1373–89.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6786.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coker E, Liverani S, Ghosh JK, Jerrett M, Beckerman B, Li A, et al. Multi-pollutant exposure profiles associated with term low birth weight in Los Angeles County. Environ Int. 2016;91:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Madigan D, Raftery AE. Model selection and accounting for model uncertainty in graphical models using Occam’s window. J Am Stat Assoc. 1994;89(428):1535–46.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ. Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience; 2005.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vlissides J, Helm R, Johnson R, Gamma E. Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software, vol. 49. Read: Addison-Wesley; 1995. p. 11.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coker E, Gunier R, Bradman A, Harley K, Kogut K, Molitor J, et al. Association between pesticide profiles used on agricultural fields near maternal residences during pregnancy and IQ at age 7 years. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(5):506.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14050506.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hastie DI, Liverani S, Azizi L, Richardson S, Stücker I. A semi-parametric approach to estimate risk functions associated with multi-dimensional exposure profiles: application to smoking and lung cancer. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):129.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    • Ko Y-A, Mukherjee B, Smith JA, SLR K, Allison M, Diez Roux AV. Classification and clustering methods for multiple environmental factors in gene–environment interaction: application to the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Epidemiology. 2016;27(6):870–8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000548 We highlight this study because it demonstrates how profile regression can be coupled with genetic information to identify populations potentially susceptible to the health effects from environmental pollution due to gene by environment interaction. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mattei F, Liverani S, Guida F, Matrat M, Cenée S, Azizi L, et al. Multidimensional analysis of the effect of occupational exposure to organic solvents on lung cancer risk: the ICARE study. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73(6):368–77.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2015-103177.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Papathomas M, Molitor J, Richardson S, Riboli E, Vineis P. Examining the joint effect of multiple risk factors using exposure risk profiles: lung cancer in nonsmokers. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;119(1):84–91.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pirani M, Best N, Blangiardo M, Liverani S, Atkinson RW, Fuller GW. Analysing the health effects of simultaneous exposure to physical and chemical properties of airborne particles. Environ Int. 2015;79:56–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shekhar S, Yoo E-H, Ahmed SA, Haining R, Kadannolly S. Analysing malaria incidence at the small area level for developing a spatial decision support system: a case study in Kalaburagi, Karnataka, India. Spat Spatio-Temporal Epidemiol. 2017;20:9–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sste.2016.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    •• Liverani S, Lavigne A, Blangiardo M. Modelling collinear and spatially correlated data. Spat Spatio-Temporal Epidemiol. 2016;18:63–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sste.2016.04.003. This study is particularly helpful because it provides a description on how to implement the prediction profiles and how to interpret the results of predicted outcomes in relation to different profiles. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    •• Molitor J, Coker E, Jerrett M, Ritz B, Li A, Health Review Committee (2016) Part 3. Modeling of multipollutant profiles and spatially varying health effects with applications to indicators of adverse birth outcomes. Res Rep Health Eff Inst 3–47. This study is particularly important because it portrays the adaptability of profile regression to a variety of study questions in regard to susceptible populations. For instance, multiple air pollutants or combined social, demographic, built environment may be of interest or, alternatively, combined pollutants and social, demographic, and built environment factors. Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Molitor J, Fortunato L, Molitor N-T, Richardson S (2010) Examining the association between deprivation profiles and air pollution in greater London using Bayesian Dirichlet process mixture models. COMPSTAT2010.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Papathomas M, Molitor J, Hoggart C, Hastie D, Richardson S. Exploring data from genetic association studies using Bayesian variable selection and the Dirichlet process: application to searching for gene × gene patterns: searching for gene × gene patterns. Genet Epidemiol. 2012;36(6):663–74.  https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21661.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Molitor J, Brown IJ, Chan Q, Papathomas M, Liverani S, Molitor N, et al. Blood pressure differences associated with Optimal Macronutrient Intake Trial for Heart Health (OMNIHEART)-like diet compared with a typical American DietNovelty and significance. Hypertension. 2014;64(6):1198–204.  https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03799.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Domany K, Nava-Guerra L, McConnel K, Khoo M, Carroll J, Hossain M, Huang G, Amin R (2017) Cardiorespiratory control in premature children and the risk of sleep disorder breathing.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Phillips AE, Molitor J, Boily MC, Lowndes CM, Gurav K, Blanchard J, et al. Informal confidential voting interviewing in a sexual risk assessment of men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgenders (hijra) in Bangalore, India. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(3):245–50.  https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2011-050373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Crespo Cuaresma J, Grün B, Hofmarcher P, Humer S, Moser M. Unveiling covariate inclusion structures in economic growth regressions using latent class analysis. Eur Econ Rev. 2016;81:189–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Su JG, Morello-Frosch R, Jesdale BM, Kyle AD, Shamasunder B, Jerrett M. An index for assessing demographic inequalities in cumulative environmental hazards with application to Los Angeles, California. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(20):7626–34.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es901041p.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    CDC (2011) Children’s Food Environment State Indicator Report. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/downloads/childrensfoodenvironment.pdf, Accessed 20 Aug 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Coker
    • 1
  • Silvia Liverani
    • 2
  • Jason G. Su
    • 3
  • John Molitor
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Public HealthUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public HealthUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  4. 4.School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations