Advertisement

Information Technology & Tourism

, Volume 18, Issue 1–4, pp 133–155 | Cite as

Analysis of users’ heart rate data and self-reported perceptions to understand effective virtual reality characteristics

  • Elena Marchiori
  • Evangelos Niforatos
  • Luca Preto
Original Research
  • 204 Downloads

Abstract

Designing engaging virtual-reality (VR) experiences to promote a tourist destination is a challenge for destination managers. There is still limited research on which VR characteristics (i.e., format, field of view, presence of animated elements, presence of sound effects, and perceived realness/vividness) have greater impacts on memory recall (i.e., what a person remembers from the VR experience) and favorable behaviors (i.e., intent to visit, repeat the experience, recommend the product, and engage in word-of-mouth advertising). Thus, to investigate such aspects, this study discusses a protocol that includes the use of heart rate (HR), a specific biophysical data, and self-reported perceptions of users exposed to a VR experience. A case study of a VR experience developed by Ticino Tourism, a regional Swiss Destination Management Organization, to promote a destination was conducted, including the participation of 23 users in pre- and post-experiments that tracked their HR data. The findings show that specific characteristics of the VR experience, such as presenting an unusual viewpoint to the user and incorporating animated elements, hold potential in encouraging the formation of strong memories.

Keywords

Virtual reality Biophysical data Tourism destination Emotional responses VR characteristics Heart-rate data 

References

  1. Biocca F, Nowak K (2001) Plugging your body into the telecommunication system: Mediated embodiment, media interfaces, and social virtual environments. In: Lin Carolyn, Atkin David (eds) Communication technology and society. Hampton Press, Waverly Hill, pp 407–447Google Scholar
  2. Buhalis D, Law R (2008) Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the Internet-The state of eTourism research. Tour Manag 29(4):609–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Argembeau A, Comblain C, Van der Linden M (2003) Phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories for positive, negative, and neutral events. App Cogn Psychol 17(3):281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diemer J, Alpers GW, Peperkorn HM, Shiban Y, Mühlberger A (2015) The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: a review of research in virtual reality. Front Psychol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026 Google Scholar
  5. Earnshaw RA, Gigante MA, Jones H (1993) Virtual reality systems. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS (2011) Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(7):3017–3022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gretzel U, Fesenmaier D (2009) Information and technology: shaping the past, present and future of tourism. In: Robinson M, Jama T (eds) The SAGE handbook of tourism studies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 558–580Google Scholar
  8. Guttentag DA (2010) Virtual reality: applications and implications for tourism. Tour Manag 31(5):637–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamann S (2001) Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends Cogn Sci 5(9):394–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Highton S (2015) Virtual reality photography: creating panoramic and object images. ForewordGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang E (2012) Online experiences and virtual goods purchase intention. Internet Res 22(3):252–274.  https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211235644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang YC, Backman KF, Backman SJ, Chang LL (2015) Exploring the implications of virtual reality technology in tourism marketing: an integrated research framework. Int J Tour Res 18:116–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jang DP, Kim IY, Nam SW, Wiederhold BK, Wiederhold MD, Kim SI (2002) An investigation of immersiveness in virtual reality exposure using physiological data. Stud Health Technol Inform 85:207–213Google Scholar
  14. Kim JJ, Fesenmaier DR (2015) Measuring emotions in real time. implications for tourism experience design. J Travel Res 54(4):419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. LaBar KS, Cabeza R (2006) Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nat Rev Neurosci 7(1):54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lauria RM, FordMorie J (2015) Virtuality: VR as metamedia and herald of our future realities. In: Cantoni L, Danowski J (eds) Communication and technology, Handbooks of communication science [HoCS], vol 5. De Gruyter Mouton, Boston, pp 141–160Google Scholar
  17. Lui TW, Piccoli G, Ives B (2007) Marketing strategies in virtual worlds. Adv Inf Syst 38(4):77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malińska M, Zużewicz K, Bugajska J, Grabowski A (2015) Heart rate variability (HRV) during virtual reality immersion. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 21(1):47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marchiori E, Niforatos E, Preto L (2017) Measuring the media effects of a tourism-related virtual reality experience using biophysical data. Inf Commun Technol, Tourism, pp 203–215Google Scholar
  20. Meehan M (2000) An objective surrogate for presence: physiological response. In: Paper presented at the presence 2000 workshopGoogle Scholar
  21. Morina N, Ijntema H, Meyerbröker K, Emmelkamp PMG (2015) Can virtual reality exposure therapy gains be generalized to real-life? A meta-analysis of studies applying behavioral assessments. Behav Res Ther 74:18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nah FF, Eschenbrenner B, Dewester D (2011) Enhancing brand equity through flow and telepresence: a comparison of 2D and 3D virtual. MIS Q 35(3):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park J, Stoel L, Lennon SJ (2008) Cognitive, affective and conative responses to visual simulation: the effects of rotation in online product presentation. J Consum Behav 7(1):72–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ridout SJ, Spofford CM, van’t Wout-Frank M et al (2017) Heart rate variability responses to a standardized virtual reality exposure in veterans with PTSD. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry 4(3):271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Riva G, Mantovani F, Capideville CS, Preziosa A, Morganti F, Villani D, Gaggioli A, Botella C, Alcañiz M (2007) Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychol Behav 10(1):45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schaefer A, Philippot P (2005) Selective effects of emotion on the phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories. Memory 13(2):148–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schuemie MJ, Van Der Straaten P, Krijn M, Van Der Mast CA (2001) Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey. Cyberpsychol Behav 4:183–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shah AJ, Su S, Veledar E (2011) Is heart rate variability related to memory performance in middle-aged men? Psychosom Med 73(6):475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sherman WR, Craig AB (2002) Understanding virtual reality: interface, application, and design. Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  30. Slater M (2003) A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect 3(3)Google Scholar
  31. Steuer JS (1992) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J Commun 42(4):73–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sundar SS, Bellur S, Oh J, Jia H, Kim H-S (2014) Theoretical importance of contingency in human-computer interaction: effects of message interactivity on user engagement. Commun Res 43:595–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Talarico JM, LaBar KS, Rubin DC (2004) Emotional intensity predicts autobiographical memory experience. Mem Cogn 32(7):1118–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Noort G, Voorveld HAM, van Reijmersdal EA (2012) Interactivity in brand web sites: cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses explained by consumers’ online flow experience. J Interact Mark 26(4):223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wan CS, Tsaur SH, Chiu Y-L, Chiou WB (2007) Is the advertising effect of virtual experience always better or contingent on different travel destinations? Inf Technol Tour 9(1):45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weinberg L, Hasni A, Shinohara M, Duarte A (2014) A single bout of resistance exercise can enhance episodic memory performance. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 153:13–19Google Scholar
  37. Wiederhold BK, Davis R, Wiederhold MD (1998) The effect of immersiveness on physiology. Virtual Environ Clin Psychol Neurosci 58:52–60Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Marchiori
    • 1
  • Evangelos Niforatos
    • 2
  • Luca Preto
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Communication SciencesUniversità della Svizzera italianaLuganoSwitzerland
  2. 2.Faculty of InformaticsUniversità della Svizzera italianaLuganoSwitzerland
  3. 3.Ticino TourismBellinzonaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations