Simulation of the fatigue-wear coupling mechanism of an aviation gear

Abstract

The contact fatigue of aviation gears has become more prominent with greater demands for heavy-duty and high-power density gears. Meanwhile, the coexistence of tooth contact fatigue damage and tooth profile wear leads to a complicated competitive mechanism between surface-initiated failure and subsurface-initiated contact fatigue failures. To address this issue, a fatigue-wear coupling model of an aviation gear pair was developed based on the elastic-plastic finite element method. The tooth profile surface roughness was considered, and its evolution during repeated meshing was simulated using the Archard wear formula. The fatigue damage accumulation of material points on and underneath the contact surface was captured using the Brown-Miller-Morrow multiaxial fatigue criterion. The elastic-plastic constitutive behavior of damaged material points was updated by incorporating the damage variable. Variations in the wear depth and fatigue damage around the pitch point are described, and the effect of surface roughness on the fatigue life is addressed. The results reveal that whether fatigue failure occurs initially on the surface or sub-surface depends on the level of surface roughness. Mild wear on the asperity level alleviates the local stress concentration and leads to a longer surface fatigue life compared with the result without wear.

References

  1. [1]

    Link H, LaCava W, Van Dam J, McNiff B, Sheng S, Wallen R, McDade M, Lambert S, Butterfield S, Oyague F. Gearbox Reliability Collaborative Project Report: Findings from Phase 1 and Phase 2 Testing. Golden (United States): National Renewable Energy Lab, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    Krantz T, Anderson C, Shareef I, Fetty J. Testing aerospace gears for bending fatigue, pitting, and scuffing. In Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 2017

  3. [3]

    Nygaard J R, Rawson M, Danson P, Bhadeshia H K D H. Bearing steel microstructures after aircraft gas turbine engine service. Mater Sci Technol 30(15): 1911–1918 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    Glodež S, Winter H, Stüwe H P. A fracture mechanics model for the wear of gear flanks by pitting. Wear 208(1–2): 177–183 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. [5]

    Al-Tubi I S, Long H, Zhang J, Shaw B. Experimental and analytical study of gear micropitting initiation and propagation under varying loading conditions. Wear 328–329: 8–16 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    Chaari F, Baccar W, Abbes M S, Haddar M. Effect of spalling or tooth breakage on gearmesh stiffness and dynamic response of a one-stage spur gear transmission. Eur J Mech A/Solids 27(4): 691–705 (2008)

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    Zhong W, Hu J J, Shen P, Wang C Y, Lius Q Y. Experimental investigation between rolling contact fatigue and wear of high-speed and heavy-haul railway and selection of rail material. Wear 271(9–10): 2485–2493 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    Morales-Espejel G E, Rycerz P, Kadiric A. Prediction of micropitting damage in gear teeth contacts considering the concurrent effects of surface fatigue and mild wear. Wear 398–399: 99–115 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. [9]

    Chernets M. A method for predicting contact strength and life of archimedes and involute worm gears, considering the effect of wear and teeth correction. Tribol Ind 41(1): 134–141 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    Sadeghi F, Jalalahmadi B, Slack T S, Raje N, Arakere N K. A review of rolling contact fatigue. J Tribol 131(4): 041403 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    Hertz H. UBer die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. J Reine Angew Math 92: 156–171 (1882)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    Van K D, Maitournam M H. Steady-state flow in classical elastoplasticity: Applications to repeated rolling and sliding contact. J Mech Phys Solids 41(11): 1691–1710 (1993)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    Brown M W, Miller K J. A theory for fatigue failure under multiaxial stress-strain conditions. Proce Inst Mech Eng 187(1): 745–755 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    Fatemi A, Socie D F. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 11(3): 149–165 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. [15]

    You B R, Lee S B. A critical review on multiaxial fatigue assessments of metals. Int J Fatigue 18(4): 235–244 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    Karolczuk A, Macha E. A review of critical plane orientations in multiaxial fatigue failure criteria of metallic materials. Int J Fract 134(3–4): 267–304 (2005)

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. [17]

    Liu H L, Liu H J, Zhu C C, Sun Z D, Bai H Y. Study on contact fatigue of a wind turbine gear pair considering surface roughness. Friction 8(3): 553–567 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. [18]

    Qin W J, Guan C Y. An investigation of contact stresses and crack initiation in spur gears based on finite element dynamics analysis. Int J Mech Sci 83: 96–103 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. [19]

    Smith R N, Watson P, Topper T H. A stress-strain parameter for the fatigue of metals. J Mater 5(4): 767–778 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  20. [20]

    Van K D, Maitournam M H. On some recent trends in modelling of contact fatigue and wear in rail. Wear 253(1–2): 219–227 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. [21]

    Ringsberg J W. Life prediction of rolling contact fatigue crack initiation. Int J Fatigue 23(7): 575–586 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. [22]

    Lemaitre J, Chaboche J L, Maji A K. Mechanics of solid materials. J Eng Mech 119(3): 642–643 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. [23]

    He H F, Liu H J, Zhu C C, Yuan L H. Shakedown analysis of a wind turbine gear considering strain-hardening and the initial residual stress. J Mech Sci Technol 32(11): 5241–5250 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. [24]

    He H F, Liu H J, Zhu C C, Wei P T, Tang J Y. Analysis of the fatigue crack initiation of a wind turbine gear considering load sequence effect. Intl J Damage Mech 29(2): 207–225 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. [25]

    He H F, Liu H J, Zhu C C, Wei P T, Sun Z D. Study of rolling contact fatigue behavior of a wind turbine gear based on damage-coupled elastic-plastic model. Int J Mech Sci 141: 512–519 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. [26]

    Hannes D, Alfredsson B. Surface initiated rolling contact fatigue based on the asperity point load mechanism-A parameter study. Wear 294–295: 457–468 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. [27]

    Suraratchai M, Limido J, Mabru C, Chieragatti R. Modelling the influence of machined surface roughness on the fatigue life of aluminium alloy. Int J Fatigue 30(12): 2119–2126 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. [28]

    Zhang J, Shaw B A. The effect of superfinishing on the contact fatigue of case carburised gears. Appl Mech Mater 86: 348–351 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. [29]

    Grzesik W, Żak K. Modification of surface finish produced by hard turning using superfinishing and burnishing operations. J Mater Process Technol 212(1): 315–322 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. [30]

    Liu C R, Mittal S. Single-step superfinishing using hard machining resulting in superior surface integrity. J Manuf Syst 14(2): 129–133 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. [31]

    Flodin A, Andersson S. Simulation of mild wear in spur gears. Wear 207(1–2): 16–23 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. [32]

    Leonard B D, Sadeghi F, Shinde S, Mittelbach M. A numerical and experimental investigation of fretting wear and a new procedure for fretting wear maps. Tribol Trans 55(3): 313–324 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. [33]

    El-Thalji I, Jantunen E. Dynamic modelling of wear evolution in rolling bearings. Tribol Int 84: 90–99 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. [34]

    Yuan Z, Wu Y H, Zhang K, Dragoi M V, Liu M H. Wear reliability of spur gear based on the cross-analysis method of a nonstationary random process. Adv Mech Eng 10(12): 1–9 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. [35]

    Garcin S, Fouvry S, Heredia S. A FEM fretting map modeling: Effect of surface wear on crack nucleation. Wear 330–331: 145–159 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. [36]

    Llavori I, Urchegui M A, Tato W, Gomez X. An all-in-one numerical methodology for fretting wear and fatigue life assessment. Frattura Integrità Strutturale 37(10): 87–93 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. [37]

    Leonard B D, Sadeghi F, Shinde S, Mittelbach M. Rough surface and damage mechanics wear modeling using the combined finite-discrete element method. Wear 305(1–2): 312–321 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. [38]

    Ghosh A, Leonard B, Sadeghi F. A stress based damage mechanics model to simulate fretting wear of Hertzian line contact in partial slip. Wear 307(1–2): 87–89 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. [39]

    Shen F, Hu W P, Meng Q C. A damage mechanics approach to fretting fatigue life prediction with consideration of elastic-plastic damage model and wear. Tribol Int 82: 176–190 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. [40]

    Fletcher D I, Franklin F J, Kapoor A. Image analysis to reveal crack development using a computer simulation of wear and rolling contact fatigue. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 26(10): 957–967 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. [41]

    Mazzù A, Petrogalli C, Lancini M, Ghidini A, Faccoli M. Effect of wear on surface crack propagation in rail-wheel wet contact. J Materials Eng Perform 27(2): 630–639 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. [42]

    Prager W. The theory of plasticity: A survey of recent achievements. Proc Inst Mech Eng 169(1): 41–57 (1955)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. [43]

    Wang C H, Brown M W. A path-independent parameter for fatigue under proportional and non-proportional loading. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 16(12): 1285–1297 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. [44]

    Morrow J. Cyclic plastic strain energy and fatigue of metals. In Internal Friction, Damping, and Cyclic Plasticity. Lazan B J, Ed. West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing & Materials, 1965: 45–86.

    Google Scholar 

  45. [45]

    Timoshenko S P, Goodier J N. Theory of Elasticity. New York (USA): McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  46. [46]

    Wilkins E W C. Cumulative damage in fatigue. In Colloquium on Fatigue/Colloque de Fatigue/Kolloquium über Ermüdungsfestigkeit. Weibull W, Odqvist F K G, Eds. Berlin: Springer, 1956: 321–332.

    Google Scholar 

  47. [47]

    Zhan Z X, Hu W P, Li B K, Zhang Y J, Meng Q C, Guan Z D. Continuum damage mechanics combined with the extended finite element method for the total life prediction of a metallic component. Int J Mech Sci 124–125: 48–58 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. [48]

    Zhou Y, Zhu C C, Gould B, Demas N G, Liu H J, Greco A C. The effect of contact severity on micropitting: Simulation and experiments. Tribol Int 138: 463–472 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. [49]

    Archard J F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24(8): 981–988 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. [50]

    Baümel Jr A, Seeger T, Materials Data for Cyclic Loading. Supplement 1. New York (USA): Elsevier, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  51. [51]

    Hartley N E W, Hirvonen J K. Wear testing under high load conditions: The effect of “anti-scuff” additions to AISI 3135, 52100 and 9310 steels introduced by ion implantation and ion beam mixing. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 209–210: 933–940 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. [52]

    Manigandan K, Srivatsan T S, Quick T, Freborg A M. The high cycle fatigue and final fracture behavior of alloy steel 9310 for use in performance-sensitive applications. In Fatigue of Materials II: Advances and Emergences in Understanding. Srivatsan T S, Imam M A, Srinivasan R, Eds. Cham: Springer, 2013: 211–232.

    Google Scholar 

  53. [53]

    Bajpai P, Kahraman A, Anderson NE. A surface wear prediction methodology for parallel-axis gear pairs. J Tribol 126(3): 597–605 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. [54]

    Zhang B Y, Liu H J, Zhu C C, Li Z M Q. Numerical simulation of competing mechanism between pitting and micro-pitting of a wind turbine gear considering surface roughness. Eng Fail Anal 104: 1–12 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. [55]

    Zhou Y, Zhu C C, Liu H J. A micropitting study considering rough sliding and mild wear. Coatings 9(10): 639 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. [56]

    Liu H L, Liu H J, Zhu C C, Tang J Y. Study on gear contact fatigue failure competition mechanism considering tooth wear evolution. Tribol Int 147: 106277 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. [57]

    Zhang B Y, Liu H J, Bai H Y, Zhu C C, Wu W. Ratchetting-multiaxial fatigue damage analysis in gear rolling contact considering tooth surface roughness. Wear 428–429: 137–146 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  58. [58]

    Yuan R, Li H Q, Huang H Z, Zhu S P, Li Y F. A new non-linear continuum damage mechanics model for the fatigue life prediction under variable loading. Mechanics 19(5): 506–511 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. [59]

    Gautam A, Ajit K P, Sarkar P K. Fatigue damage estimation through continuum damage mechanics. Procedia Eng 173: 1567–1574 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. [60]

    Shen F, Zhao B, Li L, Chua C K, Zhou K. Fatigue damage evolution and lifetime prediction of welded joints with the consideration of residual stresses and porosity. Int J Fatigue 103: 272–279 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. [61]

    Townsend D P, Bamberger E N, Zaretsky E V. Comparison of pitting fatigue life of ausforged and standard forged AISI M-50 and AISI 9310 spur gears. Washington: NASA Lewis Research Center, United States NASA-TN-D-8030, E-8258, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  62. [62]

    Townsend D P, Patel P R. Surface fatigue life of CBN and vitreous ground carburized and hardened AISI 9310 spur gears. Int J Fatigue 11(3): 210 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  63. [63]

    Liu H J, Liu H L, Zhu C C, Zhou Y. A review on micropitting studies of steel gears. Coatings 9(1): 42 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB2001300).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaiju Liu.

Additional information

Boyu ZHANG. She has been studying as a doctoral student in the State Key Laboratory Mechanical Transmissions (SKLMT), Chongqing University, China since 2020. Her research interest includes gear contact fatigue and peening enhancement.

Huaiju LIU. He is currently working as an associate professor in the State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions (SKLMT), Chongqing University, China. He received the Ph.D. degree from the University of Warwick, UK, in 2013. His research fields include tribology and fatigue behaviors of mechanical elements.

Caichao ZHU. He is a professor in the State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions (SKLMT), Chongqing University, China. He received the Ph.D. degree from Chongqing University, China in 1998. His research mainly relates to the intelligent design and dynamic analysis of transmission systems.

Yibo GE. He is the founder of Shanghai Peentech Equipment Tech. Co., Ltd. He graduated from Shanghai University of Engineering Sciences. He is one of official trainers of MFN.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Liu, H., Zhu, C. et al. Simulation of the fatigue-wear coupling mechanism of an aviation gear. Friction (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-020-0447-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • gear contact fatigue
  • tooth wear
  • surface roughness
  • damage accumulation