Advertisement

Friction

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 1–22 | Cite as

A review of friction models in interacting joints for durability design

  • Zulfiqar A. Khan
  • Vivek Chacko
  • Hammad Nazir
Open Access
Review Article

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive review of friction modelling to provide an understanding of design for durability within interacting systems. Friction is a complex phenomenon and occurs at the interface of two components in relative motion. Over the last several decades, the effects of friction and its modelling techniques have been of significant interests in terms of industrial applications. There is however a need to develop a unified mathematical model for friction to inform design for durability within the context of varying operational conditions. Classical dynamic mechanisms model for the design of control systems has not incorporated friction phenomena due to non-linearity behaviour. Therefore, the tribological performance concurrently with the joint dynamics of a manipulator joint applied in hazardous environments needs to be fully analysed. Previously the dynamics and impact models used in mechanical joints with clearance have also been examined. The inclusion of reliability and durability during the design phase is very important for manipulators which are deployed in harsh environmental and operational conditions. The revolute joint is susceptible to failures such as in heavy manipulators these revolute joints can be represented by lubricated conformal sliding surfaces. The presence of pollutants such as debris and corrosive constituents has the potential to alter the contacting surfaces, would in turn affect the performance of revolute joints, and puts both reliability and durability of the systems at greater risks of failure. Key literature is identified and a review on the latest developments of the science of friction modelling is presented here. This review is based on a large volume of knowledge. Gaps in the relevant field have been identified to capitalise on for future developments. Therefore, this review will bring significant benefits to researchers, academics and industry professionals.

Keywords

friction dynamics joint clearance numerical models impact durability 

References

  1. [1]
    Saha A, Wahi P, Bhattacharya B. Characterization of friction force and nature of bifurcation from experiments on a singledegree- of-freedom system with friction-induced vibrations. Tribol Int 98:. 220–228 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Drucker D C. Coulomb friction, plasticity and limit loads. J Appl Mech 21(1):71–74 (1953)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Mukras S M. Analysis and design of planar multibody systems with revolute joint wear. Dissertations & Theses- Gradworks 268(5–6): 643–652 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Tafazoli S, Lawrence P D, Salcudean S E. Identification of inertial and friction parameters for excavator arms. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 15(5): 966–971 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Jonker J B, Waiboer R R, Aarts R G K M. Modelling of joint friction in robotic manipulators with gear transmissions. In Computational Methods in Applied Sciences. Springer, 2005: 221–243.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Simoni L, Beschi M, Legnani G, Visioli A. Friction modeling with temperature effects for industrial robot manipulators. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2015: 3524–3529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Piedboeuf J-C, de Carufel J, Hurteau R. Friction and stickslip in robots: Simulation and experimentation. Multibody Sys Dyn 4(4): 341–354 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Yao B, Tomizuka M. Adaptive control of robot manipulators in constrained motion. In American Control Conference. 1993: 1128–1132.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Nguyen K D, Dankowicz H. Adaptive control of underactuated robots with unmodeled dynamics. Rob Auton Syst 64: 84–99 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Al-Ashoor R A, Khorasani K, Patel R V, Al-Khalili A J. Adaptive control of flexible joint manipulators. In 1990 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Conference Proceedings, 1990: 627–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Johnson K L. Contact mechanics. J Tribol 108(4): 464 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Film thicknesses in lubricated Hertzian contacts (EHL). Part 1: Two-dimensional contacts (line contacts). Engineering Sciences Data Unit (ESDU) 85027, 2010.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Hess D P, Soom A. Friction at a lubricated line contact operating at oscillating sliding velocities. J Tribol 112(1): 147 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Tyfour W R, Beynon J H, Kapoor A. Deterioration of rolling contact fatigue life of pearlitic rail steel due to dry-wet rolling-sliding line contact. Wear 197(1): 255–265 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Bilandi S T. Identification of frictional effects and structural dynamics for improved control of hydraulic manipulators. Journal of Crystal Growth 180(180): 157–166 (1961)Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Flores P, Ambrósio J, Claro J C P, Lankarani H M, Koshy C S. A study on dynamics of mechanical systems including joints with clearance and lubrication. Mech Mach Theory 41(3): 247–261 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Dupac M, Noroozi S. Dynamic modeling and simulation of a rotating single link flexible robotic manipulator subject to quick stops. J Mech Eng 60(7–8): 475–482 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Flores P, Ambrósio J, Claro J C P. Dynamic analysis for planar multibody mechanical systems with lubricated joints. Multibody Syst Dyn 12(1): 47–74 (2004)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Askari E, Flores P, Dabirrahmani D, Appleyard R. Dynamic modeling and analysis of wear in spatial hard-on-hard couple hip replacements using multibody systems methodologies. Nonlinear Dyn 82(1–2): 1039–1058 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Flores P. Modeling and simulation of wear in revolute clearance joints in multibody systems. Mech Mach Theory 44(6): 1211–1222 (2009)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Flores P. A parametric study on the dynamic response of planar multibody systems with multiple clearance joints. Nonlinear Dyn 61(4): 633–653 (2010)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Flores P. Compliant contact force approach for forward dynamic modeling and analysis of biomechanical systems. Procedia IUTAM 2: 58–67 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Marques F, Flores P, Lankarani H M. On the frictional contacts in multibody system dynamics. In ECCOMAS Themat. Conf. Multibody Dyn., 2015: 565–576.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Lankarani H M, Nikravesh P E. Canonical impulsemomentum equations for impact analysis of multibody systems. J Mech Des 114(1): 180–186 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Koshy C S, Flores P, Lankarani H M. Study of the effect of contact force model on the dynamic response of mechanical systems with dry clearance joints: computational and experimental approaches. Nonlinear Dyn 73(1–2): 325–338 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Marques F, Flores P, Lankarani H M. Study of friction force model parameters in multibody dynamics. In The 4th Joint International Conference on Multibody System Dynamics, 2016.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Mukras S, Kim N H, Mauntler N A, Schmitz T L, Sawyer W G. Analysis of planar multibody systems with revolute joint wear. Wear 268(5–6): 643–652 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Mukras S, Kim N H, Sawyer W G, Jackson D B, Bergquist L W. Numerical integration schemes and parallel computation for wear prediction using finite element method. Wear 266(7–8): 822–831 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Lingard H, Cooke T, Gharaie E. A case study analysis of fatal incidents involving excavators in the Australian construction industry. Eng Constr Archit Manag 20(5): 488–504 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Koivo A J. Kinematics of excavators (backhoes) for transferring surface material. J Aerosp Eng 7(1): 17–32 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Vähä P K, Skibniewski M J. Dynamic model of excavator. J Aerosp Eng 6(2): 148–158 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Koivo A J, Thoma M, Kocaoglan E, Andrade-Cetto J. Modeling and control of excavator dynamics during digging operation. J Aerosp Eng 9(1): 10–18 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Stentz A, Bares J, Singh S, Rowe P. Robotic excavator for autonomous truck loading. Auton Robots 7: 175–186 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Seward D, Margrave F. LUCIE the robot excavator-design for system safety. In Robotics and Automation, 1996. Proceedings., 1996 IEEE International Conference, 1996: 963–968.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Tafazoli S, Lawrence P D P, Chan D, Bachmann S, de Silva C. Parameter estimation and actuator friction analysis for a mini excavator. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1996: 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Carlson J, Murphy R R. How UGVs physically fail in the field. IEEE Trans Robot 21(3): 423–437 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Liu Y, Nejat G. Robotic urban search and rescue: a survey from the control perspective. J Intell Robot Syst 72(2): 147–165 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Lioy P J, Weisel C P, Millette J R, Eisenreich S, Vallero D, Offenberg J, Buckley B, Turpin B, Zhong M, Cohen M D, Prophete C, Yang I, Stiles R, Chee G, Johnson W, Porcja R, Alimokhtari S, Hale R C, Weschler C, Chen L C. Characterization of the dust/smoke aerosol that settled east of the World Trade Center (WTC) in lower Manhattan after the collapse of the WTC 11 September 2001. Environ Health Perspect 110(7): 703–714 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Blau P J. Introduction. In Friction Science and Technology. CRC Press, 2008: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Khan Z A, Saeed A, Gregory O, Ghafoor A. Biodiesel performance within internal combustion engine fuel system-A review. Tribol Ind 38(2): 197–213 (2016)Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Khan Z A, Hadfield M. Manufacturing induced residual stress influence on the rolling contact fatigue life performance of lubricated silicon nitride bearing materials. Mater Des 28(10): 2688–2693 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Khan Z A, Hadfield M, Tobe S, Wang Y. Ceramic rolling elements with ring crack defects-A residual stress approach. Mater Sci Eng A 404(1–2): 221–226 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Khan Z A, Hadfield M, Tobe S, Wang Y. Residual stress variations during rolling contact fatigue of refrigerant lubricated silicon nitride bearing elements. Ceram Int 32(7): 751–754 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Khan Z A, Hadfield M, Wang Y. Pressurised chamber design for conducting rolling contact experiments with liquid refrigerant lubrication. Mater Des 26(8): 680–689 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Armstrong-Hélouvry B, Dupont P, De Wit C C. A survey of models, analysis tools and compensations methods for the control of machines with friction. Automatica 30(7): 1083–1138 (1994)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Rahnejat H. Multi-body dynamics: Historical evolution and application. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 214(1): 149–173 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Schiehlen W. Multibody system dynamics: Roots and perspectives. Multibody Syst Dyn 1(2): 149–188 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Siciliano B, Khatib O. Springer Handbook of Robotics, 1st ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Uicker J J, Pennock G R, Shigley J E, Mc Carthy J M. Theory of machines and mechanisms. J Mech Design 125(3): 650 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Groover M P, Zimmers E W. CAD/Cam: Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing, 1st ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall PTR, 1997.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Farhat N, Mata V, Diaz-Rodriguez M. Dynamic simulation of a parallel robot: Coulomb friction and stick slip in robot joints. Robotica 28: 35–45 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Hachkowski M R, Peterson L D, Lake M S. Friction model of a revolute joint for a precision deployable spacecraft structure. J Spacecr Rockets 36(4): 591–598 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Chacko V, Yu H. Multi-body simulation methods for rigid manipulators. Eurathlon/SHERPA, 2015.Google Scholar
  54. [54]
    Donald B, Spong M W. Chapter 3: Forward Kinematics: The Denavit-Hartenberg Convention.Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Vähä P K, Skibniewski M J, Koivo A J. Excavator dynamics and effect of soil on digging. In Proc. 8th ISARC, Stuttgart, Ger., 1991: 297–306.Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Baiges Valentin and Ivan J. Baiges-Valentin. Dynamic modeling of parallel manipulators. University of Florida, 1996.Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    Visioli A, Legnani G. On the trajectory tracking control of industrial SCARA robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 49(1): 224–232 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    Patel B P, Prajapati J M. Dynamics of mini hydraulic backhoe excavator: A Lagrange-Euler (LE) approach. Int J Mech Aerospace Ind Mechatron Manuf Eng 8(1): 202–211 (2014)Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Korayem M H, Shafei A M. Application of recursive Gibbs–Appell formulation in deriving the equations of motion of N-viscoelastic robotic manipulators in 3D space using Timoshenko Beam Theory. Acta Astronaut 83: 273–294 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    Piedboeuf J C. Kane’s equations or Jourdain’s principle–In Proc. 36th Midwest Symp Circuits Syst, 1993: 1471–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    Šalinic S. Determination of joint reaction forces in a symbolic form in rigid multibody systems. Mech Mach Theory 46(11): 1796–1810 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    Obermayr M, Vrettos C, Eberhard P, Däuwel T. A discrete element model and its experimental validation for the prediction of draft forces in cohesive soil. J Terramechanics 53: 93–104 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    Yousefi Moghaddam R, Kotchon A, Lipsett M G. Method and apparatus for on-line estimation of soil parameters during excavation. J Terramechanics 49(3–4): 173–181 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    Perumpral J V, Grisso R D, Desai C S, Perumpral J V, Grisso R D, Desai C S. A soil-tool model based on limit equilibrium analysis. Trans ASAE 26(4): 0991–0995 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    Shmulevich I. State of the art modeling of soil-tillage interaction using discrete element method. Soil Tillage Res 111(1): 41–53 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    Hollerbach J M. A recursive lagrangian formulation of manipulator dynamics. 1980.Google Scholar
  67. [67]
    Flores P, Ambrósio J, Claro J C P, Lankarani H M. Multibody systems formulation. Lecture Notes in Applied & Computational Mechanics 34: 47–66 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    Olsson H, Åström K J, Canudas de Wit C, Gäfvert M, Lischinsky P. Friction models and friction compensation. European Journal of Control 4(3): 176–195 (1998)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    Sohail T, Malik A M. Measuring Coulomb and viscous friction in revolute joint. NUST J Eng Sci 1(1): 112–116 (2008)Google Scholar
  70. [70]
    Berger E. Friction modeling for dynamic system simulation. Appl Mech Rev 55(6): 535 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    Harrison J A, Gao G, Schall J D, Knippenberg M T, Mikulski P T. Friction between solids. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 366: 1469–1495 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. [72]
    Swevers J, Al-Bender F, Ganseman C G, Prajogo T. An integrated friction model structure with improved presliding behavior for accurate friction compensation. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 45(4): 675–686 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. [73]
    Le Tien L, Albu-Schaeffer A, De Luca A, Hirzinger G. Friction observer and compensation for control of robots with joint torque measurement. In 2008 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. IROS, 2008: 3789–3795.Google Scholar
  74. [74]
    Archard J F. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24(8): 981–988 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. [75]
    Jin Z, Fisher J. Tribology in joint replacement. Joint Replace Technol 2008: 31–55 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. [76]
    Tabor D. Friction-The present state of our understanding. J Lubr Technol 103(2): 169–179 (1981)Google Scholar
  77. [77]
    van Geffen V. A study of friction models and friction compensation. 2009.Google Scholar
  78. [78]
    Lischinsky P, Canudas de Wit C, Morel G. Friction compensation for an industrial hydraulic robot. IEEE Control Syst Mag 19(1): 25–32 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. [79]
    Dahl P R. A solid friction model. Aerospace Corp El Segundo CA, No. TOR-0158 (3107-18)-1, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. [80]
    Piatkowski T. Dahl and LuGre dynamic friction models-The analysis of selected properties. Mech Mach Theory 73: 91–100 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. [81]
    Karnopp D. Computer simulation of stick-slip friction in mechanical dynamic systems. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 107(1): 100–103 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. [82]
    Kikuuwe R, Takesue N, Sano A, Mochiyama H, Fujimoto H. Fixed-step friction simulation: From classical coulomb model to modern continuous models. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst. IROS, 2005: 3910–3917.Google Scholar
  83. [83]
    Kikuuwe R, Takesue N, Sano A, Mochiyama H, Fujimoto H. Admittance and impedance representations of friction based on implicit Euler integration. IEEE Trans Robot 22(6): 1176–1188 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. [84]
    Awrejcewicz J, Kudra G. Regular and chaotic dynamics of three coupled physical pendulums. In the International Conference of Applied Mechanics, Sacam, 2000.Google Scholar
  85. [85]
    Wojewoda J, Stefanski A, Wiercigroch M, Kapitaniak T. Hysteretic effects of dry friction: modelling and experimental studies. Philos Trans R Soc London A Math Phys Eng Sci 366(1866): 747–765 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. [86]
    Romano R A, Garcia C. Karnopp friction model identification for a real control valve. IFAC Proc 17(1): 14906–14911 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. [87]
    Bliman P A, Sorine M. Easy-to-use realistic dry friction models for automatic control. In Proceedings of 3rd European Control Conference, 1995: 267–272.Google Scholar
  88. [88]
    Gafvert M. Comparisons of two dynamic friction models. In IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 1997: 386–391.Google Scholar
  89. [89]
    Freidovich L, Robertsson A, Shiriaev A, Johansson R. LuGre-model-based friction compensation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 18(1): 194–200 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. [90]
    Lampaert V, Swevers J, Al-Bender F. Modification of the Leuven integrated friction model structure. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 47(4): 683–687 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. [91]
    The Mathworks Inc. UK. Loaded-contact rotational friction. Mathworks Doc 2016: 2–4.Google Scholar
  92. [92]
    The Mathworks Inc. UK. Translational friction. Mathworks Documentation, 2015.Google Scholar
  93. [93]
    Bona B, Indri M. Friction compensation in robotics: An overview. In Proc. 44th IEEE Conf Decis Control Eur Control Conf CDC-ECC’ 05, 2005: 4360–4367.Google Scholar
  94. [94]
    De Wit C C, Olsson H, Astrom K J, Lischinsky P. A new model for control of systems with friction. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 40(3): 419–425 (1995)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. [95]
    Haessig D A, Friedland B. On the modeling and simulation of friction. In Am Control Conf, 1990: 1256–1261.Google Scholar
  96. [96]
    Dubowsky S, Freudenstein F. Dynamic analysis of mechanical systems with clearances—Part 1: Formation of dynamic model. J Eng Ind 93(1) 305 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. [97]
    Bauchau O A, Rodriguez J. Modeling of joints with clearance in flexible multibody systems. Int J Solids Struct 39(1): 41–63 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. [98]
    Bai Z F, Zhao Y. A hybrid contact force model of revolute joint with clearance for planar mechanical systems. Int J Non Linear Mech 48: 15–36 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. [99]
    Flores P, Ambrósio J, Claro J C P, Lankarani H M, Koshy C S. Lubricated revolute joints in rigid multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn 56(3): 277–295 (2009)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. [100]
    Wang Y. Simulation of mechanical systems with multiple frictional contacts. J Mech Des 116(2): 571 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. [101]
    Haines R S. Survey: 2-dimensional motion and impact at revolute joints. Mech Mach Theory 15(5): 361–370 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. [102]
    Machado M, Costa J, Seabra E, Flores P. The effect of the lubricated revolute joint parameters and hydrodynamic force models on the dynamic response of planar multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn 69(1–2): 635–654 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. [103]
    Dubowsky S, Freudenstein F. Dynamic analysis of mechanical systems with clearances-Part2: Dynamic response. J Eng Ind 93(1): 305–309 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. [104]
    Hunt K H, Crossley F R E. Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact. J Appl Mech 42(2): 440 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. [105]
    Lankarani H M, Nikravesh P E. A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody systems. J Mech Des 112(3): 369–376 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. [106]
    Rhee J, Akay A. Dynamic response of revolute joint with clearance. Mech Mach Theory 31(1): 121–134 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. [107]
    Pereira M S, Nikravesh P E. Impact dynamics of multibody systems with frictional contact using joint coordinates and canonical equations of motion. Nonlinear Dyn 9(1–2): 53–71 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. [108]
    Machado M, Moreira P, Flores P, Lankarani H M. Compliant contact force models in multibody dynamics: Evolution of the Hertz contact theory. Mech Mach Theory 53: 99–121 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. [109]
    Flores P, Koshy C S, Lankarani H M, Ambrósio J, Claro J C P. Numerical and experimental investigation on multibody systems with revolute clearance joints. Nonlinear Dyn 65(4): 383–398 (2011)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. [110]
    Ravn P. A continuous analysis method for planar multibody systems with joint clearance. Multibody Syst Dyn 2(1): 1–24 (1998)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. [111]
    Dupac M. Dynamical analysis of a constrained flexible extensible link with rigid support and clearance. J Theoret Appl Mech 52(3): 665–676 (2014)Google Scholar
  112. [112]
    Azimi Olyaei A, Ghazavi M R. Stabilizing slider-crank mechanism with clearance joints. Mech Mach Theory 53: 17–29 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. [113]
    Zhao B, Zhang Z-N, Fang C, Dai X-D, Xie Y-B. Modeling and analysis of planar multibody system with mixed lubricated revolute joint. Tribol Int 98: 229–241 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. [114]
    Furuhashi T, Morita N, Matsuura M. Research on dynamics of four-bar linkage with clearances at turning pairs: 1st report, general theory using continuous contact model. Bull JSME 21(153): 518–523 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. [115]
    Farahanchi F, Shaw S W. Chaotic and periodic dynamics of a slider-crank mechanism with slider clearance. J Sound Vib 177(3): 307–324 (1994)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. [116]
    Khulief Y A, Shabana A A. A continuous force model for the impact analysis of flexible multibody systems. Mech Mach Theory 22(3): 213–224 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. [117]
    Dubowsky S, Gardner T N. Dynamic interactions of link elasticity and clearance connections in planar mechanical systems. J Eng Ind 97(2): 652–661 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. [118]
    Earles S W E, Wu C L S. Motion analysis of a rigid link mechanism with clearance at a bearing using Lagrangian mechanics and digital computation. J Mech 83–89 (1973)Google Scholar
  119. [119]
    Yaqubi S, Dardel M, Daniali H M, Hassan M, Ghasemi M H. Modeling and control of crank-slider mechanism with multiple clearance joints. Multibody Syst Dyn 36(2): 143–167 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. [120]
    Li P, Chen W, Li D, Yu R. A novel transition model for lubricated revolute joints in planar multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 36(3): 279–294 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. [121]
    Flores P, Leine R, Glocker C. Modeling and analysis of planar rigid multibody systems with translational clearance joints based on the non-smooth dynamics approach. Multibody Syst Dyn 23(2): 165–190 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. [122]
    Flores P, Ambrósio J. Revolute joints with clearance in multibody systems. Comput Struct 82(17–19): 1359–1369 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. [123]
    Chytka T M, Brown R W, Shih A T, Reeves J D, Dempsey J A. An integrated approach to life cycle analysis. In 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidiscip Anal Optim Conf, 2006: 1360–1374.Google Scholar
  124. [124]
    Carlson J, Murphy R R. Reliability analysis of mobile robots. In 2003 IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom, 2003: 274–281.Google Scholar
  125. [125]
    Wang Z. Design study of an earthquake rescue robot. Durham University, 2004.Google Scholar
  126. [126]
    Ludema K C. Friction, Wear, Lubrication- A Textbook in Tribology. CRC Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. [127]
    Chang S-H, Huang K-T, Wang Y-H. Effects of thermal erosion and wear resistance on AISI H13 tool steel by various surface treatments. Mater Trans 53(4): 745–751 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. [128]
    Wakuda M, Yamauchi Y, Kanzaki S, Yasuda Y. Effect of surface texturing on friction reduction between ceramic and steel materials under lubricated sliding contact. Wear 254(3–4): 356–363 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. [129]
    Bajwa R S, Khan Z A, Bakolas V, Braun W. Waterlubricated Ni-based composite (Ni–Al2O3, Ni–SiC and Ni–ZrO2) thin film coatings for industrial applications. Acta Metall Sin 29(1): 8–16 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. [130]
    Saeed A. Sustainable methodology of conserving historic military vehicles. Bournemouth University, 2013.Google Scholar
  131. [131]
    Nazir M H, Khan Z A, Stokes K R. A holistic mathematical modelling and simulation for cathodic delamination mechanism—A novel and an efficient approach. J Adhes Sci Technol 29(22): 2475–2513 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. [132]
    Nazir M H, Khan Z A, Stokes K R. Optimisation of interface roughness and coating thickness to maximise coating–substrate adhesion–a failure prediction and reliability assessment modelling. J Adhes Sci Technol 29(14): 1415–1445 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. [133]
    Bhushan B. Contact mechanics of rough surfaces in tribology: multiple asperity contact. Tribol Lett 4(1): 1–35 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. [134]
    Totik Y, Sadeler R, Altun H, Gavgali M. The effects of induction hardening on wear properties of AISI 4140 steel in dry sliding conditions. Mater Des 24(1): 25–30 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. [135]
    Types and applications of lubricating greases. In Tribology Series, 1992: 664–696.Google Scholar
  136. [136]
    De Laurentis N, Kadiric A, Lugt P, Cann P M E. The influence of bearing grease composition on friction in rolling/sliding concentrated contacts. Tribol Int 94: 624–632 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. [137]
    Cann P M E. Understanding grease lubrication. Tribol Ser 31: 573–581 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. [138]
    Donnet C, Erdemir A. Historical developments and new trends in tribological and solid lubricant coatings. Surf Coat Technol 180–181: 76–84 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. [139]
    Erdemir A, Eryilmaz O L, Fenske G. Synthesis of diamondlike carbon films with superlow friction and wear properties. J Vac Sci Technol A 18(4): 1987–1992 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. [140]
    Koike H, Kanemasu K, Itakura K,. Wear and transmission error between PEEK bush and 7075 aluminium alloy cam plate components in robot joints. Appl Mech Mater 307: 3–8 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. [141]
    Erdemir A. Review of engineered tribological interfaces for improved boundary lubrication. Tribol Int 38(3): 249–256 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. [142]
    Sahoo P, Das S K. Tribology of electroless nickel coatings— A review. Mater Des 32(4): 1760–1775 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. [143]
    Zhang J, Meng Y, Tian Y, Zhang X. Effect of concentration and addition of ions on the adsorption of sodium dodecyl sulfate on stainless steel surface in aqueous solutions. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 484: 408–415 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. [144]
    Choi S H, Cheung H H. A versatile virtual prototyping system for rapid product development. Comput Ind 59(5): 477–488 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. [145]
    Schlotter M. Multibody system simulation with simmechanics. University of Canterbury, 2003.Google Scholar
  146. [146]
    Tuominen M. Multibody simulations as a product development tool: Introduction to ADAMS and two analyses. Aalto University School of Engineering, 2015.Google Scholar
  147. [147]
    Ben Abdallah M A, Khemili I, Aifaoui N. Numerical investigation of a flexible slider-crank mechanism with multijoints with clearance. Multibody System Dynamics 38(2): 173–199 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. [148]
    Ambrósio J, Verissimo P. Improved bushing models for general multibody systems and vehicle dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn 22(4): 341–365 (2009)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. [149]
    Khurshid A, Zulfiqar K, Chacko V, Ghafoor A, Malik M A, Ayaz Y. Modelling and simulation of a manipulator with stable viscoelastic grasping incorporating friction. Tribol Ind 38(4): 559–574 (2016)Google Scholar
  150. [150]
    Chacko V, Yu H, Cang S, Vladareanu L. State of the art in excavators. In International Conference on Advanced Mechatronic Systems, ICAMechS, 2014: 481–488.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access: The articles published in this journal are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NanoCorr, Energy & Modelling (NCEM) Research, Department of Design & EngineeringBournemouth UniversityBournemouthUK

Personalised recommendations