Geriatric nutritional risk index as a simple tool for assessment of malnutrition among geriatrics in Northwest of Iran: comparison with mini nutritional assessment
- 257 Downloads
Older people are more likely to develop nutritional problems and timely diagnosis of malnutrition is crucial to prevent hazardous consequences following poor nutrition.
To evaluate the efficacy of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) to assess nutritional status among non-hospitalized elderly, compared to mini nutritional assessment (MNA) among Iranian seniors.
One hundred and sixty-four subjects, aged ≥ 65 years old were recruited to our cross-sectional study from various districts of Tabriz (Tabriz, Iran). Anthropometric and biochemical measurements were performed, short- and long-form MNAs and GNRI were assessed in our study subjects. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the three indices, agreement between them, and their correlation with anthropometric and biochemical parameters were evaluated. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cut-off point for GNRI in our study population.
GNRI had lower sensitivity (50, 57%), but optimal specificity (94, 93%) and lower negative predictive value (NPV; 68, 71%) compared to MNA-LF and MNA-SF, respectively. We found a moderate agreement between GNRI and MNA-SF (K = 0.52) and MNA-LF (K = 0.46) scores. Significant correlations were observed between re-categorized MNAs as well as GNRI scores, and age, weight, MAC, CC, WC, albumin, and pre-albumin. The cut-off point of 110.33 was obtained for GNRI, according to the ROC curve.
Although GNRI may not be an efficient tool for screening malnutrition due to its lower sensitivity, it is moderately correlated with MNAs and also more useful when limited funding needs to target the truly malnourished seniors.
KeywordsElderly Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) Mini nutritional assessment (MNA) Sensitivity Specificity
This work was funded by the Research Vice Chancellor of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (grant number: 5/97/515). The Research Vice Chancellor had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.
MS-A: Formulating the research questions, designing the study, carrying it out, analyzing the data, revision and approval of the final manuscript. EV-M: Analyzing the data, drafting the manuscript, revision and approval of the final manuscript. NK: Sampling of the study, carrying it out, revision and approval of the final manuscript. LD-F: Sampling of the study, carrying it out, revision and approval of the final manuscript. PK: Sampling of the study, carrying it out, revision and approval of the final manuscript. MA-J: Analyzing the data, revision and approval of the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
We declare herein that we have no conflict of interests.
This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the ethics committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (Ethics code:TBZMED.REC.1394.24).
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
- 1.World Health Organization (2015) 10 facts on aging and life course. http://www.whoint/topics/ageing/en/htm. Accessed 2 Dec 2016
- 2.Mirzaie M, Shams M (2007) Demographic of elderly in Iran based on 1956–2006 headcounts. Salmand 2:326–331 [Persian]Google Scholar
- 4.Wellman NS, Kamp B (2017) Nutrition in Aging. In: Mahan LK, Raymond JL (eds) Krause’s food and the nutrition care process, 14th edn. Elsevier, St. Louis, p. 368Google Scholar
- 8.Joghataei MT, Nejati V (2006) Assessment of health status of elderly people in the city of kashan. Salmand 1:3–10 [Persian]Google Scholar
- 9.Drescher T, Singler K, Ulrich A, Koller M, Keller U, Christ-Crain M, Kressig W R (2010) Comparison of two malnutrition risk screening methods (MNA and NRS 2002) and their association with markers of protein malnutrition in geriatric hospitalized patients. Eur J Clin Nutr 64:887–893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kim G, Kim H, Kim Y, Kim HJ, Son JI, Kim SY, Chang N (2012) Relationship of cognitive function with plasma homocysteine, folate, vitamin B12 levels and nutrient intake in cognitively impaired elderly. FASEB J 26:627Google Scholar
- 17.Aliabadi M, Kimiaghar M, Ghior Mobarhan M, Ielati Faizabadi AA (2007) Prevalence of malnutrition and some related factors in Khorasan Razavi Province. Iran J Nutr Food Sci 2:45–56 (Persian)Google Scholar
- 29.Abd-El-Gawad WM, Abou-Hashem RM, El Maraghy MO, Amin GE (2014) The validity of Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index: simple tool for prediction of nutritional-related complication of hospitalized elderly patients. Comparison with Mini Nutritional Assessment. Clin Nurt 33:1108–1116Google Scholar
- 32.Gómez-Candela C, Serrano Labajos R, García-Vazquez N, Valero Pérez M, Morato Martínez M, Santurino Fontecha C, González Madroño A, Palma-Milla S; Comisión de Nutrición del Hospital Universitario La Paz (2013) Complete process of implantation of a nutritional risk screening system in the University Hospital La Paz, Madrid. Nutr Hosp 28:2165–2174 (In Spanish)PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Honda Y, Nagai T, Iwakami N, Sugano Y, Honda S, Okada A, Asaumi Y, Aiba T, Noguchi T, Kusano K, Ogawa H, Yasuda S, Anzai T, NaDEF investigators (2016) Usefulness of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index for assessing nutritional status and its prognostic impact in patients aged ≥ 65 years with acute heart failure. Am J Cardiol 118:550–555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.World Health Organization (2012) Nutrition for older persons. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/ageing/en/index1.html. Accessed 15 Nov 2012