An Overview of Current Models and Approaches to Biomass Supply Chain Design and Management
- 27 Downloads
Purpose of Review
The paper focuses on the progress related to models and approaches for an optimal design and management of biomass supply chains. A literature review has been conducted, and previous review papers have been used as bases. Do most of the current models adopt the same decision level, mathematical methodology and type of objective of those identified by previous reviews? Are there any innovative approaches to revitalise the considered research topic?
Most of the works published in 2017 and in early 2018 reflect the past literature reviews; regrettably, few relevant advances have been achieved in the recent period to face up the major gaps. Innovative works apply Life Cycle Assessment, Multi-Criteria Analysis, CyberGIS or Agent-Based approaches to biomass supply chain optimisation.
Future research should address, for instance, sustainability of biomass supply chains through a more comprehensive approach including economic, environmental, social and policy-related issues, integration of the decision levels to meet the needs of different stakeholders.
KeywordsBiomass Supply chain Design Management Optimisation Simulation
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Emanuela Melis, Andrea Vincis and Pier F. Orrù each declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.•• Vasković S, Gvero P, Medaković V, Halilović V: Energy chains optimization for selection of sustainable energy supply. In: Krmac E, edited by. Sustainable Supply Chain Management. InTech; 2016. The application of a MCDM (Multi-Criteria Decision-Making) approach coupled with a mathematical model to calculate optimisation criteria based on three types of objective: environmental, energetic and economic. Google Scholar
- 3.Dessbesell L, Xu C, Pulkki R, Leitch M, Mahmood N. Forest biomass supply chain optimization for a biorefinery aiming to produce high-value bio-based materials and chemicals from lignin and forestry residues: a review of literature. Can J For Res. 2017;47:277–88. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.• Hong BH, How BS, Lam HL. Overview of sustainable biomass supply chain: from concept to modelling. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 2016;18:2173–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1155-6. An overview of problems and decisions along a biomass supply chain, to define a sustainable integrated biomass supply chain. A SWAT analysis is suggested CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Gracia C, Velázquez-Martí B, Estornell J. An application of the vehicle routing problem to biomass transportation. Biosyst Eng. 2014;124:40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.06.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sahoo K, Mani S. GIS based discrete event modeling and simulation of biomass supply chain. Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference-IEEE 2015:967–978. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2015.7408225.
- 18.• Holmgren J, Ramstedt L. An extended TAPAS-Z model and a case study of the transport of forest products. Procedia Comp Sci. 2017;109C:343–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.362. Provision of an extension of an already developed Agent-Based freight transport analysis model (TAPAS-Z), for decision-making in woody biomass transport chains CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.• Lim CH, Lam HL. Biomass supply chain optimisation via novel Biomass Element Life Cycle Analysis (BELCA). Appl En. 2016;161:733–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.030. A multi-objective model including economic and environmental objectives for an efficient use of potential underutilised biomass CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.• Lin T, Wang S, Rodríguez LF, Hu H, Liu Y. CyberGIS-enabled decision support platform for biomass supply chain optimization. Env Model Soft. 2015;70:138–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.018. A CyberGIS approach using a MILP model to support strategic decisions. It guarantees a high computational performance of complex problems. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Rentizelas AA, Tolis AI, Tatsiopoulos IP. Optimisation and investment analysis of two biomass-to-heat supply chain structures. Biosyst Eng. 2014;120:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.07.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.•• Kylili A, Christoforou E, Fokaides PA. Environmental evaluation of biomass pelleting using Life Cycle Assessment. Biom Bioe. 2016;84:107–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.018. The Life Cycle Assessment methodology has been used to support the optimisation of a pellet supply chain; a new mathematical parametric model and non-linear programming have been developed for the transportation CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management—Life Cycle Assessment—principles and framework.Google Scholar
- 38.ISO 14044:2006. Environmental management—Life Cycle Assessment—requirements and guidelines.Google Scholar
- 41.Delivand MK, Cammerino ARB, Garofalo P, Monteleone M. Optimal locations of bioenergy facilities, biomass spatial availability, logistics costs and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions: a case study on electricity productions in South Italy. J Cle Pro. 2015;99:129–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.• Ribeiro Teixeira T, Alvares Soares Ribeiro CA, Rosa dos Santos A, Marcatti GE, Lorenzon AS, de Castro NLM, et al. Forest biomass power plant installation scenarios. Biom Bioe. 2018;108:35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.006. Fuzzy logic and GIS have been used to manage economic, environmental and social complexities of biomass supply chains, by minimising transport distances and costs CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.• Martinkus N, Latta G, Morgan T, Wolcott MA. comparison of methodologies for estimating delivered forest residue volume and cost to a wood-based biorefinery. Biom Bioe. 2017;106:83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.023. Comparison between two spatial methods (a past-predictive model and a future-predictive bio-economic model in a GIS environment) of estimation of biomass volume and costs of delivered forest residues to a biorefinery CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 46.Chung W, Anderson N. Spatial modeling of potential woody biomass flow, in: 35th annual meeting of the council on forest engineering: engineering new solutions for energy supply and demand 2012.Google Scholar
- 56.Ekşioğlu SD, Karimi H. A model for analyzing the impact of production tax credit on renewable electricity production. IIE Ann Conference and Expo. 2014:2407–16.Google Scholar
- 60.Balaman ŞY, Matopoulos A, Wright DJ, Scott J. Integrated optimization of sustainable supply chains and transportation networks for multi technology bio-based production: a decision support system based on fuzzy e-constraint method. J Cle Pro. 2017;172:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.150.Google Scholar
- 64.Ghaderi H, Pishvaee MS, Moini A. Biomass supply chain network design: an optimization-oriented review and analysis. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.027.
- 67.ISO 14046:2014. Environmental management—Water footprint—principles, requirements and guidelines.Google Scholar