Spatial Integration of Natural Gas Markets: a Literature Review

  • Ekaterina Dukhanina
  • Olivier Massol
Energy Markets (R Sioshansi and S Mousavian, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Energy Markets


Purpose of Review

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the definition of an integrated market and to provide a commented overview of the different empirical methodologies that have been proposed to assess the degree of spatial integration of natural gas markets.

Recent Findings

In recent years, the methodologies assessing gas market integration have evolved from simple empirical works based solely on price data analyses to more complex ones based on the theoretical notion of spatial equilibrium capturing the effects of both price and non-price data.


A number of liberalization reforms have stimulated the emergence of spatially diverse markets for wholesale natural gas interconnected through spatial arbitrage, which plays a crucial role in the determination of local prices. In recent years, a vast and rapidly growing empirical literature has emerged to examine the degree of integration of these markets. A close examination of this literature has shown that only a handful of studies pay attention to the theoretical notion of market integration and account for the role played by trade flows, capacity constraints, and unit transaction costs.


Spatial integration Law of one price Integration of gas markets Natural gas markets Market integration Price convergence 



We are grateful to Ramteen Sioshansi and to two anonymous referees for a series of useful suggestions that helped us to improve the article.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Ekaterina Dukhanina and Olivier Massol declare no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    ACER. European Gas Target model review and update. January 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Commission. Energy union package. February 2015.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Parliament. Energy union: key decisions for the realisation of a fully integrated energy market. April, 2016.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cournot A-A Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses. 1838. Paris.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marshall A. Principles of economics. Book five: general relations of demand, supply and value. Chapter 1. 1890.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    IGU World LNG report – 2015 Edition I.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark TA. Violations of the gold points, 1980-1908. J Polit Econ. 1984;92(5):791–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Spiller PT, Huang CJ. On the extent of the market: wholesale gasoline in the Northern United States. J Ind Econ. 1986;35(2):131–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Enke S. Equilibrium among spatially separated markets: solution by electric analogue. Econometrica. 1951;19(1):40–7.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Samuelson PA. Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. Am Econ Rev. 1952;42(3):283–303.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takayama T, Judge GC. Spatial and temporal price and allocation models. Amsterdam: North- Holland; 1971.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Enke S. Space and Value. Q J Econ. 1942;56(4):627–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Takayama T, Judge GC. Equilibrium among spatially separated markets: a reformulation. Econometrica. 1964;32(4):510–24.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stigler GJ, Sherwin RA. The extent of the market. J Law Econ. 1985;28(3):555–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Doane MJ, Spulber DF. Open access and the evolution of the U. S. Spot market for natural gas. J Law Econ. 1994;37(2):477–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Engle RF, Granger CW. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica. 1987;55:251–76.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Vany A, Walls WD. Pipeline Access and Market integration in the natural gas industry: evidence from cointegration tests. Energy J. 1993;14(4):1–19.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Vany A, Walls WD. The law of one price in a network: arbitrage and price dynamics in natural gas city gate markets. J Reg Sci. 1996;36(4):555–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walls D. Price Convergence across Natural Gas Fields and City Markets. The Energy Journal. 1994;15(4):37–48.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Serletis A. Is there an East-West split in North American natural gas markets? Energy J. 1997;18(1):47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Serletis A, Herbert J. The message in North American energy prices. Energy Econ. 1999;21:471–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Asche F, Misund B, Sikveland M. The relationship between spot and contract gas prices in Europe. Energy Econ. 2013;38:212–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Asche F, Osmundsen P, Tveterås R. Market integration for natural gas in Europe. Int J Global Energy Issues. 2001;16:300–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Asche F, Osmundsen P, Tveterås R. European market integration for gas? Volume flexibility and political risk. Energy Econ. 2002;24(3):249–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Renou-Maissant P. Toward the integration of European natural gas markets: a time-varying approach. Energy Policy. 2012;51:779–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Johansen S. Estimation and Hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian autoregressive models. Econometrica. 1991;59:1551–80.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siliverstovs B, L'Hégaret G, Neumann A, von Hirschhausen C. International market integration for natural gas? A cointegration analysis of prices in Europe, North America and Japan. Energy Econ. 2005;27(4):603–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brown SPA, Yücel MK. Market arbitrage: European and North American natural gas prices. Energy J Special Issue. 2009:167–85.
  29. 29.
    Brown SPA, Yücel MK. Deliverability and regional pricing in U.S. natural gas markets. Energy Econ. 2008;30(5):2441–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nick S, Thoenes S. What drives natural gas prices?—a structural VAR approach. Energy Econ. 2014;45:517–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bachmeier LJ, Griffin JM. Testing for market integration, crude oil, coal, and natural gas. Energy J. 2006;27:55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Park H, Mjelde JW, Bessler DA. Price interactions and discovery among natural gas spot markets in North America. Energy Policy. 2008;36(1):290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schultz E, Swieringa J. Price discovery in European natural gas markets. Energy Policy. 2013;61:628–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    • Olsen KK, Mjelde JW, Bessler DA. Price formulation and the law of one price in internationally linked markets: an examination of the natural gas markets in the USA and Canada. Ann Reg Sci. 2015;54(1):117–42. In addition to VECM estimation the paper performs directed acyclic graph and variance decomposition analyses. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    • Growitsch C, Stronzik M, Nepal R. Price convergence and information efficiency in German natural gas markets. German Econ Rev. 2015;16(1):87–103. The paper covers different methodologies of assessment of the market integration and attempts to account for transportation costs. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mohammadi H. Market integration and price transmission in the U.S. natural gas market: from the wellhead to end use markets. Energy Econ. 2011;33:227–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    King M, Cuc M. Price convergence in north American natural gas spot markets. Energy J. 1996;17(2):17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Neumann A, Cullmann A. What’s the story with natural gas markets in Europe? Empirical evidence from spot trade data. 9th international conference on the European energy market. 2012.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Neumann A, Siliverstovs B, von Hirschhausen C. Convergence of European spot market prices for natural gas? A real-time analysis of market integration using the Kalman filter. Appl Econ Lett. 2006;13(11):727–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Neumann A. Linking natural gas markets—is LNG doing its job? Energy J Special Issue. 2009;30:187–99.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mu X, Ye H. Towards an integrated spot LNG market: an interim assessment. Energy J. 2018;39(1)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    • Li R, Joyeux R, Ripple RD. International natural gas market integration. The Energy Journal. 2014;35(4):159–79. The paper employs recent methodologies based on price convergence and assesses the degree of market integration between different regions using pipeline and LNG prices. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Phillips PCB, Sul D. Transition modelling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica. 2007;75:1771–855.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cuddington JT, Wang Z. Assessing the degree of spot market integration for US natural gas: evidence from daily price data. J Regul Econ. 2006;29(2):195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Taylor AM. Potential pitfalls for the purchasing-power-parity puzzle? Sampling and specification biases in mean-reversion tests of the law of one price. Econometrica, 2001:9(2): 473–498.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kleit AN. Did open access integrate natural gas markets? An arbitrage cost approach. J Regul Econ. 1998;14(2):19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Micola AR, Bunn DW. Two markets and a weak link. Energy Econ. 2007;29:79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kuper G, Mulder M. Cross-border constraints, institutional changes and integration of the Dutch–German gas market. Energy Econ. 2016;53:182–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Avalos R, Fitzgerald T, Rucker RR. Measuring the effects of natural gas pipeline constraints on regional pricing and market integration. Energy Econ. 2016;60:217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    •• Massol O, Banal-Estañol A. Market power and spatial arbitrage between interconnected gas hubs. USAEE Working Paper No. 16–281. 2016. The paper applies a new approach based on spatial equilibrium theory and accounts for transportation costs, trade flows, and capacity constraints. Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Werden GJ, Froeb LM. Correlation Causality, and All that Jazz: The Inherent Shortcomings of Price Tests for Antitrust Market Delineation. Rev Ind Org. 1993;8(3):329–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hartley P, Medlock K, Rosthal J. The relationship of natural gas to oil prices. Energy J. 2008;29(3):47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hulshof D, Mulder M, Van Der Maat J-P. Market fundamentals, competition and natural gas prices. Energy Policy. 2016;94:480–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
  55. 55.
    Barrett CB, Li JR. Distinguishing between equilibrium and integration in spatial price analysis. Am J Agric Econ. 2002;84(2):292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Industrial Economics, CERNAMines ParisTechParis Cedex 06France
  2. 2.IFP Énergies NouvellesRueil-MalmaisonFrance
  3. 3.Center for Economics and ManagementRueil-MalmaisonFrance
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsCity University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations