Soil as a Basic Nexus Tool: Soils at the Center of the Food–Energy–Water Nexus

A Correction to this article was published on 07 February 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Soil is the medium for plant growth and the substrate for all biogeochemical and biogeophysical processes. Soil’s unique natural organization forms the foundation of any food–water–energy nexus system. It forms a habitat for billions of diverse micro, meso, and macrofauna and flora and is the basis of numerous ecosystem services essential to human well-being and nature conservancy. It moderates soil hydrological processes within the entire vadose zone: which is part of the earth between the soil surface and the phreatic zone. Soil structure also supports numerous ecosystem services including nutrient transformation and availability, water quality and renewability, denaturing and transport of pollutants, and groundwater table fluctuations. It also moderates the soil–water–plant-energy nexus with the replenishement of green-water supply (from precipitation) for plants and soil biota, which in turn enables the production of biomass as a source of food, feed, fiber, and biofuel feedstock. Indeed, soil is a very large reservoir for water and carbon with strong influences on local, regional, and global climate. Also, the energy factor is connected with the climate change through soil–water–food–energy nexus because of numerous interlinked pathways including gaseous emissions, energy and food production, and recycling of nutrients and water at regional, national, and global scales. Through provisioning of numerous ecosystem services, the soil–water–food–energy–climate nexus is interwoven with the ecosystem security and functioning of planet’s four ecospheres (i.e., atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithosphere, and the biosphere). Therefore, the health of soil, plants, animals, people, and ecosystems is one and indivisible.

Recent Findings

This interconnectivity is also the basis of the “4 per Thousand” initiative adopted by the COP21, the Climate Summit of 2015 in Paris, and “Adapting African Agriculture” (AAA) by COP22 in Morocco. Consequently, soil is not only a foundation for securing the natural resources: food, water and energy, but it is under desperate need to be integrated and appreciated in understanding the complex interconnectedness of any food, energy, water and soil system. Concentration and stock of soil organic carbon are the key soil properties that determine the physical, chemical, biological, and ecological properties and processes, and are major control of all nexuses described herein.

Summary

This chapter presents a conceptual model and the role of soil as a naturally organized medium to protect global food, water, energy securities. Moreover, it elaborates on using soil as a basic nexus tool and proposes a paradigm shift in integrating soil and creating the food–energy–water–soil nexus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Change history

  • 07 February 2018

    The original version of this article, published in Current Sustainable Renewable Energy Reports, Volume 4, Issue 3, September 2017, inadvertently misspelled an author’s last name on the title page as Haimanote Baybil. The correct name is Haimanote Bayabil.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.

    Abel S, Peters A, Trinks S, Schonsky H, Facklam M, Wessolek G. Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma. 2013;202-203:183–91. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ahmad, N, Qadir, G. (2007). Effect of subsurface soil compaction and improvement measures on soil properties. Int J Agric Biol (Pakistan).

  3. 3.

    Al-Saidi M, Elagib NA. Towards understanding the integrative approach of the water, energy and food nexus. Sci Total Environ. 2017;574:1131–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Asai H, Samson B, Stephan H, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, et al. Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in northern Laos: soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Res. 2009;111:81–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Assi AT, Accola J, Hovhannissian G, Mohtar RH, Braudeau E. Physics of soil medium organization, part 2: pedostructure characterization through measurement and modeling the soil moisture characteristic curves. Front Environ Sci. 2014;2:5. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2014.00005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil. 2010;337:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bagstad K, Semmens D, Waage S, Winthrop R. A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosyst Serv. 2013;5:E27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bai, Z, Dent, D, Olsson, L, Schaepman, M. (2008a). Global assessment of land degradation and improvement 1: identification by remote sensing. Report 2008/01, FAO/ISRIC-Rome/Wageningen.

  9. 9.

    Bai ZG, Dent DL, Olsson L, Schaepman ME. Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use Manag. 2008b;24(3):223–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bartlett AA. The meaning of sustainability. Teachers Clearinghouse for Science and Society Education Newsletter. 2008;31(1):1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bazilian M, Rogner H, Howells M, Hermann S, Arent D, Gielen D, et al. Considering the energy, water and food nexus: towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy. 2011;39(12):7896–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Beck M, Walker R. On water security, sustainability, and the water-food-energy-climate nexus. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering. 2013a;7(5):626–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Beck MB, Walker RV. On water security, sustainability, and the water-food-energy-climate nexus. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering. 2013b;7(5):626–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bhaduri A, Ringler C, Dombrowski I, Mohtar R, Scheumann W. Sustainability in the water-energy-food nexus. Water Int. 2015;40(5–6):723–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bouma J, Stoorvogel J, van Alphen BJ, Booltink HWG. Pedology, precision agriculture, and the changing paradigm of agricultural research. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1999;63:1763–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Braudeau E, Mohtar RH. Integrative environmental modeling. Encyclopedia of agricultural, food, and biological engineering, Second Edition. 2014; doi:10.1081/E-EAFE2-120049111.

  17. 17.

    Braudeau, E., Assi, A.T, and Mohtar R.H. (2016). Hydrostructural pedology. Wiley-ISTE. 186 pages. ISBN: 978-1-84821-994.

  18. 18.

    Braudeau E, Mohtar RH. Modeling the soil system: bridging the gap between pedology and soil-water physics. Global Planet Change J. 2009;67:51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Braudeau E, Frangi JP, Mohtar RH. Characterizing non-rigid aggregated soil-water medium using its shrinkage curve. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2004;68:359–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Brewer R. Fabric and mineral analysis of soils. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1964. p. 482.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Bronic C, Lal R. Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma. 2005;124:3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Busscher W, Bauer P. Soil strength, cotton root growth and lint yield in a southeastern USA coastal loamy sand. Soil Tillage Res. 2003;74:151–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Byrne LB, Thiet RK, Chaudhary VB. Pedogogy for the pedosphere. Ecological Society of America. Front Ecol Environ. 2016;14:238–40. doi:10.1002/fee.1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cairns R, Krzywoszynska A. Anatomy of a buzzword: the emergence of the water-energy-food nexus’ in UK natural resource debates. Environ Sci Pol. 2016;64:164–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chang Y, Li GJ, Yao Y, Zhang LX, Yu C. Quantifying the water-energy-food nexus: current status and trends. Energies. 2016;9(2)

  26. 26.

    Chen H, Zhang Y. New biorefineries and sustainable agriculture: increased food, biofuels, and ecosystem security. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;47:117–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Coleman-Jensen, A. C. Gregory, A. Singh. (2016). Report summary: household food security in the United States in 2015. USDA-ERS, September 2016.

  28. 28.

    Coleman-Jensen, A., M.P. Rabbitt, C. Gregory, A. Singh. 2016. Household food security in the United States in 2015. ERR-2015. USDA-ERS, Sept. 2016.

  29. 29.

    Collins T. World losing 2000 hectares f farm soil daily to salt-induced degradation. Tokyo: UNU; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Commoner B. The closing circle: nature, man and technology. New York: Knopf; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Daher BT, Mohtar RH. Water-energy-food (WEF) nexus tool 2.0: guiding integrative resource planning and decision-making. Water Int. 2015;40(5–6):748–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Dexter AR. Advances in characterization of soil structure. Soil Tillage Res. 1988;11:199–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Diamond J. Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed: Penguin Books; 2005. p. 592.

  34. 34.

    Doran JW, Sarrantonio M, Liebig M. Soil health and sustainability. In: Sparks DL, editor. Advances in agronomy. New York: Academic Press; 1996. p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Elhaja, ME, Ibrahim, IS, Adam, HE, Csaplovics, E. (2014). Soil aggregate stability and wind erodible fraction in a semi-arid environment of White Nile State, Sudan. In: SPIE Asia Pacific Remote Sensing. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 926017-926017-5.

  36. 36.

    Eriksson O, Bisaillon M, Haraldsson M, Sundberg J. Integrated waste management as a mean to promote renewable energy. Renew Energy. 2014;61:38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    FAO. The state of food and agriculture. Rome: FAO; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    FAO. (2011). The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture (SOLAW)—managing systems at risk.

  39. 39.

    FAO. The state of food and agriculture. Rome: FAO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Garcia DJ, You FQ. The water-energy-food nexus and process systems engineering: a new focus. Comput Chem Eng. 2016;91:49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gerbens-Leenes W, Hoekstra AY, van der Meer TH. The water footprint of bioenergy. PNAS. 2009;106(25):10219–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Grafton RQ, McLindin M, Hussey K, Wyrwoll P, Wichelns D, Ringler C, et al. Responding to global challenges in food, energy, environment and water: risks and options assessment for decision-making. Asia Pac Policy Stud. 2016;3(2):275–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Hamiche AM, Stambouli AB, Flazi S. A review of the water-energy nexus. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;65:319–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Hanlon, P., R. Madel, K. Olson-Sawyer, K. Rabin, J. Rose. (2013). Food, water, and energy: know the nexus. Grace Communications Foundation, 31 pp.

  45. 45.

    Hanson D, Steenhuis T, Walter M, Boll J. Effects of soil degradation and management practices on the surface water dynamics in the Talgua River watershed in Honduras. Land Degrad Dev. 2004;15:367–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hoff, H. (2011). Understanding the nexus (Background paper for the Bonn2011 Nexus Conference).

  47. 47.

    Howard, A. (1947). The soil and health: a study of organic agriculture (Introduction by Wendell Berry). The University Press of Kentucky.

  48. 48.

    • Howells M, Rogner H. Water-energy nexus assessing integrated systems. Nat Clim Chang. 2014;4(4):246–7. It provides an authentic conceptual basis of the nexus approach.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hunt AG, Ewing RP, Horton R. What’s wrong with soil physics? Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2013;77:1877–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hurni H, Giger M, Liniger H, Studer R, Messerli P, Portner B, et al. Soils, agriculture and food security: the interplay between ecosystem functioning and human well-being. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2015;15:25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    IPCC. Fifth assessment report. Geneva: Switzerland; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Jalilov SM, Keskinen M, Varis O, Amer S, Ward FA. Managing the water-energy-food nexus: gains and losses from new water development in Amu Darya River basin. J Hydrol. 2016;539:648–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Jiang Y. China’s water security: current status, emerging challenges and future prospects. Environ Sci Pol. 2015;54:106–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Johnson D, Ambrose S, Bassett T, Bowen M, Crummey D, Isaacson J, et al. Meanings of environmental terms. J Environ Qual. 1997;26:581–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Karhu K, Mattila T, Bergström I, Regina K. Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity—results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2011;140:309–13. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Keith A, Schmidt O, Mcmahon B. Soil stewardship as a nexus between ecosystem services and one health. Ecosyst Serv. 2016;17:40–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kerr, RA. (2009). Northern India’s groundwater is going, going, going ... Science 325 (5942):798–798.

  58. 58.

    Keskinen M, Varis O. Water-energy-food nexus in large Asian River basins. Water. 2016;8(10)

  59. 59.

    Killham K. Integrated soil management—moving towards globally sustainable agriculture. J Agric Sci. 2011;149:29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Kong X, Zhang X, Lal R, Zhang F, Chen X, Niu Z, et al. Groundwater depletion by agricultural intensification in China’s HHH Plains since 1980s. Agron J. 2016;135:59–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Koppelaar, R. (2012). World energy consumption beyond 500EJ. Resilience, 16 February 2012. http://www.resilience.org/stories/2012-02-16/world-energy-consumption-beyond-500-exajoules/

  62. 62.

    Kurian M, Ardakanian R. Governing the nexus. Dordrecht: Springer; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL. Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma. 2010;158:443–9. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.05.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma. 2004a;123:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    •• Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science. 2004b;304:1623–7. It is a seminal article on the importance of soil organic carbon to agronomic productivity and adaptation/mitigation of climate change.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Lal R. Soil degradation as a reason for inadequate human nutrition. Food Secur. 2009;1:45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Lal R. Climate-strategic agriculture and the water-soil-waste nexus. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 2013b;176(4):479–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Lal, R. (2013a). The nexus of soil, water, and waste. Lecture Series #1 UNU-FLORES, Dresden, Germany.

  69. 69.

    Lal R. Societal value of soil carbon. J Soil Water Conserv. 2014;69:186A–92A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Lal R. The nexus approach in managing water, soil and waste under changing climate and growing demands on natural resources. In: Kurian M, Ardakanian R, editors. Governing the nexus: water, soil, waste change. Dordrecht, Holland: Springer; 2015a. p. 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Lal R. The soil-peace nexus: our common future. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2015b;61:566–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration and aggregation by cover cropping. J Soil Water Conserv. 2015c;70:329–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Lal R. Soil health and carbon management. Food Energy Secur. 2016a;5(4):212–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Lal R. Global food security and nexus thinking. J Soil Water Conserv. 2016b;71(4):85A–90A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Lal R. Feeding 11 billion on 0.5 hectare of cropland. Food Energy Secur J. 2016c;5(4):239–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Lasson G. Hegels Grundlinien der Philosophies des Recht. 2nd ed. Liepzig: F. Meiner; 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Canadell JG, Sitch S, Korsbakken JI, Peters GP, et al. Global carbon budget. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2016;8:605–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Lin H, Bouma J, Pachepsky Y, Westem A, Thompson J, van Genuchten R, et al. Hydropedology: synergistic integration of pedology and hydrology. Water Resour Res. 2006;42:W05301. doi:10.1029/2005WR004085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Lovelock J. The Gaia. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1971. 147 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Mannschatz T, Wolf T, Hulsmann S. Nexus tools platform: web-based comparison of modelling tools for analysis of water-soil-waste nexus. Environ Model Softw. 2016;76:137–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    •• Martin, D. (2016). At the nexus of fire, water and society. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 371, no 1696. It is important to understanding the conceptual basis of the nexus approach in addressing global issues.

  82. 82.

    Marzluff JM. Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. New York: Springer; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    McCarl, B.A., and J.M. Reilly. (2007). “US Agriculture in the climate change squeeze: Part 1: Sectoral Sensitivity and Vulnerability,” report to National Environmental Trust http://agecon2.tamu.edu/people/faculty/mccarl-bruce/papers/1303Agriculture in the climate change squeez1.doc.

  84. 84.

    Meadows D, Randers J, Meadows D. Limits to growth. White River Junctions, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company; 2004. 338 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Mohtar RH. Ven Te Chow memorial lecture: localizing water and food security. Water Int. 2015;40(4):559–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Mohtar RH, Assi AT, Daher BT. Current water for food situational analysis in the Arab region and expected changes due to dynamic externalities. In: Water Security in a New World, Amer K, et al., editors. The Water, Energy, and Food Security Nexus in the Arab Region. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    •• Mohtar RH, Daher B. Water-energy-food nexus framework for facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogue. Water Int. 2016;41(5):655–61. This article highlights the significance of nexus framework to facilitating multi-stakeholder dialogue.

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Mohtar, R.H., Assi, A. T. and Daher, B. T. (2015). Bridging the water and food gap: the role of the water-energy-food nexus. UNUFLORES Working Paper Series 5, Edited by Hiroshan Hettiarachchi. Dresden: United Nations University Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES).

  89. 89.

    Mohtar RH. An integrated sustainability index for effective water policy. In: Waughray D, editor. Water security: the water-food-energy-climate nexus world economic forum water initiative. Washington: Island Press; 2011. p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Muir J. My first summer in the sierra. Boston, MA: The Riverside Press Cambridge; 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Nortcliff, S. (2015). Task Force: soil matters. Catena, 154 pp.

  92. 92.

    NRC. Water implications of biofuels production in the United States. Washington DC: The National Academy Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Osman KT. Soils: principles, properties and management. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. p. 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Pankhurst C, Doube BM, Gupte VVSR. Biological indicators of soil health. New York: CABI Publishing; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Pate, R., M. Hightower, C. Cemron, W. Einfeld. (2007). Overview of energy-water interdependencies and the emerging energy demands on water resources. Report SAND 2007-1349C. Los Alamos National Lab, NM.

  96. 96.

    Pepper IL. The soil health-human health nexus. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2013;43(24):2617–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Radcliffe D, West L, Clark R, Manor G, Langdale G, Bruce R. Effect of traffic and in-row chiseling on mechanical impedance. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1989;53:1197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Raper R, Schwab E, Balkcom K, Burmester C, Reeves D. Effect of annual, biennial, and triennial in-row subsoiling on soil compaction and cotton yield in southeastern US silt loam soils. Appl Eng Agric. 2005;21:337–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Rasul G. Food, water, and energy security in south asia: a nexus perspective from the hindu kush himalayan region. Environ Sci Pol. 2014;39:35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Rengasamy P. World salinization with emphasis on Australia. J Exp Bot. 2006;57:1017–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Ringler C, Bhaduri A, Lawford R (2013) The nexus across water, energy, land and food (WELF): potential for improved resource use efficiency? Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:617–624

  102. 102.

    Schoeneberger P, Wysocki D. Hydrology of soils and deep regolith: a nexus between soil geography, ecosystems and land management. Geoderma. 2005;126(1–2):117–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Smut, J.C. (1926). Holism and evolution. Greenwood Press (Reprint 1973). ISBN 0837165563.

  104. 104.

    Temesgen M, Savenije H, Rockström J, Hoogmoed W. Assessment of strip tillage systems for maize production in semi-arid Ethiopia: effects on grain yield, water balance and water productivity. Phys Chem Earth. 2012a;parts A/B/C 47:156–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Temesgen M, Uhlenbrook S, Simane B, Zaag P, Mohamed Y, Wenninger J, et al. Impacts of conservation tillage on the hydrological and agronomic performance of Fanya juus in the upper Blue Nile (Abbay) river basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2012b;16:4725–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Tripathi V, Fraceto L, Abhilash P. Sustainable clean-up technologies for soils contaminated with multiple pollutants: plant-microbe-pollutant and climate nexus. Ecol Eng. 2015;82:330–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Twomlow S, Love D, Walker S. The nexus between integrated natural resources management and integrated water resources management in southern Africa. Phys Chem Earth. 2008;33(8–13):889–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    U.N. World population prospect: the 2015 revision. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Verheijen F, Jeffery S, Bastos AC, van der Velde M, Diafas I. Biochar application to soils—a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes and functions (EUR 24099 EN). Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Wada Y, Florke M, Hanasaki N, Eisner S, Fischer G, Tramberend S, et al. Modeling global water use for the 21st century: the water futures and solutions (wfas) initiative and its approaches. Geosci Model Dev. 2016;9(1):175–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Wang H, Luo H, Fallgren P, Jin S, Ren Z. Bioelectrochemical system platform for sustainable environmental remediation and energy generation. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33(3–4):317–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Weber, M. (1922). Science as a vocation. Published as “Wissenschaft als Beruf,” Gesammlte Aufsaetze zur Wissenschaftslehre (Tubingen, 1922), pp. 524–55.

  113. 113.

    Weigelt, J., H. Janetschek, A. Muller and K. Topfer. (2015). Editorial overview: environmental change issues: soils in the nexus. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 15, V-Viii.

  114. 114.

    Wichelns D. The water-energy-food nexus: is the increasing attention warranted from either a research or policy perspective? Environ Sci Pol. 2017;69:113–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    World Bank. (2014). Arable land-hectares per person. data. worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.ARBL.HA.PC

  116. 116.

    World Economic Forum. Water security: the water-food-energy-climate nexus. Washington: Island Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Yang H, Zhou Y, Liu J. Land and water requirements of biofuel and the implications for food supply and the environment in China. Energy Policy. 2009;37:1876–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Texas A&M WEF Nexus initiative, and the Carbon Management and Sequestration Center of the Ohio State University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rattan Lal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Nexus of Food, Water, Energy

A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-018-0101-0.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lal, R., Mohtar, R.H., Assi, A.T. et al. Soil as a Basic Nexus Tool: Soils at the Center of the Food–Energy–Water Nexus. Curr Sustainable Renewable Energy Rep 4, 117–129 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-017-0082-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Soil health
  • Interconnectivity
  • Holistic approach
  • Soil carbon sequestration
  • Sustainability
  • Climate change