Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Up-to-Date Infection Control Practices for Febrile Neutropenic Patients

  • New Technologies and Advances in Infection Prevention (A Marra, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Neutropenia and its related infections are still a significant challenge in the treatment of patients with onco-hematological diseases, impacting increased mortality and morbidity. In this review, we compiled up-to-date scientific evidence on infection control in neutropenic patients and discussed the potential role of new technologies

Recent findings

Traditional measures such as hand hygiene (HH), patient’s skincare, central venous catheter care, environment protection, and contact isolation are the cornerstone of infection prevention in neutropenic patients while antibiotic prophylaxis is still a debated issue. Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are increasing as reported in this population, and new techniques such as decolonization and the use of predictive models for infection by MDRO could play a pivotal role.

Summary

Well-established measures should always be enhanced and stimulated. New technological tools based on artificial intelligence algorithms could lead to personalized infection control practices and better outcomes. More studies are needed to evaluate these new tools in the real-world setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HH:

Hand hygiene

HCT:

Hematopoietic cell transplantation

CVC:

Central venous catheter

CRBSI:

Catheter-related bloodstream infection

CNS:

Coagulase-negative Staphylococci

CDC:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

HEPA:

High-efficiency particulate air

MDRO:

Multidrug-resistant organisms

FN:

febrile neutropenia

ESBL:

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase

CRE:

Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteria

FMT:

Fecal microbiota transplantation

EHR:

Electronic health records

MDR-GNB:

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Tomblyn M, et al. Guidelines for preventing infectious complications among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a global perspective recommendations. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:1143–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodey G, Buckley M, Sathe YS, Freireich EJ. Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia. Ann Intern Med. 1966;64:328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sodré Da Costa LS, et al. Measuring hand hygiene compliance in a hematology-oncology unit: a comparative study of methodologies. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41:997–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mostafazadeh-Bora M, Bahrami M, Hosseini A. A survey of nurses’ compliance with hand hygiene guidelines in caring for patients with cancer in a selected center of Isfahan, Iran, in 2016. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018;23:119–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fehling P, et al. Effect of gloved hand disinfection on hand hygiene before infection-prone procedures on a stem cell ward. J Hosp Infect. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2019.06.004.

  6. •• Jain S, Clezy K, McLaws ML. Safe removal of gloves from contact precautions: the role of hand hygiene. Am J Infect Control. 2018;46:764–7. The authors showed that appropriate hand hygiene was effective in removing MRSA and VRE even when gloves were not used for routine clinical care, despite contact with patients known to be colonized with MRSA or VRE. They suggests a modified approach to glove use for dry contact with patients on contact precautions.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cusini A, Nydegger D, Kaspar T, Schweiger A, Kuhn R, Marschall J. Improved hand hygiene compliance after eliminating mandatory glove use from contact precautions-is less more? Am J Infect Control. 2015;43:922–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thom KA, Kleinberg M, Roghmann M-C. Infection prevention in the cancer center. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit290.

  9. Srigley JA, Furness CD, Gardam M. Measurement of patient hand hygiene in multiorgan transplant units using a novel technology: an observational study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:1336–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wisplinghoff H, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. Current trends in the epidemiology of nosocomial bloodstream infections in patients with hematological malignancies and solid neoplasms in hospitals in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:1103–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schiffer CA, Mangu PB, Wade JC, Camp-Sorrell D, Cope DG, el-Rayes BF, et al. Central venous catheter care for the patient with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1357–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Menegueti MG, Ferreira LR, Silva MFI, da Silva AS, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F. Assessment of microbiological air quality in hemato-oncology units and its relationship with the occurrence of invasive fungal infections: an integrative review. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013;46:391–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Murray J, Agreiter I, Orlando L, Hutt D. BMT settings, infection and infection control. In: The European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Textbook for Nurses. Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 97–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50026-3_7.

  14. Hentrich M, Schalk E, Schmidt-Hieber M, Chaberny I, Mousset S, Buchheidt D, et al. Central venous catheter-related infections in hematology and oncology: 2012 updated guidelines on diagnosis, management and prevention by the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:936–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Biehl LM, Huth A, Panse J, Krämer C, Hentrich M, Engelhardt M, et al. A randomized trial on chlorhexidine dressings for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections in neutropenic patients. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1916–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gudiol C, et al. Administration of taurolidine-citrate lock solution for prevention of central venous catheter infection in adult neutropenic haematological patients: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (TAURCAT). Trials. 2018;19.

  17. Siegel JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M. Guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in healthcare settings. 2007.

  18. Schlesinger A, Paul M, Gafter-Gvili A, Rubinovitch B, Leibovici L. Infection-control interventions for cancer patients after chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9:97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Combariza JF, Toro LF, Orozco JJ. Effectiveness of environmental control measures to decrease the risk of invasive aspergillosis in acute leukaemia patients during hospital building work. J Hosp Infect. 2017;96:336–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Özen M, et al. A quasi-experimental study analyzing the effectiveness of portable high-efficiency particulate absorption filters in preventing infections in hematology patients during construction. Turkish J Hematol. 2016;33:41–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. • Styczynski J, et al. Protective environment for hematopoietic cell transplant (HSCT) recipients: the Infectious Diseases Working Party EBMT analysis of global recommendations on health-care facilities. Bone Marrow Transplant, 53. 2018:1131–8.The authors showed that the majority of the European HCT centers were equipped with HEPA filter, however knowledge on its details and maintenance was inadequate.

  22. • Sung AD, et al. Universal mask usage for reduction of respiratory viral infections after stem cell transplant: a prospective trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:999–1006. In this prospective single-center study, the authors demonstrated that a universal surgical mask policy was associated with a reduction in respiratory viral infections in the period following HSCT.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nouér SA, Nucci M, Anaissie E. Tackling antibiotic resistance in febrile neutropenia: current challenges with and recommendations for managing infections with resistant Gram-negative organisms. Expert Rev Hematol. 2015;8:647–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Virizuela JA, Carratalà J, Aguado JM, Vicente D, Salavert M, Ruiz M, et al. Management of infection and febrile neutropenia in patients with solid cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016;18:557–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hirsch HH, Martino R, Ward KN, Boeckh M, Einsele H, Ljungman P. Fourth European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-4): guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of human respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, and coronavirus. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:258–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. • Ullmann AJ, et al. Posaconazole or fluconazole for prophylaxis in severe graft-versus-host disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:335–47. In this randomized, double-blind trail, the authors demonstraded that the use of oral posaconazole compared with fluconazole reduced the incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal infections in patients with GVHD who were receiving immunossupressive therapy.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. • Cornely OA, et al. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:348–59. In this randomized, double-blind trail, published in the same issue than the previous reference, the authors demonstraded that the use of oral posaconazole compared with fluconazole reduced the incidence of proven or probable invasive fungal infections in patients receiving induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Taplitz R. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for adult patients with cancer-related immunosuppression: ASCO and IDSA clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:3043–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gafter-Gvili A, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD004386.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Owattanapanich W, Chayakulkeeree M. Efficacy of levofloxacin as an antibacterial prophylaxis for acute leukemia patients receiving intensive chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hematology. 2019;24:362–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mikulska M, et al. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in haematological cancer patients with neutropenia: ECIL critical appraisal of previous guidelines. J Inf Secur. 2018;76:20–37.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Egan G, Robinson PD, Martinez JPD, Alexander S, Ammann RA, Dupuis LL, et al. Efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a systematic review of randomized trials. Cancer Med. 2019;8:4536–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bucaneve G, Micozzi A, Menichetti F, Martino P, Dionisi MS, Martinelli G, et al. Levofloxacin to prevent bacterial infection in patients with cancer and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:977–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Catho G, Huttner BD. Strategies for the eradication of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae intestinal carriage. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2019;17:557–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dimitriou V, Biehl LM, Hamprecht A, Vogel W, Dörfel D, Peter S, et al. Controlling intestinal colonization of high-risk haematology patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase II trial (CLEAR). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74:2065–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tavoukjian V. Faecal microbiota transplantation for the decolonization of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the gut: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2019;102:174–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yoon YK, Suh JW, Kang E-J, Kim JY. Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation for decolonization of intestinal multidrug-resistant microorganism carriage: beyond Clostridioides difficile infection. Ann Med. 2019;1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2019.1662477

  38. •• Battipaglia G, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation before or after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies carrying multidrug-resistance bacteria. Haematologica. 2019;104:1682–8. The authors reported results in ten adult patients colonized with MDRO that received HSCT for hematologic malignancies. With a median follow-up of 13 months, decolonization was achieved in seven of ten patients.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. • Schinkel M, Paranjape K, Panday RSN, Skyttberg N, Nanayakkara PWB. Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in sepsis: a narrative review. Comput Biol Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103488. The authors reviewed papers on the diagnosis of sepsis with artificial intelligence that reported AUROC as outcome measures.

  40. Morales H, et al. Sepsis and clinical deterioration prediction based on a machine learning model. In: 29th European Congress of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, ECCMID 2019. 2019.

  41. Saba L, Biswas M, Kuppili V, Cuadrado Godia E, Suri HS, Edla DR, et al. The present and future of deep learning in radiology. Eur J Radiol. 2019;114:14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. •• Garcia-Vidal C, Sanjuan G, Puerta-Alcalde P, Moreno-García E, Soriano A. Artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making processes. EBioMedicine. 2019;46:27–9. The authors describe their challenges and pitfalls in implementing an artificial intelligence program within an infectious disease setting to support clinical decision-making processes.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Garcia-Vidal C, et al. Predicting multidrug-resistant gram negative infections in hematological patients with high risk neutropenia using neuronal networks. In: 29th European Congress of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, ECCMID 2019. 2019. p. 119.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Anthony Armenta for providing English language assistance of the publication at hand.

Funding

This study has been co-funded by a research grant from the Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS PI18/01061] and a European Regional Development Fund (EDRD). CG-V has received the INTENSIFICACIÓ Grant—a grant supported by the Catalan Health Agency (PERIS [Pla estratègic de recerca i innovació en salut—“Strategic Plan for Research and Innovation in HealthCare”]). Our group is recognized by the AGAUR (Project 2017SGR1432) of the Catalan Health Agency. Dr. Pedro Puerta-Alcalde has received a pre-doctoral grant supported by the Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Instituto de Salud Carlos III [RH041828].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Garcia-Vidal MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

CG-V has received honoraria for talks on behalf of Gilead Science, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, and Lilly as well as grant support from Gilead Science and Merck Sharp and Dohme. PP-A has received honoraria for talks on behalf of Pfizer. AS has received honoraria for talks on behalf of Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pfizer, Novartis, and Angellini as well as grant support from Pfizer.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Disclaimer

The funders had no specific role in the study design or data collection, or in writing the paper or the decision to submit.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on New Technologies and Advances in Infection Prevention

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morales, H.M.P., Puerta-Alcalde, P., Sanjuan-Gomez, G. et al. Up-to-Date Infection Control Practices for Febrile Neutropenic Patients. Curr Treat Options Infect Dis 12, 77–86 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-020-00214-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40506-020-00214-9

Keywords

Navigation