Abstract
The response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. var. PBW-550) and Triticale (a wheat and rye hybrid) were enhanced at elevated atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen (N) nutrition. Both the crops were raised in plastic pots inside open top chambers under ambient CO2 (AC) and elevated CO2 (EC) levels and varying N supply, viz., N0 (optimum N), N1.5 (one and half times of optimum N) and N2 (twice the optimum N). Findings of the study showed that significant growth improvement in terms of leaf area, root and shoot biomass accumulation under elevated atmospheric CO2 at optimum and super optimal N nutrition, in both the crop species. Chlorophyll content, rate of photosynthesis as well as soluble sugars increased under elevated atmospheric CO2 and N nutrition, while soluble protein content and stomatal conductance decreased and no significant changes occurred in leaf starch under above treatments, in wheat as well as Triticale. Results also showed significantly higher plant biomass, grain yield and 1000 grain weight under elevated CO2 as compared with ambient conditions. Plant height and number of tillers increased in response to elevated CO2 and high N in both the crop species. Super optimal N supply showed larger increase in grain yield and 1000 grain weight of Triticale as compared to wheat variety, while increase in biological yield in response to higher N was more in wheat variety. The above findings suggest that addition of N supply under elevated CO2 environment, can enhance growth and grain yield more in Triticale than that of wheat.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, N. R., Wall, G. W., Kimball, B. A., Pinter, P. J., LaMorte, R. L., Hunsaker, D. J., et al. (2000). Acclimation response of spring wheat in a free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) atmosphere with variable soil nitrogen regimes. 1. Leaf position and phenology determine acclimation response. Photosynthesis Research, 66(1–2), 65–77.
Aranjuelo, I., Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Morcuende, R., Avice, J. C., Nogués, S., Araus, J. L., et al. (2011). Does ear C sink strength contribute to overcoming photosynthetic acclimation of wheat plants exposed to elevated CO2? Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(11), 3957–3969.
Arnon, D. (1949). Estimation of total chlorophyll. Plant Physiology, 24(1), 1–15.
Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72(1–2), 248–254.
Broberg, M. C., Högy, P., & Pleijel, H. (2017). CO2-induced changes in wheat grain composition: Meta-analysis and response functions. Agronomy, 7(2), 32.
Butterly, C. R., Armstrong, R., Chen, D., & Tang, C. (2015). Carbon and nitrogen partitioning of wheat and field pea grown with two nitrogen levels under elevated CO2. Plant and Soil, 391(1–2), 367–382.
Erice, G., Irigoyen, J. J., Pérez, P., Martínez-Carrasco, R., & Sánchez-Díaz, M. (2006). Effect of elevated CO2, temperature and drought on dry matter partitioning and photosynthesis before and after cutting of nodulated alfalfa. Plant Science, 170(6), 1059–1067.
Fangmeier, A., De Temmerman, L., Mortensen, L., Kemp, K., Burke, J., Mitchell, R., et al. (1999). Effects on nutrients and on grain quality in spring wheat crops grown under elevated CO2 concentrations and stress conditions in the European, multiple-site experiment ‘ESPACE-wheat’. European Journal of Agronomy, 10(3–4), 215–229.
Franzaring, J., Weller, S., Schmid, I., & Fangmeier, A. (2011). Growth, senescence and water use efficiency of spring oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. cv. Mozart) grown in a factorial combination of nitrogen supply and elevated CO2. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 72(2), 284–296.
Han, X., Hao, X., Lam, S. K., Wang, H., Li, Y., Wheeler, T., et al. (2015). Yield and nitrogen accumulation and partitioning in winter wheat under elevated CO2: A 3-year free-air CO2 enrichment experiment. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 209, 132–137.
Hoffman, W. (2016). Ecosystems, food crops, and bioscience: A symbiosis for the anthropocene. Asian Biotechnology and Development Review, 18(1), 39–68.
Isopp, H., Frehner, M., Long, S. P., & Nösberger, J. (2000). Sucrose-phosphate synthase responds differently to source-sink relations and to photosynthetic rates: Lolium perenne L. growing at elevated pCO2 in the field. Plant, Cell and Environment, 23(6), 597–607.
Jensen, B., & Christensen, B. T. (2004). Interactions between elevated CO2 and added N: Effects on water use, biomass, and soil 15 N uptake in wheat. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science, 54(3), 175–184.
Kim, H. Y., Lieffering, M., Kobayashi, K., Okada, M., Mitchell, M. W., & Gumpertz, M. (2003). Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment and nitrogen supply on the yield of temperate paddy rice crops. Field Crops Research, 83(3), 261–270.
Lam, S. K., Chen, D., Norton, R., Armstrong, R., & Mosier, A. R. (2012). Nitrogen dynamics in grain crop and legume pasture systems under elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration: A meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 18(9), 2853–2859.
Manderscheid, R., Pacholski, A., Frühauf, C., & Weigel, H. J. (2009). Effects of free air carbon dioxide enrichment and nitrogen supply on growth and yield of winter barley cultivated in a crop rotation. Field Crops Research, 110(3), 185–196.
Mergoum, M., Singh, P. K., Pena, R. J., Lozano-del Río, A. J., Cooper, K. V., Salmon, D. F., & Macpherson, H. G. (2009). Triticale: a “new” crop with old challenges. In Cereals (pp. 267–287). Springer, New York, NY.
Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., et al. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. In Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 151). IPCC.
Pal, M., Rao, L. S., Jain, V., Srivastava, A. C., Pandey, R., Raj, A., et al. (2005). Effects of elevated CO2 and nitrogen on wheat growth and photosynthesis. Biologia Plantarum, 49(3), 467–470.
Paul, M. J., & Driscoll, S. P. (1997). Sugar repression of photosynthesis: The role of carbohydrates in signalling nitrogen deficiency through source: sink imbalance. Plant, Cell and Environment, 20(1), 110–116.
Reich, P. B., Hungate, B. A., & Luo, Y. (2006). Carbon-nitrogen interactions in terrestrial ecosystems in response to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 37, 611–636.
Saha, S., Chakraborty, D., Pal, M., & Nagarajan, S. (2011). Impact of elevated CO2 on utilization of soil moisture and associated soil biophysical parameters in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 142(3–4), 213–221.
Saha, S., Sehgal, V. K., Chakraborty, D., & Pal, M. (2015). Atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment induced modifications in canopy radiation utilization, growth and yield of chickpea [Cicer arietinum L.)]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 202, 102–111.
Sanz-Sáez, Á., Erice, G., Aranjuelo, I., Nogués, S., Irigoyen, J. J., & Sánchez-Díaz, M. (2010). Photosynthetic down-regulation under elevated CO2 exposure can be prevented by nitrogen supply in nodulated alfalfa. Journal of Plant Physiology, 167(18), 1558–1565.
Saxe, H., Ellsworth, D. S., & Heath, J. (1998). Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO 2 atmosphere. The New Phytologist, 139(3), 395–436.
Schütz, M., & Fangmeier, A. (2001). Growth and yield responses of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Minaret) to elevated CO2 and water limitation. Environmental Pollution, 114(2), 187–194.
Taub, D. R., & Wang, X. (2008). Why are nitrogen concentrations in plant tissues lower under elevated CO2? A critical examination of the hypotheses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 50(11), 1365–1374.
Thompson, M., Gamage, D., Hirotsu, N., Martin, A., & Seneweera, S. (2017). Effects of elevated carbon dioxide on photosynthesis and carbon partitioning: A perspective on root sugar sensing and hormonal crosstalk. Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 578.
Uprety, D. C., & Mahalaxmi, V. (2000). Effect of elevated CO2 and nitrogen nutrition on photosynthesis, growth and carbon-nitrogen balance in Brassica juncea. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 184(4), 271–276.
Wang, L., Feng, Z., & Schjoerring, J. K. (2013). Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on physiology and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): A meta-analytic test of current hypotheses. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 178, 57–63.
Yoshida, S., Forno, D. A., & Cock, J. H. (1971). Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research, 14(6), 415–421.
Ziska, L. H., Bunce, J. A., Shimono, H., Gealy, D. R., Baker, J. T., Newton, P. C., et al. (2012). Food security and climate change: On the potential to adapt global crop production by active selection to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. In Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, rspb20121005.
Ziska, L. H., Namuco, O., Moya, T., & Quilang, J. (1997). Growth and yield response of field-grown tropical rice to increasing carbon dioxide and air temperature. Agronomy Journal, 89(1), 45–53.
Ziska, L. H., Weerakoon, W., Namuco, O. S., & Pamplona, R. (1996). The influence of nitrogen on the elevated CO2 response in field-grown rice. Functional Plant Biology, 23(1), 45–52.
Acknowledgements
The first author duly acknowledges the financial assistance in the form of the fellowship received from the University Grants Commission, India (Grant No. 2012-13/RGNF-2012-13-SC-MAH-20061). Facilities used at Divisions of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi are duly acknowledged. The suggestions and guidance given by Dr. Divya Shah are sincerely acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gadpayle, K.A., Bhattacharyya, R., Pal, M. et al. Additional N supply improves grain yield in Triticale (× Triticosecale sp.) better than wheat (Triticum aestivum. L) under elevated CO2 environment. Ind J Plant Physiol. 23, 521–528 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-018-0401-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-018-0401-9