Screening soybean genotypes for high temperature tolerance by in vitro pollen germination, pollen tube length, reproductive efficiency and seed yield
- 75 Downloads
High temperature stress is a major environmental stress and there are limited studies elucidating the impact of high day and night time temperature on reproductive processes in soybean. Twelve soybean genotypes were grown at day/night temperatures of 30/22, 34/24, 38/26 and 42/28 °C with an average temperature of 26, 29, 32 and 35 °C, respectively under green-house conditions. High temperature stress significantly increased duration of flowering and decreased number of flowers and pods formed as compared to ambient temperature. When plants were grown at elevated temperature pollen germination, pollen size and pollen tube length were declined leading to reduced reproductive efficiency which ultimately resulted reduction in seed yield. The average seed yield was maximum (13.2 g/plant) in plants grown under ambient temperature condition. Seed yield was declined by 8, 14, 51 and 65% as the plants were grown at 30/22, 34/24, 38/26 and 42/28 °C as compared to plants grown under ambient temperature conditions, respectively. The genotypes such as NRC 7 and EC 538828 showed less reduction in yield and stable reproductive biology as compared to other genotypes. It is concluded that for heat tolerance in soybean, breeding efforts needs to be focused on improving the reproductive efficiency.
KeywordsPollen germination Reproductive efficiency Soybean Temperature Yield
Kanchan Jumrani would like to acknowledge the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)/University Grants commission (UGC), Government of India (20-06/2010 (i) EU-IV) for providing the financial support in the form of Research Fellowship.
- Ali, M., Gupta, S., & Basu, P. S. (2009). Higher levels of warming in North India will affect crop productivity. Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture, pp. 44–48.Google Scholar
- Bhatia, V. S., Jumrani, K., & Pandey, G. P. (2014a). Developing drought tolerance in soybean using physiological approaches. Soybean Research, 12, 1–19.Google Scholar
- Bhatia, V. S., Jumrani, K., & Pandey, G. P. (2014b). Evaluation of the usefulness of senescing agent potassium iodide as a screening tool for tolerance to terminal drought in soybean. Plant Knowledge Journal, 3, 23–30.Google Scholar
- IPCC. (2013). Summary for policymakers. In: T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Climate change: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA.Google Scholar
- Prasad, P. V. V., Boote, K. J., & Allen, L. H. (2006a). Adverse high tempearture effects on pollen viability, seed-set, seed yield and harvest index of grain-sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) are more severe at elevated carbon dioxide due to higher tissue temperatures. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology, 139, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prasad, P. V. V., Craufurd, P. Q., Summerfield, R. J., Wheeler, T. R., & Boote, K. J. (2001). Influence of high temperature during pre- and post-anthesis stages of floral development on fruit-set and pollen germination in peanut. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 28, 233–240.Google Scholar
- Prasad, P. V. V., Pisipati, S. R., Momcilovic, I., & Ristic, Z. (2011). Independent and combined effects of high temperature and drought stress during grain filling on plant yield and chloroplast EF-Tu expression in spring wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 197, 430–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prasad, P. V. V., Staggenborg, S. A., & Ristic, Z. (2008b). Impacts of drought and/or heat stress on physiological, developmental, growth and yield processes of crop plants. In: L. H. Ahuja, & S. A. Saseendran (Eds.), Response of crops to limited water: Understanding and modeling water stress effects on plant growth processes, advances in agricultural systems modeling series 1. ASA-CSSA: Madison, WI, USA, 2008, pp. 301–355.Google Scholar