Abstract
The rate of nitrate uptake was studied in ambient (AC) and elevated (EC, 600 ± 50 μmol mol−1) carbon dioxide conditions in wheat seedlings adapted to low nitrogen (uninduced) or high nitrogen (induced) conditions. Twenty five days old seedlings grown in climate controlled growth chambers were incubated in a range of nitrate concentrations (0.01–1 mM). Rate of uptake observed in low N adapted seedlings was used to calculate kinetics of constitutive high affinity transport system (CHATS). The difference in uptake observed between induced and uninduced seedlings were indicative of inducible high affinity transport system (IHATS). In both the CO2 levels, the nitrate uptake was biphasic in induced as well as uninduced seedlings, i.e. the rate of nitrate uptake saturated at about 0.08–0.1 mM and then a sharp increase in the rate of nitrate uptake was noticed in seedlings incubated in solutions of 0.5 mM nitrate and the uptake increased linearly in both induced as well as uninduced seedlings in the concentration beyond 0.5 mM. Hence, uninduced seedlings growing under EC took up nitrate more efficiently as compared to the seedlings growing under AC suggestive of efficient CHATS in EC grown plants. Growth under EC decreased both the affinity and rate of nitrate uptake in induced seedlings. However, the expression of TaNRT2.1, TaNRT2.2, TaNRT2.3 genes were highly induced by EC when the N supply level was low. Recent evidences suggest the involvement of ECO2-triggred synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) as a mediator of high affinity nitrate transporter activity in plants. The observed negative impact of EC on IHATS might also be an after effect of NO perturbation. EC could modify the inorganic nitrogen uptake by altering the access to or accessibility of nutrients in soil or by altering the kinetics of CHATS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barber, S. A. (1984). Soil nutrient bioavailability. A mechanistic approach (pp. 55–86). New York: Wiley-Interscience Publication.
Bloom, A. J., Burger, M., Asensio, J. S. R., & Cousins, A. B. (2010). Carbon dioxide enrichment inhibits nitrate assimilation in wheat and Arabidopsis. Science, 328, 899–903.
Bloom, A. J., Burger, M., Kimball, B. A., & Pinter Jr, P. J. (2014). Nitrate assimilation is inhibited by elevated CO2 in field-grown wheat. Nature Climate Change, 4(6), 477.
Bloom, A. J., Smart, D. R., Nguyen, D. T., & Searles, P. S. (2002). Nitrogen assimilation and growth of wheat under elevated carbon dioxide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99, 1730–1735.
Bloom, A. J., Sukrapanna, S. S., & Warner, R. L. (1992). Root respiration associated with ammonium and nitrate absorption and assimilation by barley. Plant Physiology, 99, 1294–1301.
Crawford, N. M., & Glass, A. D. M. (1998). Molecular and physiological aspects of nitrate uptake in plants. Trends in Plant Science, 3, 389–395.
Downes, M. T. (1978). An improved hydrazine reduction method for automated determination of low nitrate levels in fresh water. Water Research, 12, 673–675.
Du, S., Zhang, R., Zhang, P., Liu, H., Yan, M., Chen, N., et al. (2016). Elevated CO2-induced production of nitric oxide (NO) by NO synthase differentially affects nitrate reductase activity in Arabidopsis plants under different nitrate supplies. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67(3), 893–904.
Faure-Rabasse, S., Le Deunff, E., Laine, P., Macduff, J. H., & Ourry, A. (2002). Effects of nitrate pulses on BnNRT1 and BnNRT2 genes mRNA levels and nitrate influx rates in relation to the duration of N deprivation in Brassica napus L. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53, 1711–1721.
Frungillo, L., Skelly, M. J., Loake, G. J., Spoel, S. H., & Salgado, I. (2014). S-Nitrosothiols regulate nitric oxide production and storage in plants through the nitrogen assimilation pathway. Nature Communications, 5, 5401.
Glass, A. D. M., & Siddiqi, M. Y. (1995). Nitrogen absorption in higher plants. In H. S. Srivastava & R. P. Singh (Eds.), Nitrogen nutrition in higher plants (pp. 21–55). New Delhi: Associated Publishers.
Guo, T., Xuan, H., Yang, Y., Wang, L., Wei, L., Wang, Y., et al. (2014). Transcription analysis of genes encoding the wheat root transporter NRT1 and NRT2 families during nitrogen starvation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 33(4), 837–848.
Harris, G. (1998). An analysis of global fertilizer application rates for major crops. http://www.fertilizer.org/crops/crops/harris. Accessed 3 May 2006.
Hocking, P. J., & Meyer, C. P. (1991). Carbon dioxide enrichment decreases critical nitrate and nitrogen concentrations in wheat. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 14, 571–584.
Huang, N. C., Liu, K. H., Lo, H. J., & Tsay, Y. F. (1999). Cloning and functional characterization of an Arabidopsis nitrate transporter gene that encodes a constitutive component of low affinity uptake. Plant Cell, 11(8), 1381–1392.
Laine, P., Ourry, A., Macduff, J., Boucaud, J., & Salette, J. (1993). Kinetic parameters of nitrate uptake by different cash crop species: Effects of low temperatures or previous nitrate starvation. Physiologia Plantarum, 88(1), 85–92.
Lambers, H., Van Der Werf, A., & Konings, H. (1991). Respiratory patterns in roots in relation to their functioning. In Y. Waisel, A. Eshel, & U. Kafkafi (Eds.), Plant roots: The hidden half (pp. 229–263). New York: Marcel Dekker.
Larigauderie, A., Reynonds, J. F., & Strain, B. R. (1994). Root response to carbon dioxide enrichment and nitrogen supply in loblolly pine. Plant and Soil, 165, 21–32.
Lejay, L., Tillard, P., & Lepetit, M. (1999). Molecular and functional regulation of two NO3—uptake systems by N and C status of Arabidopsis plants. The Plant Journal, 18(5), 509–519.
Lekshmy, S., Jain, V., Khetarpal, S., & Pandey, R. (2013). Inhibition of nitrate uptake and assimilation in wheat seedlings grown under elevated CO2. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 18, 23–29.
Lekshmy, S., Jain, V., Khetarpal, S., Pandey, R., & Singh, R. (2009). Effect of elevated carbon dioxide on kinetics of nitrate uptake in wheat roots. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 14, 16–22.
Lekshmy, S., Jain, V., Khetarpal, S., Verma, R., Sailo, N., & Pandey, R. (2016). Influence of elevated carbon dioxide and ammonium nutrition on growth and nitrogen metabolism in wheat. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 86(1), 25–30.
Lekshmy, S., & Jha, S. K. (2017). Selection of reference genes suitable for qRT-PCR expression profiling of biotic stress, nutrient deficiency and plant hormone responsive genes in bread wheat. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 22(1), 101–106.
Li, J., Zhou, J.-M., Duan, Z.-Q., Du, C.-W., & Wang, H.-Y. (2007). Effect of CO2 enrichment on the growth and nutrient uptake of tomato seedlings. Pedosphere, 17, 343–351.
Livak, K. J., & Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods, 25, 402–408.
Matt, P., Geiger, M., Walch-Liu, P., Engels, C., Krapp, A., & Stitt, M. (2001). Elevated CO2 increases nitrate uptake and nitrate reduction activity when tobacco is growing on nitrate but increases ammonium uptake and inhibits nitrate reductase activity when tobacco is growing an ammonium nitrate. Plant, Cell and Environment, 24(1119–1137), 1.
Ono, F., Frommer, W. B., & von Wiren, N. (2000). Coordinated diurnal regulation of low and high affinity nitrate transporters in tomato. Plant Biology, 2, 17–23.
Pandey, R., Dubey, K. K., Ahmad, A., Nilofar, R., Verma, R., Jain, V., et al. (2015). Elevated CO2 improves growth and phosphorus utilization efficiency in cereal species under sub-optimal phosphorus supply. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 38(8), 1196–1217.
Pearson, P. N., & Palmer, M. R. (2000). Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years. Nature, 406, 695–699.
Pilbeam, D. J., & Kirkby, E. A. (1990). The physiology of nitrate uptake. In Y. P. Abrol (Ed.), Nitrogen in higher plants (pp. 39–64). New York: Wiley.
Prentice, I. C., Farquhar, G. D., Fasham, M. J. R., Goulden, M. L., & Heimann, M. (2001). The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. In J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D. J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden, & D. Xiaosu (Eds.), Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 183–239). New York NY: Cambridge University Press.
Siddiqi, M. Y., Glass, A. D. M., Ruth, T. J., & Rufty, T. W., Jr. (1990). Studies of the uptake of nitrate in barley I. Kinetics of 13NO3 − influx. Plant Physiology, 93, 1426–1432.
Stitt, M., & Krapp, A. (1999). The interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition: The physiological and molecular background. Plant, Cell and Environment, 22, 583–621.
Taub, D. R., & Wang, X. (2008). Why are nitrogen concentrations in plant tissues lower under elevated CO2? A critical examination of the hypotheses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 50, 1365–1374.
Yin, L. P., Li, P., Wen, B., Taylor, D., & Berry, J. O. (2007). Characterization and expression of a high-affinity nitrate system transporter gene (TaNRT2. 1) from wheat roots, and its evolutionary relationship to other NTR2 genes. Plant Science, 172(3), 621–631.
Zhao, X. Q., Li, Y. J., Liu, J. Z., Li, B., Liu, Q. Y., Tong, Y. P., et al. (2004). Isolation and expression analysis of a high-affinity nitrate transporter TaNRT2. 3 from roots of wheat. Acta Botanica Sinica, 46(3), 347–354.
Ziska, L. H. (2003). The impact of nitrogen supply on the potential response of a noxious, invasive weed, Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) to recent increases in atmospheric carbondioxide. Physiologia Plantarum, 119, 105–112.
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute for funding and providing the necessary facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sathee, L., Adavi, S.B., Jain, V. et al. Influence of Elevated CO2 on kinetics and expression of high affinity nitrate transport systems in wheat. Ind J Plant Physiol. 23, 111–117 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-018-0355-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-018-0355-y