Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Scoping Review of Eye Tracking Technology for Communication: Current Progress and Next Steps

  • Published:
Current Developmental Disorders Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Eye tracking technology can be used as a way to access communication software on an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) device. This article reviews the literature on the use of eye tracking technology for communication. It examines what has been investigated to date, discusses current perspectives, and identifies the needs for future direction.

Recent Findings

Results from this review were organized according to five principles previously identified by people who use AAC. Literature reports on eye tracking technology (1) creating early access to communication; (2) becoming assimilated into a range of available communication techniques; (3) getting personalized to fit an individual’s strengths; (4) facilitating participation in a range of life situations; and (5) improving through input from users themselves.

Summary

The literature suggests that using eye tracking for communication broadens the environments and activities that people are able to actively participate in which can, in turn, improve quality of life. Further collaborative work is needed to ensure that services and supports continue to evolve and improve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. • McEwen R, Atcha A, Lui M, Shimaly R, Maharaj A, Ali S, Carroll S. Interlocutors and interactions: examining the interactions between students with complex communication needs, teachers, and eye-gaze technology. Human-Machine Communication. 2020;1(1):113–31. This study looked at eye gaze as a functional communication system in the classroom.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. UN General Assembly, Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, 13 December 2006. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/4680cd212.html. Accessed 26 Nov 2022.

  3. Caligari M, Giardini M, Arcolin I, Godi M, Corna S, Colombo R. Writing with the eyes: the effect of age on eye-tracking performance in non-disabled adults and a comparison with bimanual typing. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021;2021:9365199. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9365199

  4. Eyes on Communication Research Group. Eye-gaze control technology for people with cerebral palsy. Clinical Guidelines 2021. Cerebral Palsy Alliance, The University of Sydney. 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.ausacpdm.org.au/resources/eye-gaze-control-technology-for-people-with-cerebral-palsy-2021-clinical-guidelines/. Accessed Nov 2022.

  5. Kokorelias KM, Gignac MA, Naglie G, Cameron JI. Towards a universal model of family centered care: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):564.

  6. Williams MB, Krezman C, McNaughton D. “Reach for the stars”: five principles for the next 25 years of AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24(3):194–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available at https://www.covidence.org.

  9. Rytterstrom P, Borgestig M, Hemmingsson H. Teachers’ experiences of using eye gaze-controlled computers for pupils with severe motor impairments and without speech. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 2016;31(4):506–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1187878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bekteshi S, Karlsson P, DeReyck l, Vermeerbergen K, Konings M, Hellin P, et al. Eye movements and stress during eye-tracking gaming performance in children with dyskinetic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(11):1402–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. • Perfect E, Hoskin E, Noyek S, Davies TC. A systematic review investigating outcome measures and uptake barriers when children and youth with complex disabilities use eye gaze assistive technology. Dev Neurorehabil. 2020;23(3):145–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2019.1600066. This study reviewed eye gaze assistive technology outcomes for children and youth. Factors were classified as facilitators or barriers.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. •• Bhattacharya U, Pradana WA, Wei X, Tarquinio D. Medical communication and advocacy through eye-tracking AAC: implications for applied linguistics. EuroAmerican J Appl Linguist Lang. 2022;9(1):71–90. https://doi.org/10.21283/2376905X.15.1.266. This study highlights the importance of eye tracking as a means to reveal communicative competence.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Borgestig M, Rytterstrom P, Hemmingsson H. Gaze-based assistive technology used in daily life by children with severe physical impairments - parents’ experiences. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(5):301–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2016.1211769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsieh YH, Granlund M, Hwang AW, Henningsson H. Impact of using eye-gaze technology by a young adult with severe cerebral palsy without speech. 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1686372. Accessed Aug 2022.

  15. • Lui M, Maharaj A, Shimaly R, Atcha A, Ali H, Carroll S, et al. User experiences of eye gaze classroom technology for children with complex communication needs. J Spec Educ Technol. 2021;37(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434211019399. This study describes the effectiveness of eye tracking devices in naturalistic settings.

  16. Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Parsons R, Falkmer T, Hemmingsson H. Eye gaze performance for children with severe physical impairments using gaze-based assistive technology-a longitudinal study. Assist Technol. 2016;28(2):93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2015.1092182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hemmingsson H, Ahlsten G, Wandin H, Rytterstrom P, Borgestig M. Eye-gaze control technology as early intervention for non-vernal young child with high spinal cord injury: a case report. Technologies. 2018;6(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6010012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karlsson P, Bech A, Stone H, Vale C, Griffin S, Manbaliu E, Wallen M. Eyes on communication: trialling eye-gaze control technology in young children with dyskinetic cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil. 2019;22(2):134–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2018.1519609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karlsson P, Allsop A, Dee-Price BJ, Wallen M. Eye-gaze control technology for children, adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy with significant physical disability: findings from a systematic review. Dev Neurorehabil. 2018;21(8):497–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2017.1362057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Townend GS, Marschik PB, Smeets E, Van de Berg R, Van den Berg M, Curfs LMG. Eye gaze technology as a form of augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with Rett syndrome: experiences of families in The Netherlands. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2016;28:101–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-015-9455-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. •• Hsieh YH, Borgestig M, Gopalarao D, McGowan J, Granlund M, Hwang AW, et al. Communicative interaction with and without eye-gaze technology between children and youths with complex needs and their communication partners. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2021;18(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105134. This study shows how eye gaze technology can help children with CCN communicate more efficiently and effectively.

  22. • Hemmingsson H, Borgestig M. Usability of eye-gaze controlled computers in Sweden: a total population survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051639. This study investigates usability and satisfaction with eye-gaze technology.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Borgestig M, Hemmingsson H. The benefits of gaze-based assistive technology in daily activities for children with disabilities. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;242:1082–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-798-6-1082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van Niekerk K, Tönsing K. Eye gaze technology: a South African perspective. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(4):340–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.974222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Koch Fager S, Fried-Oken M, Jakobs T, Beukelman DR. New and emerging access technologies for adults with complex communication needs and severe motor impairments: state of the science. Augmentative Altern Commun. 2019;35(1):13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1556730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. • Hsieh YH, Granlund M, Odom SL, Hwang AW, Hemmingsson H. Increasing participation in computer activities using eye-gaze assistive technology for children with complex needs. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2022.2099988. This study discusses goal attainment and increase in diversity and frequency of computer activities.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen SHK, O’Leary M. Eye Gaze 101: What speech-language pathologists should know about selecting eye gaze augmentative and alternative communication systems. Perspec ASHA Spec Interes Group. 2018;3(13):24–32. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp3.SIG12.24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. •• Karlsson P, Griffiths T, Clarke MT, Monbaliu E, Himmelmann K, Bekteshi S, et al. Stakeholder consensus for decision making in eye-gaze control technology for children, adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy service provision: findings from a Delphi study. BMC Neurol. 2021;21(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02077-z. This study presents information that informs the development of clinical guidelines.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Meena YK, Cecotti H, Wong-Lin K, Dutta A, Prasad G. Toward optimization of gaze-controlled human-computer interaction: application to Hindi virtual keyboard for stroke patients IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering: a publication of the IEEE. Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018;26(4):911–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2814826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Caligari M, Giardini M, Arcolin I, Godi M, Corna S, Colombo R. Writing with the eyes: the effect of age on eye-tracking performance in non-disabled adults and a comparison with bimanual typing. Computational intelligence and neuroscience. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9365199.

  31. Rytterstrom P, Borgestig M, Hemmingsson H. Hope and technology: other-oriented hope related to eye gaze technology for children with severe disabilities. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2019;16(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101667.

  32. Hsieh YH, Borgestig M, Gopalarao D, McGowan J, Granlund M, Hwang A, et al. The impacts of using eye-gaze technology on communicative interactions for children and youths with severe disabilities and their communication partners. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15160.

  33. Wandin H, Lindberg P, Sonnander K. Aided language modelling, responsive communication and eye-gaze technology as communication intervention for adults with Rett syndrome: three experimental single case studies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2021.1967469.

  34. •• Tegler H, Demmelmaier I, Johansson MB, Noren N. Creating a response space in multiparty classroom settings for students using eye-gaze accessed speech-generating devices. Augmentative Alternat Commun. 2020;36(4):203–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1811758. This study identified partner strategies helpful in creating a response space for students using SGDs.

  35. Fager SK, Sorenson T, Jakobs E, Koester H, Jakobs T, Beukelman DR. Multi-modal access method (eye-tracking + switch-scanning) for individuals with severe motor impairment: a preliminary investigation. Assist Technol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2022.2053895.

  36. •• Borgestig M, Al Khatib I, Masayko S, Hemmingsson H. The impact of eye-gaze controlled computer on communication and functional independence in children and young people with complex needs - a multicenter intervention study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2021;24(8):511–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2021.1903603. This study looks at the effectiveness of eye gaze controlled computers for communication and participation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Ahlsten G, Falkmer T, Hemmingsson H. Gaze-based assistive technology in daily activities in children with severe physical impairments – an intervention study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(3):129–41. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2015.1132281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hwang CS, Weng HH, Wang LF, Tsai CH, Chang HT. An eye-tracking assistive device improves the quality of life for ALS patients and reduces the caregivers’ burden. J Mot Behav. 2014;46(4):233–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2014.891970.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Holmqvist E, Thunberg G, Peny DM. Gaze-controlled communication technology for children with severe multiple disabilities: parents and professionals’ perception of gains, obstacles, and prerequisites. Assist Technol. 2018;30(4):201–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2017.1307882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vessoyan K, Steckle G, Easton B, Nichols M, Mok Siu V, McDougall J. Using eye-tracking technology for communication in Rett syndrome: perceptions of impact. Augmentative Alternat Commun. 2018;34(3):230–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1462848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Spataro R, Ciriacono M, Manno C, La Bella V. The eye-tracking computer device for communication in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;130(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12214.

  42. Diana P, Dansart P, Micale M, Carotenuto M, Salerno M, Tripi G. Rett syndrome and eye-tracking technology: a brief review. Acta Med Mediterr. 2019;35(3):1411–6. https://doi.org/10.19193/0393-6384_2019_3_218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nerisanu R, Nerisanu RA, Maniu I, Neamtu B. Cerebral palsy and eye-gaze technology. Interaction, perspective and usability. A review. Acta Med Transilvanica. 2017;22(4):59–62. Available from: http://www.amtsibiu.ro/Arhiva/2017/Nr4-en/Nerisanu.pdf. Accessed Aug 2022.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Augmentative Communication Service, TVCC, 779 Baseline Road E, London, ON, N6C 5Y6, Canada

    Kelli Vessoyan & Gill Steckle

  2. Research Program, Quality Management, TVCC, 779 Baseline Road E, London, ON, N6C 5Y6, Canada

    Eric Smart & Meaghan McKillop

  3. Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada

    Eric Smart

Authors
  1. Kelli Vessoyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eric Smart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gill Steckle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Meaghan McKillop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelli Vessoyan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 24 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vessoyan, K., Smart, E., Steckle, G. et al. A Scoping Review of Eye Tracking Technology for Communication: Current Progress and Next Steps. Curr Dev Disord Rep 10, 20–39 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-023-00271-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-023-00271-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation