Advertisement

Advances in Manufacturing

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 71–82 | Cite as

Additive manufacturing of mechanical testing samples based on virgin poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and PLA/wood fibre composites

  • Yu Dong
  • Jamie Milentis
  • Alokesh Pramanik
Article

Abstract

3D printing in additive manufacturing is considered as one of key technologies to the future high-precision manufacturing in order to benefit diverse industries in building construction, product development, biomedical innovation, etc. The increasing applications of 3D printed components depend primarily on their significant merits of reduced weight, minimum used materials, high precision and shorter production time. Furthermore, it is very crucial that such 3D printed components can maintain the same or even better material performance and product quality as those achieved by conventional manufacturing methods. This study successfully fabricated 3D printed mechanical testing samples of PLA and PLA/wood fibre composites. 3D printing parameters including infill density, layer height and the number of shells were investigated via design of experiments (DoE), among which the number of shells was determined as the most significant factor for maximising tensile strengths of PLA samples. Further, DoE work evaluated the effect of material type (i.e., neat PLA and PLA/wood fibres) and the number of shells on tensile, flexural and impact strengths of material samples. It is suggested that material type is the only predominant factor for maximising all mechanical strengths, which however are consistently lower for PLA/wood fibre composites when compared with those of neat PLA. Increasing the number of shells, on the other hand, has been found to improve almost all strength levels and decrease infill cavities.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing (AM) Poly (lactic acid) (PLA) Wood fibres Polymer composites Design of experiments (DoEs) 

References

  1. 1.
    Chen D, Heyer S, Ibbotson S et al (2015) Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. J Clean Prod 107:615–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murphy SV, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32:773–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D et al (2015) The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput-Aided Des 69:65–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li X, Cui R, Sun L et al (2014) 3D-printed biopolymers for tissue engineering application. Int J Polym Sci 24:1–13Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patricio T, Domingos M, Gloria A et al (2013) Characterisation of PCL and PCL/PLA scaffolds for tissue engineering. Procedia CIRP 5:110–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Senatov FS, Niaza KV, Zadorozhnyy MY et al (2016) Mechanical properties and shape memory effect of 3D-printed PLA-based Porous scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 57:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosenzweig DH, Carelli E, Steffen T et al (2015) 3D-printed ABS and PLA scaffolds for cartilage and mucleus pulposus tissue regeneration. Int J Mol Sci 16:15118–15135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Inzana JA, Olvera D, Fuller SM et al (2014) 3D printing of composite calcium phosphate and collagen scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials 35:4026–4034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bakarich SE, Gorkin IR, Panhuis MIH et al (2014) Three-dimensional printing fiber reinforced hydrogel composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:15998–16006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le Duigou A, Castro M, Bevan R et al (2016) 3D printing of wood fibre biocomposites: from mechanical to actuation functionality. Mater Des 96:106–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suwanprateeb J, Sanngam R, Suvannapruk W et al (2009) Mechanical and in vitro performance of apatite-wollastonite glass ceramic reinforced hydroxyapatite composite fabricated by 3D-printing. J Mater Sci-Mater Med 20:1281–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Compton BG, Lewis JA (2014) 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites. Adv Mater 26:5930–5935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richter C, Lipson H (2011) Untethered hovering flapping flight of a 3D-printed mechanical insect. Artif Life 17:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park SH (1996) Robust design and analysis for quality engineering. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dong Y, Bhattacharyya D (2008) Effect of clay type, clay/compatibiliser content and matrix viscosity on the mechanical properties of polypropylene/organoclay nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39:1177–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dong Y, Bickford T, Haroosh HJ et al (2013) Multi-response analysis in the material characterisation of electrospun poly (lactic acid)/halloysite nanotube composite fibres based on Taguchi design of experiments: fibre diameter, non-intercalation and nucleation effects. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 112:747–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCurtin UniversityPerth, WAAustralia

Personalised recommendations