Cornering characteristics of a truck tire on wet surface using finite element analysis and smoothed-particle hydrodynamics



This paper presents the cornering characteristics of a wide base truck tire 445/50R22.5 over dry and wet surfaces in a virtual software package Pam-Crash. The wide base truck tire is modeled and validated using finite element analysis, while the water is modeled using smoothed-particle hydrodynamics technique. The tire–terrain interaction algorithm captures the node-symmetric node-to-segment contact with edge treatment. The simulation is repeated for several inflation pressure, applied vertical loading, cornering angles and water depth to evaluate the influence of these parameters on the tire operational performance. The simulation results obtained are validated against experimental data published in literature. The cornering characteristics investigated includes the lateral force, rolling resistance, cornering stiffness and self-aligning moment. Finally, the optimal operating conditions of the wide base tire are presented. To the author’s knowledge, no previous attempt to compute cornering characteristics of a truck tire on a wet surface using SPH technique has been made. This work will be further used for tire performance prediction research.


Finite element analysis (FEA) Smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) Truck tire Cornering characteristics Rolling resistance Wet surface Tire–terrain interaction 



The authors express their gratitude to Volvo Group Trucks Technology for there continuous support during the course of this study.


  1. 1.
    Wong JY (2008) Theory of ground vehicles. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dixon JC (1996) Society of Automotive Engineers. Tires, suspension and handling 1996:636Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tönük E, Ünlüsoy YS (2001) Prediction of automobile tire cornering force characteristics by finite element modeling and analysis. Comput Struct 79(13):1219–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baffet G, Charara A, Stéphant J (2006) Sideslip angle, lateral tire force and road friction estimation in simulations and experiments. In: Computer aided control system design, 2006 IEEE international conference on control applications, 2006 IEEE international symposium on intelligent control, 2006 IEEE. IEEE, pp 903–908Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baffet G, Charara A, Lechner D, Thomas D (2008) Experimental evaluation of observers for tire-road forces, sideslip angle and wheel cornering stiffness. Veh Syst Dyn 46(6):501–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Srirangam SK, Anupam K, Scarpas A, Kösters A (2013) Influence of temperature on tire-pavement friction-1: laboratory tests and finite element modeling. In: Transportation research board 92nd annual meeting, pp 13–4260Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anupam K, Srirangam S, Scarpas A, Kasbergen C, Kane M (2014) Study of cornering maneuvers of a pneumatic tire on asphalt pavement surfaces using the finite element method. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2457:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    El-Sayegh Z, El-Gindy M (2017) Sensitivity analysis of truck tire hydroplaning speed using FEA-SPH model. Int J Veh Syst Model Test 12(1/2):143–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    El-Sayegh Z, El-Gindy M, Johansson I, Öijer F (in press) Truck tire–terrain interaction modelling and testing: literature survey. Int J Veh Syst Model TestGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marjani M (2016) Development of FEA wide-base truck tire and soil interaction models. Master’s thesis, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chae S (2006) Nonlinear finite element modeling and analysis of a truck tire. Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bui HH, Fukagawa R, Sako K, Ohno S (2008) Lagrangian meshfree particles method (SPH) for large deformation and failure flows of geomaterial using elastic–plastic soil constitutive model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(12):1537–1570CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    ESI Group (2014) Pam-Crash user manual PAM System InternationalGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goodman RE, Taylor RL, Brekke TL (1968) A model for the mechanics of jointed rocks. J Soil Mech Found Div 94:637–659Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilson EA, Parsons B (1970) Finite element analysis of elastic contact problems using differential displacements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2(3):387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chan SK, Tuba IS (1971) A finite element method for contact problems of solid bodies part I. Theory and validation. Int J Mech Sci 13(7):615–625CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hallquist JO, Goudreau GL, Benson DJ (1985) Sliding interfaces with contact-impact in large-scale Lagrangian computations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 51(1–3):107–137MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benson DJ, Hallquist JO (1990) A single surface contact algorithm for the post-buckling analysis of shell structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 78(2):141–163MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    El-Sayegh Z, El-Gindy M, Johansson I, Öijer F (in press) Improved tire–soil interaction model using FEA-SPH simulation. J TerramechGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bergman W, Clemett HR (1975) Tire cornering properties. Tire Sci Technol 3(3):135–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Automotive, Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of Ontario Institute of TechnologyOshawaCanada

Personalised recommendations