Skip to main content
Log in

Observability for optimal sensor locations in data assimilation

  • Published:
International Journal of Dynamics and Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we will discuss the application of observability to the planning of sensor configurations in numerical weather prediction (NWP). The dimensions used in NWP make conventional definitions of observability impractical. For this reason we will rely partial observability which is obtained using dynamic optimization to approximate the observability. Using this metric we will form an optimization problem to select sensor configurations that maximize the partial observability of the dynamical system. This leads to a max–min problem which using an empirical gramian matrix we reduce to an eigenvalue optimization problem. Atmospheric data assimilation is the process of combining prior knowledge with observations to form an estimate of the system state required to produce a forecast of future weather conditions. Optimal sensor configurations leading to improved forecast quality are of interest. Due to the potential size of our intended application we will focus on computational methods that are both efficient and scalable. We will also leverage existing tools used in data assimilation and introduce tools used in nonsmooth optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker N, Daley R (2000) Observation and background adjoint sensitivity in the adaptive observation-targeting problem. Q J R Meteorol Soc 126:1431–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Langland R, Baker N (2004) Estimation of observation impact using the NRL atmospheric variational data assimilation adjoint system. Tellus 56A:189–201

  3. Gelaro R, Langland R, Pellerin S, Todling R (2010) The THORPEX observation intercomparison experiment. Mon Weather Rev 138:4009–4025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang W, Xu L (2009) Computational analysis of control systems using dynamic optimization. arXiv:0906.0215v2

  5. Xu L, Rosmond T, Daley R (2005) Development of NAVDAS-AR: formulation and initial tests of the linear problem. Tellus 57A:546–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang W, Xu L (2009) A quantitative measure of observability and controllability. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, Shanghai

  7. Kang W (2011) The consistency of partial observability for PDEs. arXiv:1111.5846.

  8. King SA, Kang W, Xu L (2013) Partial observability for the shallow water equations. In: Proceedings of SIAM conference on control & its applications, San Diego

  9. Morales JL, Nocedal J (2011) L-BFGS-B: remark on algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B, FORTRAN routines for large scale bound constrained optimization. ACM Trans Math Softw 38

  10. Lewis AS, Overton ML (2012) Nonsmooth optimization via quasi-Newton methods. Math Program 141:135–163

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kang W, Xu L (2012) Optimal sensor placement for data assimilations. Tellus 64A:17133

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosmond T (1997) A technical description of the NRL adjoint modeling system. Naval Research Laboratory Publication, Monterey

    Google Scholar 

  13. Houghton DD, Kasahara A (1968) Nonlinear shallow fluid over an isolated ridge. Commun Pure Appl Math 21:1–23

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawless A (2001) Irrotational shallow water model (Version 0.1) [Computer Software]. National Center for Earth Observation, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson C, Hoskins B, Nichols N (2005) A singular vector perspective of 4D-Var: filtering and interpolation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

King, S., Kang, W. & Xu, L. Observability for optimal sensor locations in data assimilation. Int. J. Dynam. Control 3, 416–424 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-014-0120-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-014-0120-7

Keywords

Navigation