Large eddy simulation (LES) is an efficient technique to simulate turbulent flows of practical interest, based on the elimination of flow scales smaller than a characteristic length and direct resolution of the largest scales. There is a variety of subgrid-scale models available in the literature to describe the turbulence in small scales, with different levels of complexity and computational cost. Although many advances have been achieved since the development of the LES technique, there is still no consensus on a definitive subgrid model for generic use in engineering applications. The objective of this work is to analyze the effect of subgrid modeling in LES of turbulent coaxial jets. Simulations were carried out for a test problem using the Smagorinsky, Germano and velocity structure function models, and results were compared with experimental data from the literature. The best results for average properties were found with the Smagorinsky model with an optimal ad hoc coefficient, while the dynamic model of Germano was the one that best described the turbulent features. These results show that this type of comparative analysis is of fundamental importance to obtain reliable results when addressing new problems.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abramovich G (1963) The theory of turbulent jets. Ph.D. thesis, MIT Press, Massachusetts Institute of technology
Amielh M, Djeridane T, Anselmet F, Fulachier L (1996) Velocity near-field of variable density turbulent jets. Int J Heat Mass Transf 39(10):2149–2164
Andersson N, Eriksson LE, Davidson L (2005) Effects of inflow conditions and subgrid model on les for turbulent jets. In: 11th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference. p 2925
Bardina J, Ferziger JH, Reynolds WC (1980) Improved subgrid-scale models for large-eddy simulation. In: American Institute of aeronautics and astronautics, fluid and plasma dynamics conference, 13th, Snowmass, July 14–16, 1980
Batchelor GK (1953) The theory of homogeneous turbulence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Blazek J (2015) Computational fluid dynamics: principles and applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Bodony DJ, Lele SK (2008) Current status of jet noise predictions using large-eddy simulation. AIAA J 46(2):364–380
Bogey C, Bailly C (2003) Les of a high reynolds, high subsonic jet: effects of the subgrid modellings on flow and noise. In: 16th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference. p 3557
Brès GA, Lele SK (2019) Modelling of jet noise: a perspective from large-eddy simulations. Philos Trans R Soc A 377(2159):20190081
Chen CJ, Rodi W (1980) Vertical turbulent buoyant jets: a review of experimental data. NASA Sti/Recon technical report A 80
Chollet JP, Lesieur M (1981) Parameterization of small scales of three-dimensional isotropic turbulence utilizing spectral closures. J Atmos Sci 38(12):2747–2757
Deardorff JW (1970) A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers. J Fluid Mech 41(2):453–480
Djeridane T, Amielh M, Anselmet F, Fulachier L (1996) Velocity turbulence properties in the near-field region of axisymmetric variable density jets. Phys Fluids 8(6):1614–1630
Ferziger JH, Peric M (2012) Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Springer, Berlin
Fortuna AdO (2000) Técnicas computacionais para dinâminca dos fluidos: conceitos básicos e aplicações. Edusp
Fureby C, Tabor G, Weller H, Gosman A (1997) A comparative study of subgrid scale models in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys Fluids 9(5):1416–1429
Germano M (1990) Averaging invariance of the turbulent equations and similar subgrid scale modeling. CTR Manus 116
Germano M, Piomelli U, Moin P, Cabot WH (1991) A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys Fluids A 3(7):1760–1765
Hirt C et al (1975) Sola: a numerical solution algorithm for transient fluid flows. Technical reports Alamos Scientific Lab, USA
Ilyushin B, Krasinsky D (2006) Large eddy simulation of the turbulent round jet dynamics. Thermophys Aeromech 13(1):43–54
Jones S, Sotiropoulos F, Sale M (2002) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent circular jet flows. EERE Publication and Product Library, Washington, DC (United States), Technical report
Kuo KKy, Acharya R, (2012) Fundamentals of turbulent and multi-phase combustion. Wiley, London
Lesieur M (2012) Turbulence in fluids, vol 40. Springer, Berlin
Lesieur M, Métais O, Comte P (2005) Large-eddy simulations of turbulence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lilly DK (1992) A proposed modification of the germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys Fluids A 4(3):633–635
Lipari G, Stansby PK (2011) Review of experimental data on incompressible turbulent round jets. Flow Turbul Combust 87(1):79–114
Löffler M, Pfadler S, Beyrau F, Leipertz A, Dinkelacker F, Huai Y, Sadiki A (2008) Experimental determination of the sub-grid scale scalar flux in a non-reacting jet-flow. Flow Turbul Combust 81(1):205–219
Markesteijn AP, Karabasov SA (2018) GPU CABARET solutions for the cojen jet noise experiment. In: 2018 AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference. p 3921
McMillan O (1980) Tests of new subgrid-scale models in strained turbulence. aiaa paper aiaa-80-1339. In: AIAA 13th fluid and plasma dynamics conference, Snowmass, Co
Meneveau C, Katz J (2000) Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32(1):1–32
Métais O, Lesieur M (1992) Spectral large-eddy simulation of isotropic and stably stratified turbulence. J Fluid Mech 239:157–194
Moin P, Squires K, Cabot W, Lee S (1991) A dynamic subgrid-scale model for compressible turbulence and scalar transport. Phys Fluids A 3(11):2746–2757
Payri R, López JJ, Martí-Aldaraví P, Giraldo JS (2016) Effect of turbulent model closure and type of inlet boundary condition on a large eddy simulation of a non-reacting jet with co-flow stream. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 61:545–552
Pierce CD (2011) Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University
Pierce CD, Moin P (2004) Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion. J Fluid Mech 504:73–97
Pinho J, Muniz AR (2020) PMLES: a hybrid openMP CUDA source code for LES of turbulent flows. J Appl Fluid Mech 13(4):1067–1079
Piomelli U (1999) Large-eddy simulation: achievements and challenges. Prog Aerosp Sci 35(4):335–362
Pope SB (2000) Turbulent flows. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Quadros AER (2016) Processamento paralelo em cuda aplicado ao modelo de geração de cenários sintéticos de vazões e energias-gevazp. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Ruetsch G, Fatica M (2011) Cuda fortran for scientists and engineers. NVIDIA Corporation 2701
Sagaut P (2006) Large eddy simulation for incompressible flows: an introduction. Springer, Berlin
Salkhordeh S, Mazumdar S, Landfried DT, Jana A, Kimber ML (2014) Les of an isothermal high reynolds number turbulent round jet. In: 2014 22nd international conference on nuclear engineering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection
Schmitt FG (2007) About boussinesq’s turbulent viscosity hypothesis: historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity. C R Mécanique 335(9–10):617–627
Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91(3):99–164
Tennekes H, Lumley JL (1972) A first course in turbulence. MIT press, London
Terrana S, Nguyen C, Peraire J (2020) Gpu-accelerated large eddy simulation of hypersonic flows. In: AIAA Scitech 2020 forum. p 1062
Uzun A, Blaisdell GA, Lyrintzis AS (2003) Sensitivity to the smagorinsky constant in turbulent jet simulations. AIAA J 41(10):2077–2079
Wang P, Fröhlich J, Michelassi V, Rodi W (2008) Large-eddy simulation of variable-density turbulent axisymmetric jets. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 29(3):654–664
Wilson RV, Demuren AO (1997) Numerical simulation of turbulent jets with rectangular cross-section. 97. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center
Wilson T et al (1988) Sola-dm: A numerical solution algorithm for transient three-dimensional flows. Technical report, Los Alamos National Lab
The authors acknowledge CAPES for financial support through PROEX/CAPES program, and the National Supercomputing Center (CESUP-UFRGS) and the National Laboratory for Scientific Computing (SDumont supercomputer, LNCC/MCTI, Brazil) for providing computational resources for the calculations reported in this paper.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Technical Editor: Daniel Onofre de Almeida Cruz.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
About this article
Cite this article
Pinho, J.M., Muniz, A.R. The effect of subgrid-scale modeling on LES of turbulent coaxial jets. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 43, 63 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-02798-9
- Subgrid modeling
- Numerical simulation