Advertisement

Experimental analysis on force and correction factor of an active magnetic thrust bearing

  • V. V. Kondaiah
  • Jagu S. Rao
  • V. V. Subba Rao
Technical Paper

Abstract

Active magnetic thrust bearing (AMTB) is a device which is used to support an object by controlling the magnetic field. In practice, there is lot of difference between theoretical force and actual force developed between the stator and rotor of an AMTB. This difference is mainly due to fringing, leakage, variation in material properties, misalignments, vibrations, and temperature effects, etc. The difference is also varying with the air gap between stator and rotor and the current supplied. In this work, an experimental approach has been proposed to study the loss factor and efficiency of an Active Magnetic Thrust Bearing. A prototype of AMTB has been made and experimented at different air gaps. Based on the study of single acting actuator, the control performance of a double actuator has been studied. From the study of single acting actuator efficiency and double acting actuator control performance, an optimum air gap has been suggested.

Keywords

Active magnetic thrust bearings Correction factor Magnetic levitation Control system Air gap 

List of symbols

\(A_{\text{g}}\)

Area of air gap (m2)

\(B\)

Magnetic flux density

\(F_{\text{a}}\)

Actual Force developed (N)

\(F_{\text{h}}\)

Position stiffness (N/m)

\(F_{\text{i}}\)

Current stiffness

\(F_{\text{p}}\)

Force on one pole face (N)

\(F_{\text{pre}}\)

Predicted force (N)

\(F_{\text{th}}\)

Theoretical force (N)

\(h_{\text{c}}\)

Axial length of stator (mm)

\(h_{\text{t}}\)

Axial length of stator pole with base (mm)

\(i_{\text{c}}\)

Control current (A)

\(i_{\text{in}}\)

Input current (A)

\(i_{\text{ut}}\)

Utilized current (A)

\(k\)

Correction factor

\(k_{\text{D}}\)

Derivative gain

\(k_{\text{p}}\)

Proportional gain

\(k_{\text{av}}\)

Average correction factor

\(l_{b}\)

Axial length of stator base (m)

\(l_{\text{d}}\)

Axial length of thrust rotor (m)

\(h\)

Height of an air gap (m)

\(n\)

Number of readings

N

Number of coil turns

\(v\)

Voltage supplied

\(\varepsilon_{\text{th}} \%\)

Percentage of error between theoretical force and actual force

\(\varepsilon_{\text{pre}} \%\)

Percentage of error between predicted force and actual force

\(Ni\)

Magneto motive force

\(\phi\)

Magnetic flux

\(\mu_{0}\)

Permeability of free space 4π × 10−7 H/m

References

  1. 1.
    Bitterly JG (1998) Flywheel technology: past, present and 21st Century Projections, IEEE AES Magazine, pp 13–16Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kasarda MEF (2000) An overview of magnetic bearing technology and applications. SAGE The Shock and Vibration Digest 32(2):91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schweitzer G, Blueler H, Traxler A (2003) Active magnetic bearings: basics, properties and applications of active magnetic bearings. Authors reprint, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhou S, Shi J (2001) Active balancing and vibration control of rotating machinery: a survey. SAGE The Shock and Vibration Digest 33(4):361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nasar SA (1970) Electromagnetic energy conversion devices and systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Allaire PE, Mikula A, Banerjee BB, Lewis DW, Imlach J (1989) Design and test of magnetic thrust bearing. J Franklin Inst 326(6):831–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meker DC, Maslen EH, Noh MD (1996) An augmented circuit model for magnetic bearings including Eddy currents, fringing, and leakage. IEEE Trans 32(4):3219–3227Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Groom NJ, Bloodgood VD (2000) A comparison of analytical and experimental data for a magnetic actuator, NASA-2000-tm210328Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bloodgood Jr VD, Groom NJ, Britcher CP (2000) Further development of an optimal design approach applied to axial magnetic bearings, NASA-2000-7ismb-vdbGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aenis M, Knopf E, Nordmann R (2002) Active magnetic bearings for the identification and fault diagnosis in turbo machinery. Mechatronics 12:1011–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guinzburg A, Buse FW (1995) Magnetic bearings as an impeller force measurement technique, proceedings of the twelfth international pump users symposium, 69–76Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marshall JT, Kasarda MEF, Imlach J (2003) A Multipoint measurement technique for the enhancement of force measurement with active magnetic bearing. Trans ASME 125:90–94Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kasarda ME, Marshall J, Prins R (2007) Active magnetic bearing based force measurement using the multi-point technique. Mech Res Commun 34:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Minihan TP, Lei S, Sun G, Palazzolo A, Kascak AF, Calvert T (2003) Large motion control for thrust magnetic bearings with fuzzy logic, sliding mode, and direct linearization. J Sound Vib 263:549–567MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rao JS, Tiwari R (2009) Design optimization of double-acting hybrid magnetic thrust bearings with control integration using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. Mechatronics 19:945–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tang J, Wang C, Xiang B (2013) Gimballing flywheel and its novel reluctance force-type magnetic bearing with low eddy loss and slight tilting torque. J Magn 18(4):432–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuo BC, Golnaraghi F (2003) Automatic control systems. Wiley, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rao JS, Tiwari R (2008) Optimum design and analysis of thrust magnetic bearings using multi objective genetic algorithms. Int J Comput Methods Eng Sci Mech 9:223–245CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chiba A, Fukao T, Ichikawa O, Oshima M, Takemoto M, Dorrell DG (2005) Magnetic bearings and bearingless drives, Newnes, An imprint of Elsevier, Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, 30 Corporate Drive, Burlington, MA 01803Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Skubov D, Khodzhaev KS (2008) Non-linear electromechanics, foundations of engineering mechanics, 1st edn. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kondaiah VV, Rao JS, Rao VVS (2016) Parameter estimation of solid cylindrical electromagnetic actuator using radial basis function neural networks, microelectronics, electromagnetics and telecommunications, pp 349–363, Springer IndiaGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li J, Li J, Zhou D, Wang L (2015) The modeling and analysis for the self-excited vibration of the maglev vehicle-bridge interaction system. Math Probl Eng, Hindawi Publishing 2015:1–10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. V. Kondaiah
    • 1
  • Jagu S. Rao
    • 2
  • V. V. Subba Rao
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringTirumala Engineering CollegeNarasaraopetaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringRGUKT NuzividuNuzividuIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringJNTUK KakinadaKakinadaIndia

Personalised recommendations