Pressure and temperature sensitivity analysis of palm fiber as a biobased reinforcement material in brake pad

Technical Paper
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of palm fiber on properties of automotive brake composite materials is analyzed. The test procedure followed is JASO C 406, which is for passenger car pads. Tribological properties of three brake pads (6 PF, 8 PF and 10 PF) were tested on full-scale inertia dynamometer for various performance parameters such as pressure–speed sensitivity (effectiveness studies) and Temperature sensitivity (fade and recovery behaviour). A pad undergoes all the testing parameters and maintains its low temperature rise in the disc for three pressure sensitivity and two temperature sensitivity tests. By increasing palm fiber content, hardness, heat swell and specific gravity increases, and also porosity and loss on ignition decreases. Test has been conducted using scanning electron microscope to analyse the all three specimens to evaluate the contact plateaus and wear debris during braking. 8% of palm fiber content in brake pad was found to be superior to 6 PF and 10 PF in most of the important tribological properties.

Keywords

Palm fiber Brake pad Pressure sensitivity Fade and recovery Friction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Central Institute of Plastics and Technology (CIPET), Chennai for helping us doing in SEM analysis and also we thank Sai Friction (Brake Pad manufacturers) Chennai, for supporting to manufacture brake pads.

References

  1. 1.
    Patnaik Amar, Kumar Mukesh, Bhabani K, Satapathy Bharat S, Tomar (2010) Performance sensitivity of hybrid phenolic composites in friction braking: effect of ceramic and aramid fibre combination. Wear 269:891–899.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2010.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ruzaidi CM, Kamarudin H, Shamsul JB, Mustafa Al Bakri AM, Rafiza AR (2011) Comparative study of thermal, compressive, and wear properties of palm slag brake pad composites with other fillers. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 5:790–796.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.328-330.1636 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramousse S, Hoj JW, Sorensen OT (2001) Thermal characterization of brake pads. J Therm Anal Calorim 64:933–943.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011575013779 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ganguly A, George R (2008) Asbestos free friction composition for brake linings. Bull Mater Sci 31:19–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-008-0004-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cho KH, Cho MH, Kim SJ (2008) H Jang (2008) Tribological properties of potassium titanate in the brake friction materials; morphological effects. Tribol Lett 32:59–66.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-008-9362-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ficici F, Durat M, Kapsiz M (2014) Optimization of tribological parameters for a brake pad using Taguchi design method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 36:653–659.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-013-0115-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chan D, Stachowiak GW (2004) Review of automotive brake friction materials. Proceed Inst Mech Eng Part D J Auto Eng 218:953–966.  https://doi.org/10.1243/0954407041856773 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cho MH, Kim SJ, Basch RH, Fash JW, Jang H (2003) Tribological study of gray cast iron with automotive brake linings: the effect of rotor microstructure. Tribol Int 36:537–545.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-679X(02),00260-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Esswein JAL Jr, Arrieche FE, Schaeffer L (2008) Analysis of wear in organic and sintered friction materials used in small wind energy converters. Mater Res 11:269–273.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-14392008000300007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rongping Y, Peter F, Yafei L (2010) Performance and evaluation of eco-friendly brake friction materials. Tribol Int 43:2010–2019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    El-Tayeb NSM, Liew KW (2008) Effect of water spray on friction and wear behaviour of noncommercial and commercial brake pad materials. Wear 208:135–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.111 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thiyagarajan V, Kalaichelvan K, Vijay R, Lenin Singaravelu D (2015) Influence of thermal conductivity and thermal stability on the fade and recovery characteristics of non–asbestos semi–metallic disc brake pad. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 38:1207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0448-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ikpambese KK, Gundu DT, Tuleun LT (2016) Evaluation of palm kernel fibers (PKFs) for production of asbestos-free automotive brake pads. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 28:110–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2014.02.001 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Han Y, Tian X, Yan Y (2008) Effect of ceramic fiber on the friction performance of automotive brake lining materials. Tribol Trans 51:779–783.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402000802011778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stephen Bernard S, Jayakumari LS (2014) Effect of the properties of natural resin binder in a high friction composite material. Polim Ciencia Tecnol 24(2):149–152.  https://doi.org/10.4322/polimeros.2014.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hee KW, Filip P (2005) Performance of ceramic enhanced phenolic matrix brake lining materials for automotive brake linings. Wear 259:1088–1096.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Idris UD, Aigbodion VS, Abubakar IJ, Nwoye CI (2013) Eco-friendly asbestos free brake-pad: using banana peels. J Eng Sci 27:1018–1036.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2013.06.006 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bijwe Jayashree, Kumar Mukesh (2007) Optimization of steel wool contents in non-asbestos organic (NAO) friction composites for best combination of thermal conductivity and tribo-performance. Wear 263:1243–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stephen Bernard S, Jayakumari LS (2016) Effect of rockwool and steel fiber on the friction performance of brake lining materials. Mater Rio de Janeiro 21:656–665.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-707620160003.0063 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ingo GM, D’Uffizi M, Falso G, Bultrini G, Padeletti G (2004) Thermal and microchemical investigation of automotive brake pad wear residues. Thermochim Acta 418:61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2003.11.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Malhotra VM, Valimbe PS, Wright MA (2002) Effects of fly ash and bottom ash on the frictional behaviour of composites. Fuel 81:235–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01),00126-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stephen Bernard S (2009) Investigation on performance, combustion and emission characteristics of a turbocharged low heat rejection DI diesel engine with extended expansion concept. SAE Tech Paper.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-28-0006 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mohanty S (2007) Chugh YP (2007) Development of fly ash-based automotive brake lining. Tribol Int 40:1217–1224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2007.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suresh G, Jayakumari LS (2015) Evaluating the mechanical properties of E-Glass fiber/carbon fiber reinforced interpenetrating polymer networks. Polimeros 1:49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1428.1650 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Avital Gabriel de Almeida Rosa, Jéferson Aparecido Moreto, Marcos Dorigão Manfrinato, Luciana Sgarbi Rossino (2014) Study on friction and wear behavior of SAE 1045 steel, reinforced nylon 6.6 and NBR rubber used in clutch disks. Mater Sci. 17:1397–1403.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-1439.282714
  26. 26.
    Jang H, Lee JS, Fash JW (2001) Compositional effects of the brake friction material on creep groan phenomena. Wear 251:1477–1483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(01),00786-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kolluri DK, Boidin X, Desplanques Y, Degallaix G, Ghosh AK, Kumar M, Bijwe J (2010) Effect of natural graphite particle size in friction materials on thermal localisation phenomenon during stop-braking. Wear 268:1472–1482.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2010.02.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cho Min Hyung, Kim Seong Jin, Kim Daehwan, Jang Ho (2005) Effects of ingredients on tribological characteristics of a brake lining: an experimental case study. Wear 258:1682–1687.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2004.11.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kchaou Mohamd, Sellami Amira, Elleuch Riyadh, Singh Harpeeth (2013) Friction characteristics of a brake friction material under different braking conditions. J Mater Design 52:533–540.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blau Peter J, Meyer HM III (2003) Characteristics of wear particles produced during friction tests of conventional and unconventional disc brake material. Wear 255:1261–1269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00111-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ertan Rukiye, Yavuz Nurettin (2010) An experimental study on the effects of manufacturing parameters on the tribological properties of brake lining materials. Wear 2010(268):1524–1532.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2010.02.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mutlu O, Eidogan Findik F (2005) Production of ceramic additive automotive brake lining and investigation of its braking characteristics. Int J Tribol 57:84–92.  https://doi.org/10.1108/00368790510583401 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringRajalakshmi Institute of TechnologyChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Rubber and Plastics TechnologyMadras Institute of TechnologyChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations