Advertisement

Computational investigation of diesel nozzle internal flow during the complete injection event

  • F. J. Salvador
  • J. De la Morena
  • G. Bracho
  • D. Jaramillo
Technical Paper

Abstract

Currently, diesel engines are calibrated using more and more complex multiple injection strategies. Under these conditions, the characteristics of the flow exiting the fuel injector are strongly affected by the transient interaction between the needle, the sac volume and the orifices, which are not yet clear. In the current paper, a methodology combining a 1D injector model and 3D-CFD simulations is proposed. First, the characteristics of the nozzle flow have been experimentally assessed in transient conditions by means of injection rate and momentum flux measurements. Later, the 3D-CFD modeling approach has been validated at steady-state fixed lift conditions. Finally, a previously developed 1D injector model has been used to extract the needle lift profiles and transient pressure boundary conditions used for the full-transient 3D-CFD simulations, using adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) strategies to be able to simulate the complete injection rate starting from 1 µm lift.

Keywords

Nozzle Modeling Diesel Dynamic Moving-mesh 

List of symbols

Nomenclature

A

Constant for discharge coefficient vs. Reynolds equation

Aeff

Effective area

Ao

Geometrical area

Ca

Area coefficient

Cc

Contraction coefficient

Cd

Discharge coefficient

Cd,max

Maximum value of discharge coefficient vs. Reynolds

Cv

Velocity coefficient

Do

Geometrical nozzle diameter

\(\dot{m}\)

Mass flow

\(\dot{M}\)

Momentum flux

Pback

Discharge pressure

Pinj

Injection pressure

uo

Outlet nozzle orifice velocity

uth

Theoretical outlet orifice velocity, \(u_{\text{o}} = \sqrt {\frac{{2 \cdot (P_{\text{inj}} - P_{\text{back}} )}}{{\rho_{\text{f}} }}}\)

Greek symbols

ΔP

Pressure drop, ΔP = Pinj − Pback

ρf

Fuel density

υf

Kinematic viscosity

λ

Flow coefficient or theoretical Reynolds number

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partly sponsored by “Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad”, of the Spanish Government, in the frame of the Project “Estudio de la interacción chorro-pared en condiciones realistas de motor”, Reference TRA2015-67679-c2-1-R. The authors would like also to thank the computer resources, technical expertise and assistance provided by Universidad de Valencia in the use of the supercomputer “Tirant”. Mr. Jaramillo’s Thesis is funded by “Conselleria d’Educació, Cultura i Esports” of Generalitat Valenciana in the frame of the program “Programa VALI + D para investigadores en formación, Reference ACIF/2015/040.

References

  1. 1.
    Hall CAS, Lambert JG, Balogh SB (2014) EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy 64:141–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lujan JM, Tormos B, Salvador FJ, Gargar K (2009) Comparative analysis of a DI diesel engine fuelled with biodiesel blends during the European MVEG-A cycle: preliminary study (I). Biomass Bioenergy 33:941–947.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pickett LM, Siebers DL (2004) Soot in diesel fuel jets: effects of ambient temperature, ambient density, and injection pressure. Combust Flame 138:114–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dec JE (1997) A Conceptual Model of DI Diesel Combustion Based on Laser-Sheet Imaging. SAE Tech. Pap. 970873Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang X, Huang Z, Zhang W et al (2011) Effects of ultra-high injection pressure and micro-hole nozzle on flame structure and soot formation of impinging diesel spray. Appl Energy 88:1620–1628.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sayin C, Gumus M, Canakci M (2013) Influence of injector hole number on the performance and emissions of a di diesel engine fueled with biodiesel-diesel fuel blends. Appl Therm Eng 61:121–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.07.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohan B, Yang W, Chou SK (2013) Fuel injection strategies for performance improvement and emissions reduction in compression ignition engines—A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 28:664–676.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Payri R, Salvador FJ, Gimeno J, De la Morena J (2011) Influence of injector technology on injection and combustion development, Part 1: hydraulic characterization. Appl Energy 88:1068–1074.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park SW, Kim JW, Lee CS (2006) Effect of injector type on fuel-air mixture formation of high-speed diesel sprays. Proc Inst Mech Eng D 220:647–659.  https://doi.org/10.1243/09544070D20304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moon S, Komada K, Sato K et al (2015) Ultrafast X-ray study of multi-hole GDI injector sprays: effects of nozzle hole length and number on initial spray formation. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 68:68–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.03.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Powell CF, Kastengren AL, Liu Z, Fezzaa K (2010) The effects of diesel injector needle motion on spray structure. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 133:12802.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huang W, Moon S, Ohsawa K (2016) Near-nozzle dynamics of diesel spray under varied needle lifts and its prediction using analytical model. Fuel 180:292–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun Z-Y, Li G-X, Chen C et al (2015) Numerical investigation on effects of nozzle’s geometric parameters on the flow and the cavitation characteristics within injector’s nozzle for a high-pressure common-rail DI diesel engine. Energy Convers Manag 89:843–861.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.10.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Devassy BM, Habchi C, Daniel E (2015) Atomization modelling of liquid jets using a two-surface density approach. At Sprays 25:47–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moon S, Gao Y, Park S et al (2015) Effect of the number and position of nozzle holes on in- and near-nozzle dynamic characteristics of diesel injection. Fuel 150:112–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Payri R, Salvador FJ, Carreres M, De la Morena J (2016) Fuel temperature influence on the performance of a last generation common-rail diesel ballistic injector. Part II: 1D model development, validation and analysis. Energy Convers Manag 114:376–391.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plamondon E, Seers P (2014) Development of a simplified dynamic model for a piezoelectric injector using multiple injection strategies with biodiesel/diesel-fuel blends. Appl Energy 131:411–424.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Postrioti L, Malaguti S, Bosi M et al (2014) Experimental and numerical characterization of a direct solenoid actuation injector for diesel engine applications. Fuel 118:316–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Desantes JM, Salvador FJ, Lopez JJ, De la Morena J (2011) Study of mass and momentum transfer in diesel sprays based on X-ray mass distribution measurements and on a theoretical derivation. Exp Fluids 50:233–246.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-0919-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    De la Morena J, Neroorkar K, Plazas AH et al (2013) Numerical analysis of the influence of diesel nozzle design on internal flow characteristics for 2-valve diesel engine application. At Sprays 23:97–118.  https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.2013006361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duke DJ, Schmidt DP, Neroorkar K et al (2013) High-resolution large eddy simulations of cavitating gasoline-ethanol blends. Int J Engine Res 14:578–589.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087413501824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mitroglou N, McLorn M, Gavaises M et al (2014) Instantaneous and ensemble average cavitation structures in diesel micro-channel flow orifices. Fuel 116:736–742.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.08.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang X, Li K, Su W (2012) Experimental and numerical investigations on internal flow characteristics of diesel nozzle under real fuel injection conditions. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 42:204–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.04.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sou A, Pratama RH (2016) Effects of asymmetric inflow on cavitation in fuel injector and discharged liquid jet. At Sprays 26:939–959.  https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.2015013501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xue Q, Battistoni M, Powell CF et al (2015) An Eulerian CFD model and X-ray radiography for coupled nozzle flow and spray in internal combustion engines. Int J Multiph Flow 70:77–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2014.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Castilla R, Gamez-Montero PJ, Ertrk N et al (2010) Numerical simulation of turbulent flow in the suction chamber of a gearpump using deforming mesh and mesh replacement. Int J Mech Sci 52:1334–1342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Parlak Z, Engin T (2012) Time-dependent CFD and quasi-static analysis of magnetorheological fluid dampers with experimental validation. Int J Mech Sci 64:22–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chiatti G, Chiavola O, Palmieri F (2009) Spray modeling for diesel engine performance analysis. SAE Tech Pap 2009-01-0835.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0835
  29. 29.
    Marcer R, Audiffren C, Viel A, et al (2010) Coupling 1D system AMESim and 3D CFD EOLE models for diesel injection simulation Renault. In: ILASS—Eur. 2010, 23rd Annu. Conf. Liq. At. Spray Syst., pp 1–10Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Desantes JM, Salvador FJ, Carreres M, Martínez-López J (2014) Large-eddy simulation analysis of the influence of the needle lift on the cavitation in diesel injector nozzles. Proc Inst Mech Eng D 229:407–423.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407014542627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Battistoni M, Xue Q, Som S (2016) Large-eddy simulation (LES) of spray transients: start and end of injection phenomena. Oil Gas Sci Technol 71:24.  https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2015024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    CONVERGE is a trade mark of convergent science. https://convergecfd.com
  33. 33.
    Macian V, Bermúdez V, Payri R, Gimeno J (2003) New technique for determination of internal geometry of a diesel nozzle with the use of silicone methodology. Exp Tech 27:39–43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2003.tb00107.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dabiri S, Sirignano WA, Joseph DD (2007) Cavitation in an orifice flow. Phys Fluids 19:72112.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2750655 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mohan B, Yang W, Chou SK (2014) Cavitation in injector nozzle holes—a parametric study. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 8:70–81Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Salvador FJ, Hoyas S, Novella R, Martinez-Lopez J (2011) Numerical simulation and extended validation of two-phase compressible flow in diesel injector nozzles. Proc Inst Mech Eng D 225:545–563.  https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070JAUTO1569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Som S, Longman DE, Ramirez AI, Aggarwal S (2012) Influence of nozzle orifice geometry and fuel properties on flow and cavitation characteristics of a diesel injector. In: Fuel Inject. Automot. Eng., pp 112–126Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Desantes JM, Salvador FJ, Carreres M, Jaramillo D (2015) Experimental characterization of the thermodynamic properties of diesel fuels over a wide range of pressures and temperatures. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr 8:2015-01-0951.  https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-0951
  39. 39.
    Bosch W (1966) The fuel rate indicator: a new measuring instrument for display of the characteristics of individual injection. SAE Pap. 660749Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Payri R, Salvador FJ, Gimeno J, Bracho G (2008) A new methodology for correcting the signal cumulative phenomenon on injection rate measurements. Exp Tech 32:46–49.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2007.00188.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Payri F, Payri R, Salvador FJ, Martínez-López J (2011) A contribution to the understanding of cavitation effects in diesel injector nozzles through a combined experimental and computational investigation. Comput Fluids 58:88–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lichtarowicz AK, Duggins RK, Markland E (1965) Discharge coefficients for incompressible non-cavitating flow through long orifices. J Mech Eng Sci 7:210–219.  https://doi.org/10.1243/JMES_JOUR_1965_007_029_02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lopez JJ, Salvador FJ, De la Garza OA, Arrègle J (2012) Characterization of the pressure losses in a common rail diesel injector. Proc Inst Mech Eng D 226:1697–1706.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954407012447020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Salvador FJ, Carreres M, Jaramillo D, Martínez-López J (2015) Comparison of microsac and VCO diesel injector nozzles in terms of internal nozzle flow characteristics. Energy Convers Manag 103:284–299.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.05.062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    LMS (2010) Imagine.Lab AMESim v.10. User’s manualGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Payri R, Salvador FJ, Martí-Aldaraví P, Martínez-López J (2012) Using one-dimensional modeling to analyze the influence of the use of biodiesels on the dynamic behavior of solenoid-operated injectors in common rail systems: detailed injection system model. Energy Convers Manag 54:90–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CMT-Motores Térmicos, Universitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations