Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conceptualizations of Craving and the Pornography Craving Questionnaire: A Scoping Review

  • Published:
Current Addiction Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Research has demonstrated that craving is a salient aspect of behavioral and substance use addictions. In 2014, the Pornography Craving Questionnaire (PCQ) was published as the first comprehensive scale to assess craving for pornography. This review was undertaken to understand conceptualizations of craving in behavioral addictions and identify all research studies assessing the subjective experience of craving for pornography using the PCQ.

Recent Findings

Craving has been conceptualized as a passionate attachment, ambivalence, and desire thinking. The PCQ has been administered in multiple studies in various countries. These investigations have indicated that the PCQ is positively related to desire thinking, passionate attachment (i.e., obsessive and harmonious passion), future pornography use (e.g., duration and frequency), mental health concerns (e.g., anger, anxiety, depression, behavioral and substance use addictions), dysfunctional coping (i.e., the tendency to use sex in response to negative mood states and stressors), and problematic pornography use.

Summary

Craving is a salient dimension of pornography use. Additionally, the PCQ appears of value to measure craving for diagnostic and outcome evaluation purposes. We recommend further evaluation of the PCQ in clinical settings to predict the course and prognosis among help-seeking patients for problematic pornography use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. •• Kraus S, Rosenberg H. The pornography craving questionnaire: psychometric properties. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(3):451–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0229-3. (This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

  2. •• Allen A, Kannis-Dymand L, Katsikitis M. Problematic Internet pornography use: the role of craving, desire thinking, and metacognition. Addict Behav. 2017;70:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.02.001. (This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

  3. •• Allen A, Kannis-Dymand L, Katsikitis M. Investigating anger in a metacognitive model of problematic pornography use: preliminary findings. Sex Relationsh Ther. 2021;1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2021.1991906(This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

  4. •• Berger JH, Kehoe JE, Doan AP, et al. Survey of sexual function and pornography. Mil Med. 2019;184(11–12):731–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz079. (This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

  5. •• Bőthe B, Baumgartner C, Schaub MP, Demetrovics Z, Orosz G. Hands-off: feasibility and preliminary results of a two-armed randomized controlled trial of a web-based self-help tool to reduce problematic pornography use. J Behav Addict. 2021;10(4):1015–35. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2021.00070. (This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

  6. •• Bibi K, Fatima A, Amin R, Rowland DL. Understanding serial mediators of problematic pornography use in Pakistani men and women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):14336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114336. (This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

  7. •• Chen L, Ding C, Jiang X, Potenza MN. Frequency and duration of use, craving and negative emotions in problematic online sexual activities. Sex Addict Compuls. 2018;25(4):396–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2018.1547234. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. •• Chen L, Jiang X. The assessment of problematic internet pornography use: a comparison of three scales with mixed methods. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2):488. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020488. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. •• Chen L, Jiang X, Luo X, Kraus SW, Bőthe B. The role of impaired control in screening problematic pornography use: evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in a large help-seeking male sample. Psychol Addict Behav. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000714. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Chen L, Luo X, Bőthe B, Jiang X, Demetrovics Z, Potenza MN. Properties of the problematic pornography consumption scale (PPCS-18) in community and subclinical samples in China and Hungary. Addict Behav. 2021;112:106591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106591. (This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.) 

  11. •• Doshi L, Parekh J, Merchant N. Videogame addiction, pornography craving, sexual attitudes on parental perceptions among adults. IAHRW Int J Soc Sci Rev. 2019;7(7–12):2176–80. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Google Scholar 

  12. •• Jiang X, Wu Y, Zhang K, Bőthe B, Hong Y, Chen L. Symptoms of problematic pornography use among help-seeking male adolescents: latent profile and network analysis. J Behav Addict. 2022;11(3):912–27. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2022.00065. (This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. •• Khaleghian A, Sajjadian I, Fatehizade M, Manshaei G. The mediating role of impulsivity and experiential avoidance in the relationship between emotion regulation and pornography viewing in married men. PractClin Psychol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.32598/jcp.8.4.645.1. (This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

  14. •• Kim SR, Bhang SY, Lim EY, et al. Reliability, validity, and unidimensionality of the korean version of the pornography craving questionnaire based on the classical test theory and item response theory. Psychiatry Investig. 2021;18(6):530. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2020.0401. (This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

  15. •• Kraus SW, Gola M, Grubbs JB, et al. Validation of a brief pornography screen across multiple samples. J Behav Addict. 2020;9(2):259–71. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00038. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. •• Marino C, Melodia F, Pivetta E, et al. Desire thinking and craving as predictors of problematic Internet pornography use in women and men. Addict Behav. 2023;136:107469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107469. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. •• Molavi N, Khosravifar S, Ghazanfanpour M, Najarzadegan MR, Saeidi A, Babakhanian M. Psychometric properties of the pornography craving questionnaire (PCQ) in Iran. Iranian J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2020;14(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.88756. (This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

  18. •• Muris P, Otgaar H, Meesters C, Papasileka E, Pineda D. The dark triad and honesty-humility: A preliminary study on the relations to pornography use. Dign: J Anal Exploit Violence. 2020;5(1):3. https://doi.org/10.23860/dignity.2020.05.01.03. (This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

  19. •• Rosenberg H, Kraus S. The relationship of “passionate attachment” for pornography with sexual compulsivity, frequency of use, and craving for pornography. Addict Behav. 2014;39(5):1012–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.02.010. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. •• Rømer Thomsen K, Callesen MB, Hesse M, et al. Impulsivity traits and addiction-related behaviors in youth. J Behav Addict. 2018;7(2):317–30. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.22. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. •• Russo GI, Campisi D, Di Mauro M, et al. The impact of asexual trait and porn addiction in a young men healthy cohort. Androl. 2021;53(8):e14142. https://doi.org/10.1111/and.14142. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. •• Schmidt C, Gleesborg C, Schmidt H, et al. A bias towards natural rewards away from gambling cues in gamblers undergoing active treatment. Brain Res. 2021;1764:147479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147479. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. •• Shirk SD, Saxena A, Park D, Kraus SW. Predicting problematic pornography use among male returning US veterans. Addict Behav. 2021;112:106647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106647. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. •• Weidacker K, Kim SG, Buhl-Callesen M, et al. The prediction of resilience to alcohol consumption in youths: insular and subcallosal cingulate myeloarchitecture. Psychol Med. 2022;52(11):2032–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720003852. ( This article used the PCQ with a sample of participants.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Burtăverde V, Jonason PK, Giosan C, Ene C. Why do people watch porn? an evolutionary perspective on the reasons for pornography consumption. Evol Psychol. 2021;19(2): https://doi.org/10.1177/14747049211028798.

  26. Floyd CG, Volk F, Flory D, Harden K, Peters CE, Taylor A. Sexual shame as a unique distress outcome of morally incongruent pornography use: modifications and methodological considerations. Arch Sex Behav. 2022;51(2):1293–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02104-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grubbs JB, Perry SL, Wilt JA, Reid RC. Pornography problems due to moral incongruence: an integrative model with a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48:397–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1248-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. • Vallerand RJ, Blanchard C, Mageau GA, et al. Les passions de l’ame: on obsessive and harmonious passion. J Personal Soc Psychol. 2003;85(4):756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756. ( This article discusses the passionate attachment model of craving.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ferguson SG, Shiffman S. The relevance and treatment of cue-induced cravings in tobacco dependence. J Subst Abus Treat. 2009;36(3):235–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. • Vallerand RJ. On the psychology of passion: In search of what makes people’s lives most worth living. Can Psychol. 2008;49(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.1. ( This article discusses the passionate attachment model of craving.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ratelle CF, Vallerand RJ, Mageau GA, Rousseau FL, Provencher P. When passion leads to problematic outcomes: a look at gambling. J Gambl Stud. 2004;20:105–19. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000022304.96042.e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rousseau FL, Vallerand RJ, Ratelle CF, Mageau GA, Provencher PJ. Passion and gambling: on the validation of the Gambling Passion Scale (GPS). J Gambl Stud. 2002;18:45–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014532229487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang CC, Chu YS. Harmonious passion and obsessive passion in playing online games. Soc Behav Personal: Int J. 2007;35(7):997–1006. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.7.997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rosenberg H. Clinical and laboratory assessment of the subjective experience of drug craving. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29(6):519–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. • Breiner MJ, Stritzke WG, Lang AR. Approaching avoidance: a step essential to the understanding of craving. Alcohol Res Health. 1999;23(3):197. (This article discusses the approach-avoidance model of craving.)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. • Stritzke WG, McEvoy PM, Wheat LR, Dyer KR, French DJ. The yin and yang of indulgence and restraint: the ambivalence model of craving. In: Motivation of health behavior. 2007;31–47. (This article discusses the approach-avoidance model of craving.)

  37. Orford J. Addiction as excessive appetite. Addict. 2001;96(1):15–31. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961152.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. • Caselli G, Spada MM. The metacognitions about desire thinking questionnaire: Development and psychometric properties. J Clin Psychol. 2013;69(12):1284–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21999. ( This article discusses the desire thinking model of craving.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. • Caselli G, Spada MM. Metacognitions in desire thinking: a preliminary investigation. Behav and Cogn Psychother. 2010;38(5):629–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465810000317. ( This article discusses the desire thinking model of craving.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. • Caselli G, Spada MM. The desire thinking questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. Addict Behav. 2011;36(11):1061–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.06.013. (This article discusses the desire thinking model of craving.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. • Caselli G, Spada MM. Desire thinking: what is it and what drives it? Addict Behav. 2015;44:71–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.07.021. (This article discusses the desire thinking model of craving.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann of Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Weinstein AM, Zolek R, Babkin A, Cohen K, Lejoyeux M. Factors predicting cybersex use and difficulties in forming intimate relationships among male and female users of cybersex. Front Psychiatry. 2015;6:54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Shafir R, Zucker L, Sheppes G. Turning off hot feelings: down-regulation of sexual desire using distraction and situation-focused reappraisal. Biol Psychol. 2018;137:116–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bőthe B, Baumgartner C, Schaub MP, Demetrovics Z, Orosz G. Hands-off: study protocol of a two-armed randomized controlled trial of a web-based self-help tool to reduce problematic pornography use. J Behav Addict. 2020;9(2):433–45. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Wordecha M, Wilk M, Kowalewska E, Skorko M, Łapiński A, Gola M. “Pornographic binges” as a key characteristic of males seeking treatment for compulsive sexual behaviors: qualitative and quantitative 10-week-long diary assessment. J Behav Addict. 2018;7(2):433–44. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.7.2018.33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kraus SW, Martino S, Potenza MN. Clinical characteristics of men interested in seeking treatment for use of pornography. J Behav Addict. 2016;5(2):169–78. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.036.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Reed GM, First MB, Billieux J, et al. Emerging experience with selected new categories in the ICD-11: complex PTSD, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder. World Psychiatry. 2022;21(2):189–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20960.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bőthe B, Tóth-Király I, Zsila Á, Griffiths MD, Demetrovics Z, Orosz G. The development of the problematic pornography consumption scale (PPCS). J Sex Res. 2018;55(3):395–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1291798.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kor A, Zilcha-Mano S, Fogel YA, Mikulincer M, Reid RC, Potenza MN. Psychometric development of the problematic pornography use scale. Addict Behav. 2014;39(5):861–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.01.027.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wéry A, Burnay J, Karila L, Billieux J. The short french Internet addiction test adapted to online sexual activities: validation and links with online sexual preferences and addiction symptoms. J Sex Res. 2016;53(6):701–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1051213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cacioppo M, Gori A, Schimmenti A, Baiocco R, Laghi F, Caretti V. Development of a new screening tool for cyber pornography: psychometric properties of the cyber pornography addiction test (CYPAT). Clin Neuropsychiatry. J Treat Eval. 2018;15(1).

  53. Laier C, Pawlikowski M, Pekal J, Schulte FP, Brand M. Cybersex addiction: experienced sexual arousal when watching pornography and not real-life sexual contacts makes the difference. J Behav Addict. 2013;2(2):100–7. https://doi.org/10.1556/JBA.2.2013.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Antons S, Trotzke P, Wegmann E, Brand M. Interaction of craving and functional coping styles in heterosexual males with varying degrees of unregulated Internet-pornography use. Personal Individ Differ. 2019;149:237–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Antons S, Mueller SM, Wegmann E, Trotzke P, Schulte MM, Brand M. Facets of impulsivity and related aspects differentiate among recreational and unregulated use of Internet pornography. J Behav Addict. 2019;8(2):223–33. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.8.2019.22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Snagowski J, Laier C, Duka T, Brand M. Subjective craving for pornography and associative learning predict tendencies towards cybersex addiction in a sample of regular cybersex users. Sex Addict Compuls: J Treat Prev. 2016;23(4):342–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2016.1151390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Harold Rosenberg, PhD, for his comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Funding

Shane W Kraus and Bailey Way receive funding support from Kindbridge Research Institute (GR15685).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, USA

    Bailey M. Way & Shane W. Kraus

  2. Department of Psychiatry, UNLV School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, USA

    Shane W. Kraus

Authors
  1. Bailey M. Way
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shane W. Kraus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

B.W. wrote and revised the manuscript, completed the scoping review, and prepared the figure and tables. S.K. wrote and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shane W. Kraus.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Way, B.M., Kraus, S.W. Conceptualizations of Craving and the Pornography Craving Questionnaire: A Scoping Review. Curr Addict Rep 11, 242–255 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-024-00547-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-024-00547-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation