Abstract
Purpose of the Review
Adolescents and young adults are a critical target for smoking prevention efforts. Health education is a key approach to these efforts, yet little is known about how adolescents and young adults process health information. One novel approach to understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of cognitive processing of public health communications is to use neuroimaging techniques to map the brain regions involved and make inferences about the neural systems engaged in the processing of health information. We reviewed recent studies that employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) to examine the brain responses of adolescents and young adults to anti-smoking health messages and videos.
Findings
This narrative literature review found that the medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus were the brain regions most commonly engaged in response to health warnings. Developmental factors modulate the relationship between brain regions, regulated emotional reaction, and frontal regions that are responsible for decision making.
Summary
Research that integrates neurophysiology and behavior to study adolescent and young adult neurocognitive responses to health messaging is an important tool for identifying optimal methods to communicate the health hazards of smoking with this vulnerable population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major Importance
CDC. Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(45):1226–8.
USDHHS. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Health UOoSa; 2012.
• Do KT, Galvan A. FDA cigarette warning labels lower craving and elicit frontoinsular activation in adolescent smokers. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015;10(11):1484–96. This study characterized brain response to the FDA-proposed graphic warning labels in adolescent and adult smokers and nonsmokers.
Koechlin E, Ody C, Kouneiher F. The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science. 2003;302(5648):1181–5.
Donoso M, Collins AG, Koechlin E. Human cognition. Foundations of human reasoning in the prefrontal cortex. Science. 2014;344(6191):1481–6.
Lau JY, Britton JC, Nelson EE, Angold A, Ernst M, Goldwin M, et al. Distinct neural signatures of threat learning in adolescents and adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(11):4500–5.
Mueller SC, Cromheeke S, Siugzdaite R, Nicolas Boehler C. Evidence for the triadic model of adolescent brain development: cognitive load and task-relevance of emotion differentially affect adolescents and adults. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017;26:91–100.
Gabard-Durnam LJ, Flannery J, Goff B, Gee DG, Humphreys KL, Telzer E, et al. The development of human amygdala functional connectivity at rest from 4 to 23 years: a cross-sectional study. NeuroImage. 2014;95:193–207.
Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Erus G, Ruparel K, Elliott MA, Gennatas ED, et al. Functional maturation of the executive system during adolescence. J Neurosci. 2013;33(41):16249–61.
Gogtay N, Giedd JN, Lusk L, Hayashi KM, Greenstein D, Vaituzis AC, et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(21):8174–9.
Romer D. Adolescent risk taking, impulsivity, and brain development: implications for prevention. Dev Psychobiol. 2010;52(3):263–76.
Pruitt DB. Your adolescent: emotional, behavioral, and cognitive development from early adolescence through the teen years. New York: HarperCollins; 2000.
Chang FC, Miao NF, Lee CM, Chen PH, Chiu CH, Lee SC. The association of media exposure and media literacy with adolescent alcohol and tobacco use. J Health Psychol. 2016;21(4):513–25.
FTC. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2014. 2016.
Kids CfT-F. Broken promises to our children. 2015.
Hitchman SC, Driezen P, Logel C, Hammond D, Fong GT. Changes in effectiveness of cigarette health warnings over time in Canada and the United States, 2002-2011. Nicotine Tob Res: Off J Soc Res Nicotine Tob. 2014;16(5):536–43.
Peebles K, Hall MG, Pepper JK, Byron MJ, Noar SM, Brewer NT. Adolescents’ responses to pictorial warnings on their parents’ cigarette packs. J Adolesc Health. 2016;59(6):635–41.
Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act Pub. L. No. 111-31 Stat. 1776 (2009).
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. et al v. FDA et al. USDist Affirmed ed: United States District Court For The District Of Columbia; 2011.
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. United States FDA. 845 Fd Supp 2d 266: U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26257 (D.D.C., 2012); 2012.
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Food and Drug Administration. F3d: US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit; 2012. p. 1205.
Robinson TN, Killen JD. Do cigarette warning labels reduce smoking? Paradoxical effects among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(3):267–72.
Hitchman SC, Mons U, Nagelhout GE, Guignard R, McNeill A, Willemsen MC, et al. Effectiveness of the European Union text-only cigarette health warnings: findings from four countries. Eur J Pub Health. 2011;
• Wang AL, Lowen SB, Romer D, Giorno M, Langleben DD. Emotional reaction facilitates the brain and behavioural impact of graphic cigarette warning labels in smokers. Tob Control. 2015;24(3):225–32. This is the first neuroimaging study that demonstrated the emotional salience of graphic warning labels engaging brain regions that mediate emotional memory and influence recall and cigarette craving.
Wang AL, Romer D, Elman I, Strasser AA, Turetsky BI, Gur RC, et al. Emotional graphic cigarette warning labels reduce the electrophysiological brain response to smoking cues. Addict Biol. 2015;20(2):368–76.
Green AE, Mays D, Falk EB, Vallone D, Gallagher N, Richardson A, et al. Young adult smokers’ neural response to graphic cigarette warning labels. Addict Behav Rep. 2016;3:28–32.
Falk EB, Berkman ET, Whalen D, Lieberman MD. Neural activity during health messaging predicts reductions in smoking above and beyond self-report. Health Psychol. 2011;30(2):177–85.
Phelps EA. Human emotion and memory: interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004;14(2):198–202.
Hamann S. Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001;5(9):394–400.
Zald DH. The human amygdala and the emotional evaluation of sensory stimuli. Brain Res Rev. 2003;41(1):88–123.
Hesse E, Mikulan E, Decety J, Sigman M, Garcia Mdel C, Silva W, et al. Early detection of intentional harm in the human amygdala. Brain :J Neurol. 2016;139(Pt 1):54–61.
LaBar KS, Cabeza R. Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(1):54–64.
Newman-Norlund RD, Thrasher JF, Fridriksson J, Brixius W, Froeliger B, Hammond D, et al. Neural biomarkers for assessing different types of imagery in pictorial health warning labels for cigarette packaging: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):e006411.
Wang AL, Lowen SB, Romer D, Giorno M, Langleben DD. Emotional reaction facilitates the brain and behavioural impact of graphic cigarette warning labels in smokers. Tob Control. 2015;24(3):225–32.
Do KT, Galvan A. FDA cigarette warning labels lower craving and elicit frontoinsular activation in adolescent smokers. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015;10(11):1484–96.
Jasinska AJ, Chua HF, Ho SS, Polk TA, Rozek LS, Strecher VJ. Amygdala response to smoking-cessation messages mediates the effects of serotonin transporter gene variation on quitting. NeuroImage. 2012;60(1):766–73.
Maynard OM, Brooks JCW, Munafo MR, Leonards U. Neural mechanisms underlying visual attention to health warnings on branded and plain cigarette packs. Addiction. 2017;112(4):662–72.
Blakemore SJ, Choudhury S. Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47(3–4):296–312.
Wang AL, Ruparel K, Loughead JW, Strasser AA, Blady SJ, Lynch KG, et al. Content matters: neuroimaging investigation of brain and behavioral impact of televised anti-tobacco public service announcements. J Neurosci. 2013;33(17):7420–7.
Chua HF, Ho SS, Jasinska AJ, Polk TA, Welsh RC, Liberzon I, et al. Self-related neural response to tailored smoking-cessation messages predicts quitting. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14(4):426–7.
Denny BT, Kober H, Wager TD, Ochsner KNA. Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of self- and other judgments reveals a spatial gradient for mentalizing in medial prefrontal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012;24(8):1742–52.
Falk EB, O’Donnell MB, Tompson S, Gonzalez R, Dal Cin S, Strecher V, et al. Functional brain imaging predicts public health campaign success. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016;11(2):204–14.
Ramsay IS, Yzer MC, Luciana M, Vohs KD, AW MD. Affective and executive network processing associated with persuasive antidrug messages. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013;25(7):1136–47.
Cartocci G, Modica E, Rossi D, Maglione AG, Venuti I, Rossi G, et al. A pilot study on the neurometric evaluation of “effective” and “ineffective” antismoking public service announcements. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016;2016:4597–600.
Stothart G, Maynard O, Lavis R, Munafo M. Neural correlates of cigarette health warning avoidance among smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;161:155–62.
Chiosi JJ, Andes L, Asma S, Palipudi K, McAfee T. Warning about the harms of tobacco use in 22 countries: findings from a cross-sectional household survey. Tob Control. 2016;25(4):393–401.
Pierce JP, Sargent JD, White MM, Borek N, Portnoy DB, Green VR, et al. Receptivity to tobacco advertising and susceptibility to tobacco products. Pediatrics. 2017;139(6):e20163353.
Rahman MA, Hann N, Wilson A, Mnatzaganian G, Worrall-Carter L. E-cigarettes and smoking cessation: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0122544.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Adolescent/Young Adult Addiction
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fairchild, V.P., Aronowitz, C.A., Langleben, D.D. et al. Brain Responses to Anti-smoking Health Warnings in Youth. Curr Addict Rep 5, 372–378 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-018-0221-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-018-0221-z