Mini review: Diatom species as seen through a molecular window

S.I. : Use of molecular tools in the systematics of plants and fungi
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

It has been accepted that we know less than 10% of the identified diversity in the marine microbial world and the diatoms are no exception. Even the species that we think we can easily recognize are often cryptic species, and even less is known of their life histories and spatial and temporal trends in their abundance and distribution. With new molecular and analytical techniques, we can advance our knowledge of a species to understand its morphological range, biogeographies and reproductive isolation. Moreover, some of molecular techniques are very sensitive. Depending on the species-level question(s) being asked, the molecular tools appropriate to answer them differ greatly.

Keywords

Bacillariophyta Barcoding Molecular tools Species concepts 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Dr. D. G. Mann critically read my manuscript.

References

  1. Abarca N, Jahn R, Zimmermann J, Enke N (2014) Does the cosmopolitan diatom Gomphonema parvulum (Kützing) Kützing have a biogeography? PLoS ONE 9:e86885.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086885 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amann R, Lin C, Key R, Montgomery L, Stahl DA (1992) Diversity among Fibrobacter isolates: towards a phylogenetic classification. Syst Appl Microbiol 15:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amato A, Montresor M (2008) Morphology, phylogeny, and sexual cycle of Pseudo-nitzschia mannii sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae): a pseudo-cryptic species within the P. pseudodelicatissima complex. Phycologia 47:487–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amato A, Kooistra WHCF, Ghiron JHL, Mann DG, Proschold T, Montresor M (2007) Reproductive isolation among sympatric cryptic species in marine diatoms. Protist 158:193–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Cordonier A, Straud F, Iseli J, Esling P, Pawlowski J (2017) Taxonomy-free molecular diatom index for high-throughput eDNA biomonitoring. Mol Ecol Res.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12668 Google Scholar
  6. Balzano S, Percopo I, Sianao R, Gourvil P, Chanoine M, Marie D, Vaulot D, Sarno D (2017) Morphological and genetic diversity of Beaufort Sea diatoms with high contributions from the Chaetoceros neogracilis species complex. J Phycol 53:161–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basu S, Pati S, Mapleson D, Russo MT, Vitale L, Fevola C, Maumus F, Casotti R, Mock T, Caccamo M, Montresor M, Sanges R, Ferrante MI (2017) Finding a partner in the ocean: molecular and evolutionary bases of the response to sexual cues in a planktonic diatom. New Phytol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14557 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Behnke A, Friedl T, Chepurnov V, Mann DG (2004) Reproductive compatibility and rDNA sequence analyses in the Sellaphora pupula species complex (Bacillariophyta). J Phycol 40:193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bendif EM, Probert I, Diaz-Rosas F, van den Engh G, Young JR, von Dassow P (2014) Recent reticulate evolution in the ecologically dominant lineage of coccolithophores. Front Microbiol.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00784 Google Scholar
  10. Bendif EM, Probert I, Young JR, von Dassow P (2015) Morphological and phylogenetic characterization of new Gephyrocapsa isolates suggests introgressive hybridization in the Emiliania/Gephyrocapsa complex (Haptophyta). Protist.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2015.05.003 Google Scholar
  11. Beszteri B, Acs E, Medlin LK (2005) Conventional and geometric morphometric studies of valve ultrastructural variation in two closely related Cyclotella species (Bacillariophyceae). Eur J Phycol 40:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beszteri B, John U, Medlin LK (2007) An assessment of cryptic genetic diversity within the Cyclotella meneghiniana species complex (Bacillariophyta) based on nuclear and plastid genes, and amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Eur J Phycol 42:47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowler C (2017) Tara oceans: eco-systems biology at planetary scale. Presentation at 7th applied phycology conference Nantes, June 2017Google Scholar
  14. Casteleyn G, Chepurnov VA, Leliaert F, Mann DG, Bates SS, Lundholm N, Rhodes L, Sabbe K, Vyverman W (2008) Pseudo-nitzschia pungens (Bacillariophyceae): a cosmopolitan species? Harmful Algae 7:241–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Coleman AW (2000) The significant of a coincidence between evolutionary landmarks in mating affinity and a DNA sequence. Protist 151:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman AW, Mai JC (1997) Ribosomal DNA ITS-1 and ITS-2 sequence comparisons as a tool for predicting genetic relatedness. J Mol Evol 44:258–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cox EJ (2009) What’s in a name? Diatom classification should reflect systematic relationships. Acta Bot Croat 68:443–454Google Scholar
  18. Cox EJ (2014) Diatom identification in the face of changing species concepts and evidence of phenotypic plasticity. J Micropalaeontol.  https://doi.org/10.1144/jmpaleo2014-014 Google Scholar
  19. Cracraft J (1989) Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and process of differentiation. In: Otte D, Endler JA (eds) Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland, pp 28–59Google Scholar
  20. Edgar RK, Saleh AI, Edgar SM (2015) A morphometric diagnosis using continuous characters of Pinnunavis edkuensis, sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta: Bacillariophyceae), a brackish-marine species from Egypt. Phytotaxa 212:1–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Engesmo A, Eikrem W, Seoane S, Smith K, Edvardsen B, Hofgaard A, Tomas CR (2016) New insights into the morphology and phylogeny of Heterosigma akashiwo (Raphidophyceae), with the description of Heterosigma minor sp. nov. Phycologia 55:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans KM, Wortley AH, Mann DG (2007) An assessment of potential diatom barcode genes (cox1 rbcL 18S, ITS rDNA) and their effectiveness in determining relationships in Sellaphora (Bacillariophyta). Protist 158:349–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans KM, Wortley AH, Simpson GE, Chepurnov VA, Mann DG (2008) A molecular systematic approach to explore diversity within the Sellaphora pupula species complex. J Phycol 44:215–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Evans KM, Chepurnov VA, Sluiman HJ, Thomas SJ, Spears BM, Mann DG (2009) Highly differentiated populations of the freshwater diatom Sellaphora capitata suggest limited dispersal and opportunities for allopatric speciation. Protist 160:386–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garrido-Cardenas JA, Garcia-Maroto F, Alvares-Bermej JA, Manznao-Agugliaro F (2017) DNA sequencing sensors: an overview. Sensors 17:588.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s17030588 PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldman N, Paddock TBB, Shaw KM (1990) Quantitative analysis of shape variation in populations of Surirella fastuosa. Diatom Res 5:25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gomez F, Wang L, Hernandez-Becerril DU, Lisunova Lopes RM, Lin S (2017) Molecular phylogeny suggests transfer of Hemidiscus into Actinocyclus (Coscinodiscales, Coscinodiscophyceae). Diatom Res 32:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gosling EM (1994) Speciation and species concepts in the marine environment. In: Beaumont AR (ed) Genetics and evolution of aquatic organisms. Chapmann Hall, London, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  29. Hamsher SE, Evans KM, Mann DG, Poulickova A, Saunders GW (2011) Barcoding diatoms: exploring alternatives to COI-5P. Protist 162:405–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hasle GR, Medlin LK, Syvertsen EE (1994) Synedropsis gen. nov. a genus of araphid diatoms associated with sea ice. Phycologia 33:248–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball LS, DeWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 270:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hillebrand H, Soininen J, Snoeijs P (2010) Warming leads to higher species turnover in a coastal ecosystem. Glob Change Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02045.x Google Scholar
  33. Huss VAR, Don R, Grossman U, Kessler E (1986) Deoxyribonucleic acid reassociation in the taxonomy of the genus Chlorella. Arch Microbiol 145:329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huss VAR, Huss G, Kessler E (1989) Deoxyribonucleic acid reassociation and interspecies relationships of the genus Chlorella Chlorophyceae. Plant Syst Evol 168:1–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jahn R, Abarca N, Gemeinholzer B, Mora D, Skibbe O, Kulikovskiy M, Gusev E, Kusber W-H, Zimmermann J (2017) Planothidium lanceolatum and Planothidium frequentissimum reinvestigated with molecular methods and morphology: four new species and the taxonomic importance of the sinus and cavum. Diatom Res 32:75–107.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2017.1312548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. John U, Litaker RW, Montresor M, Murray S, Brosnahan B, Anderson DM (2014) Formal revision of the Alexandrium tamarense species complex (Dinophyceae) taxonomy: the introduction of five species with emphasis on molecular-based (rDNA) classification. Protist 165:779–804PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaczmarska I, Ehrman JM (2015) Auxosporulation in Paralia guyana MacGillivary (Bacillariophyta) and possible new insights into the habit of the earliest diatoms. PLoS ONE 10:e0141150.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141150 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kermarrec L, Franc A, Rimet F et al (2013) Next generation sequencing to inventory taxonomic diversity in eukaryotic communities: a test for freshwater diatoms. Mol Ecol Res 13:607–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kermarrec L, Franc A, Rimet F et al (2014) A Next generation sequencing approach to river monitoring using benthic diatoms. Fresh Sci 33:349–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kistenich S, Dreßler M, Zimmermann J, Hübener T, Bastrop HR, Jahn R (2014) An investigation into the morphology and genetics of Cyclotella comensis and closely related taxa. Diatom Res.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2014.922125 Google Scholar
  41. Kitching IJ, Forey PL, Humphries CJ, Williams DM (1998) Cladistics: the theory and practice of parsimony analysis, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 229 ppGoogle Scholar
  42. Klee R, Houk V (1996) Morphology and ultrastructure of Cyclotella woltereckii Hustedt (Bacillariophyceae). Arch Protist 147:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Knowlton N (1993) Sibling species in the sea. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 24:189–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kooistra WHCF, Sarno D, Balzano S, Gu H, Andersen RA, Zingone A (2008) Global diversity and biogeography of Skeletonema species (Bacillariophyta). Protist 159:177–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kooistra WHCF, Sarno D, Hernandez-Becerril DU, Assmy P, Di Prisco C, Montresor M (2010) Comparative molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses of taxa in the Chaetocerotaceae (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 49:471–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lohbeck KT, Riebesell U, Thorsten BH, Reusch TBH (2012) Adaptive evolution of a key phytoplankton species to ocean acidification. Nat Geosci 5:346–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luddington IA, Kaczmarska I, Lovejoy C (2012) Distance and character-based evaluation of the v4 region of the 18 s rRNA gene for the identification of diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). PLoS ONE 7:e45664.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045664 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Malviya S, Scalcob E, Audicc S, Vincenta F, Veluchamya A, Poulaind J, Winckerd P, Iudiconeb D, de Vargas C, Bittnera L, Zingone A, Bowler C (2017) Insights into global diatom distribution and diversity in the world’s ocean. PNAS.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509523113 Google Scholar
  49. Manhart JR, McCourt RM (1992) Molecular data and species concepts in the algae. J Phycol 28:730–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mann DG (1999) The species concept in diatoms. Phycologia 38:437–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mann DG, Chepurnov VA, Droop SJM (1999) sexuality, incompatibility, size variation, and preferential polyandry in natural populations and clones of Sellaphora pupula (Bacillariophyceae). J Phycol 35:151–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mann DG, McDonald SM, Bayer MM, Droop SJM, Chepurnov VA, Loke RE, Ciobanu A, Du Buf JMH (2004) The Sellaphora pupula species complex (Bacillariophyceae): morphometric analysis, ultrastructure and mating data. Phycologia 43:459–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mann DG, Sato S, Trobajo R, Vanomelingen P, Souffreau C (2010) DNA barcoding for species identification and discovery in diatoms. Cryptogam Algol 31:557–577Google Scholar
  54. Medlin LK (1997) Can molecular techniques help define species limits? Diatom 13:19–23Google Scholar
  55. Medlin LK (2008) Molecular clocks and inferring evolutionary milestones and biogeography in the microalgae. In: Okada H, Mawatari SF, Suzuki N, Gautam P (eds) Proceedings of International Symposium “The Origin and Evolution of Natural diversity”, 1–5 October 2007, Sapporo, pp 31–42Google Scholar
  56. Medlin LK (2014) Evolution of the diatoms: VIII. Re-examination of the SSU-rRNA gene using multiple outgroups and a cladistic analysis of valve features. J Biodivers Biopros Dev 1:129.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2376-0214.1000129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Medlin LK (2016a) Opinion: can coalescent models explain deep divergences in the diatoms and argue for the acceptance of paraphyletic taxa at all taxonomic hierarchies? Nova Hedwig.  https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2015/0295 Google Scholar
  58. Medlin LK (2016b) A timescale for diatom evolution based on four molecular markers: reassessment of ghost lineages and major steps defining diatom evolution. Vie et Milleu 65:219–238Google Scholar
  59. Medlin LK, Fryxell GA (1984) Structure, life history and systematics of Rhoicosphenia (Bacillariophyta). IV. Changes in frustule morphology concomitant with size reduction in Rhoicosphenia genuflexa (Kütz.) Medlin. J Phycol 20:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Medlin LK, Kooistra WHCF (2010) Methods to estimate the diversity in the marine photosynthetic protist community with illustrations from case studies: a review. Biol Divers Assess Mol Methods 2:973–1014Google Scholar
  61. Medlin LK, Elwood HJ, Stickel S, Sogin ML (1991) Morphological and genetic variation within the diatom Skeletonema costatum Bacillariophyta: evidence for a new species Skeletonema pseudocostatum. J Phycol 27:514–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Medlin LK, Lange M, Baumann MEM (1994) Genetic differentiation among three colony-forming species of Phaeocystis: further evidence for the phylogeny of the Prymnesiophyta. Phycologia 33:199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Medlin LK, Barker GLA, Campbell L, Green JC, Hayes PK, Marie D, Wrieden S, Vaulot D (1996) Genetic characterisation of Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyta). J Mar Syst 9:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Medlin LK, Sato S, Mann DG, Kooistra WCHF (2008) Molecular evidence confirms sister relationship of Ardissonea, Climacosphenia, and Toxarium within the bipolar centric diatoms (Bacillariophyta, Mediophyceae), and cladistic analyses confirm that extremely elongated shape has arisen twice in the diatoms. J Phycol 44:1340–1348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mizuno M (2006) Evolution of meiotic patterns of oogenesis and spermatogenesis in centric diatoms. Phycol Res 54:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mizuno M (2008) Evolution of centric diatoms inferred from patterns of oogenesis and spermatogenesis. Phycol Res 56:156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Moniz MBJ, Kaczmarska I (2009) Barcoding diatoms: is there a good marker? Mol Ecol Res 9:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Moniz MBJ, Kaczmarska I (2010) Barcoding of diatoms: nuclear encoded ITS revisited. Protist 161:7–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nanjappa D, Kooistra WHCF, Zingone A (2013) A reappraisal of the genus Leptocylindrus (Bacillariophyta), with the addition of three species and the erection of Tenuicylindrus gen. nov. J Phycol 49:917–936PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Nanjappa D, Audic S, Romac S, Kooistra WCHF, Zingone A (2014) Assessment of species diversity and distribution of an ancient diatom lineage using a DNA metabarcoding approach. PLoS ONE 9:e103810PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pawlowski J, Audic S, Adl S, Bass D, Belbahri L et al (2012) CBOL protist working group: barcoding eukaryotic richness beyond the animal, plant, and fungal kingdoms. PLoS Biol 10:e1001419.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001419 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pennesi C, Poulin M, Totti C (2016) Phylogenetic relationships and biogeography of the diatom genus Mastogloia (Bacillariophyceae): revision of the Section Ellipticae including the description of new taxa. Protist 167:148–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pinseel E, Hejdukova E, Vanormelingen P, Kopalova K, Vyverman W, Van de Vijver B (2017a) Pinnularia catenaborealis sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae), a unique chain-forming diatom species from James Ross Island and Vega Island (Maritime Antarctica). Phycologia 56:94–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pinseel E, Vanormelingen P, Hamilton P, Vyverman W, Van de Vijver B, Kopalova K (2017b) Molecular and morphological characterization of the Achnanthidium minutissimum complex (Bacillariophyta) in Petuniabukta (Spitsbergen, High Arctic) including the description of A. digitatum sp. nov. Eur J Phycol.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2017.1283540 Google Scholar
  75. Pinseel E, Vanormelingen P, Janssens S et al (2017c) Opening Pandora’s box: a diatom species complex as a case study for the diversity and biogeography of terrestrial micro-eukaryotes. Abstracts from the 11th international phycological congress. Phycologia 56:146 (supplement 4)Google Scholar
  76. Piredda R, Sarno D, Lange CB, Tomasino MP, Zingonne A, Montresor M (2017) Diatom resting stages in surface sediments: a pilot study comparing next generation sequencing and serial dilution cultures. Cryptogam Algol 38:31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rappé MS, Kemp PF, Giovannoni SJ (1995) Chromophyte plastid 16S ribosomal RNA genes found in a clone library from Atlantic Ocean Seawater. J Phycol 31:979–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rimet F, Trobajo R, Mann DG, Kermarrec L, Franc A, Domaizon I, Bouchez A (2014) When is sampling complete? The effects of geographical range and marker choice on perceived diversity in Nitzschia palea (Bacillariophyta). Protist 165:245–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rose DL, Cox EJ (2013) Some diatom species do not show a gradual decrease in cell size as they reproduce. Fundam Appl Limnol 182:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rose DL, Cox EJ (2014) What constitutes Gomphonema parvulum? Long-term culture studies show that some varieties of G. parvulum belong with other Gomphonema. Plant Ecol Evol 147:366–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rovira L, Trobajo R, Sato S, Ibanez C, Mann DG (2015) Genetic and physiological diversity in the diatom Nitzschia inconspicua. J Euk Microbiol 62:815–832PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ruggerior MV, Barra L, Kooistra WHCF, Zingone A (2015) Diversity and temporal pattern of Pseudo-nitzschia species (Bacillariophyceae) through the molecular lens. Harmful Algae.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2014.12.001 Google Scholar
  83. Rynearson TA, Armbrust EV (2005) Maintenance of clonal diversity during a spring bloom of the centric diatom Ditylum brightwellii. Mol Ecol 14:1631–1640PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rynearson TA, Lin EO, Armbrust EV (2009) Metapopulation structure in the planktonic diatom Ditylum brightwellii (Bacillariophyceae). Protist 160:111–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sarno D, Kooistra WHCF, Medlin LK, Percopo I, Zingone A (2005) Diversity in the genus Skeletonema (Bacillariophyceae): Skeletonema costatum (Bacillariophyceae) consists of several genetically and morphologically distinct species with the description of four new species. J Phycol 41:151–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Souffreau C, Verbruggen H, Wolfe AP, Vanormelingen P, Siver PA, Cox EJ, Mann DG, Van de Vijver B, Sabbe S, Vyverman W (2011) A time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny of the diatom genus Pinnularia. Mol Syst Evol 61:866–879Google Scholar
  87. Sournia A (1988) Phaeocystis Prymnesiophyceae: how many species? Nova Hedwig 47:211–217Google Scholar
  88. Subirana L, Péquin B, Michely S, Escand M-L, Meillanda J, Derelle E, Marine B, Piganeau G, Desdevises Y, Moreau H, Nigel H, Grimsley NH (2013) Morphology, genome plasticity, and phylogeny in the genus Ostreococcus reveal a cryptic species, O. mediterraneus sp. nov. (Mamiellales, Mamiellophyceae). Protist 164:643–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Theriot EC, Ashworth M, Nakov T, Ruck E, Jansen RK (2015) Dissecting signal and noise in diatom chloroplast protein encoding genes with phylogenetic information profiling. Mol Phylo Evol 89:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Trobajo R, Clavero E, Chepurnov VA, Koen Kabbe, Mann DG, Ishihara S, Cox EJ (2009) Morphological, genetic and mating diversity within the widespread bioindicator Nitzschia palea (Bacillariophyceae). Phycologia 48:443–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Trobajo R, Mann DG, Clavero E, Evans KM, Vanormelingen P, McGregor RC (2010) The use of partial cox1, rbcL and LSU rDNA sequences for phylogenetics and species identification within the Nitzschia palea species complex (Bacillariophyceae). Eur J Phycol 45:413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Urbánková P, Scharfen V, Kulichová J (2016) Molecular and automated identification of the diatom genus Frustulia in northern Europe. Diatom Res 31:217–229.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2016.1224780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vanderlaan TA, Ebach MC, Williams DM, Wilkins JS (2013) Defining and redefining monophyly: Haeckel, Hennig, Ashlock, Nelson and the proliferation of definitions. Aust Syst Bot 26:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vanormelingen P, Chepurnov VA, Mann DG, Cousin S, Vyverman W (2007) Congruence of morphological, reproductive and ITS rDNA sequence data in some Australasian Eunotia bilunaris (Bacillariophyta). Eur J Phycol 42:61–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vanormelingen P, Chepurnov VA, Mann DG, Sabbe K, Vyverman W (2008) Genetic divergence and reproductive barriers among morphologically heterogeneous sympatric isolates of Eunotia bilunaris sensu lato (Bacillariophyta). Protist 159:73–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vanormelingen P, Evans KM, Chepurnov VA, Vyverman W, Mann DG (2013) Molecular species discovery in the diatom Sellaphora and its congruence with mating trials. Fottea 13:133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Vanormelingen P, Evans KM, Mann DG, Lance SL, Debeer AE, D’Hondt S, Verstraete T, de Meester L, Vyverman W (2015) Genotypic diversity and differentiation among populations of two benthic freshwater diatoms as revealed by microsatellites. Mol Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13336 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Vaulot D, Birrien J-L, Marie D, Casotti R, Veldhuis MJW, Kraay GW, Chretiennot-Dinet M-J (1994) Morphology, ploidy, pigment composition and genome size of cultured strains of Phaeocysts. J Phycol 30:1022–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wetzel CE, Ector L, Van de Vijver B, Compère P, Mann DG (2015) Morphology, typification and critical analysis of some ecologically important small naviculoid species (Bacillariophyta). Fottea Olomouc 15:203–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Whitaker K, Rynearson TA (2017) Evidence for environmental and ecological selection in a microbe with no geographic limits to gene flow. PNAS.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612346114 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Williams DM (2007) Classification and diatom systematics: the past, the present and the future. In: Brodie J, Lewis J (eds) Unravelling the algae—the past, present and future of algal systematics. CRC Press, Baton Rouge, pp 57–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Woodard K, Kulichová J, Poláčková T, Neustupa J (2016) Morphometric allometry of representatives of three naviculoid genera throughout their life cycle. Diatom Res 31:231–242.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2016.1227375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Young JR, Liu H, Probert I, Aris-Brosou S, De Vargas C (2014) Morphospecies versus phylospecies concepts for evaluating phytoplankton diversity: the case of the coccolithophores. Cryptogam Algol 35:353–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zimmermann J, Jahn R, Gemeinholzer B (2011) Barcoding diatoms: evaluation of the V4 sub-region on the 18S rRNA gene, including new primers and protocols. Org Divers Evol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-011-0050-6 Google Scholar
  105. Zimmermann J, Glöckner G, Jahn R, Enke N, Gemeinholzer B (2014a) Metabarcoding vs morphological identication to assess diatom diversity in environmental studies. Mol Ecol Res.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12336 Google Scholar
  106. Zimmermann J, Abarca N, Enk N, Skibbe O, Kusber W-H et al (2014b) Taxonomic reference libraries for environmental barcoding: a best practice example from diatom research. PLoS ONE 9:e108793.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108793 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zingone A, Percopo I, Sims PA, Sarno D (2005) Diversity in the genus Skeletonema (Bacillariophyceae). I. A re-examination of the type material of Skeletonema costatum, with the description of S. grevillei sp. nov. J Phycol 41:140–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Botanical Society of Sao Paulo 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Biological Association of the UKPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations